Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:09:20.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Memento Mori and Other Ghostly Sexualities

from Part III - Social Change and Civil Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Andrew Grossman
Affiliation:
Temple University Press
Jooran Lee
Affiliation:
Harrington Park Press
Chi-Yun Shin
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Julian Stringer
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

In an English-language anthology dedicated to the ‘new’ South Korean cinema, where issues of Western cultural imperialism and neo-colonialism will inevitably raise their heads, we encounter special difficulties as we address themes of alternative sexuality. Even if basic civil rights ideology derived from much-dreaded ‘Western cultural imperialism’ has recently swollen the ranks of Seoul's gay-pride ‘Mujigae Parade’, South Korea has yet widely to disseminate queerly contentious media, let alone foster something like a Westernised queer film movement. Therefore, when we consider Korea's few extant queer films, we are caught between condescendingly excusing the absence of a progressive queer theory in Korea, and engaging transnational or universalised readings that, with equal condescension, pretend Korean homosexual identities are not historically particular. But Korean sexual culture diverges not only from Western sexuality, but also from other East Asian sexualities.

While, in China, the records of the Han Dynasty glorified male homosexuality among the aristocracy, and while Japanese literature, from Murasaki Shikibu's The Tale of Genji to Saikaku's Life of a Sensuous Man, has traditionally included bisexuality as a regular facet of upper-class hedonism, Korea has no classical or canonised literature of same-sex love. True, it is well known that, in the Silla Kingdom (57 bc–ad 935), the Hwarang, a military troop of handsome, aristocratic youths, made homosexual love (and occasional transvestism) a part of their martial ethos, and that, during the Koryǒ Dynasty (935–1392), homosexuality was tolerated among aristocrats and Buddhist monks.

Type
Chapter
Information
New Korean Cinema , pp. 180 - 192
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×