Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:35:26.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Egyptian mummification with evisceration per ano

from PART I - Mummies of Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Theodore A. Reyman
Affiliation:
Michigan
William H. Peck
Affiliation:
Michigan
Eve Cockburn
Affiliation:
Paleopathology Association
Theodore A. Reyman
Affiliation:
Formerly Mt Carmel Mercy Hospital, Detroit
Get access

Summary

The Egyptian embalmers were masters of their art. The trial and error method they employed for 2000 years resulted in a scientific discipline for preserving bodies (Mokhtar et al. 1973). These embalming techniques required long hours of toil, expensive medicants, and fine linen wrappings. The costs were necessarily high. Because the majority of people who were mummified in the early dynasties were royalty or the rich and influential of the time, cost had little importance. As the poorer segments of the populace were allowed the privilege of mummification, these costs became prohibitive. For this and possibly other reasons, modifications were made in the classical mummification process, most being aimed at reducing the cost. The external form and appearance of the mummy remained the same but the fact is that mummification for the poor became less a preservative and more a symbolic exercise. Two examples of a common alternative method are presented: mummification with evisceration per ano. Both mummies were provided by David O'Connor, Department of Egyptology, Pennsylvania University Museum. Neither had known provenance or coffin. The first, designated PUM III, was an adult female; the second, a male child called PUMIV. They will be described separately.

PUM III

Radiography

Before the unwrapping, the mummy was examined radiographically (Kristen and Reyman 1980). The body arrived with the head unwrapped and separated from the body at the level of the fifth cervical vertebra, probably occurring postmortem. There was a healed fracture of the left second rib. Harris lines were present in the distal femora. The chest cavity revealed central densities suggesting the heart and lungs. The diaphragm clearly separated the thorax and abdominal cavities. A right upper abdominal mass appeared to be the liver. The remainder of the abdominal cavity contained irregular, speckled opacities. In the pelvis, a double shadow centrally suggested the urinary bladder with an air contrast lumen and the uterine body behind it. There were numerous air contrast lines in the thigh muscle, suggesting fissuring.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×