Book contents
- Model(ing) Justice
- Model(ing) Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Table of Authorities
- Introduction
- Part I Theorizing International Criminal Justice
- Part II Applying International Criminal Law’s Paradoxes to Paradigmatic International Criminal Law Doctrine: Post-Rule-of-Law Procedure, and Illiberal Theories of Culpability
- Part III Narrative and Discourse Emerging from International Criminal Justice Mechanisms
- Conclusion
- Appendix A ICTY Prosecutions as of June 20181
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 November 2018
Book contents
- Model(ing) Justice
- Model(ing) Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Table of Authorities
- Introduction
- Part I Theorizing International Criminal Justice
- Part II Applying International Criminal Law’s Paradoxes to Paradigmatic International Criminal Law Doctrine: Post-Rule-of-Law Procedure, and Illiberal Theories of Culpability
- Part III Narrative and Discourse Emerging from International Criminal Justice Mechanisms
- Conclusion
- Appendix A ICTY Prosecutions as of June 20181
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Model(ing) JusticePerfecting the Promise of International Criminal Law, pp. 214 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Ainley, Kirsten. “Evaluating the Evaluators: Transitional Justice and the Contest of Values.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 11, no. 3 (2017): 421–442.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam. “Justice in The Hague, Peace in the Former Yugoslavia? A Commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal.” Human Rights Quarterly 20, no. 4 (1998): 737–816.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam.“Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” The American Journal of International Law 95, no. 1 (2001): 7–31.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam.Reducing Genocide to Law: Definition, Meaning, and the Ultimate Crime. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam.“The Rise, and Fall, and Rise, of International Criminal Justice.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 11 (2013): 527–536.Google Scholar
Aksenova, Marina. “The Specific Direction Requirement in Aiding and Abetting: A Call for Revisiting Comparative Criminal Law.” Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 4, no. 1 (2015): 88–107.Google Scholar
Alexander, Ronelle. “Language and Identity: The Fate of Serbo-Croatian.” In Entangled Balkans, edited by Daskalov, Rumen and Marinov, Tchavdar. Brill, 2013, 341–417.Google Scholar
Alexander, Ronelle and Elias-Bursać., Ellen Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian: A Textbook with Exercises and Basic Grammar. University of Wisconsin Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ali, Rabia and Lifschultz, Lawrence. Why Bosnia? Writings on the Balkan War. Pamphleteer’s Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip.“The Concept of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 10, no. 1 (1999): 31–50.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip.The Health of Nations: Society and Law beyond the State. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Helfer, Laurence R.. “Legal Integration in the Andes: Law-Making by the Andean Tribunal of Justice.” European Law Journal 17, no. 5 (2011): 701–715.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E. “Rush to Closure: Lessons of the Tadić Judgment.” Michigan Law Review 96, no. 7 (1998): 2031–2112.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E.“Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda.” Yale Journal of International Law 24 (1999): 365.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E.“Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughter’s Liberal Theory.” European Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (2001): 183–246.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai. “Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law: A Jurisprudential Analysis – From Nuremberg to the Hague.” In Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts, edited by Kirk-McDonald, Gabrielle and Swaak-Goldman, Olivia. Kluwer Law International, 2000, 1–31.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai“International Criminal Procedure: ‘Adversarial’, ‘Inquisitorial’ or Mixed?” Third International Criminal Law Review 3 (2003): 1–37.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, 2006.Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi. “Advocating for an International Criminal Court.” Fordham International Law Journal 21, no. 2 (1997): 363–366.Google Scholar
Anzulovic, Branimir. Heavenly Serbia: From Myth to Genocide. New York University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise. “The Prosecution of International Crimes: Prospects and Pitfalls.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 1 (1999a): 13.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise.“The Status of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Goals and Results.” Paper presented at the Hofstra Law and Policy Symposium, 1999b.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise.“In Our Name and on Our Behalf.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006): 511–526.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise.“Economic and Social Justice for Societies in Transition.” NYU Journal of International Law and Policy 40 (2007): 1.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth A. and Cage, Suzanna M.. “Movements and Memory: The Making of the Stonewall Myth.” American Sociological Review 71, no. 5 (2006): 724–751.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. Principles of Criminal Law (sixth edition). Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan and Czaplicka, John. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique 65 (1995): 125–133.Google Scholar
Babic, Jovan. “War Crimes: Moral, Legal, or Simply Political?” in War Crimes and Collective Wrongdoing: A Reader, edited by Aleksandar, Jokić. Wiley-Blackwell, 2001, 57–71.Google Scholar
Badar, Mohamed Elewa. “‘Just Convict Everyone!’ – Joint Perpetration: From Tadić to Stakić and Back Again.” International Criminal Law Review 6 (2006): 293–302.Google Scholar
Bagaric, Mirko and Morss, John. “International Sentencing Law: In Search of a Justification and Coherent Framework.” International Criminal Law Review 6 (2006): 191.Google Scholar
Baker, Catherine. “Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest.” Contemporary Southeastern Europe 2, no. 1 (2015): 74–93.Google Scholar
Banac, Ivo. The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics. Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Banac, Ivo.Raspad Jugoslavije: eseji o nacionalizmu i nacionalnim sukobima. Durieux, 2001.Google Scholar
Baruma, Ian. The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan. Farrar Straus, and Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary Jonathan. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. “Nuremberg Forty Years after: An Introduction.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 18 (1986): 261.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif.“Crimes against Humanity: The Need for a Specialized Convention.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 31 (1993): 457.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif.“Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice: The Need for Accountability.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 4 (1996): 9–28.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif.International Criminal Law: Multilateral and Bilateral Enforcement Mechanisms. Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif.Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif.Introduction to International Criminal Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Brill Academic Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Manikas, Peter. The Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Transnational Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (ed). Beccaria: On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Beresford, Stuart. “Unshackling the Paper Tiger – The Sentencing Practices of the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.” International Criminal Law Review 1 (2001): 33.Google Scholar
Beschloss, Michael R. The Conquerors: Roosevelt, Truman and the Destruction of Hitler’s Germany, 1941–1945. Simon & Schuster, 2003.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bickford, Louis. “Human Rights Archives and Research on Historical Memory: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay.” Latin American Research Review 35, no. 2 (2000): 160–182.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, David. “On Good Terms: Clarifying Reconciliation.” Berghof Report No. 14 (2006).Google Scholar
Bloxham, Donald. Genocide on Trial: War Crimes Trials and the Formation of Holocaust History and Memory. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon. “Creating Laws of Evidence for International Criminal Law: The ICTY and the Principle of Flexibility.” Criminal Law Forum 12, no. 1 (2001): 41–90.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon.The Milošević Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon, Schabas, William A., and Scharf, Michael P.. International Criminal Justice: Legitimacy and Coherence. Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. “Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey and Pollack, Mark. Cambridge University Press, 2012, 321–342.Google Scholar
Boerma, N. Westendorp. “Collective Guilt (A Survey).” Synthese 8, no. 3/5 (1950): 213–221.Google Scholar
Bohlander, Michael. “Plea Bargaining Before the ICTY.” Available at SSRN 1592902 (2000).Google Scholar
Bohlander, Michael. “Language, Culture, Legal Traditions, and International Criminal Justice.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 12, no. 3 (2014): 491.Google Scholar
Bolton, John R. “The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court from America’s Perspective.” Law and Contemporary Problems 64, no. 1 (2001): 167–180.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon., Alexander. “Can Truth Telling Promote Reconciliation?” The Collection of TRC Speeches (1998): 1.Google Scholar
Boraine, Alexander L. “Transitional Justice: A Holistic Interpretation.” Journal of International Affairs-Columbia University 60, no. 1 (2006): 17.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. Settling Accounts: Violence, Justice, and Accountability in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. “Reconciliation after Ethnic Cleansing: Listening, Retribution, Affiliation.” Public Culture 14, no. 2 (2002): 281–304.Google Scholar
Bose, Sumantra. Bosnia after Dayton: Nationalist Partition and International Intervention. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. “A Grotian Moment.” Fordham International Law Journal 18 (1994): 1609.Google Scholar
Brannigan, Augustine. “Is the Sun Setting on Cosmopolitan Justice?” Society 48 (2011): 420–425.Google Scholar
Brants, Chrisje, Field, Stewart, and Jörg, Nico. “Are Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Converging?” In Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study, edited by Harding, Christopher, Fennel, Philip, Jörg, Nico, and Swart, Bert. Clarendon Press, 1995, 41–56.Google Scholar
Bringa, Tone. Being Muslim the Bosnian Way: Identity and Community in a Central Bosnian Village. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich. “The New Imperialism: Violence, Norms, and the ‘Rule of Law’.” Michigan Law Review 101, no. 7 (2003): 2275–2340.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. HarperCollins Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law (fifth edition). Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Burchard, Christoph. “The Nuremberg Trial and Its Impact on Germany.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006): 800–829.Google Scholar
Burg, Steven L. and Shoup, Paul S.. The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnic Conflict and International Intervention. M.E. Sharpe, 1999.Google Scholar
Burns, Peter. “An International Criminal Tribunal: The Difficult Union of Principle and Politics.” Criminal Law Forum 5 (1994): 341.Google Scholar
Buruma, Ian. The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan. Farrar Straus Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar
Buscher, Frank M. The US War Crimes Trial Program in Germany, 1946–1955. Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Caianiello, Michele. “Law of Evidence at the International Criminal Court: Blending Accusatorial and Inquisitorial Models.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 36, no. 2 (2010): 287–318.Google Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter Emmanuel, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A.. Handbook of International Relations. Sage Publications Ltd, 2012.Google Scholar
Carlson, Kerstin Bree. “Post Rule of Law: The Structural Problem of Hybridity in International Criminal Procedure.” The Italian Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2016): 33–64.Google Scholar
Carlson, Kerstin Bree“Reconciliation through a Judicial Lens: Competing Legitimation Frameworks in the ICTY’s Plavšić and Babić Judgments.” Denver Journal of International & Comparative Law 44, no. 2 (2016): 281–322.Google Scholar
Carlson, Kerstin Bree“International Criminal Law and Its Paradoxes: Implications for Institutions and Practice” Journal of Law & Courts 5, no. 1 (2017): 33–53.Google Scholar
Carlson, Kerstin, Babcock-Halaholo, Daska, Mahle, Anne, Fletcher, Laurel, Weinstein, Harvey, and Arnault, Damir. “Justice, Accountability and Social Reconstruction: An Interview Study of Bosnian Judges and Prosecutors.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 18, no. 1 (2000): 102–164.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. Criminal Courts: The Defendant’s Perspective. University of Michigan Library, 1978.Google Scholar
Caspersen, Nina. Contested Nationalism: Serb Elite Rivalry in Croatia and Bosnia in the 1990s. Berghahn Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Caspersen, Nina and Stansfield, Gareth R. V.. Unrecognized States in the International System. Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. “On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 9 (1998a): 2–17.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio.“Reflections on International Criminal Justice.” Modern Law Review 61 (1998b): 1.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. “The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007a): 133.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. “On Some Problematical Aspects of the Crime of Aggression.” Leiden Journal of International Law 20 (2007b): 841, 844.Google Scholar
Cibelli, Kristen and Guberek, Tamy. “Justice Unknown, Justice Unsatisfied: Bosnian NGOs Speak About the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Tufts University, 2000.Google Scholar
Citron, Rodger. “The Nuremberg Trials and American Jurisprudence: The Decline of Legal Realism and the Revival of Natural Law.” In The Nuremberg Trials: International Criminal Law Since 1945, edited by Reginbogin, Herbert and Safferling, Christoph. De Gruyter Saur, 2006 : 139–150.Google Scholar
Civikov, Germinal. Srebrenica. Der Kronzeuge (Srebrenica: The Star Witness). Promedia, (2009).Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya. “Plea Bargaining at the ICTY: Guilty Pleas and Reconciliation.” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 2 (2009): 415–436.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya.“Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court Limitations and Possibilities.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 9, no. 3 (2011): 521–545.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine Natalya.International Trials and Reconciliation: Assessing the Impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Clark, Roger S. “Nuremberg and the Crime against Peace.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 6 (2007): 527–550.Google Scholar
Climo, Jacob J. and Cattell, Maria G.. Social Memory and History: Anthropological Perspectives. Altamira Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cogan, Jacob. “International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials: Difficulties and Prospects.” Yale Journal of International Law 27 (2002): 111.Google Scholar
Cohen, David. “Beyond Nuremberg: Individual Responsibility for War Crimes.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by Post, Robert and Hesse, Carla. Zone Books, 1999, 53–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, David.Indifference and Accountability: The United Nations and the Politics of International Justice in East Timor. EastWest Institute, 2006a.Google Scholar
Cohen, David. “Transitional Justice in Divided Germany 1945.” In Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon. Cambridge University Press, 2006b, 59–88.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lenard J. The Socialist Pyramid: Elites and Power in Yugoslavia. Mosaic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lenard J. Broken Bonds: Yugoslavia’s Disintegration and Balkan Politics in Transition. Westview Press Boulder, 1995.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lenard J. and Dragović-Soso., Jasna State Collapse in South-Eastern Europe: New Perspectives on Yugoslavia’s Disintegration. Purdue University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Collin, Matthew. Guerrilla Radio: Rock n Roll Radio and Serbia’s Underground Resistance. Nation Books, 2001.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy. “Procuring Guilty Pleas for International Crimes: The Limited Influence of Sentencing Discounts.” Vanderbilt Law Review 59, no. 1 (2006): 69.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy.“Testimonial Deficiencies and Evidentiary Uncertainties in International Criminal Trials.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 14, no. 1 (2009): 235.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy. Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa.“Cultural Memory.” In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by Tilley, Chris, Keane, Webb, Kuechler, Susanne, Rowlands, Mike, and Spyer, Patricia. Sage Publications Limited, 2006, 315–324.Google Scholar
Conrad, Clay S. Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine. Carolina Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Cook, Julian A. “Plea Bargaining at The Hague.” Yale Journal of International Law 30 (2005): 473–506.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. “The Origins of Judicial Activism in the Protection of Minorities.” The Yale Law Journal 91, no. 7 (1982): 1287–1316.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M.“Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95, no. 8 (1986): 1601–1629.Google Scholar
Crocker, David. “Truth Commissions, Transitional Justice, and Civil Society.” In Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions, edited by Rotberg, Robert I. and Thompson, Dennis. Princeton University Press, 2000, 309.Google Scholar
Crocker, David. “Reckoning with Past Wrongs: A Normative Framework.” In Dilemmas of Reconciliation: Cases and Concepts, edited by Prager, Carol A. and Govier, Rudy. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2003, 39–63.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert. “One Appeal, Two Philosophies, Four Opinions, and a Remittal: The Erdemovic Case at the ICTY Appeals Chamber.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2, no. 2, (1997): 193–208.Google Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald. The Alchemists: Questioning our Faith in Courts as Democracy-Builders. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan. “Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 506 (1973): 506–589.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan.“The Reality of Prosecutorial Discretion: Comments on a German Monograph.” American Journal of Comparative Law 29 (1981): 119.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan.The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan.“The International Criminal Court between Aspiration and Achievement.” UCLA Journal of Law and Foreign Affairs 14 (2009): 19.Google Scholar
Danner, Alison. “Constructing a Hierarchy of Crimes in International Criminal Law Sentencing.” Virginia Law Review 87, no. 3 (2001): 415–501.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison.“Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court.” The American Journal of International Law 97 (2003): 510–552.Google Scholar
Danner, Alison Marston and Martinez, Jenny S.. “Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law.” California Law Review 93, no. 1 (2005): 75–170.Google Scholar
Darrow, Mac and Arbour, Louise. “The Pillar of Glass: Human Rights in the Development Operations of the United Nations.” The American Journal of International Law 103 (2009): 446–501.Google Scholar
D’Ascoli, Silvia. Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The Approach of the Two ad hoc Tribunals and Future Perspectives for the International Criminal Court. Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eugene. The Death and Life of Germany: An Account of the American Occupation. Knopf, 1959.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eugene.The Nuremberg Fallacy: Wars and War Crimes since World War II. Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eugene.The Trial of the Germans: An Account of the Twenty-two Defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. University of Missouri, 1997.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Louisiana State University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Deák, István, Gross, Jan T., and Judt, Tony. The Politics of Retribution in Europe. Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille, “The Contribution of Comparative Law to a Pluralist Conception of International Criminal Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1, no 1 (2003): 13–25.Google Scholar
Del Ponte, Carla and Sudetic, Chuck. Madame Prosecutor: Confrontations with Humanity’s Worst Criminals and Culture of Impunity. Other Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte. “What are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought.” Human Rights Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2010): 1–20.Google Scholar
De Than, Claire and Heaton, Russel. Criminal Law (fourth edition). Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dietrich, John. The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy. Algora Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rodney and Demerdjian, Alexis. “Advising Defendants about Guilty Pleas before International Courts.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 680–694.Google Scholar
Dizdarević, Raif. Put u raspad : stenogrami izlaganja Raifa Dizdarevića u raspravama iza zatvorenih vrata dr žavnog i politi čkog vrha Jugoslavije. Institut za istoriju, 2011.Google Scholar
Donia, Professor Robert J. and Professor John, V. A. Fine Bosnia and Hercegovina: A Tradition Betrayed. Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. “Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 6 (1984): 400.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence. The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Drakulic, Slavenka. “The False Repentance of Biljana Plavsic.” Eurozine (October 23, 2009).Google Scholar
Drapac, Vesna. “The End of Yugoslavia.” Contemporary European History 10, no. 2 (2001): 317–331.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark. “Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity.” Northwestern University Law Review 99, no. 2 (Winter 2005): 539–610.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A.Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. “The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (review).” Human Rights Quarterly 31, no. 3 (2009): 801–806.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. “Can We Punish the Perpetrators of Atrocities?” In The Religious in Response to Mass Atrocity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Brudholm, Thomas and Cushman, Thomas. Cambridge University Press, 2009: 79–104.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. “Relational Reasons and the Criminal Law I.” In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 2, edited by Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian. Oxford University Press, 2013: 175–208.Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, Norbert. The Nuremberg Legacy: How the Nazi War Crimes Trials Changed the Course of History. St. Martin’s Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Mel. “Private Ordering Through Negotiation: Dispute Settlement and Rulemaking.” Harvard Law Review 89 (1976): 637.Google Scholar
Ellis, Mark S. and Goldstone, Richard. The International Criminal Court: Challenges to Achieving Justice and Accountability in the 21st Century. International Debate Education Association, 2008.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ely, John. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Erozden, Ozan. “Croatia & the EU: A Difficult Year of Cooperation.” Central European University, 2002.Google Scholar
Esman, Milton J. and Herring, Ronald J.. Carrots, Sticks, and Ethnic Conflict: Rethinking Development Assistance. University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Estrin, Saul. Self-Management: Economic Theory and Yugoslav Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. “History, Memory, and the Law: The Historian as Expert Witness.” History and Theory 41, no. 3 (2002): 326–345.Google Scholar
Ewald, Uwe. “‘Predictably Irrational’: International Sentencing and Its Discourse against the Backdrop of Preliminary Empirical Findings on ICTY Sentencing Practices.” International Criminal Law Review 10, no. 3 (2010): 365–402.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S.. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fairlie, Megan. “The Marriage of Common and Continental Law at the ICTY and its Progeny, Due Process Deficit.” International Criminal Law Review 4 (2004): 243–319.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. “Perspectives on Plea Bargaining.” Law & Society Review 13, no. 2 (1979): 199–209.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Rubin, Edward. Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise. University of Michigan Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Rubin, Edward. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Field, Stewart and West, Andrew. “A Tale of Two Reforms: French Defense Rights and Police Powers in Transition.” Criminal Law Forum 6, no. 3 (1995): 473–506.Google Scholar
Finch, George A. “The Nuremberg Trial and International Law.” The American Journal of International Law 41, no. 1 (1947): 20–37.Google Scholar
Findlay, Mark. “Synthesis in Trial Procedures? The Experience of International Criminal Tribunals.” International and Comparative Legal Quarterly 50 (2001): 26–53.Google Scholar
FineJr., John V. A. When Ethnicity Did Not Matter in the Balkans: A Study of Identity in Pre-Nationalist Croatia, Dalmatia, and Slavonia in the Medieval and Early-Modern Periods. University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Finkielkraut, Alain. La mémoire vaine: du crime contre l’humanité. Editions Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. and Resnik, Judith. Adjudication and Its Alternatives: An Introduction to Procedure. Foundation Press, Thomson/West, 2003.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P.“The Storrs Lectures: Liberals and Romantics at War: The Problem of Collective Guilt.” Yale Law Journal 111, no. 7 (2002): 1499–1573.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P.“Collective Guilt and Collective Punishment.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5, no. 1 (2004): 163–178.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Laurel E. and Weinstein, Harvey M.. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation.” Human Rights Quarterly 24, no. 3 (2002): 573–639.Google Scholar
Focarelli, Carlo. International Law as Social Construct: The Struggle for Global Justice. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas. “The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights.” Journal of Social Philosophy 40, no. 4 (2009): 595–607.Google Scholar
Ford, Stuart. “A Social Psychology Model of the Perceived Legitimacy of International Criminal Courts: Implications for the Success of Transitional Justice Mechanisms.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 45 (2012): 405.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Tuomas. “The Philosophy and Practice of Dealing with the Past: Some Conceptual and Normative Issues.” In Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice, edited by Biggar, Nigel. Georgetown University Press, 2003: 65–84.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Fossedal, Gregory A. Our Finest Hour: Will Clayton, the Marshall Plan, and the Triumph of Democracy. Hoover Institute Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Vintage, 1980.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. “Legitimacy in the International System.” The American Journal of International Law 82, no. 4 (1988): 705–759.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M.Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert. Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration. Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Saul. Memory, History, and the Extermination of the Jews of Europe. Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 630–672.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law: Revised Edition (The Storrs Lectures Series). Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gagnon, V. P. The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine and Papadopoulous, Ioannis. Juger en Amerique at en France: Culture juridique française et common law. Odile Jakobs, 2004.Google Scholar
Garland, David. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Garland, David.The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gibson, Catherine. “Testing the Legitimacy of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine in the ICTY: A Comparison of Individual Liability for Group Conduct in International and Domestic Law.” Duke Journal Comparative and International Law 18, no. 521 (2008): 521–547.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23, no. 3 (1989): 469–496.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L.“The Contributions of Truth to Reconciliation: Lessons from South Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, no. 3 (2006): 409–432.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gissel, Line Engbo. “Contemporary Transitional Justice: Normalising a Politics of Exception.” Global Society (2016): 1–17.Google Scholar
Glasius, Marlies. “Do International Criminal Courts Require Democratic Legitimacy?” European Journal of International Law 23 (2012): 43–66.Google Scholar
Glenny, Misha.The Balkans: Nationalism, War, and the Great Powers, 1804–2011. Penguin Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Golden, Charles. “Where Does Memory Reside, and Why Isn’t It History?” American Anthropologist 107, no. 2 (2005): 270–274.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Vintage, 1996.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Abraham S. and Marcus, Martin. “The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three ‘Inquisitorial’ Systems: France, Italy, and Germany.” Yale Law Journal 87, no. 2 (1977): 240–283.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard J. “50 Years after Nuremberg: A New International Criminal Tribunal for Human Rights Criminals.” In Contemporary Genocides: Causes, Cases, Consequences, edited by Jongman, Albert J.. PIOOM, 1996, 215.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark. Surrendering to Utopia: An Anthropology of Human Rights. Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gregory S. “Toward an International Criminal Procedure: Due Process Aspirations and Limitations.” Bepress Legal Series (2006): 1695.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sarah S. Hitler, Germans, and the Jewish Question. Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Gow, James and Kerr, Rachel. “Introduction: Trials and Tribulations at the ICTY” in Prosecuting War Crimes: Lessons and Legacies of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, edited by Gow, James, Kerr, Rachel, and Pajić, Zoran. Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Grande, Elisabetta “Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance.” American Journal of Comparative Law 48 (2000): 227.Google Scholar
Grande, Elisabetta “Comparative Criminal Justice.” In The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law, edited by Mattei, Mauro Bussani-Ugo. 2012, 191–209.Google Scholar
Gray, David. “An Excuse-Centered Approach to Transitional Justice.” Fordham Law Review 74 (2006): 2621.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jessica. “‘There’s Nothing Anyone Can Do About It’: Participation, Apathy, and ‘Successful’ Democratic Transition in Postsocialist Serbia.” Slavic Review 69, no. 1 (2010): 41–64.Google Scholar
Grodsky, Brian. “Re-Ordering Justice: Towards A New Methodological Approach to Studying Transitional Justice.” Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 6 (2009): 819–837.Google Scholar
Gross, Jan Tomasz. Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland. Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Grossman, Nienke. “The Normative Legitimacy of International Courts.” Temple Law Review 86 (2013): 61–106.Google Scholar
Hafetz, Jonathan. Punishing Atrocities through a Fair Trial: International Criminal Law from Nuremberg to the Age of Global Terrorism. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hagan, John and Levi, Ron. “Crimes of War and the Force of Law.” Social Forces 83 (2005): 1499–1534.Google Scholar
Hagan, John and Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja. “War Crimes, Democracy, and the Rule of Law in Belgrade, the Former Yugoslavia, and Beyond.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605, no. 1 (2006): 129–151.Google Scholar
Hagan, John and Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja. Reclaiming Justice: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Local Courts. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Halpern, Jodi and Weinstein, Harvey M.. “Rehumanizing the Other: Empathy and Reconciliation.” Human Rights Quarterly 26 (2004): 561.Google Scholar
Hamdorf, Kai and “The Concept of a Joint Criminal Enterprise and Domestic Modes of Liability for Parties to a Crime: A Comparison of German and English Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5, no. 1, (2007): 208–226.Google Scholar
Harmon, Mark B. and Gaynor, Fergal. “Ordinary Sentences for Extraordinary Crimes.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5, no. 3 (2007): 683–712.Google Scholar
Harmon, Mark B. and Karagiannakis, Magdalini. “The Disclosure of Exculpatory Material by the Prosecution to the Defense under Rule 68 of the ICTY Rules.” In Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, edited by May, Richard. Brill, 2001: 315–328.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. and Fuller, Lon L.. The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Cane, Peter. Hart, 2010.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal 111 (2002): 1935–2042.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. “The New Empiricism in Human Rights: Insights and Implications.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 98 (2004): 206–211.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A.“Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law.” The University of Chicago Law Review 72 (2005): 469–536.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A.“Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2007): 588–621.Google Scholar
Haviv, Ron, Sudetic, Chuck, and Rieff, David. Blood and Honey: A Balkan War Journal. TV Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Hayden, Robert M. Blueprints for a House Divided: The Constitutional Logic of the Yugoslav Conflicts. University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre. Justice in a Time of War: The True Story Behind the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Texas A&M University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C. “Social Justice through Civil Justice.” University of Chicago Law Review 36 (1969): 669.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence and Alter, Karen. “Legitimacy and Lawmaking: A Tale of Three International Courts.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (2013): 479.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication.” Yale Law Journal 107 (1997): 273.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo.” California Law Review 93, no. 3 (2005): 899–956.Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon. The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Henham, Ralph. “Developing Contextualized Rationales for Sentencing in International Criminal Trials: A Plea for Empirical Research.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5, no. 3 (2007): 757–778.Google Scholar
Henham, Ralph and Drumbl, Mark. “Plea Bargaining at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Criminal Law Forum 16, no. 1 (2005): 49–87.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys. Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert. Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia. Zone Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Hinton, Alexander Laban. Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities after Genocide and Mass Violence. Rutgers University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hinton, Alexander Laban, O’Neill, Kevin Lewis, and Sanford, Victoria. Genocide: Truth, Memory, and Representation. Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. “‘Negative’ Rights vs. ‘Positive’ Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicical Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order.” Human Rights Quarterly 22, no. 4 (2000): 1060–1098.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. “The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 93–118.Google Scholar
Hoare, Marko Attila. “Genocide in Bosnia and the Failure of International Justice.” Working Paper Series 8 (2008).Google Scholar
Hodžić, Refik. “Living the Legacy of Mass Atrocities: Victims’ Perspectives on War Crimes Trials.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010): 113–136.Google Scholar
Holtermann, Jakob v. “ ‘One of the Challenges that Can Plausibly Be Raised Against Them’? On the Role of Truth in Debates about the Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals.” In The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals, edited by Hayashi, Nobuo and Bailliet, Cecilia M.. Cambridge University Press, 2017: 206–227.Google Scholar
Horvat, Srećko and Štiks, Igor (editors), Welcome to the Desert of Post-Socialism. Radical Politics after Yugoslavia. Verso Brooklyn, 2015.Google Scholar
Hughes, Edel, Schabas, William, and Thakur, Ramesh Chandra. Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice. United Nations University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. Explorations in Law and Society: Toward A Constitutive Theory of Law. Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Huyse, Luc. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past.” Law & Social Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1995): 51–78.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Israël, Liora and Mouralis, Guillaume. “General Introduction.” In Dealing with Wars and Dictatorships, edited by Israël, Liora and Mouralis, Guillaume. T.M.C. Asser Press, 1–20, 2012.Google Scholar
Jackson, John. “Finding the Best Epistemic Fit for International Criminal Tribunals: Beyond the Adversarial–Inquisitorial Dichotomy.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7, no. 1 (2009): 17–39.Google Scholar
Jain, Neha. Perpetrators and Accessories in International Criminal Law: Individual Modes of Responsibility for Collective Crimes. Hart Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris. “German Reactions to Nazi Atrocities.” American Journal of Sociology 52, no. 2 (1946): 141–146.Google Scholar
Jansen, Stef. “If Reconciliation Is the Answer, Are We Asking the Right Questions?” Studies in Social Justice 7, no. 2 (2013): 229–243.Google Scholar
Johnson, Larry D. “Closing an International Criminal Tribunal While Maintaining International Human Rights Standards and Excluding Impunity.” American Journal of International Law 99, no. 1 (2005): 158–174.Google Scholar
Johnson, Scott T. “On the Road to Disaster: The Rights of the Accused and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” International Legal Perspectives 10 (1998): 111.Google Scholar
Jokic, Alexandar. “War Crimes: Moral, Legal or Simply Political?” In War Crimes and Collective Wrongdoing: A Reader, edited by Jokic, Alexandar. MA Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Jones, Priscilla Dale. “Nazi Atrocities against Allied Airmen: Stalag Luft III and the End of British War Crimes Trials.” The Historical Journal 41, no. 2 (1998): 543–565.Google Scholar
Jović, Dejan. Jugoslavija, dr žava koja je odumrla : uspon, kriza i pad Kardeljeve Jugoslavije, 1974–1990. Prometej, 2003.Google Scholar
Judah, Tim. The Serbs: History, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaes, Anton. From Hitler to Heimat: The Return of History as Film. Harvard University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kaminski, Marek M. and Nalepa, Monika. “Judging Transitional Justice: A New Criterion for Evaluating Truth Revelation Procedures.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, no. 3 (2006): 383–408.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Political Writings, edited by Reiss, H.S.. Cambridge University Press, 1991, 41–53.Google Scholar
Karnavas, Michael G. “Gathering Evidence in International Criminal Trials – the View of the Defence Lawyer.” In International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures, edited by Bohlander, Michael. Cameron May Ltd., 2007, 75–152.Google Scholar
Karnavas, Michael G. “The ICTY Legacy: A Defense Counsel’s Perspective.” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011): 1053–1092.Google Scholar
Keating, V.C. and Kaczmarska, K.. “Conservative Soft Power: Liberal Soft Power Bias and the ‘Hidden’ Attraction of Russia.” Journal of International Relations and Development (May 11, 2017): 1–27.Google Scholar
Keen, Peter Carmichael. “Tempered Adversariality: The Judicial Role and Trial Theory in the International Criminal Tribunals.” Leiden Journal of International Law 17, no. 4 (2004): 767–814.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. “Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?” The International Law Quarterly 1, no. 2 (Summer, 1947): 153.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. “The Disciplines of International Law and Policy.” Leiden Journal of International Law 12, no. 01 (1999): 9–133.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David.“My Talk at the ASIL: What Is New Thinking in International Law?” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 94 (2000): 104–125.Google Scholar
Kerr, Rachel. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: An Exercise in Law, Politics, and Diplomacy. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kerr, Rachel.“Peace through Justice? The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 7, no. 3 (2007): 373–385.Google Scholar
King, Henry T. Jr., “Nuremberg and Crimes against Peace.” Case Western Reserve Journal International Law 41 (2009): 281.Google Scholar
Kissinger, J. and Henry, A. “The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction.” Foreign Affairs 80 (2001): 86–96.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. An Introduction to International Institutional Law (third edition). Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl E. “Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism,” South African Journal on Human Rights 14, no. 1 (1998): 146–188.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” Yale Law Journal 106 (1997): 2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, David S. “The Faith of the International Criminal Lawyer.” NYU Journal of International Law and Policy 40 (2007): 1019.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations.” In The Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti.“Between Impunity and Show Trials.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6, no. 1 (2002a): 1–32.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti.“‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 2 (2002b): 159–175.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti.From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti.Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising From Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Erik Castrén Institute of International Law, 2007.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti.“The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics.” The Modern Law Review 70, no. 1 (2007): 1–30.Google Scholar
Kostić, Roland. “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Whose Memories, Whose Justice?” Sociologija LIV 4, 2012.Google Scholar
Kranzbuhler, Otto. “Nuremberg Eighteen Years Afterwards.” DePaul Law Review 14 (1964): 333.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. United States Inst of Peace Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J.“Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability Mechanisms for Mass Violations of Human Rights.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 4 (1996): 127–152.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J.“Policy Implications of Empirical Research on Transitional Justice.” In Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research, edited by Van der Merwe, Hugo, Baxter, Victoria, and Chapman, Audrey. US Institute of Peace Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J. and Finci, Jakob. “A Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.” International Law Forum du droit internationale 3 (2001): 50–58.Google Scholar
Krog, Antjie. Country of My Skull: Guilt, Sorrow, and the Limits of Forgiveness in the New South Africa. Times Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Ku, Julian and Nzelibe, Jide. “Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities.” Washington University Law Review 84 (2006): 777.Google Scholar
Kubek, Anthony. “The Morgenthau Plan and the Problem of Policy Perversion.” The Journal of Historical Review 9, no. 3 (1989): 1.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis.” European Journal of International Law 15, no. 5 (2004): 907–931.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will.Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will and Opalski, Magda. Can Liberal Pluralism Be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. “Historicising Criminalisation: Conceptual and Empirical Issues.” Modern Law Review 72, no. 6 (2009): 936–960.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. “Community, Culture and Criminalization.” In Crime, Punishment and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff, edited by Cruft, Rowan, Kramer, Matthew H., and Reiff, Mark R.. Oxford University Press, 2011: 292–310.Google Scholar
Lamont, Christopher K. International Criminal Justice and the Politics of Compliance. Lund Humphries Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar
Lampe, John R. Yugoslavia as History: Twice There was a Country. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Landsman, Stephan. “Retroactive Trials and Justice.” Michigan Law Review 96 (1998): 1456–1473.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. “Controlling Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany.” University of Chicago Law Review 41, no. 3 (1974): 439–467.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. “The Criminal Trial before the Lawyers.” University of Chicago Law Review 45 (1978): 263–316.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. “The German Advantage in Civil Procedure.” University of Chicago Law Review 52 (1985): 823–866.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. and Weinreb, Lloyd L.. “Continental Criminal Procedure: ‘Myth’ and Reality.” The Yale Law Journal 87, no. 8 (1978): 1549–1569.Google Scholar
Langer, Maximo. “The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law.” Bepress Legal Series 343 (2005): 1–64.Google Scholar
Langer, Maximo and Doherty, Joseph. “Managerial Judging Goes International but Its Promise Remains Unfulfilled: An Empirical Assessment of the ICTY Reforms.” Yale Journal of International Law 36 (2011): 241.Google Scholar
Laternser, Hans. “Looking Back at the Nuremberg Trials with Special Consideration of the Processes against Military Leaders.” Whittier Law Review 8 (1986): 557.Google Scholar
Leebaw, Bronwyn Anne. “The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice.” Human Rights Quarterly 30, no. 1 (2008): 95–118.Google Scholar
Leebaw, Bronwyn Anne. Judging State-Sponsored Violence, Imagining Political Change. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. “The Impossibility of Legal Transplants.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997): 111–124.Google Scholar
Lerner, Renée Letow. “The Intersection of Two Systems: An American on Trial for an American Murder in the French Cour d’Assises.” University of Illinois Law Review (2001): 791–892.Google Scholar
Levine, Kay. “The Intimacy Discount: Prosecutorial Discretion, Privacy, and Equality in the Statutory Rape Caseload.” Emory Law Journal 55 (2006): 691.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel and Sznaider, Natan. Holocaust and Memory in the Global Age. Temple University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel and Sznaider, NatanHuman Rights and Memory. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lovrenović, Ivan and Predrag, Lucić. Stenogrami o podjelene Bosne. Dani Biblioteka, 2003.Google Scholar
Luban, David. “Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law.” In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
MacDonald, David. Balkan Holocausts? Serbian and Croatian Victim-Centred Propaganda and the War in Yugoslavia. Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
MacDonald, David.“Living Together or Hating Each Other.” In Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies. A Scholars’ Initiative, edited by Ingrao, Charles and Emmert, Thomas A.. Purdue University Press, 2009: 390–424.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Ruth and Sands, Philippe. “International Courts and Tribunals and the Independence of the International Judge.” Harvard International Law Journal 44 (2003): 271.Google Scholar
Maga, Timothy P. America Attacks Japan: The Invasion That Never Was. University Press of Kentucky, 2002.Google Scholar
Magas, Branka. The Destruction of Yugoslavia: Tracking the Break-Up 1980–1992. Verso, 1993.Google Scholar
Maguire, Peter. Law and War: International Law and American History. Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. “Bosnia and the West: A Study in Failure.” Quadrant 39, no. 6 (1995): 12.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga. “Selective Memory: How the Law Affects What We Remember and Forget about the Past: The Case of East Germany.” Law & Society Review 35, no. 3 (2001): 513–563.Google Scholar
Marrus, Michael R.The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, 1945–46: A Documentary History. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1997.Google Scholar
Martin, Francesco Forest. International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Treaties, Cases and Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
May, Richard and Wierda, Marieke. “Trends in International Criminal Evidence: Nuremberg, Tokyo, The Hague, and Arusha.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37 (1998): 725.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. University Of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McDermott, Yvonne. “The Admissibility and Weight of Written Witness Testimony.” Leiden Journal of International Law 26, no. 4 (2013): 971–989.Google Scholar
McEvoy, Kieran. “Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo.” Journal of Law and Society 34 (2007): 411–440.Google Scholar
McKillop, Bron. “Anatomy of a French Murder Case.” American Journal of Comparative Law 45, no. 3 (Summer, 1997): 527–583.Google Scholar
McMahon, Patrice C. and Forsythe, David P.. “The ICTY’s Impact on Serbia: Judicial Romanticism Meets Network Politics.” Human Rights Quarterly 30, no. 2 (2008): 412–435.Google Scholar
Meernik, James. “Victor’s Justice or the Law? Judging and Punishing at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47, no. 2 (2003): 140–162.Google Scholar
Meernik, James.“Justice and Peace? How the International Criminal Tribunal Affects Societal Peace in Bosnia.” Journal of Peace Research 42, no. 3 (2005): 271–289.Google Scholar
Meernik, James and King, Kimi Lynn. “The Effectiveness of International Law and the ICTY – Preliminary Results of an Empirical Study.” International Criminal Law Review 1 (2001): 343.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. “The Politics of International Criminal Justice.” European Journal of International Law 13, no. 5 (2002): 1261–1284.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric.“Three Dangers for the International Criminal Court: A Critical Look at a Consensual Project.” Finnish Yearbook of International Law 12 (2002): 195–247.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric.“In Search of the ‘Vertical’: An Exploration of What Makes International Criminal Tribunals Different (and Why)?” Working Paper Series (2008): 1–57.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric.“Beyond Fairness: Understanding the Determinants of International Criminal Procedure.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 14 (2009): 37.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric and Hoffman, Florian. “The UN as a Human Rights Violator? Some Reflections on the United Nations Changing Human Rights Responsibilities.” Human Rights Quarterly 25, no. 2 (2003): 314–342.Google Scholar
Meijers, Tim and Glasius, Marlies “Trials as Messages of Justice: What Should be Expected of International Criminal Justice?” Ethics & International Affairs 30, no. 4 (2016): 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Bernard D. “Robert H. Jackson: Nuremberg’s Architect and Advocate.” Albany Law Review 68 (2004): 55, 57.Google Scholar
Mendeloff, David. “Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Postconflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm?” International Studies Review 6, no. 3 (2004): 355–380.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor.“International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities.” American Journal of International Law 89 (1995): 554.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor.“Answering for War Crimes: Lessons from the Balkans.” Foreign Affairs 76 (1997): 2–8.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor.“Is International Law Moving Towards Criminalization?” European Journal of International Law 9 (1998): 18–31.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor.“Reflections on the Prosecution of War Crimes by International Tribunals.” The American Journal of International Law 100, no. 3 (2006): 551–579.Google Scholar
Merritt, Richard L. Democracy Imposed: US Occupation Policy and the German Public, 1945–1949. Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry and Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (third edition). Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mettraux, Guénaël. “Judicial Inheritance: The Value and Significance of the Nuremberg Trial to Contemporary War Crimes Tribunals.” In Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial, edited by Mettraux, Guénaël. Oxford University Press, 2009a, 599.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2009.Google Scholar
Miller, Frank. Prosecution: The Decision to Charge a Suspect with a Crime. Little, Brown and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Milosevic, Milan. “The Media Wars.” In Burn This House, edited by Udovicki, Jasminka and Ridgeway, James. Duke University Press, 1997, 108–129.Google Scholar
Minear, Richard H. Victors’ Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial. Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Beacon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha.Breaking the Cycles of Hatred: Memory, Law, and Repair. Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Moeller, Robert G. War Stories: The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany. University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Saira. “Deviance, Aspiration, and the Stories We Tell: Reconciling Mass Atrocity and the Criminal Law.” Yale Law Journal 124, no. 5 (2015).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (1997): 513–553.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew.“The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54 (2000): 217–252.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, Thompson, Kenneth, and Clinton, David. Politics among Nations. McGraw-Hill, 2005.Google Scholar
Morris, Clarence. “Law, Reason, and Sociology.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 107, no. 2 (1958): 147–165.Google Scholar
Morris, Virginia and Scharf, Michael. An Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Documentary History and Analysis (two volumes). Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Mundis, Daryl A. “From ‘Common Law’ Towards ‘Civil Law’: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence.” Leiden Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2001): 367–382.Google Scholar
Mundis, Daryl A.“The Legal Character and Status of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals.” International Criminal Law Review 1 (2001): 191.Google Scholar
Murphy, Colleen. The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nalepa, Monika. “Reconciliation, Refugee Returns, and the Impact of International Criminal Justice: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Transitional Justice: NOMOS Li, edited by Williams, Melissa, Nagy, Rosemary, Elster, Jon. New York University Press, 2012, 316–359.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. “What Should be Done About the Guilty?” The New York Review of Books 37, no. 1 (1990): 32–35.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh.“Rethinking Truth, Justice, and Guilt after Bosnia and Rwanda.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert. Zone Books, 1999, 39–52.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. “Comparatists and transferability.” In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick. Cambridge University Press, 2003, 437–466.Google Scholar
Nettelfield, Lara. “Research and Repercussions of Death Tolls: The Case of the Bosnian Book of the Dead.” In Sex, Drugs, and Body Counts: The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict, edited by Andreas, Peter and Greenhill, Kelly M.. Cornell University Press, 2010, 159–187.Google Scholar
Nettelfield, Lara. Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Neuffer, Elizabeth. The Key to My Neighbor’s House: Seeking Justice in Bosnia and Rwanda. Picador, 2002.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos. “The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentian.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2619.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, Andre. “The Legitimacy of International Law in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” In Ambiguity in the Rule of Law. The Interface between National and International Legal Systems, edited by Thomas, A.J.A. Vandamme and Reestman, Jan-Herman. Europa Law Publishing, 2001, 13–23.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen. System Criminality in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, Selznick, Philip, and Kagan, Robert Allen. Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Transaction Publishers, 1978.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. “Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire.” Representations 26, no. 26 (1989): 7–24.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Therese. “Executioners, Bystanders and Victims: Collective Guilt, the Legacy of Denazification and the Birth of Twentieth-Century Transitional Justice.” Legal Studies 25, no. 4 (2005): 627–667.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Jens.“Proportional Sentences at the ICTY.” In The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, edited by Swart, Bert, Sluiter, Göran, and Zahar, Alexander. Oxford University Press, 2011: 406–419.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K. “What Does it Mean to Normalize the Past? Official Memory in German Politics since 1989.” Social Science History 22, no. 4 (1998): 547–571.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K.“Collective Memory: The Two Cultures.” Sociological Theory 17, no. 3 (1999): 333–348.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K.The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K.“Between Chaos and Diversity: Is Social Memory Studies a Field?” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 22 (2009): 249–252.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K and Levy, Daniel. “Collective Memory and Cultural Constraint: Holocaust Myth and Rationality in German Politics.” American Sociological Review 62 (1997): 921–936.Google Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K., Vinitzky-Seroussi, Vered, and Levy, Daniel. The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Olsen, Tricia D., Payne, Leigh A, and Reiter, Andrew G. “The Justice Balance: When Transitional Justice Improves Human Rights and Democracy.” Human Rights Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2010a): 980–1007.Google Scholar
Olsen, Tricia D., Payne, Leigh A, and Reiter, Andrew G. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficiency. United States Institute for Peace, 2010b.Google Scholar
Olusanya, Olaoluwa. Sentencing War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity under the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Europa Law Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2537–2615.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. “Shrinking the Space for Denial. The Impact of the ICTY in Serbia” Open Society Justice Initiative. Available at www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/serbia_20080501.pdf (2008).Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. “That Someone Guilty Be Punished: The Impact of the ICTY in Bosnia.” Open Society Justice Initiative. Available at www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/that-someone-guilty-20100708.pdf (2010).Google Scholar
Orentlicher, Diane F. “Review Essays: From Viability to Impact: Evolving Metrics for Assessing the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (2013): 536–546.Google Scholar
Orie, Alphons. “Accusatorial v. Inquisitorial Approach in International Criminal Proceedings Prior to the Establishment of the ICC and in the Proceedings before the ICC.” In The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, edited by Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paula, and Jones, John R.W.D.. Oxford University Press, 2002, 1439–1495.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. Transaction Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Overy, Richard. “The Nuremberg Trials: International Law in the Making.” In From Nuremberg to The Hague, edited by Sands, Phillippe. Cambridge University Press, 2003, 1–29.Google Scholar
Pavlaković, Vjeran. “Croatia, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and General Gotovina as a Political Symbol.” Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 10 (2010): 1707–1740.Google Scholar
Pendas, Devin O. The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Perica, Vjekoslav. Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor. “Courting Rwanda: The Promises and Pitfalls of the ICTR Outreach Programme.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 4 (2005): 950–961.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor.International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Philipose, Elizabeth. “Prosecuting Violence, Performing Sovereignty: The Trial of Dusko Tadic.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 15, no. 2 (2002): 159–184.Google Scholar
Piacente, Nicola. “Importance of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine for the ICTY Prosecutorial Policy.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, no. 2 (2004): 446–454.Google Scholar
Pizzi, William T. “Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion in the United States: The Limits of Comparative Criminal Procedure as an Instrument of Reform.” Ohio State Law Journal 54 (1993): 1325.Google Scholar
Pizzi, William T. “Overcoming Logistical and Structural Barriers to Fair Trials at International Tribunals.” International Commentary on Evidence 4, no. 1 (2006): 1051–1567.Google Scholar
Pomorski, Stanislaw. “Conspiracy and Criminal Organization.” In The Nuremberg Trial and International Law, edited by Ginsburgs, George and Kudriavtsev, V.N.. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990, 213–229.Google Scholar
Popov, Nebojša and Drinka, Gojković. The Road to War in Serbia: Trauma and Catharsis. Central European University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Power, Samantha. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. Basic Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Prendergast, David, “The Constitutionality of Strict Liability Offences.” Dublin University Law Journal 33 (June 24, 2011): 285. Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2359084Google Scholar
Primus, Richard. “A Brooding Omnipresence: Totalitarianism in Postwar Constitutional Thought.” Yale Law Journal 106 (1996): 423–457.Google Scholar
Provost, Rene. International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. “Introduction,” in Reconciliation(s): Transitional Justice in Postconflict Societies, edited by Quinn, Joanna R.. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2009: 3–14.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy. “No Substitute for Sovereignty: Why International Criminal Justice Has a Bleak Future – and Deserves It.” In Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transnational Justice, edited by Schabas, William A., Thakur, Ramesh, and Hughes, Edel. United Nations University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P.The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Indiana University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. and Vjeran, Pavlaković. Serbia since 1989: Politics and Society under Milosevic and After. University of Washington Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. and Vjeran, Pavlaković. Balkan Babel: Politics, Culture, and Religion in Yugoslavia. Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina Petra. Balkan Babel: Thinking about Yugoslavia: Scholarly Debates about the Yugoslav Breakup and the Wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., Abrams, Jason, and Bischoff, James. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rauxloh, Regina E. “Negotiated History: The Historical Record in International Criminal Law and Plea Bargaining.” International Criminal Law Review 10 (2010): 739–770.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Roberts, Geoffrey. “Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” European Journal of International Law 11, no. 3 (2000): 569–589.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.L., Stalin’s Wars: From World War to Cold War, 1939–1953. Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. “State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law.” California Law Review 78, no. 2 (1990): 449–513.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi.Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi.The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi.“The New Landscape of Transitional Justice.” In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth Versus Justice, edited by Roht-Arriaza, Naomi and Mariezcurrena, Javier. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Röling, Bert V. “The Nuremberg and the Tokyo Trials in Retrospect.” In Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial, edited by Mettraux, Guénaël. Oxford University Press, 2008: 455–472.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change. University of Chicago, 1991.Google Scholar
Roth, Brad R. Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Roth, Brad R.Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rothe, Dawn L. and Mullins, Christopher W.. “Beyond the Juristic Orientation of International Criminal Justice: The Relevance of Criminological Insight to International Criminal Law and its Control: A Commentary.” International Criminal Law Review 10, no. 1 (2010): 97–110.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Locke, John, and Hume, David. Social Contract – Essays by Locke [An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government]; Hume [of the Original Contract]; Rousseau [The Social Contract], edited by Barker, Ernest. Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Rowen, Jamie. Searching for Truth in the Transitional Justice Movement. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rückerl, Adalbert. The Investigation of Nazi Crimes 1945–1978: A Documentation. Muller, 1979.Google Scholar
Sa’adah, Anne. Germany’s Second Chance: Trust, Justice, and Democratization. Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sa’adah, Anne“Regime Change: Lessons from Germany on Justice, Institution Building, and Democracy.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2006): 303–323.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya. The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium. Transnational Publishers Inc, 2002.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya.“The Nuremberg Trial, Seventy Years Later” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 15, no. 4 (2015): 575–592.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya and Carden, S. Richard. “The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution.” Georgetown Law Journal 88 (1999): 381.Google Scholar
Safferling, Christoph Johannes Maria. Towards an International Criminal Procedure. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Salas, Denis. “The Role of the Judge,” in European Criminal Procedures, edited by Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Spencer, J.R.. Cambridge University Press, 2006, 488–541.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. Imagining Legality: Where Law Meets Popular Culture. University of Alabama Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin.Transitions: Legal Change, Legal Meanings. University of Alabama Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Hussain, Nasser. When Governments Break the Law: The Rule of Law and the Prosecution of the Bush Administration. New York University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy. “Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 30, no. 4 (2008): 1028–1042.Google Scholar
Scalia, Damien, Rauschenbach, Mina, and Christian, Staerklé. “Paroles d’accués sur la légitimitéde la justice pénale internationale.” Chronique de criminologie (juillet/septembre 2012): 727–746.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Schabas, William.“Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach.” Duke Journal Comparative and International Law 7 (1997): 461–518.Google Scholar
Schabas, William.“Mens Rea and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia” New England Law Review 37, no. 4 (2003): 1015–1036.Google Scholar
Schabas, William.“State Policy as an Element of International Crimes.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98, no. 3 (2008): 953–982.Google Scholar
Schabas, William.Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schabas, William.An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. and Darcy, Shane. Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth. Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael. “A Critique of the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 25 (1997a): 305–312.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael Balkan Justice: The Story Behind the First International War Crimes Trial since Nuremberg. Carolina Academic Press, 1997b.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael and Epps, Valerie. “The International Trial of the Century: A Cross-Fire Exchange on the First Case before the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal.” Cornell International Law Journal 29 (1996): 635.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P.“Trading Justice for Efficiency Plea-Bargaining and International Tribunals.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, no. 4 (2004): 1070–1081.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David J. “The Tool Box, Past and Present, of Justice and Reconciliation for Atrocities.” The American Journal of International Law 95, no. 4 (2001): 970–977.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. The Rule of Law in European Integration: The Path of the Schuman Plan. Greenwood Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A.The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. University of Michigan Press [1964], 2004.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. and Gressett, Lynne A.. “Policy, Politics, and the Criminal Courts.” Law & Social Inquiry 12, nos. 2–3 (1987): 461–505.Google Scholar
Schlütter, Birgit. Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia. Martinus Nijhoff, 2010.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Hans Peter and Sikkink, Kathryn. “International Human Rights.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter. Sage Publishing, 2012: 827–851.Google Scholar
Schomburg, Wolfgang. “Jurisprudence on JCE – Revisiting a Never Ending Story.” (availabe at: http://www.cambodiatribunal.org/assets/pdf/court-filings/ctm_blog_6_1_2010.pdf) (accessed July 2018).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry. “The Social Context of Commemoration: A Study in Collective Memory.” Social Forces 61, nos. 2 (1982): 374–402.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry, Zerubavel, Yael, and Barnett, Bernice. “The Recovery of Masada: A Study in Collective Memory.” The Sociologial Quarterly 27, no. 2 (1986): 147–164.Google Scholar
Sell, Louis. Slobodan Milosevic and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. Duke University Press Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Sellars, Kirsten. “Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo.” European Journal of International Law 21, no. 4 (2010): 1085–1102.Google Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed. International Criminal Justice at the Yugoslav Tribunal: A Judge’s Recollection. Oxford University Press, 2012, 129–186.Google Scholar
Shandley, Robert R. Unwilling Germans? The Goldhagen Debate. University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, 1998.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Sharp, Dustin N. Re-Thinking Transitional Justice for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Shaw, Rosalind, Waldorf, Lars, and Hazan, Pierre. Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities after Mass Violence. Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Harvard University Press, 1964/1986.Google Scholar
Shniderman, Adam B. and Smith, Charles A.. “Toward Justice: Neuroscience and Affirmative Defenses at the ICC.” In Studies in Law, Politics, and Society volume 66, edited by Sarat, Austin. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015, 87–113.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.Google Scholar
Simic, Olivera. “Bringing ‘Justice’ Home? Bosnians, War Criminals and the Interaction between the Cosmopolitan and the Local.” German Law Journal 12 (2011): 1388.Google Scholar
Skapska, Grazyna. “Settling Accounts with the Past, the Conceptualization of Difference and the Dilemmas of the Law-governed State.” In Central and Eastern Europe after Transition, edited by Febbrajo, Alberto and Sadurski, W.. Ashgate Publishing Group, 2010.Google Scholar
Skilbeck, Rupert. “Frankenstein’s Monster: Creating a New International Procedure.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8, no. 2 (2010): 451–462.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Skouteris, Thomas. “Engaging History in International Law.” In New Approaches to International Law, edited by Beneyto, Jose Maria, and Kennedy, David. Asser Press, 2012, 99–120.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “International Law in a World of Liberal States.” European Journal of International Law 6 (1995): 503.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie.“A Liberal Theory of International Law.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) (2000): 240.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Göran and Vasiliev, Sergey. International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law. Cameron May International Law & Policy, 2009.Google Scholar
Smit, Dirk Van Zyl. “International Imprisonment’.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005): 357, 367.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack and Vinjamuri, Leslie. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28, no. 3 (2004): 5–44.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. “The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather than States.” The American University Law Review 32 (1982): 1–64.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jonny. “Liberia’s Experiment with Transitional Justice.” African Affairs 109, no. 434 (2010): 135–144.Google Scholar
Stensrud, Ellen Emilie. “New Dilemmas in Transitional Justice: Lessons from the Mixed Courts in Sierra Leone and Cambodia.” Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 1 (2009): 5–15.Google Scholar
Stokes, Gale. “Independence and the Fate of Minorities, 1991–1992.” In Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies: A Scholars’ Initiative, edited by Emmert, Thomas A., and Ingrao, Charles. Purdue University Press, 2009, 82–112.Google Scholar
Stover, Eric and Weinstein, Harvey M. My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Subotić, Jelena. Hijacked justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Subotić, Jelena.“The Cruelty of False Remorse: Biljana Plavsic at The Hague.” Southeastern Europe 36 (2012): 39–59.Google Scholar
Sudetic, Chuck. Blood and Vengeance: One Family’s Story of the War in Bosnia. Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Swart, Mia. “Judicial Lawmaking at the ad hoc Tribunals: The Creative use of the Sources of International Law and ‘Adventurous Interpretation’.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 no. 3 (2010): 459–486.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. “How to Use Max Weber’s Ideal Type in Sociological Analysis.” Journal of Classical Sociology (2017): 181–196.Google Scholar
Sweet, Alec Stone, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Fligstein, Neil. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi. “The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law.” European Journal of International Law 13, no. 3 (2002): 561–595.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi.“The Durkheimian Spell of International Criminal Law.” (September 20, 2012): 137–169.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Taylor, Telford “Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy.” New York Times Books 1970.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G.“Transitional Justice Genealogy.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16 (2003): 69–94.Google Scholar
Tesanovic, Jasmina. The Diary of a Political Idiot: Normal Life in Belgrade. Cleis Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther. “Exogenous Self-Binding: How National and International Courts Contribute to Transnational Constitutionalization.” In Transconstitutionalism, edited by Corsi, Giancarlo, Esposito, Elena, and Febbrajo, Alberto. Ashgate, 2015 (available at SSRN DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2432628).Google Scholar
Thaman, Stephen C. “Plea-Bargaining, Negotiating Confessions and Consensual Resolution of Criminal Cases.” Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 486, no. 493 (2007): 1992.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Mark and Amley, Jr. Edward A. “Proceeding to Justice and Accountability in the Balkans: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Rule 61.” Yale Journal of International Law 23 (1998): 231.Google Scholar
Tieger, Alan. “Non-State Actors and the Case Law of the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 92 (1998): 48–52.Google Scholar
Tochilovsky, Vladimir. “Proceedings in the International Criminal Court: Some Lessons to Learn from ICTY Experience.” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice 10 (2002): 268.Google Scholar
Tochilovsky, Vladimir. Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.Google Scholar
Tochilovsky, Vladimir. “The Nature and Evolution of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.” In Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, edited by Khan, Karim A.A., Buisman, Caroline, and Gosnell, Christopher. Oxford University Press, 2010, 157–184.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tsvetan.“Memory as Remedy for Evil.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7 (2009): 447–462.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tsvetan.Mémoire du mal Tentation du bien: Enquête sur le siècle. Robert Laffont, 2012.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian “The Legacy of Nuremberg.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, no. 4 (September 1, 2006): 830–844.Google Scholar
Trbovich, Ana S. A Legal Geography of Yugoslavia’s Disintegration. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tuðman, Franjo. Bespuâca povijesne zbiljnosti: rasprava o povijesti i filozofiji zlosilja. Nakladni zavod Matice hrvatske, 1989.Google Scholar
Twinning, William. “Some Scepticism about Some Scepticisms.” Journal of Law and Society 11 (1984): 137.Google Scholar
Burn This House, edited by Udovicki, Jasminka, and Ridgeway, James. Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. Tyler, Tom and Blader, Steven. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (Essays in Social Psychology). Psychology Press, 2000.Google Scholar
United States Institute on Peace. “Transitional Justice: Information Handbook.” (2008).Google Scholar
Uzelac, Alan. “Role and Status of Judges in Croatia.” (1998) (available at: http://www.alanuzelac.from.hr/Pdf/Radovi/en-crojud.pdf) (accessed August 2018).Google Scholar
van Caenegam, William. “Advantages and disadvantages of the adversarial system in criminal proceedings.” 1.1. 1999 Bond University E papers.Google Scholar
van der Wilt, Harmen. “Joint Criminal Enterprise: Possibilities and Limitations.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5 (2007): 91.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, Elies “Pluralism in International Criminal Law.” Editorial, Leiden Journal of International Law 25, no. 4 (2007).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, Elies International Criminal Responsibility in International Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
van Verseweld, Annemieke. Mistake of Law: Excusing Perpetrators of International Crimes. Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
Vasielev, Sergey. “International Criminal Trials: A Normative Theory.” PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2014.Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, Charles. “Reconciliation.” In Pieces of the Puzzle: Keywords on Reconciliation and Transitional Justice, edited by Villa-Vicencio, Charles and Doxtader, Erik. Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, African Minds, 2004.Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, Leslie and Snyder, Jack. “Law and Politics in Transitional Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (2015): 303–327.Google Scholar
Vogler, Richard. “Making International Criminal Procedure Work: From Theory to Practice.” In Exploring the Boundaries of International Criminal Justice. Ashgate, 2011, 105–112.Google Scholar
Vujačić, Veljko. “Elites, Narratives, and Nationalist Mobilization in the Former Yugoslavia.” Comparative Politics (2007): 103–124.Google Scholar
Wachtel, Andrew. Making a Nation, Breaking a Nation: Literature and Cultural Politics in Yugoslavia. Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M. “International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Comes of Age: Some Observations on Day-to-Day Dilemmas of an International Court.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 5 (2001): 87.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M.“Dealing with Witnesses in War Crime Trials: Lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal.” Yale Human Rights Development Law Journal 5, no 1 (2002): 217–239.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M.“Review: Justice in a Time of War: The True Story behind the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia by Pierre Hazan: James Thomas Snyder.” American Journal of International Law 99, no. 3 (2005): 720–726.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M.“Foreword: War Tales and War Trials.” Michigan Law Review (2008): 901–922.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward. Dissolution: Sovereignty and the Breakup of the Soviet Union. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Warbrick, Colin. “International Criminal Courts and Fair Trial.” Journal of Conflict Security Law 3, no. 1 (1998): 45–64.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. University Press of Virginia, 1974.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy.” In The Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited and translated by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. Free Press, 1904/1949.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, translation by Edward Shils, edited with introduction and annotations by Rheinstein, Max. Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. “The Issues of the Nuremberg Trial.” In Principles, Politics, and Fundamental Law: Selected Essays, edited by Wechsler, Herbert. Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Weingartner, James J. Americans, Germans, and War Crimes Justice: Law, Memory, and “The Good War.” Prager, 2011.Google Scholar
Whiting, Alex. “The ICTY as a Laboratory of International Criminal Procedure.” In The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, edited by Swart, Bert, Zahar, Alexander, and Sluiter, Goran. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wildt, M. “Des vérités qui different. Historiens et procureurs face aux crimes de Nazis.” In Le génocide des juifs entre procès et histoire, 1943–2000, edited by Brayard, Florent. Editions Complexe, 2000: 245–260.Google Scholar
Wiggers, Richard Dominic. “The United States and the Refusal to Feed German Civilians after World War II.” In Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth-Century Europe, edited by Vardy, Steven Bela and Tooley, T. Hunt. Columbia University Press, 2003: 274–288.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton University Press, 2010: 245 – 260.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, Goldstone, Richard J., Horowitz, Donald L., Joras, Ulrike, and Schetter, Conrad. Facing Ethnic Conflicts: Toward a New Realism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Winston, Morton. “Hannah Arendt and the Challenge of Modernity: A Phenomenology of Human Rights (review).” Human Rights Quarterly 31, no. 1 (2009): 278–282.Google Scholar
Wittmann, Rebecca. Beyond Justice: The Auschwitz Trial. Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L. Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War. Brookings Institution Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. “The Law of the Nuremberg Trial.” The American Journal of International Law 41, no. 1 (1947): 38–72.Google Scholar
Zacklin, Ralph. “The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2 (2004): 541.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, José. “Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Applicable Principles and Political Constraints.” Hamline Law Review 13 (1990): 623.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, José.“Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemma of New Democracies Confronting Past Human Rights Violations.” Hastings Law Journal 43 (1992): 1425.Google Scholar
Zappalà, Salvatore. Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Zoglin, Katie. “The Future of War Crimes Prosecutions in the Former Yugoslavia: Accountability or Junk Justice?” Human Rights Quarterly 27, no. 1 (2005): 41–77.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 2 (2004): 260–287.Google Scholar