Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T02:58:01.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Terry Janzen
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Linguistics University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada
Barbara Shaffer
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Linguistics University of New Mexico
Richard P. Meier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Grammaticization is the diachronic process by which:

  • lexical morphemes in a language, such as nouns and verbs, develop over time into grammatical morphemes; or

  • morphemes less grammatical in nature, such as auxiliaries, develop into ones more grammatical, such as tense or aspect markers (Bybee et al. 1994).

Thus any given grammatical item, even viewed synchronically, is understood to have an evolutionary history. The development of grammar may be traced along grammaticization pathways, with vestiges of each stage often remaining in the current grammar (Hopper 1991; Bybee et al. 1994), so that even synchronically, lexical and grammatical items that share similar form can be shown to be related. Grammaticization is thought to be a universal process; this is how grammar develops. Bybee et al. claim that this process is regular and has predictable evidence, found in the two broad categories of phonology and semantics. Semantic generalization occurs as the more lexical morpheme loses some of its specificity and, usually along with a particular construction it is found within, can be more broadly applied. Certain components of the meaning are lost when this generalization takes place. Regarding phonological change, grammaticizing elements and the constructions they occur in tend to undergo phonological reduction at a faster rate than lexical elements not involved in grammaticization.

The ultimate source of grammaticized forms in languages is understood to be lexical. Most commonly, the source categories are nouns and verbs. Thus, the origins of numerous grammatical elements, at least for spoken languages, are former lexical items.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe, and Sherman E. Wilcox. 1995. Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Baker, Charlotte, and Dennis Cokely. 1980. American Sign Language: A teacher's resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers
Bergman, Brita. 1984. Non-manual components of signed language: Some sentence types in Swedish Sign Language. In Recent research on European sign languages, ed. Filip Loncke, Penny Boyes-Braem, and Yvan Lebrun, 49–59. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B. V
Blake, Joanna. 2000. Routes to child language: Evolutionary and developmental precursors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press
Brouland, Josephine. 1855. Language mimique: Spécimen d'un dictionaire des signes. Gallaudet Archives
Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 247–264
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bybee, Joan L., and Östen, Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13:51–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere Perkins. 1991. Back to the future. In Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II: Focus on the types of grammatical markers, ed. Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Coerts, Jane. 1990. The analysis of interrogatives and negations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Current trends in European sign language research: Proceedings of the 3rdEuropean Congress on Sign Language Research, ed. Siegmund Prillwitz and Tomas Vollhaber, 265–277. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18:83–101Google Scholar
Eriksson, Per. 1998. The history of deaf people: A source book. Örebro, Sweden: National Swedish Agency for Special Education
Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51:696–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In Word order and word order change, ed. Charles Li, 47–112. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54:564–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives on grammaticalization, ed. William Pagliuca, 3–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Hewes, Gordon W. 1973. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Cultural Anthropology 14:5–24Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, ed. Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 149–187. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Humphries, Tom, Carol Padden, and Terence O'Rourke. 1980. A basic course in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers
Janzen, Terry. 1995. The polygrammaticalization of FINISH in ASL. Manuscript, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg
Janzen, Terry. 1997. Phonological access to cognitive representation. Paper presented at 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, July, Amsterdam
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Janzen, Terry. 1999. The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23:271–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2000. Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity: A translation of Andrea de Jorio's La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the mind hears: A history of the deaf. New York: Random House
Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton
Pèlissier, P. 1856. Iconographie des signes. Paris: Imprimerie et Librarie de Paul Dupont
Petitto, Laura A. 1983. From gesture to symbol: The relation between form and meaning in the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Papers and reports on child language development 22:100–127Google Scholar
Petitto, Laura A. 1990. The transition from gesture to symbol in American Sign Language. In From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, ed. V. Volterra and C. J. Erting, 153–161. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Rizzolatti, Giacomo and Michael, A. Arbib. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21:188–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senghas, Ann, Asli Ozyurek, and Sotaro Kita. 2000. Encoding motion events in an emerging sign language: From Nicaraguan gestures to Nicaraguan signs. Paper presented at the 7th Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, July, Amsterdam
Shaffer, Barbara. 1999. Synchronic and diachronic perspectives on negative modals in ASL. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual High Desert Linguistic Society Conference, March, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Shaffer, Barbara. 2000. A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Singleton, Jenny, Susan Goldin-Meadow, and David McNeill. 1995. The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: Evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. In Language, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 287–311. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Sweetser, Eve. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 389–405
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65:31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In International review of sign linguistics, Vol. 1, ed. William H. Edmondson and Ronnie. B. Wilbur, 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999. Metrical structure, morphological gaps, and possible grammaticalization in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2:217–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Cynthia, Patschke. 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2:3–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman and Phyllis Wilcox. 1995. The gestural expression of modality in ASL. In Modality in grammar and discourse, ed. Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 135–162. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Woll, Bencie. 1981. Question structure in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on British Sign Language and deafness, ed. B. Woll, J. Kyle and M. Deuchar, 136–149. London: Croom Helm
Woodward, James. 1978. Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 333–348. New York: Academic Press
Woodward, James. 1980. Some sociolinguistic aspects of French and American Sign Language. In Recent perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. Harlan Lane and François Grosjean, 103–118. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Wylie, Laurence. 1977. Beaux gestes: A guide to French body talk. Cambridge, MA The Undergraduate Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×