Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:36:45.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology

Persons and the Polity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

David A. Dana
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

In 1917, as a war marked by blindingly murderous technology wound down, a curious phenomena swept Britain: a belief in spiritualism and magic, which existed directly alongside a sincere faith in science. It was a time when electrical engineering was transforming the Victorian landscape, electrifying factories for evening shift work, and linking the Empire with new, rapid, forms of communication – the technology was both mesmerizing and terrifying, threatening a physical and social order of long stable relationships of production and creation. It was a time when the breadth of the global world was fully revealed, and the Empire became linked by instant communications. The premise was that beneath the new technology, the new industrial organization, and the mystery of electrification lay a life-world within an unblemished and innocent nature that must be uniquely protected. This was signified perhaps in its purest form by the fascination with the Cottingley Fairies, fairy figures “captured” on the new media of photography, when children in the household of one of Britain's first electrical engineers took photographs they claimed as real. What is important about the Cottingley fairies was that they were widely believed, evidence of the limits of science and of the public unease and uncertainty about the “wonders” of the future. After all, the fairies seemed, in the context of the times, as neither more nor less fantastic than the idea of electrical currents coursing through the air, or across wires traversing a many miles, or of photography itself, which created narratives that were both real (in science) and set piece constructions of a photographic framer (in the case of the fairies). The father of the children who reported the fairies was part of the effort to electrify the textile factories, transforming the darkness of the north English winter night into perpetual day.

Belief in things unseen made oddly consonant bedfellows with technology. The children's photographs were not only championed by Harry Houdini, three experts from the Kodak camera company, and others who also embraced industrialization, modernity, and progress and were skeptical about fakes, but also by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and other spiritualists who had an interest in promoting the existence of a spiritualized world and contact with ghosts. The girls’ photographs were fully and widely believed to be authentic (which seems remarkable, given what looks to our eyes to be an obvious fake) because they had not claimed to see fairies, they had the mechanical photographic proof they had seen them. Of course, faked photographs, as was demonstrated in the pages of Science in 2007 with the faked stem cell cloning photos, would become a constant feature of science hoaxes. In 1917, after a decade of scientific progress, an optimistic public was ready to believe in what the experts confirmed was true.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Nanotechnology Challenge
Creating Legal Institutions for Uncertain Risks
, pp. 337 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bensley, D. AlanWhy Great Thinkers Sometimes Fail to Think CriticallySkeptical Inquirer 30 2006 47Google Scholar
Kolata, GinaA Cloning Scandal Rocks a Pillar of Science PublishingThe New York Times 18 2005Google Scholar
Moss, WilliamEckhardt, RogerThe Human Plutonium Injection ExperimentsLos Alamos Science 23 1995 177Google Scholar
Stolberg, Sheryl G.Institute Restricted after Gene Therapy DeathThe New York Times 25 2000Google Scholar
Stolberg, Sheryl G.Trials Are Halted On Gene TherapyThe New York Times 4 2002Google Scholar
Dunmore, CharlieEU Move to Break GM Deadlock Could Sow DiscordReuters News Service 29 2010Google Scholar
Harris, GardinerJournal Retracts 1998 Paper Linking Autism to VaccinesThe New York Times 2 2010Google Scholar
Kim, Eun-Young
Walters, LeRoyPalmer, Julie GageThe Ethics of Human Gene TherapyOxfordOxford University Press 1996Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B.Zilinskas, Raymond A.The Promise and Perils of Synthetic BiologyThe New AtlantisSpring 2006Google Scholar
Ratner, Mark ARatner, DanielNanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big IdeaUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice Hall PTR 2002Google Scholar
Wolpe, Paul RootTreatment, Enhancement and the Ethics of NeurotherapeuticsBrain and Cognition 50 2002 378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, J.MThaxton, C. SMirkin, C. ANanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteinsScience 301 2003 1884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratner, Mark ARatner, DanielNanotechnology: A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big IdeaUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice Hall PTR 2002Google Scholar
Institute of MedicineGlobalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life SciencesWashington, DCNational Academies Press 2006Google Scholar
Rubin, Susan B.Zoloth, LaurieMargin of Error: The Ethics of Mistakes in the Practice of MedicineHagergtown, MDUniversity Publishing 2000Google Scholar
Herresl, EdmundIdeas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book General Introduction to a Pure PhenomenologyEdmund Herresl Collected Works Volume I: Phenomenology and the Foundations of ScienceNew YorkSpringer Publishing Co 1980Google Scholar
Bostrom, NickDefence of Posthuman DignityBioethics 19 2005 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, YuvalImagining the FutureThe New AtlantisWinter 2004 48Google Scholar
Kass, Leon RPreventing a Brave New WorldThe New Republic Online 21 2001Google Scholar
Zoloth, LaurieWhen You Plow the Field Your Torah Is with You’: Genetic Modification and GM Food in the Jewish Tradition(s)Acceptable Genes? Religious Traditions and Genetically Modified FoodsNYSUNY Press 2009Google Scholar
Zoloth, LauriePerson, Polis, Risk, Need and Uncertainty: Justice and consent in emerging technologyNanotechnology and the Weight of Justice: The Social Scalenot yet published 2010Google Scholar
Traina, CristieOld Wine, Old Wineskins: Nanotechnology and JusticeNanotechnology and the Weight of Justice: The Social Scalenot yet published 2010Google Scholar
Zimmer, CarlSoul Made Flesh: The Discovery of the BrainNew YorkFree Press 2004Google Scholar
Diamond, JaredGuns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human SocietiesNew YorkW. W. Norton & Co 1997Google Scholar
Robert, Jason S.Just Scenarios: Cultivating Anticipatory Assessment of Novel TechnologiesNanoechnology and the Weight of Justice: The Social Scalenot yet published 2010Google Scholar
Friedman, ThomasThe World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first CenturyNew YorkFarrar, Straus and Giroux 2005Google Scholar
Dorff, Elliott NNewman, Louis EContemporary Jewish Theology: A ReaderNew YorkOxford University Press 1999Google Scholar
Zoloth, LaurieWhen You Plow the Field Your Torah Is with You’: Genetic Modification and GM Food in the Jewish Tradition(s)Acceptable Genes? Religious Traditions and Genetically Modified Foods81Albany, NYSUNY Press 2009Google Scholar
Walters, LeRoyPalmer, Julie GageThe Ethics of Human Gene TherapyOxfordOxford University Press 1996Google Scholar
Frankel, Mark SChapman, Audrey R 2000
Cohen, Cynthia BRenewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and Public PolicyNew YorkOxford University Press 2007Google Scholar
Kass, Leon RToward a More Natural Science: Biology and Human AffairsNew YorkFree Press 1985Google Scholar
Jeungst, Eric TThe Ethics of Prediction: Genetic Risk and the Physician-Patient RelationshipGenome Science & Technology 1 1995 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoloth, LaurieEthical Issues in Synthetic BiologyThe Ethics of Protocells – Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory Second LifeCambridge, MAMIT Press 2009Google Scholar
Berry, WendellWhat Are People For?: EssaysNew YorkNorth Point Press 1990Google Scholar
Overbye, DennisIn the Hunt for Planets, Who Owns the Data?The New York Times 14 2010Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W.Global Justice (Metaphilosophy)Malden, MABlackwell Publishing 2001Google Scholar
Frankel, Mark SChapman, Audrey R 2000

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×