Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:48:32.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Moral limit and possibility in world politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2010

Richard M. Price
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

Introduction

At what point, if any, is one to reasonably concede that the ‘realities’ of world politics require compromise from cherished principles or moral ends, and that what has been achieved is ethically justified? How do we really know we have reached an ethical limit when we see one, or fallen short in ways that deserve the withholding of moral praise? Less abstractly, how might we seek to reconcile the cherished freedoms of liberal democracy with restrictions on immigration? Can war legitimately be waged in defence of human rights, and override competing moral claims to self-determination? Can the perpetuation of slaughter be risked by refusing amnesties to perpetrators of atrocities in order to enforce international criminal law? Is there any way to ethically navigate moral dilemmas such as the above, ones that seem to require choices between cosmopolitanism and communitarianism, or consequentialism and deontology, or the oft-competing demands between procedural and substantive justice?

As the history of ethics and international political theory attest, these are difficult enough questions for which to hope for some answer, not the least given traditions of thought like realism that deny the very existence of developments we could call ethically progressive change in world politics in the first place. But it becomes even more difficult still if a research programme that has itself led the charge in empirically documenting putative moral progress inherently problematises the very grounds upon which prima facie judgements of moral good are often made.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Price, Richard, ‘Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics’, World Politics 55:4 (2003), 579–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas for a conspicuous exception: Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey, ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics 50:2 (1998), 324–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowert, Paul and Jeffrey, Legro, ‘Norms, Identity and their Limits’. In Katzenstein, Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1996), 451–497Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth, ‘The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Idea of International Civil Society’, European Journal of International Relations 11:1 (2000), 91–120Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, ‘A Turn Not Taken: Ethics in IR at the Millennium’, Review of International Studies 24 (1998), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta has also noted, ‘constructivists have little to say about what to do’. Argument and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert, ‘Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. In Keohane, Robert (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1986), 210Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998), 5Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, ‘“Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization 51 (2000), 17–18Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Müller, Harald, ‘Theoretical Paradise – Empirically Lost? Arguing with Habermas’, Review of International Studies 31 (2005), 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, The Moral Purpose of the State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Lee, Steven, Morality, Prudence and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, ‘“Is” and “Ought”: Evaluating Empirical Aspects of Normative Research’. In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), 349–377Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 3:3 (1997), 319–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibney, Matthew J., The Ethics and Politics of Asylum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 17, 19
Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Shapcott, Richard, Justice, Community, and Dialogue in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 114Google Scholar
questions, Shapcott, ‘how does a universal postconventional theory of justice include those who do not share the same self understanding, that is, who are not, in Habermas’ terms, part of the discourse of modernity?' Justice, Community, and Dialogue, 123
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52:4 (1998), 887–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, John, ‘In His Own Words’, video clip. Accessed April 12, 2005; www.truthout.org/multimedia.htm
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2000), xxviiiGoogle Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan, ‘A Choice Among Evils’, Globe and Mail, March 5, 2003. Accessed March 5, 2003; www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPPrint/LAC/20030305/CODERSH/…3/7/2003Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, ‘The Year of Living Dangerously’, New York Times Magazine March 14, 2004. Accessed June 2, 2006; www.ksg.harvard.edu/news/opeds/2004/ignatieff_year_dangerously_nyt_031404.htm
Finnemore, Martha, The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Brown, Chris, ‘Selective Humanitarianism: In Defence of Inconsistency’. In Chatterjee, D. and Scheid, D. (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 31–50Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel, The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Roppe, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar, ‘Producing Collective Identity and Interacting with Difference: The Security Implications of Community-Building in Europe and Southeast Asia’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2002), 49
Doty, Roxanne Lynn, Imperial Encounters (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 136Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen, ‘The Image Before the Weapons: The Genealogy of the “Civilian” in International Law and Politics’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2003)
Andreas, Peter, ‘The Clandestine Political Economy of War and Peace in Bosnia’, International Studies Quarterly 48:1 (2004), 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations 4:3 (1998), 259–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochnick, Chris af and Normand, Roger, ‘The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal 35:1 (1994), 50Google Scholar
Campbell, David, Writing Security (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, revised edition, 1998), 216Google Scholar
George, Jim and Campbell, David, ‘Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 34 (1990), 269–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakarada, Radmila, ‘The Uncertain Reach of Critical Theory’. In Wapner, Paul and Ruiz, Lester Edwin J. (eds.), Principled World Politics: The Challenge of Normative International Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), 68Google Scholar
Campbell, David, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), 13Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard, ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’. In Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David and Shapiro, Michael J., ‘Introduction: From Ethical Theory to the Ethical Relation’. In Campbell, David and Shapiro, Michael J. (eds.), Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), xGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David, ‘The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics After the End of Philosophy’. In Campbell and Shapiro, Moral Spaces, 32–35
Zehfuss, Maja, Constructivism in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization 46:1 (1992), 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldes, Jutta, Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×