Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:02:29.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Postmortem imaging

from Section III - Solving clinical problems and interpretation of test results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

Cornelia Hagmann
Affiliation:
Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals London UK
Nicola J. Robertson
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Neonatology and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
Janet M. Rennie
Affiliation:
Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Neonatal Medicine, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
Janet M. Rennie
Affiliation:
University College London
Cornelia F. Hagmann
Affiliation:
University College London
Nicola J. Robertson
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction to the clinical problem

Establishing the cause of perinatal death has a particularly valuable role in the counseling of the parents after a loss of a baby. Assigning a cause of death can help parents in the grieving process, improve parental and professional understanding, and address any concerns they may have that prenatal events such as maternal illness or maternal use of medication might have contributed to the death of their baby [1,2,3,4]. After termination, confirmation of the prenatal diagnosis is vitally important information when counseling for future pregnancies.

Despite the recognized value of autopsy, perinatal autopsy rates have declined significantly in recent years [2,3,5]. Studies in both Europe and the United States indicate that as many as 40% of all perinatal deaths are not submitted for autopsy [6,7,8]. There is no obvious single explanation for the decline in autopsy rates but possible influences include a shift in attitude of clinicians towards autopsies and a change in the public's willingness to grant permission [3].

This decline in consent for autopsy leads to a reduction in the information available to parents about the risk for future pregnancies. The Chief Medical Officer of the United Kingdom issued two reports in 2000 and 2001 [9,10] recommending the assessment of less invasive forms of postmortem examination. After wide consultation with interested parties and faith groups, Alistair Parker produced a document (on behalf of the Department of Health) entitled Less Invasive Autopsy: The Place of MR Imaging in 2004 [11].

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wright, C, Lee, RE. Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (4): F285–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, P, Angst, DB, Taxy, J, Mangurten, HH. Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154 (1): 38–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Brodlie, M, Laing, IA, Keeling, JW, McKenzie, KJ. Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. Br Med J 2002; 324 (7340): 761–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laing, IA. Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy. Semin Neonatol 2004; 9 (4): 247–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okah, FA. The autopsy: experience of a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16 (4): 350–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craven, CM, Dempsey, S, Carey, JC, Kochenour, NK. Evaluation of a perinatal autopsy protocol: influence of the Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 (4): 684–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Cartlidge, PH, Dawson, AT, Stewart, JH, Vujanic, GM. Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. Br Med J 1995; 310 (6973): 155–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saller, DN Jr, Lesser, KB, Harrel, U, Rogers, BB, Oyer, CE. The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273 (8): 663–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chief Medical Officer. Report of a consensus of organs and tissues retained by pathology services in England. London, Stationery Office, 2000.
Chief Medical Officer. The removal, retention and use of human organs and tissues from post mortem examination. London, Stationery Office, 2001.
Parker. A. Less invasive autopsy: the place of magnetic resonance imaging. February, 2004. www.dh.gov.uk.
Roberts, IS, Benbow, EW, Bisset, Ret al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology 2003; 42 (5): 424–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ros, PR, Li, KC, Vo, P, Baer, H, Staab, EV. Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8 (3): 303–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, JA, Hall-Craggs, MA, Sams, VR, Lees, WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996; 348 (9035): 1139–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, PJ, Sohaey, R, Harris, DPet al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (1): 41–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huisman, TA, Wisser, J, Stallmach, T, Krestin, GP, Huch, R, Kubik-Huch, RA. MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17 (1): 58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderliesten, ME, Peringa, J, Hulst, VP, Blaauwgeers, HL, Lith, JM. Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110 (4): 378–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, PD, Variend, D, Evans, Met al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (1): 22–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Brookes, JA, Deng, J, Wilkinson, ID, Lees, WR. Three-dimensional imaging of the postmortem fetus by MRI: early experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999; 14 (3): 166–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razavi, RS, Hill, DL, Muthurangu, Vet al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of congenital cardiac anomalies. Cardiol Young 2003; 13 (5): 461–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagmann, CF, Robertson, NJ, Sams, VR, Brookes, JA. Postmortem MRI as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal tract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92 (3): F215–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Postmortem imaging
    • By Cornelia Hagmann, Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals London UK, Nicola J. Robertson, Senior Lecturer in Neonatology and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK, Janet M. Rennie, Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Neonatal Medicine, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Janet M. Rennie, University College London, Cornelia F. Hagmann, University College London, Nicola J. Robertson, University College London
  • Book: Neonatal Cerebral Investigation
  • Online publication: 07 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544750.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Postmortem imaging
    • By Cornelia Hagmann, Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals London UK, Nicola J. Robertson, Senior Lecturer in Neonatology and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK, Janet M. Rennie, Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Neonatal Medicine, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Janet M. Rennie, University College London, Cornelia F. Hagmann, University College London, Nicola J. Robertson, University College London
  • Book: Neonatal Cerebral Investigation
  • Online publication: 07 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544750.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Postmortem imaging
    • By Cornelia Hagmann, Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals London UK, Nicola J. Robertson, Senior Lecturer in Neonatology and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK, Janet M. Rennie, Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Neonatal Medicine, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Janet M. Rennie, University College London, Cornelia F. Hagmann, University College London, Nicola J. Robertson, University College London
  • Book: Neonatal Cerebral Investigation
  • Online publication: 07 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544750.016
Available formats
×