Abernathy, W.J., and Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of innovation in industry. Technology Review 80(7): 40–47.Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses (1986). Catching-up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History 46(2): 385–406.Google Scholar

Adler, P.S. (1993). The learning bureaucracy: New United Motors Manufacturing, Inc. In Staw, B. and Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 111–194.Google Scholar

Adner, R., and Helfat, C.E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 1011–1025.Google Scholar

Aghion, P., David, P.A., and Foray, D. (2009). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in “STIG systems.” Research Policy 38(4): 681–693.Google Scholar

Aitken, Brian J., and Harrison, Ann E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89(3): 605–618.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G., and Schiller, R. (2015). Phishing for Pfools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58(3): 211–222.Google Scholar

Aldridge, H. (1999). Organizations Evolving, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar

Allen, P.M. (2005). Understanding Social and Economic Systems as Evolutionary Complex Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R.C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 4: 1–24.Google Scholar

Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33–46.Google Scholar

Amsden, Alice H. (1989). Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Amsden, Alice H., and Chu, Wan-wen (2003). Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Amsden, Alice H., and Hikino, Takashi (1994). Project execution capability, organizational know-how and conglomerate corporate growth in late industrialization. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 111–147.Google Scholar

Anderson, P., and Tushman, M.L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 604–633.Google Scholar

Araujio, B. (2017). Market leadership in Brazil’s ICT sector: The cases of Totvs and Positivo. In Malerba, F., Mani, S., and Adams, P. (Eds.), The Rise to Market Leadership, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Argote, L. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.Google Scholar

Arocena, Rodrigo, and Sutz, Judith (2000). Looking at national systems of innovation from the South. Industry and Innovation 7(1): 55–75.Google Scholar

Arora, A., Cohen, W.M., and Walsh, J.P. (2016). The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and impact. Research Policy 45(6): 1113–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, B.W. (2014). Complexity and the Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., and Soete, L. (1995). Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest firms. Results of the PACE survey. European Innovation Monitoring System, Report No. 23, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar

Auerswald, P.E. (2017). The Code Economy: A Forty-Thousand-Year History, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Augier, M., and Teece, D.J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science 20(2): 410–421.Google Scholar

Basalla, G. (1988). The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Becker, C., and Knudsen, T. (2017). Heterogeneity of habits as a foundation for Schumpeterian economic policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27(1): 43–62.Google Scholar

Becker, M.C. (Ed.) (2005). Handbook of Organizational Routines, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Becker, M.C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(5): 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Martin (1984). Learning and the accumulation of industrial technological capacity in developing countries. In Fransman, M. and King, K. (Eds.), Technological Capability in the Third World, Macmillan, London, p. 404.Google Scholar

Bell, Martin, and Figueiredo, Paulo N. (2012). Building innovative capabilities in latecomer emerging market firms: Some key issues. In Amann, Edmund and Cantwell, John (Eds.), Innovative Firms in Emerging Market Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 24–109.Google Scholar

Bell, R.M., and Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change 2(1): 157–210.Google Scholar

Bergek, Anna, Jacobsson, Staffan, Carlsson, Bo, Lindmark, S., and Rickne, Anneka (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37(3): 407–429.Google Scholar

Binswanger, H., and Ruttan, V. (1978). Induced Innovation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Bleda, M., and Del Rio, P. (2013). The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research Policy 42(5): 1039–1052.Google Scholar

Blind, G., and Pyka, A. (2014). The rule approach in evolutionary economics: A methodological template for empirical research. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24(5): 1085–1105.Google Scholar

Blomström, Magnus (1986). Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35(1): 97–110.Google Scholar

Bloom, N., and Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives 24: 203–224.Google Scholar

Bonaccorsi, A., Giuri, P., and Pierotti, F. (2005). Technological frontiers and competition in multi-technology sectors: Micro evidence from the aero-engine industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14: 23–42.Google Scholar

Borensztein, Eduardo, Gregorio, Jose De, and Lee, Jong-Wha (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics 45(1): 115–135.Google Scholar

Boschma, R., and Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. In Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Lippi, M., Pammolli, F., and Riccaboni, M. (2001). Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19: 1161–1187.Google Scholar

Brenner, T., and Murmann, J.P. (2016). Using simulation experiments to test historical explanations: The development of the German dye industry 1857–1913. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 26: 907–932.Google Scholar

Breschi, S., Malerba, F., and Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal 110: 388–410.Google Scholar

Breznitz, Dan (2007). Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry. Research Policy 36(9): 1465–1482.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review: 380–400.Google Scholar

Cantner, U., and Pyka, A. (2001). Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Research Policy 30(5): 759–775.Google Scholar

Capron, Laurence, and Mitchell, Will (2009). Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organization Science 20(2): 294–312.Google Scholar

Castellacci, F. (2009). The interactions between national systems and sectoral patterns of innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 19(3): 321–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chai, A. (2017). Tackling Keynes’s question: A look back on 15 years of learning to consume. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27(2): 239–250.Google Scholar

Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (1990). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chandy, Rajesh K., and Tellis, Gerard J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64(3): 1–17.Google Scholar

Chang, Sea Jin, and Hong, Jaebum (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 429–448.Google Scholar

Chiaromonte, F., and Dosi, G. (1993). Heterogeneity, competition, and macroeconomics dynamics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4(1): 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choo, Kineung, Lee, Keun, Ryu, Keunkwan, and Yoon, Jungmo (2009). Changing performance of business groups over two decades: Technological capabilities and investment inefficiency in Korean chaebols. Economic Development and Cultural Change 57(2): 359–386.Google Scholar

Chu, Wan-wen (2009). Can Taiwan’s second movers upgrade via branding? Research Policy 38(6): 1054–1065.Google Scholar

Cimoli, Mario, Primi, Annalisa, and Rovira, Sebastián (2011). National innovation surveys in Latin America: Empirical evidence and policy implications. In National Innovation Surveys in Latin America: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications, ECLAC, Santiago, 7–14. LC/W. 408.Google Scholar

Cohen, M., and Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory. Organization Science 5: 554–568.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., and Levin, R. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M., and Levinthal, Daniel A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99(397): 569–596.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper, No. 7552.Google Scholar

Cohen, W., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Collis, D.J. (1994). How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal 15(Winter Special Issue): 143–152.Google Scholar

Constant, E. (1980). The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4): 945–974.Google Scholar

Cooper, Charles (Ed.) (1973). Science, Technology and Development: The Political Economy of Technical Advance in Underdeveloped Countries, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Coriat, B., and Dosi, G. (1998). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the co-evolution of competences, conflicts, and organizational routines. In Chandler, A., Hagstrom, P., and Solvell, O. (Eds.), The Dynamic Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar

Crawford, S.E.S., and Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review 89(3): 582–600.Google Scholar

Cyert, R.M., and March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Dahlman, Carl J., Westphal, Larry E., and Kim, Linsu (1985). Reflection on South Korea’s acquisition of technological capability. In Rosenberg, N. and Frischtak, C. (Eds.), International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

Daly, H.E. (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Daly, H.E., and Cobb, Jr., J.B. (1990). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future, Green Print, London.Google Scholar

Danneels, Erwin. (2008). Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal 29(5): 519–543.Google Scholar

Danneels, Erwin. (2012). Second-order competences and Schumpeterian rents. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 6(1): 42–58.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75: 332–337.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (1989). A paradigm for historical economics: Path dependence and predictability in dynamic systems with local network externalities. Working Paper, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (2001a). From keeping nature’s secrets to the institutionalization of open science. Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (2001b). Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics.” In Garrouste, P. and Ioannides, S. (Eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

David, P.A. (2004). Understanding the emergence of “open science” institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(3): 571–589.Google Scholar

David, P.A., and Hall, B. (2006). Property and the pursuit of knowledge: IPR issues affecting scientific research. Research Policy 35(6): 767–771.Google Scholar

Deeds, David L., DeCarolis, Dona, and Coombs, Joseph. (1999). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 15(3): 211–229.Google Scholar

Diamond, P., and Vartainen, H. (Eds.) (2007). Behavioral Economics and its Applications, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (Eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, Th. (1964). Biology, molecular and organismic source. American Zoologist 4(4): 443–452.Google Scholar

Dodgson, Mark, Hughes, Alan, Foster, John, and Metcalfe, Stan (2011). Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Research Policy 40(9): 1145–1156.Google Scholar

Dodgson, Mark, Mathews, John, Kastelle, Tim, and Hu, Mei-Chih (2008). The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research Policy 37(3): 430–445.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K. (Ed.) (2005). Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K., and Potts, J. (2008). The General Theory of Economic Evolution, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar

Dopfer, K., Foster, J., and Potts, J. (2004). Micro–meso–macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 263–279.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11(3): 147–162.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (1984). Technical Change and Industrial Transformation, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26(3): 1120–1171.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (2007). Statistical regularities in the evolution of industries: A guide through some evidence and challenges for the theory. In Malerba, F. and Brusoni, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (2014). Economic Organization, and Development: Selected Essays, Edward Elgar, London.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., and Nelson, R.R. (2010). Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In Bronwyn, H.H. and Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. I, Academic Press, Burlington, VA, pp. 51–128.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Marengo, L., and Pasquali, C. (2006). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy 35(8): 1110–1121.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (2000). The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., and Treibich, T. (2015). Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52: 166–189.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Faillo, M., Manara, V. Cecchini, Marengo, L., and Moschella, D. (2017a). The formalization of organizational capabilities and learning: Results and challenges. In Teece, D. and Leih, S. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Dynamics Capabilities, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Faillo, M., Marengo, L., and Moschella, D. (2011). Toward formal representations of search processes and routines in organizational problem solving: An assessment of the state-of-the-art. Seoul Journal of Economics 24(3): 247–286.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Grazzi, M., Tomasi, C., and Zeli, A. (2012). Turbulence underneath the big calm? The micro-evidence behind Italian productivity dynamics. Small Business Economics 39(4): 1043–1067.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Paraskevopoulou, E., Valente, M. et al. (2017b). A model of cognitive and operational memory of organizations in changing worlds. Cambridge Journal of Economics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., and Salvatore, R. (1995). Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures. Small Business Economics 7: 411–436.Google Scholar

Dutta, Shantanu, Narasimhan, Om, and Rajiv, Surendra. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal 26(3): 277–285.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K., and Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21(10–11): 1105–1121.Google Scholar

Eliasson, G. (1990). The firm as a competent team. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13(3): 275–298.Google Scholar

Elsner, W., Heinrich, T., and Schwardt, H. (2015). The Microeconomics of Complex Economies. Evolutionary, Institutional, Neoclassical, and Complexity Perspectives, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Ernst, Dieter, and Guerrieri, Paolo (1998). International production networks and changing trade patterns in East Asia: The case of the electronics industry. Oxford Development Studies 26(2): 191–212.Google Scholar

Ernst, Holger (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1): 1–40.Google Scholar

Essletzbichler, J., and Rigby, D.L. (2007). Exploring evolutionary economic geographies. Journal of Economic Geography 7(5): 549–571.Google Scholar

Ethiraj, S.K., and Levinthal, D. (2004). Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Administrative Science Quarterly 49(3): 404–437.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, Jan, and Godinho, Manuel M. (2005). Innovation and catching-up. In Mowery, D.C., Fagerberg, J., and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 514–543.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, Jan, and Srholec, Martin (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy 37: 1417–1435.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, J., and Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy 38(2): 218–233.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., and Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy 41(7): 1132–1153.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, Jan, Srholec, Martin, and Knell, M. (2007). The competitiveness of nations: Why some countries prosper while others fall behind. World Development 35: 1595–1620.Google Scholar

Fagerberg, Jan, Srholec, Martin, and Verspagen, Bart (2010). Innovation and economic development. In Hall, B. and Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 833–872.Google Scholar

Fang, C., Lee, J., and Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science 21(3): 625–642.Google Scholar

Feldman, M.S., and Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 94–118.Google Scholar

Felin, T., and Foss, N.J. (2011). The endogenous origins of experience, routines and organizational capabilities: The poverty of stimulus. Journal of Institutional Economics 7: 231–256.Google Scholar

Findlay, Ronald (1978). Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: A simple dynamic model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 92(1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Foray, D. (2006). The Economics of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fosfuri, Andrea, Motta, Massimo, and Rønde, Thomas (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility. Journal of International Economics 53(1): 205–222.Google Scholar

Foster, J. (2014). Energy, knowledge and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24(2): 209–238.Google Scholar

Foster, J., and Metcalfe, S.J. (2004). Evolution and Economic Complexity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Franco, April M., Sarkar, M.B., Agarwal, Rajshree, and Echambadi, Raj (2009). Swift and smart: The moderating effects of technological capabilities on the market pioneering–firm survival relationship. Management Science 55(11): 1842–1860.Google Scholar

Fransman, Martin (1985). Conceptualising technical change in the Third World in the 1980s: An interpretive survey. The Journal of Development Studies 21(4): 572–652.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation (2nd ed.), Pinter, London.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1983). Long Waves in the World Economy, Butterworth, Kent.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1984). Prometheus unbound. Futures, October, 490–500.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20(5): 499–514.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18: 463–514.Google Scholar

Freeman, C., and Louça, F. (2001). As Time Goes By, from the Industrial Revolution to the Information Revolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Freeman, C., and Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Dosi, G., Freeman, Ch., Nelson, R., Siverberg, G., and Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar

Freeman, C., Clark, J., and Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation, Pinter, London.Google Scholar

Frenken, K., Saviotti, P.P., and Trommetter, M. (1999). Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and microcomputers. Research Policy 28(5): 469–488.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Friedman, M, Essays on Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Garavaglia, C., Malerba, F., and Orsenigo, L. (2006). Entry, market structure and innovation in a history-friendly model of the pharmaceutical industry. In Mazzucato, M. and Dosi, G. (Eds.), Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution: The Case of Pharma-Biotech, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 234–265.Google Scholar

Garavaglia, C., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., and Pezzoni, M. (2013). Technological Regimes and Demand Structure in the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Industry, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar

Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science 16(6): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavetti, G., and Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1): 113–137.Google Scholar

Gerber, J.-F., and Steppacher, R. (Eds.) (2012). Towards an Integrated Paradigm in Heterodox Economics: Alternative Approaches to the Current Eco-Social Crisis, Palgrave Macmillan, UK.Google Scholar

Gereffi, Gary (2005). The global economy: Organization, governance, and development. The Handbook of Economic Sociology 2: 160–182.Google Scholar

Gereffi, Gary, Humphrey, John, and Sturgeon, Timothy (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.Google Scholar

Geroski, Paul A., Machin, Stephen J., and Walters, Christopher F. (1997). Corporate growth and profitability. The Journal of Industrial Economics 45(2): 171–189.Google Scholar

Gerschenkron, Alexander (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Frederik A. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

Gerschlager, C. (2012). Agents of change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22(3): 413–441.Google Scholar

Giachetti, Claudio (2013). Competitive Dynamics in the Mobile Phone Industry, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar

Giachetti, Claudio, and Marchi, Gianluca (2017). Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action. Research Policy 46(2): 337–534.Google Scholar

Giuliani, Elisa, Pietrobelli, Carlo, and Rabellotti, Roberta (2005). Upgrading in global value chains: Lessons from Latin American clusters. World Development 33(4): 549–573.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gorg, Holger, and Greenaway, David (2003). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment?, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 944. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=475044 (last accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar

Goto, Akira (1982). Business groups in a market economy. European Economic Review 19(1): 53–70.Google Scholar

Graf, H. (2009). Inventor networks in emerging key technologies: Information technology vs. semiconductors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22(3): 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Grebel, T. (2010). Innovation and Health: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons From Medieval Trade, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griliches, Z., and Mairesse, J. (1997). Production functions: The search for identification. Working Papers from Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, No. 97-30.Google Scholar

Gu, Shulin, Adeoti, John O., Castro, Ana Celita, Orozco, Jefferey, and Diaz, Rafael (2012). The agro-food sector in catching-up countries: A comparative study of four cases. In Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Guillén, Mauro F. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 362–380.Google Scholar

Guo, B. (2017). The rise to market leadership of Chinese leading automotive firms: A case of Geely Group from the sectoral innovation system perspective. In Malerba, F., Mani, S., and Adams, P. (Eds.), The Rise to Market Leadership, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Habakkuk, H.J. (1962). American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century: The Search for Labour-Saving Inventions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., and Sena, V. (2014). The choice of formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature 52(2): 375–423.Google Scholar

Hanusch, H. (Ed.) (1988). Evolutionary Economics: Applications of Schumpeter’s Ideas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hanusch, H., and Pyka, A. (2007). The principles of Neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31(2): 275–289.Google Scholar

Harper, D.A. (2014). Intellectual property as a complex adaptive system. In Pyka, A. and Foster, J. (Eds.), The Evolution of Economic and Innovation Systems, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar

Hausmann, Ricardo, Pritchett, Lant, and Rodrik, Dani (2005). Growth accelerations. Journal of Economic Growth 10(4): 303–329.Google Scholar

Hausmann, Ricardo, Rodrik, Dani, and Velasco, Andrés (2008). Growth diagnostics. In Serra, N. and Stiglitz, J.E. (Eds.), The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 324–355.Google Scholar

Hayami, Yujiro, and Ruttan, Vernon W. (1985). Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1994a). Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science 40(12): 1720–1747.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1994b). Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organization Science 5(2): 173–184.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal 18(5): 339–361.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E., and Campo-Rembado, M.A. (2016). Integrative capabilities, vertical integration, and innovation over successive technology lifecycles. Organization Science 27(2): 249–264.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E., and Martin, J. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: A review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management 41(5): 1281–1312.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E., and Peteraf, Margaret A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 997–1010.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E., and Winter, S.G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal 32: 1243–1250.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J., and Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Heller, M., and Eisenberg, R. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anti-commons in biomedical research. Science 280: 698–701.Google Scholar

Henderson, R.M., and Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30.Google Scholar

Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND Journal of Economics 27(1): 32–59.Google Scholar

Hidalgo, C.A., and Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS June 30, 106(26): 10575.Google Scholar

Hidalgo, César A., Klinger, Bailey, Barabási, A.-L., and Hausmann, Ricardo (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317(5837): 482–487.Google Scholar

Hobday, Michael (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan, Edward Elgar, London.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. (1968). Industry and Empire, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. (1993). Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2005). The concept of a routine. In Becker, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2016). On fuzzy frontiers and fragmented foundations: Some reflections on the original and new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Economics 10(4): 591–611.Google Scholar

Holt, R.P.F., Rosser Jr., B., and Colander, D. (2010). The complexity era in economics. Middlebury College Economics Discussion Paper, No. 10-01.Google Scholar

Hoopes, David G., and Postrel, Steven. (1999). Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal 20(9): 837–865.Google Scholar

Hoopes, D.G., Madsen, T., and Walker, G. (2003). Why is there a Resource-based View? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 889–902.Google Scholar

Hughes, T.P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Hull, D. (2001). Science and Selection, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1762). History of England.Google Scholar

Iizuka, Michiko, and Katz, Jorge (2011). Natural resource industries, “tragedy of the commons” and the case of Chilean salmon farming. International Journal of Institutions and Economies 3(2): 259–286.Google Scholar

Iizuka, Michiko, and Soete, Luc (2011). Catching-up in the 21st century: Globalization, knowledge & capabilities in Latin America, a case for natural resource based activities. MERIT Working Papers 071, United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).Google Scholar

Jacobides, M.G., and Winter, S.G. (2012). Capabilities: Structure, agency, and evolution. Organization Science 23(5): 1365–1381.Google Scholar

Johansson, D. (2009). The theory of the experimentally organized economy and competence blocs: An introduction. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20(2): 185–201.Google Scholar

Jones, Benjamin F., and Olken, Benjamin A. (2008). The anatomy of start-stop growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3): 582–587.Google Scholar

Jun, B., Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2017). The effect of education on growth and income distribution. Paper submitted to the 23rd Computing in Economics and Finance Conference, New York, June 28–30, 2017.Google Scholar

Kahl, S. (2014). Associations, jurisdictional battles, and the development of dual-purpose capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives 28(4): 381–394.Google Scholar

Katz, Jorge M. (1984). Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage: Further reflections on a comparative case-study program. Journal of Development Economics 16(1): 13–37.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2001). Structural reforms and technological behaviour: The sources and nature of technological change in Latin America in the 1990s. Research Policy 30(1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Katz, Jorge (2006). Market-oriented reforms, globalisation and the recent transformation of the production and social structure of developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management 36(13).Google Scholar

Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar

Khanna, Tarun, and Palepu, Krishna (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75: 41–54.Google Scholar

Khanna, Tarun, and Palepu, Krishna (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance 55(2): 867–891.Google Scholar

Kim, Linsu (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Kim, Yoon-Zi, and Lee, Keun (2009). Making a technological catch-up in the capital goods industry: Barriers and opportunities in the Korean case. In Malerba, Franco and Mani, Sunil (Eds.), Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, chapter 9.Google Scholar

Kim, Yee Kyoung, and Lee, Keun (2015). Different impacts of scientific and technological knowledge on economic growth: Contrasting science and technology policy in East Asia and Latin America. Asian Economic Policy Review 10(1): 43–66.Google Scholar

Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 145–182.Google Scholar

Klepper, S., and Graddy, E. (1990). The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure. Rand Journal of Economics 21: 27–44.Google Scholar

Klepper, S., and Simonis, K.L. (1997). The making of an oligopoly: Firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the U.S. tire industry. Paper presented at the Workshop on Economic Evolution, Learning and Complexity. Augsburg, Germany, May 1997.Google Scholar

Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24: 185–205.Google Scholar

Knudsen, T., and Levinthal, D. A. (2007). Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organization Science 18(1): 39–54.Google Scholar

Kock, Carl J., and Guillén, Mauro F. (2001). Strategy and structure in developing countries: Business groups as an evolutionary response to opportunities for unrelated diversification. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(1): 77–113.Google Scholar

Koopmans, T.C. (1957). Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Kudic, M. (2015). Innovation Networks in the German Laser Industry, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review 45: 1–28.Google Scholar

Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure and Spread, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjaya (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development 20(2): 165–186.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjaya (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured export, 1985–1998. Oxford Development Studies 28(3): 337–369.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjaya, and Teubal, M. (1998). “Market-stimulating” technology policies in developing countries: A framework with examples from East Asia. World Development 26(8): 1369–1385.Google Scholar

Landes, D.S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., and Denis, B. (2005). Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(5): 873–896.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., and Raybaut, A. (2005). Knowledge, hierarchy and the selection of routines: An interpretative model with group interactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15(4): 393–422.Google Scholar

Lazonick, W. (2005). The innovative firm. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun (2005). Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 13(2): 97–131.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun (2013a). Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-up: Knowledge, Path-Creation, and the Middle-Income Trap, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun (2013b). Capability failure and industrial policy to move beyond the middle-income trap: From trade-based to technology-based specialization. In Lin, J. and Stiglitz, J. (Eds.), Industrial Policy Revolution I, Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, and Ki, Jee-hoon (2017). Rise of the latecomers and catch-up cycles in the world steel industry. Research Policy, Special Issue on Catch-up Cycles, 46(2): 365–375.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, and Kim, Byung-Yeon (2009). Both institutions and policies matter but differently for different income groups of countries: Determinants of long-run economic growth revisited. World Development 37(3): 533–549.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, and Lim, Chaisung (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy 30(3): 459–483.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, and Malerba, Franco (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses by firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, Special Issue on Catch-up Cycles, 46(2): 338–351.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, and Temesgen, Tilahun (2009). What makes firms grow in developing countries? An extension of the resource-based theory of firm growth. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 2(3): 139–172.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, Gao, Xudong, and Li, Xibao (2017). Assessing industrial catch-up in China: A sectoral systems of innovation perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10(1): 59–76.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, Lim, Chaisung, and Song, Wichin (2005). Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: Catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms. International Journal of Technology Management 29(1/2): 40–63.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, Mani, Sunil, and Mu, Qing (2012). Explaining variations in the telecommunication equipment industry in Brazil, China, India and Korea. In Malerba, F. and Nelson, R. (Eds.), Economic Development as a Learning Process, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 21–71.Google Scholar

Lee, Keun, Song, Jaeyong, and Kwak, Jooyoung (2015). An exploratory study on the transition from OEM to OBM: Case studies of SMEs in Korea. Industry and Innovation 22(5): 423–442.Google Scholar

Leff, Nathaniel H. (1978). Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change 26(4): 661–675.Google Scholar

Levin, R.C., Cohen, W.M., and Mowery, D.C. (1985). R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review Proceedings 75: 20–24.Google Scholar

Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783–831.Google Scholar

Levinthal, D.A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science 43(7): 934–950.Google Scholar

Lim, C., Kim, Y., and Lee, K. (2017). Changes in industrial leadership and catch-up by latecomers in the shipbuilding industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation: 1–18.Google Scholar

Lin, Justin Y. (2012a). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Lin, Justin Y. (2012b). The Quest for Prosperity: How Developing Economies Can Take Off, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In Dosi, G., Freeman, Ch., Nelson, R., Siverberg, G., and Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1993). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In Foray, D. and Freeman, C. (Eds.), Technology and the Wealth of Nations: The Dynamics of Constructed Advantage, Pinter, New York, pp. 277–300.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2014). Deteriorating quality of work undermines Europe’s innovation systems and the welfare of Europe’s workers. http://portal.ukwon.eu/guest-essay (last accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2016). The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, Anthem Press, London.Google Scholar

Macher, J.T., and Mowery, D.C. (2009). Measuring dynamic capabilities: Practices and performance in semiconductor manufacturing. British Journal of Management 20: 41–62.Google Scholar

Malerba, F. (Ed.) (2004). Sectoral System of Innovation: Concepts, Issues, and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31(2): 247–264.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2009). Increase learning, break knowledge lock-ins and foster dynamic complementarities: Evolutionary and system perspectives on technology policy in industrial dynamics. In Foray, D. (Ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, and Mani, Sunil (2009). Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries: Actors, Structure and Evolution, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, and Nelson, Richard (2011). Learning and catching-up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 20(6): 1645–1675.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, and Nelson, Richard (2012). Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation Across Sectoral Systems, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, and Orsenigo, Luigi (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy 25(3): 451–478.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., and Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 83–117.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, Mani, Sunil, and Adams, Pamela (2017). The Rise to Market Leadership, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.Google Scholar

Malerba, F., Nelson, R.R., Orsenigo, L., and Winter, S.D. (1999) History-friendly models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 8(1): 3–4.Google Scholar

Malerba, Franco, Nelson, Richard, Orsenigo, Luigi, and Winter, Sidney (2016). Innovation and the Evolution of Industries: History-friendly Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mandeville, B. (1714). The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Public Benefits, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Reprinted in Kaye, F.B. (Ed.) (1924). Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Public Benefits, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mani, S. (2017). Market leadership in India’s pharmaceutical industry: The case of CIPLA Limited. In Malerba, F., Mani, S., and Adams, P. (Eds.), The Rise to Market Leadership, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science 32(2): 173–181.Google Scholar

March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.Google Scholar

March, J.G., and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Marengo, L. (1992). Coordination and organizational learning in the firm. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2(4): 313–326.Google Scholar

Marengo, L. (1996). Structure, competence and learning in an adaptive model of the firm. In Dosi, G. and Malerba, F. (Eds.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp. 124–154.Google Scholar

Marengo, L., and Dosi, G. (2005). Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58(2): 303–326.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1892). Elements of Economics of Industry, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and Trade, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar

Marsili, O. (2001). The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2010). Complexity thinking and economic geography. In Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 93–119.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1847). The Poverty of Philosophy (English version), Marx-Engels Institute, Moscow.Google Scholar

Mathews, John A. (1996). High technology industrialisation in East Asia. Journal of Industry Studies 3(2): 1–77.Google Scholar

Mathews, John A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19(4): 467–488.Google Scholar

Mathews, John A. (2005). Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review 47(2): 6–32.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, R., and Nelson, R.R. (1998). The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: A contribution to the current debate. Research Policy 27(3): 273–284.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Nelson, Richard R. (2006). The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch-up, LEM Working Paper Series, No. 1.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Nelson, Richard R. (2007). Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy 36(10): 1512–1528.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, R., and Nelson, R. (2013). An interpretive history of challenges to neoclassical microeconomics and how they have fared. Industrial and Corporate Change: 1–44.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking the Public vs. Private Myth in Risk and Innovation, Anthem Press, London.Google Scholar

Meliciani, V. (2002). The impact of technological specialisation on national performance in a balance-of-payments-constrained growth model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 13(1): 101–118.Google Scholar

Merges, R.P., and Nelson, R.R. (1994). On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 25(1): 1–24.Google Scholar

Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J.S. (1994). Evolutionary economics and technology policy. Economic Journal 104(425): 931–944.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J.S. (1998). Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2005). Systems failure and the case for innovation policy. In Llerena, P., Matt, M., and Avadikyan, A. (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-based Economy, Springer, Germany, pp. 47–74.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2014). Capitalism and evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24(1): 11–34.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J.S., Foster, J., and Ramlogan, R. (2006). Adaptive economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30(1): 7–32.Google Scholar

Mill, J.S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Longman Green and Co., London.Google Scholar

Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mokyr, J. (2002). The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2009). The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2010). The contribution of economic history to the study of innovation and technical change: 1750–1914. In Bronwyn, H.H. and Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. I, Academic Press, Burlington, VA, pp. 11–50.Google Scholar

Mokyr, J. (2017). Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Morrison, Andrea, Pietrobelli, Carlo, and Rabellotti, Roberta (2008). Global value chains and technological capabilities: A framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries. Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 39–58.Google Scholar

Mowery, David C., and Nelson, Richard R. (1999). Explaining industrial leadership. In Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 359–382.Google Scholar

Mowery, D., and Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy 8(2): 102–153.Google Scholar

Mowery, D., Nelson, R., and Martin, B. (2010). Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy 39: 1011–1023.Google Scholar

Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., and Ziedonis, A. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation, Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Muchie, Mammo, and Baskaran, Angathevar (2013). Creating Systems of Innovation in Africa: Country Case Studies 2, Asia, Tut and Aalborg University Publishers, Aalborg.Google Scholar

Muñoz, F.F., Encinar, M.I., and Cañibano, C. (2011). On the role of intentionality in evolutionary economic change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 22(3): 193–203.Google Scholar

Murmann, J.P. (2003). Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murmann, J.P., and Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy 35(7): 925–952.Google Scholar

Narayanan, V.K., Colwell, Ken, and Douglas, Frank L. (2009). Building organizational and scientific platforms in the pharmaceutical industry: A process perspective on the development of dynamic capabilities. British Journal of Management 20: S25–S40.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. (1981). Research on productivity growth and productivity differences: Dead ends and new departures. Journal of Economic Literature 19(3): 1029–1064.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1991). Why do firms differ and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. (Ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(1): 47–63.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature 33(1): 48–90.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1999). Why do firms differ and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal 12(S2): 61–74.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy 33(3): 455–471.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R. (2006). Reflections on “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research”: Looking back and looking forward. Industrial and Corporate Change 15: 145–149.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R. (2008a). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy 37(1): 1–11.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R. (2008b). Factors affecting the powers of technological paradigms. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: 485–497.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2008c). Routines as technologies and as organizational capabilities. In Becker, M.C. and Lazaric, N. (Eds.), Organizational Routines, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2008d). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 9–21.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2013). Demand, supply, and their interaction on markets as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23(1): 17–38.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. (2016). The behavior and cognition of economic actors in evolutionary economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 26(4): 737–751.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., and Consoli, D. (2010). An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20(5): 665–687.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R., and Pack, Howard (1999). The Asian miracle and modern growth theory. The Economic Journal 109(457): 416–436.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., and Sampat, B. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44(1): 31–54.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1974). Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: Critique and prospectus. The Economic Journal 84(336): 886–905.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1977). In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6: 36–76.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R., and Wolff, E.N. (1997). Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8(2): 205–220.Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R., Peck, J.M., and Kalachek, E.D. (1967). Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Niosi, Jorge, Athreye, Suma, and Tschang, Ted (2012). The global computer software sector. In Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation Across Sectoral Systems, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, p. 72.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W.D. (2007). Two centuries of productivity growth in computing. Journal of Economic History 67(1): 128–159.Google Scholar

North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Nuvolari, A. (2004). Collective invention during the British industrial revolution: The case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 347–363.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Basurto, X. (2011). Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics 7(3): 317–343.Google Scholar

Park, Kyoo-Ho, and Lee, Keun (2006). Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: Analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data. Industrial and Corporate Change 15(4): 715–753.Google Scholar

Pasinetti, L.L. (1981). Structural Change and Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pasinetti, L.L. (1993). Structural Economic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13: 343–373.Google Scholar

Pavitt, K. (1987). The objectives of technology policy. Science and Public Policy 14: 182–188.Google Scholar

Peneder, M. (2016). Competitiveness and industrial policy: From rationalities of failure towards the ability to evolve. Cambridge Journal of Economics, bew025. doi: 10.1093/cje/bew025.Google Scholar

Penrose, Edith Tilton (1995 [1st ed. 1959]). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, October, 357–375.Google Scholar

Perez, C. (1985). Microelectronics, long waves and structural change: New perspectives for developing countries. World Development 13(3): 441–463.Google Scholar

Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Perez, C. (2014). Financial bubbles, crises and the role of government in unleashing golden ages. In Burghof, H.P. and Pyka, A. (Eds.), Innovation and Finance, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

Perez, Carlos, and Soete, Luc (1988). Catching-up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity, Pinter, New York.Google Scholar

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Potts, J. (2011). Creative Industries and Economic Evolution, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–145.Google Scholar

Pyka, A. (2000). Informal networking and industrial life cycles. Technovation 20(1): 25–35.Google Scholar

Pyka, A. (2002). Innovation networks in economics: From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based approaches. European Journal of Innovation Management 5(3): 152–163.Google Scholar

Ramani, Shyama V., and Guennif, Samira (2012). Catching-up in the pharmaceutical sector: Lessons from case studies of India, Thailand and Brazil. In Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Economic Development as a Learning Process, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, pp. 157–193.Google Scholar

Rammel, Ch., Stagl, S., and Wilfing, H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems: A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics 63(1): 9–21.Google Scholar

Rasiah, Rajah (2006). Electronics in Malaysia: Export expansion but slow technical change. In Chandra, V. (Ed.), Technology, Adaptation, and Exports: How Some Developing Countries Got it Right, World Bank, Washington, DC, p. 127.Google Scholar

Rasiah, Rajah, Kong, Xin-Xin, Lin, Yeo, and Song, Jaeyong (2012). Explaining variations in catch-up strategies in Malaysia, China and Taiwan. In Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Economic Development as a Learning Process, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, pp. 113–156.Google Scholar

Rhee, Yung W., Westphal, Larry E., Kim, Linsu, and Amsden, Alice H. (1984). Republic of Korea. World Development 12(5): 505–533.Google Scholar

Richerson, P.J., and Boyd, R. (2005). Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Rivkin, J.W., and Siggelkow, N. (2003). Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Science 49(3): 290–311.Google Scholar

Robert, V., and Yoguel, G. (2016). Complexity paths in neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics, structural change and development policies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 38: 3–13.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Clare, Andres (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. The American Economic Review 86(4): 852–873.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’s economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature 44(4): 973–987.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2015). Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science, Norton, New York.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. (1963). Mandeville and laissez-faire. Journal of the History of Ideas 24(2): 183–196.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N., and Birdzell, L. (1986). How the West Grew Rich, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Rosenbloom, R.S., and Cusumano, M.A. (1987). Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: The birth of the VCR industry. California Management Review 29(4): 51–76.Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F.T., and Hess, A.M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science 18(6): 898–921.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R.P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Lamb, R. (Ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 556–570.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R.P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal 12(3): 167–185.Google Scholar

Rutherford, M. (1994). Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1996). Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ruttan, V.W. (2006). Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey, and Warner, Andrew (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth, NBER Working Paper No. 5398.Google Scholar

Safarzyńska, K., Frenken, K., and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2012). Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transition. Research Policy 41(6): 1011–1024.Google Scholar

Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of Technological Innovation, Addison-Wesley, New York.Google Scholar

Sahal, D. (1985). Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy 14(2): 61–82.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P. (1996). Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P., and Pyka, A. (2004). Economic development by the creation of new sectors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2008a). Product variety, competition and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18: 167–182.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2008b). Micro and macro dynamics: Industry life cycles, inter-sector coordination and aggregate growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18: 323–348.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2013a). The co-evolution of innovation, demand and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22: 461–482.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2013b). From necessities to imaginary worlds: Structural change, product quality and economic development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80(8): 1499–1512.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., and Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation, structural change and demand evolution: Does demand saturate? Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27(2): 337–358.Google Scholar

Saviotti, P.P., Pyka, A., and Jun, B. (2016). TEVECON: Description of model. www.researchgate.net/publication/292130135_TEVECON_Description_of_Model?ev=srch_pub (last accessed November 11, 2017).Google Scholar

Schamp, E.W. (2010). On the notion of co-evolution in economic geography. In Boschma, R. and Martin, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 432–449.Google Scholar

Scherer, F.M. (1984). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Scherer, F.M., Herzstein, S., Dreyfoos, A., et al. (1959). Patents and the Corporation (2nd ed.), privately published, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Schmalensee, R., and Willig, R. (Eds.) (1989). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Schroeder, H. (2011). Application possibilities of the micro-meso-macro framework in economic geography. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 11(15), Utrecht University.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J.A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. English edition, 1934.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1939). Business Cycles, A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper, New York.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (3rd ed.), Harper, New York.Google Scholar

Siggelkow, N., and Levinthal, D.A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 14(6): 650–669.Google Scholar

Siggelkow, N., and Rivkin, J.W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science 16(2): 101–122.Google Scholar

Silverberg, G. (2007). Long waves, conceptual, empirical and modelling issues. In Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A. (Eds.), Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Silverberg, G., and Lehnert, D. (1993). Long waves and “evolutionary chaos” in a simple Schumpeterian model of embodied technical change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4: 9–37.Google Scholar

Silverberg, G., and Lehnert, D. (1994). Growth fluctuations in an evolutionary model of creative destruction. In Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (Eds.), The Economics of Growth and Technical Change: Technologies, Nations, Agents, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar

Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B. (1995). An evolutionary model of long term cyclical variations of catching up and falling behind. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 5: 209–227.Google Scholar

Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B. (2005). Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth. In Dopfer, K. (Ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1957a). Models of Man, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1957b). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In Latsis, S. (Ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 129–148.Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (1981). The Science of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (2005). Darwinism, altruism and economics. In Dopfer, K. (Ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Penguin Books, London, 1986.Google Scholar

Soete, L., and Turner, R. (1984). Technological diffusion and the rate of technical change. The Economic Journal 94(375): 612–623.Google Scholar

Spender, J.C. (1989). Industry Recipes: The Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Stadler, C., Helfat, C.E., and Verona, G. (2013). The impact of dynamic capabilities on resource access and development. Organization Science 24(6): 1782–1804.Google Scholar

Stigler, G.J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy 59: 185–193.Google Scholar

Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Strohmaier, R. (2014). The evolution of economic structure under pervasive technical change: A methodological and empirical study. GSC Discussion Paper No. 07.Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Timothy J., and Gereffi, Gary (2009). Measuring success in the global economy: International trade, industrial upgrading and business function outsourcing in global value chains. Transnational Corporations 18(2): 1.Google Scholar

Suarez, F., and Utterback, J.M. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal 16: 415–430.Google Scholar

Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature 49: 326–365.Google Scholar

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(S2): 27–43.Google Scholar

Teece, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6): 285–305.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (1987). Capturing value from a technological innovation. In Guile, B.R. and Brooks, H. (Eds.), Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nation in the World Economy, National Academic Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(13): 1319–1350.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2011). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management; Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Helfat, C.E. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies 49(8): 1395–1401.Google Scholar

Teece, D.J, Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.Google Scholar

Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(2): 341–377.Google Scholar

Tushman, M.L., and Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–465.Google Scholar

Tybout, James R. (2000). Manufacturing firms in developing countries: How well do they do, and why? Journal of Economic Literature 38(1): 11–44.Google Scholar

Utterback, J.M. (1987). Innovation and industrial evolution in manufacturing industries. In Guile, B.R. and Brooks, H. (Eds.), Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nation in the World Economy, National Academic Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Utterback, J.M. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Utterback, J.M., and Abernathy, W. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 33: 639–656.Google Scholar