Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:44:58.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progressivism and the Doctrine of Natural Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

James W. Ceaser Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Ellen Frankel Paul
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Jeffrey Paul
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Fred D. Miller, Jr
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Progressive thinkers were revolutionary in their ends, not in their means. They generally condemned what John Dewey (1859–1952) called “radicalism,” meaning efforts to overthrow the government by action beyond established law, let alone through violence. Progressivism, wrote Dewey, “both by its theory and by its own nature is committed to democratic methods of effecting social change.” At the same time, Progressives made clear their plans to attempt to change the basic character of the political and economic system and to discard the theoretical foundation of natural rights philosophy that underlay it.

The immediate target was the Constitution. Progressives saw it as an instrument that thwarted the democratic will and prevented the enactment of policies needed to meet the challenges of the new Industrial Age. (It was virtually an article of faith among Progressives that the people wished for, or could be persuaded to support, the programs that Progressives favored.) An effective system of modern policy-making, Progressives argued, required above all a capacity for planning and experimentation without the imposition of artificial limits on discretion. The Constitution, however, had as one of its primary aims the protection of liberty, understood in large part as individual rights. This objective was built into the structure of the government, with its fragmentation of authority among different institutions and its restrictions on governmental power; and it was further promoted by the listing of different rights in the original Constitution and in the Bill of Rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×