Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:15:35.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - “The Unfair Advantage of the Few”: The New Deal Origins of “Soak the Rich” Taxation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Isaac William Martin
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Ajay K. Mehrotra
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Monica Prasad
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

When he arrived at the White House in 1933, Franklin Roosevelt inherited a regressive tax system. Excise taxes – most levied on consumer goods – provided more than half of all federal revenue in fiscal year 1933. “It seems to me that our national anthem should begin with the words, ‘Oh, say, can you pay?’” complained a writer for the Saturday Evening Post. “And so far as I am concerned, Yankee Doodle comes to town a-riding on a vacuum cleaner” (Phillips 1935: 27).

Leaders of the Roosevelt administration lamented this regressive system, but they didn't do much to change it. For the first two years of his presidency, Roosevelt ignored calls for progressive tax reform. In fact, the New Deal's first important tax innovation was a highly regressive food tax, enacted as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. However, in the summer of 1935, Roosevelt changed course, asking Congress for a range of new taxes on rich individuals and large corporations. Such measures were vital, he declared, to safeguard the nation's ideals as well as its economy. The growing concentration of wealth and economic power posed a serious threat to American democracy, even as it hindered economic recovery.

Compliant lawmakers gave FDR much of what he wanted, but not before a bruising battle with business groups. Indeed, business leaders were vigorous, voluble, and very nearly unanimous in their opposition to Roosevelt's tax plan. Some objected to specific provisions, defending the interests of a particular industry or company.

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Fiscal Sociology
Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective
, pp. 29 - 47
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×