Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:35:41.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Heinz Klug
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Law School
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Heinz Klug
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Law
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Studying law globally is both necessary to understanding the arc of law and justice in the twenty-first century as well as a challenge to explore how law manifests itself across cultures, institutional arrangements, and economic contexts. While legal formalism still dominates the doctrinal study of law, the emergence of legal realism in the first quarter of the twentieth century opened up the study of law to a wider range of approaches, including those of social science. Today there is a healthy debate over the different approaches and meanings of legal realism, or what is now described as New Legal Realism (NLR). However, there is little doubt that our understanding of law in all its dimensions has been enhanced by the multidisciplinary contributions of social scientists and lawyers who have explored not only the logic of the law but also the multiple ways in which law manifests itself in society, whether local or global.

For a new legal realism, the understanding of law is rooted not only in an empirical knowledge of how law works in context but also in drawing attention to the relationship between the use of law and other ways of understanding and studying law, whether doctrinal or jurisprudential. Concerned with ensuring an open yet reflexive approach to the study of law, a new legal realism embraces a multidisciplinary approach yet remains concerned with ensuring a careful translation between law and empirical research. It is this concern that makes studying law globally such a challenge as well as an opportunity to understand the role law might play in achieving the goals of justice and stability sought by communities across the globe.

In order to think about what a new legal realist approach to studying law globally might help us to do, we must first reflect on what we understand new legal realism to be. Confronting this question, our colleague Alexandra Huneeus has suggested three possible ways of understanding what new legal realism might mean in the academy today, especially when we try to think of new legal realism as an approach to the study of law that is distinct from regular social science scholarship that focuses on understanding how law works in society.

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Legal Realism
Studying Law Globally
, pp. 1 - 10
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benton, Lauren. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chanock, Martin. 2001. The Making of South African Legal Culture 1902–1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dagan, Hanoch. 2013. Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Legal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2014. Legal Realism and Law and Society in Latin America. Draft on file with authors.
Lavi, Shai. 2011. “Turning the Tables on ‘Law and …’: A Jurisprudential Inquiry into Contemporary Legal Theory.” Cornell Law Review 96: 811–836.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 2005. “The New versus the Old Legal Realism: ‘Things Ain't What They Used to Be.’”Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 365–403.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engel. 2000. Colonizing Hawai'i: The Cultural Power of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shamir, Ronen. 2000. The Colonies of Law: Colonialism, Zionism and Law in Early Mandate Palestine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharafi, Mitra. 2007. “A New History of Colonial Lawyering: Likhovski and Legal Identities in the British Empire.” Law and Social Inquiry 32(4): 1059–1094.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2016. “Legal Realism in Context.” In The New Legal Realism, Volume I: Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice, edited by Mertz, Elizabeth, Macaulay, Stewart, and Mitchell, Thomas W.. 147–168. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×