Book contents
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Disputes
- Part II Epistemic Disputes
- Part III Implications for Courts and Defendants
- 9 Unlucky, Bad, and the Space in Between: Why Criminologists Should Think More about Responsibility
- 10 Neuroscience and the Criminal Jurisdiction: A New Approach to Reliability and Admissibility in the Courts of England and Wales
- 11 Should Individuals with Psychopathy Be Compensated for Their Fearlessness? (Or How Neuroscience Matters for Equality)
- 12 The Treatment of Psychopathy: Conceptual and Ethical Issues
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
11 - Should Individuals with Psychopathy Be Compensated for Their Fearlessness? (Or How Neuroscience Matters for Equality)
from Part III - Implications for Courts and Defendants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Disputes
- Part II Epistemic Disputes
- Part III Implications for Courts and Defendants
- 9 Unlucky, Bad, and the Space in Between: Why Criminologists Should Think More about Responsibility
- 10 Neuroscience and the Criminal Jurisdiction: A New Approach to Reliability and Admissibility in the Courts of England and Wales
- 11 Should Individuals with Psychopathy Be Compensated for Their Fearlessness? (Or How Neuroscience Matters for Equality)
- 12 The Treatment of Psychopathy: Conceptual and Ethical Issues
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for ActionConcepts, Crimes, and Courts, pp. 228 - 243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
- 1
- Cited by