Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:40:24.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2010

John C. L. Ingram
John C. L. Ingram
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Neurolinguistics
An Introduction to Spoken Language Processing and its Disorders
 , pp. 387 - 413
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaltonen, O., Eerola, O., Hellström, A., Uusipaikka, E. and Lang, A. H.. 1997. Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (2): 1090–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, M. L. and Bear, D.. 1974. Time to understand: A case study of word deafness with reference to the role of time in auditory comprehension. Brain 97: 373–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, L. 1971. Perception of coarticulated nasality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 538–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasen, N. 1982. Should the term ‘thought disorder’ be revised?Comprehensive Psychiatry 23 (4): 291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, N. C., O'Leary, D. S., Cizadlo, T., Arndt, S., Rezai, K., Ponto, L. L. B., Watkins, G. L. and Hichwa, R. D.. 1996. Schizophrenia and cognitive dysmetria: A positron-emission tomography study of dysfunctional prefrontal-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (18): 9985–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasen, N. C., Nopoulos, P., O'Leary, D. S., Miller, D. D., Wassink, T. and Flaum, L.. 1999. Defining the phenotype of schizophrenia: Cognitive dysmetria and its neural mechanisms. Biological Psychiatry 46 (7): 908–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbib, M. A. 2002. The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In Chrystopher, N. and Kerstin, D. (eds.), Imitation in animals and artefacts.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. and Bota, M.. 2003. Language evolution: Neural homologies and neuroinformatics. Neural Networks 16: 1237–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archangeli, D. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5 (2): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, S. H., Allard, T., Naeser, M., Alexander, M. P. and Albert, M. A.. 1982. Pure word deafness: Analysis of a case with bilateral lesions and a defect at the prephonemic level. Brain 105: 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avikainen, S., Forss, N. and Hari, R.. 2002. Modulated activation of the human SI and SII cortices during observation of hand actions. Neuroimage 15 (3): 640–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babyonyshev, M. and Gibson, E.. 1999. The complexity of nested structures in Japanese. Language 75 (3): 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36 (3): 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balogh, J., Zurif, E., Prather, P., Swinney, D. and Finkel, L.. 1998. Gap-filling and end-of-sentence effects in real-time language processing: Implications for modelling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 61: 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamiou, D. E., Musiek, F. E. and Luxon, L. M.. 2003. The insula (Island of Reil) and its role in auditory processing literature review. Brain Research News 42 (2): 143–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrera, A., McKenna, P. J. and Berrios, G. E.. 2005. Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia: An executive or a semantic deficit?Psychological Medicine 35 (1): 121–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, S. R. 1997. Phonological, mediated and semantic priming in aphasia. Brain and Language 60 (3): 347–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beale, J. M. and Keil, F. C.. 1993. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 57 (3): 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E. 1996. The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes 11: 17–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, D. F. and Ardila, A.. 1996. Aphasia: A clinical perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benton, A. L. and Hampsher, K. L.. 1980. Multilingual aphasia battery. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Berko, J. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14 (2–3): 150–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, W. and Howard, D.. 1994. Word sound deafness resolved?Aphasiology 8: 223–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilecen, , Deniz, , Scheffler, Klaus, Schmid, Nena, Tschopp, Kurt and Seelig, Joachim. 1998. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI. Hearing Research 126 (1–2): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. M. V. 1992. The underlying nature of specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 33: 3–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, A. and Bates, E.. 1995. Inducing agrammatic profiles in normals: Evidence for the selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7 (2): 228–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance.Oxford, New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. 1911. Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien (Dementia praecox; or the group of schizophrenias, trans. Zinkin, J., 1950). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. 1973. A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. 1994. Impairments of speech production and perception in aphasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B – Biological Sciences 346 (1315): 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Burton, M., Baum, S., Waldstein, R. and Katz, D.. 1994. The role of lexical status on the phonetic categorization of speech in aphasia. Brain and Language 46 (2): 181–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Byma, G., Kurowski, K., Hourihan, J., Brown, T. and Hutchinson, A.. 1998. On-line processing of filler-gap constructions in aphasia. Brain and Language 61: 149–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Cooper, W. E., Zurif, E. B. and Caramazza, A.. 1977. The perception and production of voice-onset time in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 15: 371–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Katz, B., Goodglass, H. and Dworetsky, B.. 1985. The effects of slowed speech on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 24: 246–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Milberg, W., Brown, T., Hutchinson, A., Kurowski, K. and Burton, M. W.. 2000. The mapping from sound structure to the lexicon in aphasia: Evidence from rhyme and repetition priming. Brain and Language 72: 75–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S. E., Milberg, G. W. and Shrier, R.. 1982. Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Brain and Language 17 (2): 301–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.. 2004. Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV skeleton in Arabic. Cognition 92 (3): 271–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozeat, S., Ralph, M. A. Lambon, Patterson, K., Garrard, P. and Hodges, J. R.. 2000. Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia 38: 1207–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, N., Caine, D. and Coltheart, M.. Models of face recognition and delusional misidentification: A critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (1–3): 55–71.CrossRef
Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. 1956. Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 8: 145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broca, P. 1861. Nouvelle observation d'aphémie produite par une lésion de la moitié postérieure des deuxième et troisième circonvolutions frontales. Bulletin Société Anatomie 6 (ser. 2): 398–407.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. Schizophrenia, language and reality. American Psychologist 28: 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchman, A. S., Garron, D. C., Trost-Cardamone, J. E., Wichter, M. D. and Schwartz, M.. 1986. Word deafness: One hundred years later. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 49: 489–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, P. W. and Shallice, T.. 1997. The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, P., Piñango, M. M. and Wong, K.. 2003. The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity. Brain and Language 86 (1): 9–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bussey, T. J. and Saksida, L. M.. 2002. The organization of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2): 355–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and language use.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byng, S., Kay, J., Edmunson, A. and Scott, C.. 1990. Aphasia tests reconsidered. Aphasiology 4: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, P., Shillcock, N., Chater, N. and Levy, J.. 1995. Bottom-up connectionist modelling of speech. In Levy, J. P., Bairaktaris, D., Bullinaria, J. A. and Cairns, P. (eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language. London: UCL Press, 289–310.Google Scholar
Calvin, W. H. and Ojemann, G. A.. 1994. Conversations with Neil's brain: The neural nature of thought and language. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B. and Caramazza, A.. 2003. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 (3–6): 213–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. 1987. Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 1992. Language structure, processing and disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, D., Alpert, N., Waters, G. and Olivieri, A.. 2000. Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping 9 (2): 65–71.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. and Futter, C.. 1986. Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an aphasic patient. Brain and Language 27 (1): 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., Vijayan, S., Kuperburg, G., West, C., Waters, G., Greve, D. and Dale, A. M.. 2002. Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event related fMRI study of relative clauses. Human Brain Mapping 15: 26–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. and Waters, G. S.. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 77–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D. and Waters, G. S.. 2003. On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving window presentation. Brain and Language 84: 222–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A. and Berndt, R. S.. 1982. The semantic deficit hypothesis – perceptual parsing and object classification by aphasic patients. Brain and Language 15 (1): 161–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C. and Romani, I. C.. 1990. The multiple semantics hypothesis – multiple confusions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 7 (3): 161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Miozzo, M.. 1998. More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt. Cognition 69 (2): 231–41.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Shelton, J. R.. 1998. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardell, E. 2006. Comprehension and well-formedness judgement in Broca's aphasia and anomic aphasia. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1953. Language and myth, trans. Langer, S. K.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1962. An essay on man: An introduction to human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ceccherini-Nelli, A. and Crow, T. J.. 2003. Disintegration of the components of language as the path to a revision of Bleuler's and Schneider's concepts of schizophrenia: Linguistic disturbances compared with first-rank symptoms in acute psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 182: 233–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaika, E. 1974. A linguist looks at ‘schizophrenic’ language. Brain and Language 1: 257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenery, H. J., Ingram, J. C. L. and Murdoch, B. L.. 1990. Automatic and volitional semantic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language 38 (2): 215–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherry, C. 1978. On human communication: A review, a survey, and a criticism, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chiarello, C. 1998. On codes of meaning and the meaning of codes: Semantic access and retrieval within and between hemispheres. In Beeman, M. and Chiarello, C. (eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 141–60.Google Scholar
Chocholle, R., Chedru, F., Botte, M. C., Chain, F. and Lhermitte, F.. 1975. Etude psychoacoustique d'un cas de ‘surdité corticale’. Neuropsychologia 13: 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1972. Language and mind, enlarged edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Miller, G.. 1963. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural language. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. II. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. 1992. The (non) necessity of recursion in natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 665–70.Google Scholar
Clare, L., McKenna, P. J., Mortimer, A. M. and Baddeley, A. D.. 1993. Memory in schizophrenia: What is impaired and what is preserved?Neuropsychologia 31: 1225–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. 1979. Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R., Kelter, S. and Woll, G.. 1980. Analytical competence and language impairment in aphasia. Brain and Language 10 (2): 331–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, A. M. and Quillian, M. R.. 1969. Retrieval from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8: 240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M. 1983. Phonological awareness: A preschool precursor of success in reading. Nature 301: 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M. 2002. Cognitive neuropsychology. In Wixted, J. (ed.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, 3rd edn – vol. IV. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 139–74.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Masterson, J., Byng, S., Prior, M. and Riddoch, J.. 1983. Surface dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 469–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crain, S. and Steedman, M.. 1985. On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In Dowty, D. R., Karttunen, L. and Zwicky, A. (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 320–58.Google Scholar
Crain, S. and Pietroski, P.. 2001. Nature, nurture and Universal Grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2): 139–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., Ni, W. and Shankweiler, D.. 2004. Grammatism. Brain and Language 77 (3): 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutch, S. J. and Warrington, E. K.. 2003. The selective impairment of fruit and vegetable knowledge: A multiple processing channels account of fine grain category specificity. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 (36): 355–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crystal, D. 1975. The English tone of voice: Essays in intonation, prosody and paralanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Cummins, F. and Port, R. 1998. Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics 26 (2): 145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. 1990. Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In Altmann, G. T. M. (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 105–21.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. 1994. Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua 92 (1–4): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. and Carter, D. M.. 1987. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language 26: 406–18.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. and Segui, J.. 1986. The syllables, differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25 (4): 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. and Segui, J.. 1987. Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 19 (2): 141–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. and Otake, T.. 1994. Mora or phoneme: Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (6): 824–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. and Tranel, D.. 1993. Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90 (11): 4957–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. L., Kahn, R. G., Ko, G. and Davidson, M.. 1991. Dopamine in schizophrenia, a review and a reconceptualization. American Journal of Psychiatry 148 (11): 1474–86.Google Scholar
Villers, J. G. 1978. Fourteen grammatical morphemes in acquisition and aphasia. In Caramazza, A. and Zurif, E. B. (eds.), Language acquisition and language breakdown: Parallels and divergencies.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 121–44.Google Scholar
Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., Finnigan, S. and Humphreys, M. S.. 2004. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding. Cognitive Brain Research 22: 439–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, T. W. 1997a. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. 1997b. What makes the human brain different?Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A. and Dehaene, S.. 2005. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. Neuroimage 24 (1): 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denes, G. and Semenza, C.. 1975. Auditory modality-specific anomia: Evidence from a case of pure word deafness. Cortex 11: 401–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derwing, B. L. 1976. Morpheme recognition and learning the rules for derivational morphology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics – Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 21 (1): 38–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S. and Seidenberg, M. S.. 1998. Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhond, R. P., Marinkovic, K., Dale, A. M., Witzel, T. and Halgren, E.. 2003. Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense inflection. Neuroimage 19: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divenyi, P. L. and Robinson, A. J.. 1989. Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia. Brain and Language 37: 290–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Docherty, N. M., Gordinier, S. W., Hall, M. J. and Cutting, L. P.. 1999. Communication disturbances in relatives beyond the age of risk for schizophrenia and their associations with symptoms in patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25 (4): 851–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Docherty, N. M., Grosh, E. S. and Wexler, B. E.. 1996. Affective reactivity of cognitive functioning and family history in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 39 (1): 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, B. and Campbell, R. (eds.) 1987. Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading. London and Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dronkers, N. F. 1996. A new brain region for coordinating articulation. Nature 384: 159–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Valin, R. D., Redfern, B. B. and Jaeger, J. J.. 2004. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 92 (1–2): 145–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M. and Dunn, L. M.. 1997. The British picture vocabulary scale, 2nd edn. Windsor, Berkshire: FER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. C. 1973. The Understanding of the Brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Efron, R. 1963. Temporal perception, aphasia and deja vu. Brain 86: 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P. D. and Corbit, J. D.. 1973. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology 4: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. and Vigorito, J.. 1971. Speech perception in early infancy. Science 171: 304–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. 1990a. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L. 1990b. Representation and structure in connectionist models. In Altmann, G. (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K. (eds.). 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. and McClelland, J. L.. 1986. Exploiting the lawful variability in the speech wave. In Perkell, J. S. and Klatt, D. H. (eds.), Invariance and variability of speech processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 360–81.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. and McClelland, J. L.. 1988. Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language 27 (2): 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvevag, B. and Goldberg, T. E.. 2000. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is the core of the disorder. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology 14 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G. and Rizzolatti, G.. 2002. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2): 399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. and Rizzolatti, G.. 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73 (6): 2608–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellbaum, C. (ed.). 1998. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
Felser, C., Clahsen, H. and Munte, T. F.. 2003. Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language 87 (3): 345–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, F. and Clifton, C.. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25: 348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A. and McFarlane, D. K.. 1996. Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (2): 324–35.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1–90.Google Scholar
Fischler, I. 1977. Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition 5 (3): 335–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, R. H., Miller, S. and Tallal, P.. 1997. Neurobiology of speech perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience 20: 331–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, P. C., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J. and Dolan, R. J.. 1996. Local and distributed effects of apomorphine on fronto-temporal function in acute unmedicated schizophrenia. Journal of Neuroscience. 16 (21): 7055–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, P., McKenna, P. J., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D. and Dolan, R. J.. 1999. Abnormal cingulate modulation of fronto-temporal connectivity in schizophrenia. NeuroImage 9: 337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W.. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In Pinker, S. and Mehler, J. (eds.), Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (A Cognition Special Issue).Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1993. Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. In Altmann, G. T. M. and Shillcock, R. (eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 351–400.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1995. Comprehending sentence structure. In Gleitman, L. and Liberman, M. (eds.), Language: An invitation to cognitive science, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Bradford, 209–46.Google Scholar
Ford, J. M., Mathalon, D. H., Heinks, T., Kalba, S., Faustman, W. O. and Roth, W. T.. 2002. Neurophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 158 (12): 2069–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I. 1976. Accessing the mental lexicon. In Wales, R. J. and Walker, E. (eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland, 257–87.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. 1990. Lexical processing. In Osherson, D. N. and Lasnik, H. (eds.), Language: An invitation to cognitive science, vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Bradford, 95–132.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Best, C. T. and McRoberts, G. W.. 1990. Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics 48: 559–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, C. A., Brown, J. M. and Mann, V. A.. 2000. Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 877–88.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. 1989. Dissociations in auditory word comprehension: Evidence from nine fluent aphasic patients. Aphasiology 3: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S., Howard, D. and Patterson, K.. 1995. Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12: 549–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S., Turner, J. and Ellis, A.. 1992. ADA comprehension battery. London: Action for Dysphasic Adults. Available from Action for Dysphasic Adults, Canterbury House, Royal Street, London, SE1 7LL.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. 1978. On comprehending sentences. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. C.. 1996. Construal.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Fodor, J.. 1978. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6: 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L. and Friederici, A.. 1991. On deriving the properties of agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language 40: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. 1953. On aphasia: A critical study, trans. Stengel, E.. New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1891).Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. 1982. Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits – the role of prepositions. Brain and Language 15 (2): 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D. 1983. Aphasics' perception of words in sentential context: Some real-time processing evidence. Neuropsychologia 21 (4): 351–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D. 1995. The time-course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50 (3): 259–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A. and Mecklinger, A.. 1996. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning, Memory and Cognition 22 (5): 1219–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A. and Saddy, D.. 2002. Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. and Mecklinger, A.. 1996. Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 (1): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, C. C. 1952. The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Frisch, S., Hahne, A. and Friederici, A. D.. 2004. Word category and verb argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing. Cognition 91 (3): 191–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D. 1992. The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D. and Frith, U.. 1999. Interacting minds – a biological basis. Science 286: 1692–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromkin, V. A. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47: 22–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. 1975. A linguist looks at ‘schizophrenic language’. Brain and Language 2: 498–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galaburda, A. M., Lemay, M., Kemper, T. L. and Geschwind, N.. 1978. Right-left asymmetries in brain. Science 199 (4331): 852–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall, F. J. 1809. Recherches sur le système nerveux. Paris: J. B. Baillière.Google Scholar
Ganong, W. F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1): 110–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Garbarini, F. and Adenzato, M.. 2004. At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition 56 (1): 100–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J. and Gernsbacher, M. A.. 1996. The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 35 (4): 517–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerson, S. N., Benson, D. F. and Frazier, S. H.. 1977. Diagnosis: schizophrenia versus posterior aphasia. The American Journal of Psychiatry 134: 966–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N. 1974. Selected papers on language and the brain. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N., Quadfasel, F. A. and Segarra, J. M.. 1968. Isolation of the speech area. Neuropsychologia 6: 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gielewski, E. J. 1983. Acoustic analysis and auditory retraining in the remediation of sensory aphasia. In Code, C. and Muller, D. J. (eds.), Aphasia therapy. London: Edward Arnold, 138–46.Google Scholar
Gokcen, J. M. and Fox, R. A.. 2001. Neurological evidence in support of a specialized phonetic processing model. Brain and Language 78 (2): 241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, T. E., Aloia, M. S., Gourovitch, M. L., Missar, D., Pickar, D. and Weinberger, D. R.. 1998. Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: The semantic system. American Journal of Psychiatry 155 (12): 1671–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, S. 1997. Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Johnson, K. and Mullenix, J. W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing.San Diego: Academic Press, 33–66.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. 1998. Echos of echos? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105 (2): 251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K. 1948. Language and language disturbances: Aphasic symptom complexes and their significance for medicine and theory of language. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. 1976. Agrammatism. In Whitaker, H. and Whitaker, H. A. (eds.), Studies in Neurolinguistics, vol. I. New York: Academic Press, 237–60.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. 1993. Understanding aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H. and Baker, E.. 1976. Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 3 (3): 359–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, M. 1999. Familial language impairment: More English evidence. Folia Phoniatrica Logopaedica 51: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, J. K. and Baum, S. R.. 1994. Rhyme priming in aphasia – the role of phonology in lexical access. Brain and Language 47 (4): 661–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gow, D. W. and Caplan, D.. 1996. An examination of impaired acoustic-phonetic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language 52: 386–407.Google ScholarPubMed
Grela, B. and Gandour, J.. 1999. Stress shift in aphasia: A multiple case study. Aphasiology 13 (2): 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Davis, S. (ed.), Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 305–15.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1984. The syntactic characterization of agrammatism. Cognition 16 (2): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 1986. Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language 27 (1): 135–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1995. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language 45: 396–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 23 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. and Finkel, L.. 1998. The neurology of empty categories: Aphasics' failure to detect ungrammaticality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (2): 281–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, F. H., Husain, F. T., Cohen, M. A. and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G.. 1999. Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (5): 2900–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, F. H. and Gjaja, M. N.. 1996. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (2): 1111–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D. and Schriefers, H.. 2000. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late inter-action. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 556–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to Government & Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. 1990. Tracking the time course of language understanding in aphasia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. 1997. Semantic priming in Broca's aphasics at a short SOA: No support for an automatic access deficit. Brain and Language 56 (2): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A. and Friederici, A. D.. 1999. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11 (2): 194–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahne, A. and Friederici, A. D.. 2002. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research 13 (3): 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahne, A. and Jescheniak, J. D.. 2001. What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research 11 (2): 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halperin, Y., Nachson, Y. and Carmon, A.. 1973. Shift in ear superiority in dichotic listening to temporally patterned non-verbal stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53 (1): 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I.. 1976. Deep and surface anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry 7 (3): 391–428.Google Scholar
Hari, R., Levanen, S. and Raij, T.. 2000. Timing of human cortical functions during cognition: Role of MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12): 455–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, H. J., Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1997. Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain and Language 59: 76–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. S. 1960. Structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. 1970. Papers in structural and transformational linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. P. 1980. A metrical theory of stress rules. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Head, H. 1926. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. 1949. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley Science Editions, 1949.Google Scholar
Hellige, J. B. 1993. Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. 1992. Agrammatic comprehension and the trace deletion hypothesis. Occasional paper No. 45, MIT Center for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D.. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92: 67–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, J. R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203 (3): 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L. L. and Lotto, A. J.. 2002. Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects. Hearing Research 167: 156–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornby, P. 1971. Surface structure and the topic-comment distinction: A development study. Child Development 42: 1975–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, P. 1974. Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. and Franklin, S.. 1988. Missing the meaning? A cognitive neuropsychological study of the processing of words by an aphasic patient. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. 1996. The difficulty of ‘so-called’ self-embedded structures. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/publications/WPL/uclwpl.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. 2001. Review of Terrance Deacon's The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 129–35.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W.. 1999. Humboldt: On Language: On the diversity of human language and its influence on the mental development of the human species, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. 1998. Review of The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. Times Literary Supplement, 23 October, p. 34.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. L. and Chenery, H. J.. 1995. The reversal of the concreteness effect in a fluent aphasic. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Aphasiology Symposium of Australia, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C., McCormack, P. F. and Kennedy, M.. 1992. Phonetic analysis of a case of Foreign Accent Syndrome. Journal of Phonetics 20 (4): 457–74.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. and Morice, R. D.. 1983. Reference, syntax and thought disorder in schizophrenia. Unpublished Ms.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. and Mylne, T.. 1994. Perceptual parsing of nasal vowels. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Spoken Language Processing ICSLP 94, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. and Park, S. G.. 1997. Cross-language vowel perception and production by Korean and Japanese learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 25 (3): 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J. C. and Park, S. G.. 1998. Language, context and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (2): 1161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J. C., Park, S. G. and Mylne, T.. 1997. Studies in cross-linguistic speech perception. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 2 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P. and Kuhl, P. K.. 2000. Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: Do they arise from a common mechanism?Perception and Psychophysics 62 (4): 874–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1866. Notes on the physiology and pathology of language. Medical Times and Gazette 1: 659.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., VanValin, R. D., Murphy, B. W. and Khalak, H. G.. 1996. Positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72 (3): 451–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1968. Child language: Aphasia, and phonological universals, trans. Kuler, A. R.. The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerger, J., Weikers, N., Sharbrough, F. and Jerger., S. 1969. Bilateral lesions of the temporal lobe: A case study. Acta Otolarungologica, Supplement 258: 1–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Jerison, H. J. 1990. Fossil evidence on the evolution of the neocortex. In Jones, E. G. and Peters, A. (eds.), Cerebral Cortex, vol. VIIIA. New York: Plenum, 285–309.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, K. and Mullenix, J. W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press, 145–66.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Garnham, A.. 1980. Descriptions and discourse models. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, H. M. and Pilowksy, L. S.. 2002. Dopamine and antipsychotic drug action revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry 181: 271–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A. and Bauman, A.. 1999. Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (8): 1465–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A. and Charles-Luce, J.. 1994. Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 630–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in Working Memory. Psychological Review 99 (1): 122–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E. and Holcomb, P.. 2000. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 15 (2): 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanshepolsky, J., Kelley, J. and Wagner, J.. 1973. A cortical auditory disorder, clinical audiologic and pathologic aspects. Neurology 23: 699–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, J. and Fodor, J. A.. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J., Lesser, R. and Coltheart, M.. 1992. Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kehler, A. 2002. Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kempley, S. T. and Morton, J.. 1982. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73: 441–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. 1988. Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. H., Glahn, D. C., Nuechterlein, K. H. and Cannon, T. D.. 2004. Maintenance and manipulation of information in schizophrenia: Further evidence for impairment in the central executive component of working memory. Schizophrenia Research 68 (2–3): 173–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, D. 1961. Cerebral dominance in the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 15 (3): 166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleist, K. 1970. Schizophrenic symptoms and cerebral pathology. Journal of Mental Science 106: 246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluender, R. and Kutas, M.. 1993. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (2): 196–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, C. G. and Brennan, A. R.. 2004. Recognition of facial emotions in schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 17 (2): 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, S. and Friedman, R.. 1986. Word-meaning deafness: A phonological-semantic dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 3: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. 1919. Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Ed. Robertson, G. M., trans. Barclay, R. M., 8th edn. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1979. Speaker's reference and semantic reference. In Davis, S. (ed.), Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 77–96.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M.. 1977. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. 1991. Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics 50: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. and Meltzoff, A. N.. 1984. The intermodal representation of speech in infants. Infant Behavior and Development 7 (3): 361–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. and Miller, J. D.. 1975. Speech-perception by the chinchilla – Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar and plosive consonants. Science 190: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, G. and Caplan, D.. 2003. Language dysfunction in schizophrenia. In Schiffer, R. B., Rao, S. M. and Fogel, B. S. (eds.), Neuropsychiatry, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 444–66.Google Scholar
Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A.. 1980a. Reading senseless sentences – brain potentials reflect incongruity. Science 207 (4427): 203–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A.. 1980b. Reading between the lines – event related brain potentials during natural sentence processing. Brain and Language 11 (2): 354–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A.. 1980c. Event related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology 11 (2): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 2001. A course in phonetics, 4th edn. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D.. 1991. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the mental lexicon. Cognition 38: 245–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1971. On generative semantics. In Steinberg, D. and Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lane, H. L. 1965. The motor theory of speech perception: A critical review. Psychological Review 72: 275–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laughren, M. 2002. Syntactic constraints in a free word order language. In Amberber, M. and Collins, P. (eds.), Language universals and variation. Westport, CT: Ablex Greenwood, 83–130.Google Scholar
Lazeron, R. H., Rombouts, S. A., Machielsen, W. C., Scheltens, P., Witter, M. P., Uylings, H. B. and Barkhof, F.. 2000. Visualizing brain activation during planning: The tower of London test adapted for functional MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology 21: 1407–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Lecours, A. R. and Vanier-Clement, M.. 1976. Schizophasia and jargonaphasia: A complete description with comments on Chaika's and Fromkin's respective looks at ‘schizophrenic’ language. Brain and Language 3: 516–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. 2001. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lesser, R. 1989. Linguistic investigations of aphasia. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P. and Salmelin, R.. 1998. An MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 553–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S.. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libben, G. 1994. How is morphological decomposition achieved?Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 369–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M. 1957. Some results of research on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29: 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. and Studdert-Kennedy, M.. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74: 431–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M., Isenberg, D. and Rakerd, B.. 1981. Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode. Perception & Psychophysics 30: 122–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtheim, O. 1884. On aphasia. Brain 7: 443–84.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. 1977. Speech physiology and acoustic phonetics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Linebarger, M. C. 1987. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics & Philosophy 10: 325–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linebarger, M. C. 1995. Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and Language 50: 52–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F. and Saffran, E. M.. 1983. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called aphasics. Cognition 13: 361–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. S.. 1971. Distinctive features and laryngeal control. Language 47: 767–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lively, S. E. and Pisoni, D. B.. 1997. On prototypes and phonetic categories: A critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23: 1665–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Long, D. L. and Ley., L. 2000. Understanding anaphors in story dialogue. Memory and Cognition 28 (5): 731–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotto, A. J. and Kluender, K. R.. 1998. General contrast effects of speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception and Psychophysics 60: 602–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R. and Holt, L. L.. 1997. Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (2): 1134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R. and Holt, L. L.. 1998. Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (6): 3648–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, T. and Swinney, D.. 1996. Co-reference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstrations of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukatela, K., Crain, S. and Shankweiler, D.. 1988. Sensitivity to inflectional morphology in agrammatism: Investigation of a highly inflected language. Brain and Language 33: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupker, S. J. 1984. Semantic priming without association – a 2nd look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23 (6): 709–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1970. Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment, trans. Bowden, D.. The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published in 1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1973. The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology, trans. Haigh, B.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1987. The man with a shattered world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1995. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A.. 1992. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 24: 56–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. and Seidenberg, M. S.. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 (4): 676–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. 1987. The competition model. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 249–308.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R. and McDonald, J.. 1989. Language learning: Cues or rules?Journal of Memory and Language 28 (3): 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. and Price, D.. 1980. The development of the comprehension of Topic–Comment marking. In Ingram, D., Peng, F., and Dale, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Congress of the Study of Child Language. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. 1986. Distinguishing language universal and language dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English /l/ and /r/. Cognition 24 (3): 169–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. and Liberman, A. M.. 1983. Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition 12: 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A. and Repp, B. H.. 1981. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69 (2): 548–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannheim, B. 1991. The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, M. P. 1980. A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. C. 1986. Treatment of auditory comprehension disorders. In Chapey, R. (ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia, 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 370–94.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. 1975. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science 189 (4198): 226–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. 1984. Function and process in spoken word recognition – a tutorial review. Attention and Performance (10): 125–50.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25 (1–2): 71–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L. K.. 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8 (1): 1–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L. K.. 1987. Against modularity. In Garfield, J. L. (ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 37–62.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L. K.. 1998. Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (11): 428–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R. and Older, L.. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101 (1): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. and Welsh, A.. 1978. Processing interactions and lexical access during word-recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 10 (1): 20–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. M. and Zwitserlood, P.. 1989. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Perception and Performance 15 (3): 576–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1957. Arbitraire linguistique et double articulation. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 15: 105–16. Reprinted in Eric Hamp et al. (eds.). 1966. Readings in Linguistics II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 371–8.Google Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. and Studdert-Kennedy, M.. 1991. Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception: Proceedings of a conference to honor Alvin M. Liberman, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. and Cornell, T.. 1993. Comprehension and acceptability judgements in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language 45: 340–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberg, H. S.et al. 2002. The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect. American Journal of Psychiatry 159 (5): 728–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L. and Elman, J. L.. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18: 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L. and Rogers, T. T.. 2003. The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (4): 310–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception.1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88 (5): 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.. 1988. Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, P. F. 1994. The rhythm rule in normal and ataxic speech production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. 1991. Ordering thoughts on thought disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 158: 307–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, P. and Warrington, E. K.. 1983. The Graded Naming Test. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
McKoon, G. and Ratcliff, R.. 1994. Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning, Memory and Cognition 20 (5): 1239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. and Ward, G. 1994. Testing theories of language processing – an empirical investigation of the online lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning, Memory and Cognition 20 (5): 1219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, J. M. 1991. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17: 433–43.Google ScholarPubMed
McRae, K. 2004. Semantic memory: Some insights from feature-based connectionist attractor networks. Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory 45: 41–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, K., Sa, V. R., and Seidenberg, M. S.. 1997. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (2): 99–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambretz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J. and Amiel-Tison, C.. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29: 143–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meistera, I., Boroojerdia, G. B., Foltysa, H., Sparinga, R., Huberb, W. and Töpper, R.. 2003. Motor cortex hand area and speech: Implications for the development of language. Neuropsychologia 41 (4): 401–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P. 1996. The Neanderthal legacy: An archaeological perspective from western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, M. F. and Geehan, G. R.. 1988. Cortical auditory disorders: Clinical and psychoacoustic features. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 51: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, M. F. and Rosenberg, S.. 1991. Word deafness mistaken for Alzheimer's disease – differential characteristics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 39 (2): 209–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. 1983. Development of articulatory, phonetic and phonological capabilities. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language production, 2. London: Academic Press, 3–50.Google Scholar
Miceli, G., Gainotti, G., Caltagirone, C. and Masullo, C.. 1980. Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia. Brain and Language 11: 159–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milberg, W. and Blumstein, S. E.. 1981. Lexical decision in aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language 14 (2): 371–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milberg, W., Blumstein, S. E. and Dworetzky, B.. 1987. Processing of lexical ambiguities in aphasia. Brain and Language 31 (1): 138–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milberg, W., Blumstein, S. E. and Dworetzky, B.. 1988a. Phonological processing and lexical access in aphasia. Brain and Language 34: 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milberg, W., Blumstein, S. E. and Dworetzky, B.. 1988b. Phonological factors in semantic processing: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (4): 305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milberg, W., Blumstein, S. E., Katz, D., Gershberg, F. and Brown, T.. 1995. Semantic facilitation in aphasia – effects of time and expectancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7 (1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. 1999. On knowing a word. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. and Chomsky, N.. 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Luce, D. R., Bush, R. R. and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. II. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N.. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A.. 1993. Visual pathways to perception and action. Progress in Brain Research 95: 317–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. (ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Minzenberg, M. J., Ober, B. A. and Vinogradov, S.. 2002. Semantic priming in schizophrenia: A review and synthesis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 8: 699–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, H., West, A. R. and Grace, A. A.. 1999. The regulation of forebrain dopamine transmission: Relevance to the pathophysiology and psychopathology of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 46: 40–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morice, R. and Delahunty, A.. 1996. Frontal executive impairments in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 22 (1): 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morice, R. D. and Ingram, J. C. L.. 1982. Language analysis in schizophrenia: Diagnostic implications. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 16: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morice, R. D. and Ingram, J. C. L.. 1983. Language complexity and age of onset of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 9 (3): 233–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J. and Franklin, S.. 1995. Aphasia: Assessment and remediation of a speech discrimination deficit. In Perkins, M. and Howard, S. (eds.), Case studies in clinical linguistics. London: Whurr, 245–70.Google Scholar
Morris, R. G., Ahmed, S., Syed, G. M. and Toone, B. K.. 1993. Neural correlates of planning ability: Frontal lobe activation during the Tower of London test. Neuropsychologia 31: 1367–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. 1970. A functional model of human memory. In Norman, D. A. (ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 203–54.Google Scholar
Moss, H. E., McCormick, S. F. and Tyler, L. K.. 1997. The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (5–6): 695–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K. and Marslen-Wilson, W. M.. 1995. Accessing different types of lexical semantic information – evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21 (4): 863–83.Google Scholar
Mowrey, R. A. and MacKay, I. R. A.. 1990. Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 88 (3): 1299–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, E. A. and Bussey, T. J.. 1999. Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (4): 142–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Näätänen, R. 1999. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 38: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y., Felser, C. and Clahsen, H.. 2002. Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (5): 531–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J. and Mehler, J.. 1998. Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3): 756–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Ni, W. J., Crain, S. and Shankweiler, D.. 1996. Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (3): 283–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. and Swinney., D. 1989. The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishitani, N. and Hari, R.. 2000. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (2): 913–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. and Kerswill, P. E.. 1990. The description of connected speech processes. In Ramsaran, S. (ed.), Studies in the pronunciation of English. London: Routledge, 295–316.Google Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M. and Cutler, A.. 1999. Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and performance 25 (5): 1363–89.Google Scholar
Norris, D. and Wise, R.. 2000. The study of prelexical and lexical processes in comprehension: Psycholinguistics and functional neuroimaging. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 867–80.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. and Ohala, M.. 1995. Speech perception and lexical representation: The role of vowel nasalization in Hindi and English. In Connell, B. and Arvaniti, A. (eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41– 60.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. and Wingfield, A.. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oscar-Berman, M., Zurif, E. B. and Blumstein, S.. 1975. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the processing of speech sounds. Brain and Language 2: 345–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterhout, L. 1997. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language 59 (3): 494–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrin, R. K. and Tyler, L. K.. 1993. Automatic access to lexical semantics in aphasia – evidence from semantic and associative priming. Brain and Language 45 (2): 147–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, J. E. 1962. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports 10 (3): 799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papçun, G. S., Krashen, D., Terbeek, R., Remington, R. and Harshman, R.. 1974. The left hemisphere is specialized for speech, language, and/or something else. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55: 319–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M. M. and Fazio, F.. 1999. The neural correlates of verb and noun processing – a PET study. Brain 122: 2337–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I. and Coltheart, M.. 2003. Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience 6 (7): 688–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I. and Hyde, K. L.. 2003. What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia. Trends in Cognitive Science 7 (8): 362–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkell, J. S. and Klatt, D. H.. 1986. Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perruchet, P. and Peereman, R.. 2004. The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17 (2–3): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, C. M., Murdoch, B. E., Chenery, H. J. and Kei, J.. 2004. The relationship between the mismatch negativity and psycholinguistic models of spoken word processing. Aphasiology 18 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. 2001. Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognitive Science 25 (5): 711–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pick, A. 1973. Aphasia, trans. and ed. Brown, Jason W.. Springfield, IL: Thomas. (Original work published in 1931).Google Scholar
Piñango, M. M. and Zurif, E. B.. 2001. Semantic operations in aphasic comprehension: Implications for the cortical organization of language. Brain and Language 79 (2): 297–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piñango, M. M., Zurif, E. and Jackendoff, R.. 1999. Real time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax–semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 (4): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 2000. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. and Prince, A.. 1988. On language and connectionism – an analysis of a parallel-distributed model of language acquisition. Cognition 28 (1–2): 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. and Prince, A.. 1994. The reality of linguistic rules: Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In Lima, S. D., Corrigan, R. L. and Inversion, G. K. (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. 1997. Word identification in noise. In Grosjean, F. and Frauenfelder, H. (eds.), A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms. Hove: Psychology Press, 681–7.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C. and Gonnerman, L. M.. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?Language and Cognitive Processes 15 (4–5): 445–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C. and Shallice, T.. 1993. Deep dyslexia: A case of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 10 (5): 337–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain – Deacon, T. Nature 388 (6644): 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. 2001. Pure word deafness and bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognitive Science 25: 679–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. and Hickok, G.. 2004. Towards a functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92 (1–2): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polka, L. and Bohn, O. S.. 1996. Cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1): 577–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polka, L. and Werker, J. F.. 1994. Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (2): 421–35.Google Scholar
Pollack, I. and Norman, D. A.. 1964. A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science 1: 125–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polster, M. R. and Rose, S. B.. 1998. Disorders of auditory processing: Evidence for modularity in audition. Cortex 34 (1): 47–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praamstra, P.. Hagoort, B.Maassen, T. Crul. 1991. Word deafness and auditory cortical function. Brain 114: 1197–1225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, P. A., Shapiro, L., Zurif, E. and Swinney, D.. 1991. Real time examinations of lexical processing in aphasics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20 (3): 271–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, P. A., Zurif, E., Love, T. and Brownell, H.. 1997. Speed of lexical activation in non fluent Broca's aphasia and fluent Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 59 (3): 391–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, P., Zurif, E., Stern, C. and Rosen, T. J.. 1992. Slowed lexical access in non-fluent aphasia – a case study. Brain and Language 43 (2): 336–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Protopapas, A. 1999. Connectionist modeling of speech perception. Psychological Bulletin 125 (4): 410–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulvermüller, F. 2002. The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quillian, R. 1968. Semantic memory. In Minsky, M. (ed.), Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 227–70.Google Scholar
Quillian, R. 1969. The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the ACM 12 (8): 459–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintana, J., Wong, T., Ortiz-Portillo, E., Marder, S. R. and Mazziotta, J. C.. 2004. Anterior cingulate dysfunction during choice anticipation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging 132 (2): 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J.. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntax: A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. 1998. Cortical processing of complex sounds. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8 (4): 516–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K., Kambe, G. and Duffy, S. A.. 2000. The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A: 1061–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R. and Clifton, C. J.. 1989. Eye-movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Flamberg, J.. 1993. Nurse Betty: The shooting script [screenplay]. New York: Newmarket Press.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A.. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21 (5): 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L.. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 3 (2): 131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochester, S. R., Martin, J. R. and Thurston, S.. 1977. Thought process disorder in schizophrenia: The listener's task. Brain and Language 4 (1): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S. and Levelt, W. J. M.. 1998. A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo. Cognition 69 (2): 219–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Rose, P. 2002. Forensic speaker identification. U. K. and North America: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. 2003. Auditory processing in dyslexia and specific language impairment: Is there a deficit? What is its nature? Does it explain anything?Journal of Phonetics 31: 509–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbek, J. C., McNeil, M. R. and Aronson, A. E. (eds.). 1984. Apraxia of speech: Physiology, acoustics, linguistics, management. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L.. 1981. Interactive processing through spreading activation. In Lesgold, A. M. and Perfetti, C. A. (eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 37–60.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L.. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. and PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 216–71.Google Scholar
Sag, I. and Hankamer, J.. 1984. Towards a theory of anaphoric processing. Journal of Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (3): 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G. 1997. Educating Eve: The ‘language instinct’ debate. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. 1998. From grammar to science: New foundations for general linguistics. Computational Linguistics 24 (1): 173–6.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1933 [English translation 1947]. The psychological reality of phonemes. In Mandelbaum, D. G. (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Los Angeles: University of California (1949), 49–60.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. and Levin, R.. 1994. Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Shanker, S. and Taylor, T. J.. 1998. Apes, language, and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schall, U., Johnston, P., Lagopoulos, J., Jüptner, M., Jentzen, W., Thienel, R., Dittmann-Balçar, A., Bender, S. and Ward, P. B.. 2003. Functional brain maps of Tower of London performance: A PET and fMRI study. NeuroImage 20: 1154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. 1975. Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam and New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. 1957 [English translation 1974]. Primary and secondary symptoms in schizophrenia. In Hirsch, S. R. and Shepherd, M. (eds.), Themes and variations in European psychiatry: An anthology. Bristol: John Wright, 40–4.Google Scholar
Schnider, A., Benson, D. R., Alexander, D. N. and Schnider-Claus, A.. 1994. Non-verbal environmental sound recognition after unilateral hemispheric stroke. Brain 117: 281–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M. and Marin, O. S. M.. 1980. The word order problem in agrammatism. 1. Comprehension. Brain and Language 10 (2): 249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. and Hoeffner, J. H.. 1998. Evaluating behavioral and neuroimaging data on past tense processing. Language 74 (1): 104–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seyal, M., Mull, B., Bhullar, N., Ahmad, T. and Gage, B.. 1999. Anticipation and execution of a simple reading task enhance corticospinal excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology 110: 424–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. 1982. Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences. 298 (1089): 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Gorrell, P. and Tuller, B.. 1987. Reception of language in Broca's aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M. and Ross, K.. 1994. Stress shift and early accent placement in lexical items in American English. Journal of Phonetics 22 (4): 357–88.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. and Turk, A. E.. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 (2): 193–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, J. R. and Martin, R. C.. 1992. How semantic is automatic semantic priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (6): 1191–1210.Google ScholarPubMed
Shindo, M., Kaga, K. and Tanaka, Y.. 1991. Speech discrimination and lip reading in patients with word deafness or auditory agnosia. Brain and Language 40: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. and Gasser, M.. 2005. The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life 11 (1–2): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N. V. 1989. The twitter machine: Reflections on language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. 2004. Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V., Tsimpli, I. M. and Ouhalla, J. 1993. Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant. Lingua 91: 279–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., Macaruso, P., Shankweiler, D. and Crain, S.. 1989. Syntactic comprehension in young poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics 10: 429–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S. and Clahsen, H.. 1999. Morphological priming in the German lexicon. Cognition 72: 203–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, H. 1977 [1876]. The comparative psychology of man / Herbert Spencer. Last words on evolution / Ernst Haeckel. Contributions to the study of the behavior of lower organisms / Herbert S. Jennings; edited and with prefaces by Daniel N. Robinson. Washington, DC: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Spreen, O., Benton, A. L. and Fincham, R. W.. 1965. Auditory agnosia without aphasia. Archives of Neurology 13: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanners, R., Neiser, J., Hernon, W. and Hall, R.. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, M. J. 1990. Syntax and intonation structure in combinatory grammar. In Altman, G. T. M. (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. D. W. and Holt, L. L.. 2003. Preceding phonetic context affects perception of non-speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (6): 3036–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C., Prather, P. A., Swinney, D. A. and Zurif, E. B.. 1991. The time course of automatic lexical access and aging. Brain and Language 40: 359–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, K. N. 1972. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In David, E. E. Jr and Denes, P. B. (eds.) Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 51–66.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N., Liberman, A. M., Studdert, M. and Ohman, S. E. G.. 1969. Cross language study of vowel perception. Language and Speech 12: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J. and Sanford, A. J.. 2000. The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focussing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, L. A. 1986. Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 1: 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streb, J., Hennighausen, E. and Rosler, F.. 2004. Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33 (3): 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studdert-Kennedy, M., Shankweiler, D. and Pisoni, D.. 1973. Auditory and phonetic processes in speech perception: Evidence from a dichotic study. Cognitive Psychology 3: 455–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturt, P. 2003. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (3): 542–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Namasivayam, A. K. and Chen, R.. 2001. Observation-execution matching system for speech: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 12 (7): 1341–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sussman, J. E. and Lauckner-Morano, V. J.. 1995. Further tests of the ‘perceptual magnet effect’ in the perception of (i): Identification and change/no-change discrimination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1): 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suvisaari, J. M., Haukka, J., Tanskanen, A. and Lonnqvist, J. K.. 1998. Age at onset and outcome in schizophrenia are related to the degree of familial loading. British Journal of Psychiatry 173: 494–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R. (eds.). 1980. A corpus of English conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Swaab, T., Brown, C. and Hagoort, P.. 1997. Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: Event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1): 39–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D. A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. and Osterhout, L.. 1990. Inference generation during auditory language comprehension. In Graesser, A. and Bower, G. (eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. XXV. New York: Academic Press, 17–33.Google Scholar
Swinney, D. and Zurif, E.. 1995. Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language 50: 225–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E. and Nicol, J.. 1989. The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P. and Love, T.. 1996. Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (2): 174–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, M. 1981. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. and Forster, K. I.. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15: 607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X. Q., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M. and Merzenich, M. M.. 1996. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 271 (5245): 81–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallal, P. and Newcombe, F.. 1978. Impairment of auditory perception and language comprehension in dysphasia. Brain and Language 5: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallal, P. and Piercy, M.. 1973. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature 241 (5390): 468–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turing, A. M. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59 (236): 433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Dick, E., Tavares, P., Pilgrim, L., Fletcher, P., Greer, M. and Moss, H.. 2003. Do semantic categories activate distinct cortical regions? Evidence for a distributed neural semantic system. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 (3–6): 541–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. and Stamatakis, E. A.. 2004. Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42 (4): 512–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Ostrin, R. K., Cooke, M. and Moss, H. E.. 1995. Automatic access of lexical information in Broca's aphasics – against the automaticity hypothesis. Brain and Language 48 (2): 131–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Russell, R., Fadili, J. and Moss, H. E.. 2001. The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124: 1619–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., Acres, K., Abdallah, S., Rodd, J. and Moss, H. E.. 2004. Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (3): 351–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Dick, E., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. and Moss, H.. 2003. Objects and their actions: Evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system. Neuroimage 18 (2): 542–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (10): 717–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utman, J. A., Blumstein, S. E. and Sullivan, K.. 2001. Mapping from sound to meaning: Reduced lexical activation in Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language 79 (3): 444–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallar, G. and Shallice, T. (eds). 1990. Neuropsychological impairments of short term memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essen, D. E. and Drury, H. A.. 1997. Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. The Journal of Neuroscience 17 (18): 7079–7102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varney, N. R. 1984. Phonemic imperception in aphasia. Brain and Language 21: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verspoor, K. 2005. Towards a semantic lexicon for biological language processing. Comparative and Functional Genomics 6 (1–2): 61–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, S. H., Gunter, T. G., Kolk, H. H. J. and Mulder, G.. 2001. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electro-physiological investigation. Psychophysiology 38: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, E., Wise, R. J. S., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S. and Frackowiak, R. S. J.. 1996. Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects studies with PET. Brain 119: 159–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. 1975. Selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27: 635–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. and McCarthy, R.. 1983. Category specific access dysphasia. Brain 106: 859–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K., McKenna, P. and Orpwood, L.. 1998. Single word comprehension: A concrete and abstract word synonym test. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 8: 143–54.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K. and Shallice, T.. 1984. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107: 829–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassenaar, M., Brown, C. and Hagoort, P.. 2004. ERP effects of subject–verb agreement violations in patients with Broca's aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (4): 553–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, G. E. and Caplan, D.. 2004. Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A (1): 129–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P. and Paus, T.. 2003. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41 (8): 989–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C.. 1984. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75 (6): 1866–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C.. 2005. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46 (3): 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. and Caplan, B.. 1963. Symbol formation: An organismic developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wernicke, K. 1874 [reproduced in translation 1977]. The aphasia symptom complex: A psychological study on an anatomic basis. In Eggert, G. E. (ed.), Wernicke's works on aphasia: A sourcebook and review. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Whitaker, H. A. 1971. On the representation of language in the human brain: Problems in the neurology of language and the linguistic analysis of aphasia. Alberta, Canada: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 2004. Conceptual primes in human languages and their analogues in animal communication and cognition. Language Sciences 26 (5): 413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerman, R. and Kuhl, P. K.. 1996. Cross-language speech perception: Swedish, English, and Spanish speakers' perception of front rounded vowels. Proceedings of the International Congress on Spoken Language Processing ICSLP 96, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Wills, C. 1993. The runaway brain: The evolution of human uniqueness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P., Emslie, H. and Evans, J.. 1996. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D.. 2004. Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. M. and Saygin, A. P.. 2004. Grammaticality judgment in aphasia: Deficits are not specific to syntactic structures, aphasic syndromes, or lesion sites. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2): 238–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L. and Harvey, T.. 1999. The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein. Lancet 353: 2149–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, F., Gibson, E. and Desmet, T.. 2004. Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 19 (6): 665–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., Juarez, L., Opie, M., Friederici, A., MacWhinney, B. and Zurif, E.. 1989. Pragmatics in aphasia: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and Speech 32: 315–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurm, L. H. and Samuel, A. G.. 1997. Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language 36 (2): 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Liberman, A. M. and Whalen, D. H.. 1997. On the immediacy of phonetic perception. Psychological Science 8 (5): 358–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngve, V. H. 1960. A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104: 444–66.Google Scholar
Zurif, E. B. and Caramazza, A.. 1976. Psycholinguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In Whitaker, H. and Whitaker, H. A. (eds.), Studies in neuro-linguistics, vol. I. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A. and Myerson, R.. 1972. Grammatical judgements of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia 10: 405–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A., Myerson, R. and Galvin, J.. 1974. Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language. Brain and Language 1 (2): 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John C. L. Ingram, University of Queensland
  • Book: Neurolinguistics
  • Online publication: 26 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618963.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John C. L. Ingram, University of Queensland
  • Book: Neurolinguistics
  • Online publication: 26 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618963.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John C. L. Ingram, University of Queensland
  • Book: Neurolinguistics
  • Online publication: 26 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618963.021
Available formats
×