Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:18:25.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice

from Section IV - Global Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Bronwyn Leebaw
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Heinz Klug
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Law
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In 1994, Madeleine Albright, then Ambassador to the United Nations, gave a speech that made the case for establishing the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Albright addressed potential critics of the court by arguing that “establishing the truth about what happened in Bosnia is essential to – not an obstacle to – national reconciliation” (Bass 2000, 263). Although this was once a controversial claim, the idea that a durable peace requires countries to address past violence is now widely held and promoted by influential leaders and institutions under the broad heading of “transitional justice.” The United Nations Department of Peacekeeping renamed its Justice and Security Sector Reform Team the “Security Sector Reform and Transitional Justice Unit” (UNDP 2003). A number of specialized organizations, institutes, and research networks now sponsor comparative research or training in transitional justice. In recent decades, numerous transitional justice institutions, most notably truth commissions and war crimes tribunals, have been established around the world.

Transitional justice has been associated with an array of goals, including the pursuit of justice and repair in response to past wrongs, the goal of advancing progress in the institutionalization of human rights, the goal of establishing rule of law, and the pursuit of democratizing political reform. The promotion of transitional justice institutions as a basis for advancing political reconciliation might appear puzzling, however. Truth commissions and war crimes tribunals investigate divisive and violent histories. As a result, they are routinely accused of threatening political reconciliation by “opening old wounds,” generating political instability, or interfering with forward-looking political change. In the post–Cold War context, debates on transitional justice centered on dilemmas and tensions associated with efforts to reckon with systematic abuse, which were commonly framed as tensions between the goals of “justice” and “reconciliation.” How did these goals, once thought to be deeply at odds with each other, come to be seen as mutually reinforcing and complementary? Is it possible, and is it desirable, to overcome the tensions and dilemmas that have been associated with transitional justice?

Albright's claims regarding the role of the ICTY echoed a general shift in thinking about transitional justice that occurred as a number of scholars and policy makers began to assert that dilemmas once associated with transitional justice were illusory.

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Legal Realism
Studying Law Globally
, pp. 201 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1959) 1986. “What Does Coming to Terms with the Past Mean?” In Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective, edited by Hartman, Geoffrey, 114–129. Translated by Bahti, Timothy and Hartman, Geoffrey. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Akhavan, Payam. 1998. “Justice in the Hague, Peace in the Former Yugoslavia? A Commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal.” Human Rights Quarterly 20: 737–816.Google Scholar
Backer, David. 2004. “Exit, Voice & Loyalty in Transitional Justice Processes: Evidence on Victims’ Responses to South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, September 2.
Bass, Gary Jonathan. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Boraine, Alex. 2000. A Country Unmasked: Inside South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boraine, Alex, and Levy, Janet. 1995. The Healing of a Nation?Cape Town: Justice in Transition.
Borer, Tristan Anne. 2003. “A Taxonomy of Victims and Perpetrators: Human Rights and Reconciliation in South Africa.” Human Rights Quarterly 25(4): 1088–1116.Google Scholar
Brody, Reed. 2001. “Justice: The First Casualty of Truth?” The Nation, April 30.
Brown, Wendy, and Halley, Janet, eds. 2002. Left Legalism/Left Critique. Durham: Duke University Press.
Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 31(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Chapman, Audrey, and Ball, Patrick. 2001. “The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala.” Human Rights Quarterly 23: 1–43.Google Scholar
Chayes, Antonia, and Minow, Martha, eds. 2003. Imagine Coexistence: Restoring Humanity after Violent Ethnic Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cobban, Helena. 2002. “The Legacies of Collective Violence.” Boston Review 27(2): 4–15.
Cohen, Stanley. 1995. “State Crimes of Previous Regimes: Knowledge, Accountability, and the Policing of the Past.” Law and Social Inquiry 20(1): 7–49.Google Scholar
de Brito, Alexandra Barahona, González-Enríquez, Carmen, and Aguilar, Paloma, eds. 2001. The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Des Forges, Alison, and Longman, Timothy. 2004. “Legal Responses to the Genocide in Rwanda.” In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by Stover, Eric and Weinstein, Harvey, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Des Forges, Alison, and Roth, Kenneth. 2002. “Justice or Therapy?”Boston Review 27: 3–4.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark. 2005. “Pluralizing International Criminal Justice.” Michigan Law Review. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=587430.
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, Laurel E., and Weinstein, Harvey M.. 2002. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation.” Human Rights Quarterly 24: 573–639.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2004. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
González-Enríquez, Carmen. 2001. “De-communization and Political Justice in Central and Eastern Europe.” In The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, edited by Barahona de Brito, Alexandra, Gonzaléz-Enríquez, Carmen, and Aguilar, Paloma, 218–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification. 1996. Guatemala Memory of Silence: Report of the Commission for Historical Clarification.http://shr.aaas.org/guatemala/ceh/report/english/toc.html.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2000. “The Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions.” In Truth v. Justice, edited by Rotberg, Robert I and Thompson, Dennis, 22–44. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1997. A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany. Translated by Randall, Steven. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hayner, Priscilla. 2001. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.
Herf, Jeffrey. 1997. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hesse, Carla, and Post, Robert, eds. 1999. Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia. New York: Zone Books.
Human Rights Center, International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, and Centre for Human Rights, University of Sarajevo. 2000. Justice, Accountability, and Social Reconstruction: An Interview Study of Bosnian Judges and Prosecutors.
Huyse, Luc. 1995. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past.” Law and Social Inquiry 20(1): 51–77.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 1996. “Articles of Faith.” Index on Censorship 5: 110–122.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
International Military Tribunal. 1947. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imt.asp#proc.
Jochnik, Chris, and Normand, Roger. 1994. “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War.” Harvard International Law Journal 35: 49–95.Google Scholar
Kelsall, Tim. 2005. “Truth, Lies, Ritual: Preliminary Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone.” Human Rights Quarterly 27: 361–391.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil, ed. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.
Leahy, Patrick J., 2009. “Commission of Inquiry.” Congressional Record S2461-2463, February 25, 2009 (Senate).
Leebaw, Bronwyn A., 2001. “Restorative Justice for Political Transitions: Lessons from the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” Contemporary Justice Review 4: 267–289.Google Scholar
Long, William J., and Brecke, Peter. 2003. War and Reconciliation: Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malamud-Goti, Jaime. 1990. “Transitional Governments in the Breach: Why Punish State Criminals?”Human Rights Quarterly 12(3): 1–46.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. “Reconciliation without Justice.” Southern Review 10(6): 22–25.Google Scholar
McAdams, A. James, ed. 1997. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
McCarthy, Thomas. 2002. “Vergangenheitsbewältigung in the USA: On the Politics of Memory and Slavery.” Political Theory 30: 623–648.Google Scholar
Meister, Robert. 2002. “Human Rights and the Politics of Victimhood.” Ethics and International Affairs 16(2): 91–108.Google Scholar
Meister, Robert. 2012. After Evil: A Politics of Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mendeloff, David. 2004. “Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm?”International Studies Review 6: 355–380.Google Scholar
Méndez, Juan E. 2001. “National Reconciliation, Transnational Justice, and the International Criminal Court.” Ethics and International Affairs 15: 25–44.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
Moghalu, Kinglsey Chiedo. 2002. “Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 26: 21–43.Google Scholar
Nagy, Rosemary. 2008. “Transitional Justice as Global Project: Critical Reflections.” Third World Quarterly 28(2): 275–289.Google Scholar
Nettlefield, Lara J. 2010. “Research and Repercussions of Death Tolls: The Case of the Bosnian Book of Dead.” In Sex, Drugs, and Body Counts: The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict, edited by Andreas, Peter and Greenhill, Kelly M, 159–187. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Nino, Carlos. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Orentlicher, Diane. 1991. “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime.” Yale Law Review 100: 2539–2615.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. 1997. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.
Osiel, Mark. 2005. “The Banality of Good: Aligning Incentives against Mass Atrocity.” Columbia Law Review 105(6): 1751–1862.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor. 2000. “International Justice and Domestic Rebuilding: An Analysis of the Role of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. Accessed April 9, 2005. http://www.jha.ac/greatlakes/b003.htm.
Peskin, Victor, and Boduszynski, Mieczylslaw P.. 2003. “International Justice and Domestic Politics: Post-Tudjman Croatia and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Europe–Asia Studies 55(7): 1117–1142.Google Scholar
Phelps, Teresa Godwin. 2004. Shattered Voices: Language, Violence, and the Work of Truth Commissions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Philpott, Daniel. 2012. Just and Unjust Peace: An Ethic of Political Reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pion-Berlin, David. 1993. “To Prosecute or to Pardon? Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone.” Human Rights Quarterly 16(1): 105–130.Google Scholar
Pupavac, Vanessa. 2004. “International Therapeutic Peace and Justice in Bosnia.” Social Legal Studies 13: 377–401.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernst. 1990. “What Is a Nation?” Reprinted in Nation and Narration, translated by Thom, Martin and edited by Bhabha, Homi, 8–22. London: Routledge.
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, ed. 1995. Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2006. “The New Landscape of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, edited by Roht-Arriaza, Naomi and Mariezcurrena, Javier, 1–16. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, and Mariezcurrena, Javier, eds. 2006. Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roth, Kenneth. 1999. “Human Rights in the Haitian Transition to Democracy.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert, 93–134. New York: Zone Books.
Sanford, Victoria. 2003. Buried Secrets: Truth and Human Rights in Guatemala. New York: Palgrave.
Sarat, Austin, ed. 2001. Law, Violence, and the Possibility of Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shaw, Rosalind. 2005. “Rethinking Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: Lessons from Sierra Leone.” US Institute of Peace Special Report 130, February.
Sieder, Rachel. 2001. “War, Peace, and Memory Politics in Central America.” In The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, edited by de Brito, Alexandra Barahona, González-Enríquez, Carmen, and Aguilar, Paloma, 161–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sikkink, Kathryn, and Walling, Carrie Booth. 2007. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44: 427–445.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2003/2004. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28: 5–44.Google Scholar
Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2004. Confronting Past Human Rights Violations. London and New York: Frank Cass.
Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2005. “Transitional Justice Comes of Age: Enduring Lessons and Challenges.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 23(2): 101–118.Google Scholar
Stover, Eric. 2004. “Witnesses and the Promise of Justice in the Hague.” In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by Stover, Eric and Weinstein, Harvey M., 104–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stover, Eric. 2005. The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in the Hague. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stover, Eric, and Weinstein, Harvey M.. 2004. “Conclusion: A Common Objective, a University of Alternatives.” In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by Stover, Eric and Weinstein, Harvey M., 323–342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Subotic, Jelena. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. “Transitional Justice Genealogy.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69–94.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of South Africa. 1998. The TRC Report, Vols. I–V. Available at http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/index.htm.
Tutu, Desmond Mpilo. 1999. No Future without Forgiveness. London: Rider Books.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2003. “Oslo Conference on Justice and Security Sector Reform.” http://www.undp.org/bcpr/pubinfo/transitions/2003_04/osloconfhtm.htm.
United Nations Security Council. 2004. “The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary General.” S/2004/616 (August 23). http://www.unrol.org/files/S_2011_634EN.pdf.
Uvin, Peter, and Mironko, Charles. 2003. “Western and Local Approaches to Justice in Rwanda.” Global Governance 9: 219–231.Google Scholar
Valls, Andrew. 2003. “A Truth Commission for the United States?”Intertexts 7(2): 157–170.Google Scholar
Vicencio, Villa, Charles, . 1998. “A Different Kind of Justice: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” Contemporary Justice Review 1: 407–428.Google Scholar
Williams, Paul R., and Scharf, Michael P.. 2002. Peace with Justice? War Crimes and Accountability in the Former Yugoslavia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wilson, Richard A. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zalaquett, Jose. 1992. “Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemma of New Democracies Confronting Past Human Rights Violations.” Hastings Law Journal 43: 1425–1438.Google Scholar
Zehr, Howard. 1990. Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×