Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T06:43:13.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Nature and Character of Environmental Agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Bharat H. Desai
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

As discussed in the previous chapter, the twentieth century witnessed unprecedented growth in the making of treaties, not only as codification exercises for existing customary state practices, but also as regulation of numerous subjects that confront the states. An important outcome of intergovernmental institutionalized cooperation in environmental matters has been the growth of a unique body of treaty-based and other rules. The advent of such environmental agreements seems to carry the “genes” and imprint of the maker/initiator. The methodology of treaty making in this field stands apart from that in other areas of international law as it reflects the changing needs of sovereign states in an increasingly complex world. It has also heralded qualitative and quantitative change in the character of international environmental law. This phenomenon of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) needs much closer legal scrutiny regarding its nature and character, the uniqueness and content of MEAs, and the lawmaking approach followed in marathon global environmental conferences.

Proliferation of Agreements

MEAs have emerged as the “predominant legal method for addressing environmental problems that cross national boundaries.” The pace at which the multilateral instruments concerning environmental issues are growing remains unprecedented. From the earliest reported multilateral treaty concerning the environment in 1868, approximately 502 international treaties and other agreements have taken shape. Of these, 302 (a staggering number, almost 60 percent) have been entered into since the 1972 Stockholm Conference.

Type
Chapter
Information
Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Legal Status of the Secretariats
, pp. 47 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kiss, Alexandre and Shelton, Dinah, International Environmental Law: 1994 Supplement(New York: Transnational, 1994), p. 1Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E., “The New Treaty Makers,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, vol. XXV, no. 2, 2002, pp. 213–34 at 217Google Scholar
Lang, Winfried, “Die Verrechtlichung des internationalen Umweltschutzes: Vom “soft law” zum “hard law,” Archiv des Völkerrechts, vol. 22, 1984, pp. 282–305 at 303Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, “A Survey of International Customary Rules of Environmental Protection,” in Teclaff, Ludwik A. and Utton, Albert E. (Eds.), International Environmental Law (New York: Praeger, 1974), pp. 1–11 at 1Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), Chapter XIII, pp. 283–8Google Scholar
,United Nations University (UNU), Inter-Linkages: Synergies and Coordination between Multilateral Environmental Agreements (Tokyo: UNU, 1999), pp. 5 and 8Google Scholar
Schechter, Michael G., “International Institutions: Obstacles, Agents, or Conduits of Global Structural Change?” in Schechter, Michael G., Innovation in Multilateralism (Tokyo: UNU, 1999), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“To Treaty or Not to Treaty? A Survey of Practical Experience,” in Sand, Peter H., Transnational Environmental Law: Lessons in Global Change (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 55–60
Weiss, Edith Brown, “The Five International Treaties: A Living History,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (Eds.), Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998), p. 89Google Scholar
,United Nations, U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (New York: UN, 1983), p. xxxiiiGoogle Scholar
McNair, Arnold D., “The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties,” British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 11, 1930, p. 100Google Scholar
Benedick, Richard Elliot, “Perspectives of a Negotiation Practitioner,” in Sjöstedt, Gunnar (Ed.), International Environmental Negotiation (Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993), p. 229Google Scholar
Sand, Peter H., Lessons Learned in Global Environmental Governance (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 1990), pp. 1–60Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M., “Global Environmental Governance” in ,Commission on Global Governance, Issues in Global Governance (London: Kluwer International, 1995), pp. 333–69Google Scholar
French, Hilary, “Strengthening Global Environmental Governance,” in Vanishing Borders: Protecting the Planet in the Age of Globalization (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2000), pp. 144–62Google Scholar
Desai, Bharat H., “Revitalizing International Environmental Institutions: The UN Task Force Report and Beyond,” Indian Journal of International Law, vol. 40, no. 3, 2000, pp. 455–504Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan, “Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law,” in Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, Multilateral Treaty-Making: The Current Status of Challenge to and Reforms Needed in the International Legislative Process (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2000), pp. 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, “Twilight Existence of Non-Binding International Agreements,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 71, 1977, pp. 296–304CrossRef
Desai, Bharat H., “Regulating Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes,” Indian Journal of International Law, vol. 37, no. 1, 1997, pp. 43–61 at 55Google Scholar
,FCCC Secretariat, The Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate Change (Bonn: FCCC, 1998)Google Scholar
Sand, Peter H., Transnational Environmental Law: Lessons in Global Change (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 175–87 at 181Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold D., “The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties,” British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 11, 1930, p. 100Google Scholar
Young, Oran R., “Perspectives on International Organizations,” in Sjostedt, Gunnar (Ed.), International Environmental Negotiation (Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1995, p. 245Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×