Adams, James. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, James. 2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adger, David, & Smith, Jennifer. 2005. Variation and the minimalist program. In Cornips, Leonie & Corrigan, Karen (eds.), Syntax and variation: reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 149–78.Google Scholar

Adrados, F. R. 2005. A history of the Greek language: from its origins to the present. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlqvist, Anders. 2010. Early Celtic and English. Australian Celtic Journal 9: 1–17.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra. 2004. Evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2007. Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Shopen, T (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–65.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra. 2008. The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra. 2011. Multiple marking of syntactic function and polysynthetic nouns in Tariana. In Aikenvald, Aleksandra & Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large. Leiden: Brill, 377–93.Google Scholar

Alarcos, E. 1983. Estudis lingüistics catalans. 2nd ed. Barcelona.Google Scholar

Algeo, John. 2001. External history. In Algeo, John (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. VI: English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–58.Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. 1987. Vox Graeca. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning. 1988. Center and periphery: adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical dialectology: regional and social. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 39–84.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, Tim (ed.), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 150–201.Google Scholar

Andersson, Lars Gunnar. 2011. Var lever bestämdhetsformer som dörra kvar? Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 12: 23–32.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were-variation in non-standard British English today. English World-Wide 22: 1–21.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in nonstandard British English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anthony, David. 2007. The horse, the wheel, and language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Arboe, Torben. 2008. Pronominal repræsentation i danske dialekter. In Hansen, Inger Schoonderbeek & Widell, Peter (eds.), 12. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog. Århus: Nordisk Institut Aarhus Universitet, 29–38.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles, & Maroldt, Karl. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Meisel, Jürgen (ed.), Langues en contact – pidgins – creoles. Tübingen: Narr, 21–53.Google Scholar

Baldi, Philip, & Page, Richard. 2006. Review of Vennemann Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica (2003). Lingua 116: 2183–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldinger, Kurt. 1958. Die Herausbildung der Sprachräume auf der Pyrenäenhalbinsel. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bammesberger, Alfred & Vennemann, Theo (eds.). 2003. Languages of prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan. 2004. English dialects in the North of England: morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Edgar (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English II: morphology and syntax, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 114–41.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, J. M. 1915. Los Shelknam: indígenas de la Tierra del Fuego. Buenos Aires: Talleres Gráficos de la Compañía General de Fósforos.Google Scholar

Bengtson, John (ed.). 2008. In hot pursuit of language in prehistory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bergmann, Gunter. 1990. Upper Saxon. In Russ, Charles (ed.), The dialects of modern German: a linguistic survey. London: Routledge, 290–312.Google Scholar

Bergsland, Knut. 1986. Comparative Eskimo-Aleut phonology and lexicon. Aikakauskirja/Journal de la Société finno-ougrienne 80: 63–137.Google Scholar

Berman, Howard. 1996. The position of Molala in Plateau Penutian. International Journal of American Linguistics, 62(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Bernard, John. 1981. Australian pronunciation. In The Macquarie dictionary. Sydney: Macquarie Library, 18–27.Google Scholar

Bethge, Richard. 1900. Konjugation des Urgermanischen. In Dieter, F (ed.), Laut- und Formenlehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. Leipzig: Reisland, 345–91.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, & Nichols, Johanna. 2020. Linguistic typology and hunter-gatherer languages. In Güldemann, Tom, McConvell, Patrick & Rhodes, Richard (eds.), The language of hunter-gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biggs, Bruce. 1978. The history of Polynesian phonology. In Wurm, S. A. & Carrington, L (eds.), Second international conference on Austronesian linguistics: proceedings. Canberra: Australian National University, 691–716.Google Scholar

Biraben, Jean-Noël. 1979. Essai sur l’évolution du nombre des hommes. Population 1: 13–24.Google Scholar

Bishko, Charles Julian. 1975. The Spanish and Portuguese reconquest. In Hazard, H. W. (ed.), A history of the crusades. vol. III. Madison: Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar

Blomkvist, Nils. 1979. Kalmars uppkomst och äldsta tid. In Hammarström, I (ed.), Kalmar stads historia I: Kalmarområdets forntid och stadens äldsta utveckling. Kalmar: Kulturnämnden i Kalmar.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Paul, Li (eds.), Selected papers from the eighth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 2005. Must sound change be linguistically motivated? Diachronica 22: 219–69.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 2009. The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 2012. Hawu vowel metathesis. Oceanic Linguistics 51: 207–33.Google Scholar

Bock, Karl Nielsen. 1933. Niederdeutsch auf dänischem Substrat: Studien zur Dialektgeographie Südostschleswigs. Marburg: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Bolze, Christine. 2007. On the simplification of nominal and verbal inflections in Late Old Northumbrian in comparison to Late West Saxon. University of Potsdam: MA thesis.Google Scholar

Bonnard, Henri, & Claude, Régnier. 1997. Petite grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Magnard.Google Scholar

Bornkessel, Ina. 2002. The argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation. Potsdam: Potsdam University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Bradley, Henry. 1904. The making of English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Branford, William. 1994. English in South Africa. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 5: English in Britain and overseas – origins and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–429.Google Scholar

Braunmüller, Kurt. 2008. Das älteste Germanische: offene Fragen und mögliche Antworten. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 373–403.Google Scholar

Breivik, Leiv Egil, & Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.). Language change: contributions to the study of its causes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 227–37.Google Scholar

Bremmer, Rolf. 2009. An introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 2002. Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense be in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 16–43.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 2007. Grammatical variation in England. In Britain, David (ed.), Language in the British Isles. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–104.Google Scholar

Browning, Robert. 1969. Medieval and Modern Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruyne, Jacques de. 1995. A comprehensive Spanish grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Callebout, Bruno, & Ryckeboer, Hugo. 1997. Contacts linguistiques français-néerlandais dans le Nord de la France. In Nelde, P, Stary, Z, Wölck, W & Goebl, H (eds.), Contact linguistics II. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1240–52.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 1997. On the linguistic prehistory of Finno-Ugric. In Hickey, R & Puppel, S (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling: a festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 829–62.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, & Poser, William. 2008. Language classification: history and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Capella, Joseph. 1997. The development of theory about automated patterns of face-to-face human interaction. In Philipsen, G & Albrecht, T (eds.), Developing communication theories. Albany: State University of New York Press, 57–83.Google Scholar

Carpenter, David. 2004. The struggle for mastery: the Penguin history of Britain 1066–1284. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2010. The evolution of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 2000. Universal sources of the vernacular. In Ammon, Ulrich, Nelde, Peter, & Mattheier, Klaus (eds.), Sociolinguistica: international yearbook of European sociolinguistics. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 11–15.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 2001. Vernacular universals. In Fontana, J. M., McNally, L, Turell, M. T. & Vallduví, E (eds.), ICLaVE 1: proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 2003. Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social implications, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Kortmann, B (ed.), Dialectology meets typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chapman, Kenneth. 1962. Icelandic-Norwegian linguistic relationships. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Clackson, James, & Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2007. The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clark, Ross. 1976. Aspects of proto-Polynesian syntax. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar

Clark, Ross. 1994. The Polynesian outliers as a locus of language contact. In Dutton, T & Tryon, D (eds.), Language contact and change in the Austronesian world. Berlin: Mouton, 109–40.Google Scholar

Coates, Richard. 2007. Invisible Britons: the view from linguistics. In Higham, N. J. (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 172–91.Google Scholar

Coates, Richard. 2009. A glimpse through a dirty window into an unlit house: names of some North-west European islands. In Ahrens, Wolfgang, Embleton, Sheila & Lapierre, André (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Toronto: York University, 228–42.Google Scholar

Combrink, Johan. 1978. Afrikaans: its origin and development. In Lanham, L & Prinsloo, K (eds.), Language and communication studies in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 69–95.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Morphology and word order reconstruction: problems and prospects. In Fisiak, J (ed.), Historical morphology. The Hague: Mouton, 83–96.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1992. Before complexity. In Hawkins, J & Gell-Mann, M (eds.), The evolution of human languages. Santa Fe: Westview Press, 193–211.Google Scholar

Craig Christy, Thomas. 1983. Uniformitarianism in linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cressman, Luther. 1956. Klamath prehistory: the prehistory of the culture of the Klamath Lake Area, Oregon. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 46: 375–513.Google Scholar

Cubberley, Paul. 2002. Russian: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2015. Linguistic mysteries around the North Sea. In Shaw, P, Erman, B & Sundkvist, P (eds.), From clerks to corpora: essays on the English language yesterday and today. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, 17–34.Google Scholar

Dahlbäck, Göran. 1998. Invandring – särskilt tysk – till Sverige under medeltiden. In Nilsson, Lars & Lilja, Sven (eds.), Invandrarna och lokalsamhället. Stockholm: Stad- och Kommunhistoriska Institutet, 11–30.Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1995. Middle English is a creole and its opposite: on the value of plausible speculation. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Linguistic change under contact conditions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 35–50.Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1996. The French influence on Middle English morphology: a corpus-based study of derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danchev, Andrei. 1997. The Middle English creolisation hypothesis revisited. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 79–108.Google Scholar

Darot, Mireille, & Pauleau, Christine. 1993. Situation du français en Nouvelle-Calédonie. In Robillard, D & Benjamin, M (eds.), Le français dans l’espace francophone. Paris: Champion, 283–301.Google Scholar

Davidson, Herbert. 1990. Han, hon, den: genusutvecklingen i svenskan under nysvensk tid. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

de Reuse, Willem 2006. A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2004. Person marking in Dutch dialects. In Kortmann, B (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 181–210.Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2005. Persoonsmarkering in de dialecten in het nederlandse taalgebied. Ghent: Ghent University Press.Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2009. Changing pronominal gender in Dutch; transmission or diffusion? In Tsipaklou, S, Karyolemou, M & Pavlou, P (eds.), Language variation: European perspectives II. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71–80.Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther, & van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. When typological rara generate rarissima: analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In Wohlgemuth, J & Cysouw, M (eds.), Rara and rarissima: documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther, & De Sutter, Gert, 2011. The geography of gender change: pronominal and adnominal gender in Flemish dialects of Dutch. Language Sciences 33, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dediu, Dan, & Levinson, Stephen. 2013. On the antiquity of language: the reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences. Frontiers in Psychology 2013: 1–17.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1991. Chronological strata of suffix classes in the Klamath verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 57: 426–45.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott, & Golla, Victor. 1997. The Penutian hypothesis: retrospect and prospect. International Journal of American Linguistics 63, 1: 171–202.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2002. The morphology of Old Nordic II: Old Swedish and Old Danish. In Bandle, O et al. (eds.), The Nordic Languages I. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 925–40.Google Scholar

Demiral, Sukru, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schleweski, Matthias. 2008. On the universality of language comprehension strategies: evidence from Turkish. Cognition 106: 484–500.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond. 1977. Word order universals and the existence of OVS languages. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 590–9.Google Scholar

Dieter, Ferdinand (ed.). 1900. Laut– und Formenlehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. Leipzig: Reisland.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages: their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory 2: grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Bruce. 1993. A grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Bruce. 1994. Afrikaans. In König, E & Van der Auwera, J (eds.), The Germanic languages. London: Routledge, 478–504.Google Scholar

Dresher, B. Eland. 2000. Analogical levelling of vowel length in West Germanic. In Lahiri, Aditi (ed.), Analogy, levelling, markedness: principles of change in phonology and morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drinka, Bridget. 2003. The development of the perfect in Indo-European: stratigraphic evidence of prehistoric areal influence. In Andersen, H (ed.), Language contacts in prehistory: studies in stratigraphy. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 77–105.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13: 257–292.Google Scholar

Dubé, Jaïmé. 2013. Reconsidering the ‘isolating protolanguage hypothesis’ in the evolution of morphology. In Cathcart, C, Chen, I.-H., Finley, G, Kang, S, Sandy, C & Stickles, E (eds). Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 76–90.Google Scholar

Duke, Janet. 2010, Gender reduction and loss in Germanic: three case studies. In Nübling, D, Dammel, A & Kürschner, S (eds.), Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Dumond, Don. 1987. A reexamination of Aleut prehistory. American Anthropologist 89(1): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durrell, Martin. 1989. Westphalian and Eastphalian. In Russ, C (ed.), The dialects of modern German. London: Routledge, 59–90.Google Scholar

Durrell, Martin. 1999. Zum Ausgleich der Ablautalternanzen im Niederdeutschen. In Wagener, Peter (ed.), Sprachformen: Deutsch und Niederdeutsch in europäischen Bezügen. Stuttgart: Steiner, 39–49.Google Scholar

Ebert, Wolfgang, Frings, Theodor, Gleissner, Kathe, Kötzschke, Rudolf & Streitberg, Gerhart. 1936. Kulturräume und Kulturströmungen im mitteldeutschen Osten. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Eisikovits, Edina. 1991. Variation in subject-verb agreement in Inner Sydney English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the world: sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235–55.Google Scholar

Ekwall, Eilert. 1960. The concise Oxford dictionary of place-names, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elcock, W. D. 1960. The Romance languages. London : Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph, & Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2014. English: the language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University Press.Google Scholar

Enger, Hans-Olav. 2010. Sound laws, inflectional change and the autonomy of morphology. In Ralli, Angeliki et al. (eds.). Morphology and diachrony. Patras: Univeristy of Patras.Google Scholar

Etxepare, Ricardo. 2003. Valency and argument structure in the Basque Verb. In Hualde, Jose Ignacio & de Urbina, Jon Ortiz (eds.), A grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 363–426.Google Scholar

Evans, D. Simon. 1964. A Grammar of Middle Welsh. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2010. Dying words: endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, & Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Introduction: problems of polysynthesis. In Evans, N & Sasse, H.-J. (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1–13.Google Scholar

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2005. Syntactic developments from Old Nordic to Early Modern Nordic. In Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt & Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.), The Nordic languages: an international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1149–60.Google Scholar

Fairbanks, Gordon. 1977. Case inflections in Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies 5: 1–31.Google Scholar

Feist, Sigmund. 1932. The origin of the Germanic languages and the Europeanization of North Europe. Language 8: 245–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Charles. 1959. The Arabic koiné. Language 25: 616–630.Google Scholar

Fernandes, Maria Alice. 2011. The diminutive suffixes of southern Portuguese: an example of new dialect formation by koineization. In International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology. Lisbon: University of Lisbon.Google Scholar

Ferrando, Antoni. 1989. La formació històrica del valencià. In Ferrando, A (ed.), Segon Congrés Internacional de la Llengua Catalana. vol. VIII. Àrea 7. Història de la Llengua. València: Institut de Filologia Valenciana, 399–428.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku. 2003. More on the English progressive and the Celtic connection. In Tristram, Hildegard (ed.), The Celtic Englishes III. Heidelberg: Winter, 150–68.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.). 2002. The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: University Press.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Paulasto, Heli (eds.). 2008. Vernacular universals and language contacts: evidence from varieties of English and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fischer, Steven. 2001. Mangarevan doublets: preliminary evidence for Proto-Southeastern Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics 40: 112–24.Google Scholar

Foley, William. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foley, William. 1997. Anthropological linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Forby, Robert. [1830] 1969. The vocabulary of East Anglia. [London: Nichols] New York: Kelly.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 1992. Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 242–8.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 1998. Language relations across the Bering Strait: reappraising the archaeological and linguistic evidence. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 2002. The rise and fall of polysynthesis in the Eskimo-Aleut family. In Evans, N & Sasse, H.-J. (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 282–97.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael, & Vajda, Edward. forthcoming. Mid-Holocene language connections between Asia and North America.Google Scholar

Fortson, Benjamin. 2010. Indo-European language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fox, Cyril. 1932. The personality of Britain: its influence on inhabitant and invader in prehistoric and early historic times. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales.Google Scholar

Frings, Theodor. 1932. Sprache und Siedlung im mitteldeutschen Osten. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar

Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft: ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar

Galmés de Fuentes, Álvaro. 1983. Dialectología mozárabe. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Gamble, Clive. 1986. The palaeolithic settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garman, Michael. 1990. Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Garrett, Andrew, & Weiss, Michiel (eds.). Handbook of Indo-European studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Geerts, Guido. 1966. Genus en geslacht in de Gouden Eeuw. Brussells: Belgisch Interuniversitair Centrum voor Neerlandistiek.Google Scholar

Gelling, Margaret. 1993. Place-names in the landscape: the geographical roots of Britain’s place-names. London: Dent.Google Scholar

Georgiev, Vladimir. 1981. Introduction to the history of the Indo-European languages. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Geraghty, Paul. 1983. The history of the Fijian languages. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Geraghty, Paul. 1986. The sound system of Proto-Central-Pacific. In Geraghty, P, Carrington, L & Wurm, S. A. (eds.), FOCAL II: Papers from the fourth international conference on Austronesian linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-94, 289–312.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy, & Young, Philip. 2002. Cooperation and interpersonal manipulation in the society of intimates. In Chibatani, M (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–56.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goldinger, Stephen, Luce, Paul & Pisoni, David. 1989. Priming lexical neighbours of spoken words: effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 501–18.Google Scholar

Goltz, Reinhard, & Walker, Alastair. 1989. North Saxon. In Russ, Charles (ed.), The dialects of Modern German. London: Routledge, 31–58.Google Scholar

Gordon, E. V. 1957. An introduction to Old Norse. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret & Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Zealand English: its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English: a creole? In Kastovsky, Dieter & Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–44.Google Scholar

Grace, George. 1990. The ‘aberrant’ (vs. ‘exemplary’) Melanesian languages. In Baldi, P (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–73.Google Scholar

Greenhill, Simon, Atkinson, Quentin, Meade, Andrew & Gray, Russell. 2010. The shape and tempo of language evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 2443–50.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, McConvell, Patrick & Rhodes, Richard. 2020. The language of hunter-gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hammarström, Göran. 1980. Australian English: its origins and status. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Härke, Heinrich. 2002. Kings and warriors: population and landscape from post-Roman to Norman Britain. In Slack, Paul & Ward, Ryk (eds.), The peopling of Britain: the shaping of a human landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145–75.Google Scholar

Harlow, Ray. 1987. A word-list of South Island Maori. 2nd ed. Auckland: Te Reo.Google Scholar

Harlow, Ray. 2001. A Maori reference grammar. Auckland: Longman.Google Scholar

Harris, Martin. 1988. The Romance languages. In Harris, Martin & Vincent, Nigel (eds.), The Romance languages. London: Routledge, 1–25.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70.Google Scholar

Hassan, Fekri. 1981. Demographic archaeology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Hatcher, John, & Bailey, Mark. 2001. Modelling the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André. 1954. De l’origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242: 69–82.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André. 1961. Richesse en phonèmes et richesse en locateurs. L’Homme 1: 5–10.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian languages: an introduction to their history. London: Faber.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 1990 [1987]. Germanic languages. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), The major languages of Western Europe. London: Routledge, 58–66.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 2012. Patterns of asymmetry in argument structure across languages: some principles and puzzles. In Suihkonen, Pirkho, Comrie, Bernard & Solovyev, Valery (eds.), Argument structure and grammatical relations: a crosslinguistic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hedberg, Nancy, & Potter, David. 2010. Equative and predicational copulas in Thai. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Heide, Eldar. 2003. Felleskjønnet i bergensk: resultat av mellomnedertysk kvantitetspåverknad? Maal og Minne, 2003: 23–35.Google Scholar

Helle, Knut. 1982. Bergen bys historie I: kongssete og kjøpstad – fra opphave til 1536. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond. 2000. On the phonology of gender in Modern German. In Matti, R, Nevalainen, T & Saari, M (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition II: manifestations of gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 621–63.Google Scholar

Higham, Nick. (ed.). 2007. The Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: BoydellGoogle Scholar

Hock, H. H., & Joseph, Brian. 1996. Language history, language change and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hodge, Carleton. 1970. The linguistic cycle. Language Sciences 13: 1–7.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 1994. Preposition stranding and resumptivity in West Germanic. In Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan & Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 95–118.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 1996. Transitive pronouns and gender syncretism in Fering-Öömrang. NOWELE 27, 45–66.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 2001a. Comparative aspects of Frisian morphology and syntax. In Munske, Horst Haider et al (ed.), Handbook of Frisian studies. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 775–86.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 2001b. Outline history of West Frisian. In Munske, Horst Haider et al (ed.), Handbook of Frisian studies. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 722–34.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 2006. Uwz âde Friez’ne tonge, de Halbertsma’s jonges en andere genitiefconstructies in het Fries. Taal & Tongval, 2006: 96–114.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Jarich. 2010. Die Kasusmarkierung von Eigennamen im Festlandnordfriesischen und in anderen westgermanischen Dialekten. In Dammel, Antje, Kürschner, Sebastian & Nübling, Damaris (eds.), Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik vol. 2: Germanische Linguistik. Hildesheim: Olms, 749–79.Google Scholar

Hoijer, Harry 1945. Classificatory verb stems in the Apachean languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 11: 13–23.Google Scholar

Hollyman, Kenneth. 1979. Le français en Nouvelle-Calédonie. In Valdmann, A (ed.), Le français hors de France. Paris: Champion, 621–9.Google Scholar

Holman, Katherine. 2007. The northern conquest: Vikings in Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, & Rijkhoff, Jan. 1998. Word order in the Germanic languages. In Siewierska, Anna (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 75–104.Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: a history of the language and its speakers. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hutterer, Claus Jürgen. 1975 [2008]. Die germanischen Sprachen: ihre Geschichte in Grundzügen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. [4th ed. Wiesbaden: VMA-Verlag].Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Speech and language: on the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. In Bloomfield, M & Haugen, E (eds.), Language as a human problem. New York: Norton, 45–71.Google Scholar

Itkonen, Terho. 1983. Välikatsaus suomen kielen juuriin. Virittäjä 87: 190–229, 349–86.Google Scholar

Jackson, Kenneth 1953. Language and history in early Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Jahr, Ernst Håkon. 1995. Nedertysk og nordisk: språksamfunn og språkkontakt i Hansatida. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Nordisk og nedertysk: språkkontakt og språkutvilking i Norden i seinmellomalderen. Oslo: Novus, 9–28.Google Scholar

Jahr, Ernst Håkon. 1998. Sociolinguistics in historical language contact: the Scandinavian languages and Low German during the Hanseatic period. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Language change: advances in historical sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 119–13.Google Scholar

Jahr, Ernst Håkon. 2001. Historical sociolinguistics: the role of Low German language contact in the Scandinavian typological split of the late Middle Ages. Lingua Posnaniensis 43, 95–104.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du Russe comparée à celle des autres langues Slaves =Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 2.Google Scholar

Janse, Mark. 2009. Greek-Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. Études Helléniques/Hellenic Studies 17, 1: 37–54.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1894. Progress in language. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: its nature, development and origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Jones, Bob Morris. 2010. Tense and aspect in informal Welsh. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1988. Grammatical gender in English 950–1250. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Jones, Michael. 1993. Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Peter. 1954. Zum Schleswiger Niederdeutsch: Kritik und Forschung. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Juneau, Marcel. 1972. Contribution à l’histoire de la prononciation française au Québec: études des graphies des documents d’archives. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press.Google Scholar

Karabulatova, Irina, Sayfulina, Flera & Akhmetova, Bigaysha. 2013. Ethno-lingual aspect of modern functioning of Russian dialects in North Kazakhstan. World Applied Sciences Journal 27: 137–40.Google Scholar

Kari, James, & Potter, Ben (eds.). 2010. The Dene-Yenseian connection. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar

Kastovsky, Dieter, & Mettinger, Arthur (eds.). 2001. Language contact in the history of English. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kay, Paul. 1976. Discussion of papers by Kiparsky and Wescott. In Harnard, S. R., Steklis, H. D. & Lancaster, J (eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 17–19.Google Scholar

Keenan, Ed. 1976. Discussion. In Harnard, S. R., Steklis, H. D. & Lancaster, J (eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 92–6.Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Keller, Wolfgang. 1925. Keltisches im englischen Verbum. In Anglica: Untersuchungen zur englischen Philologie 1. Leipzig: Mayer & Müller, 55–66.Google Scholar

King, Gareth. 2003. Modern Welsh: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kingston, John. 2011. Tonogenesis. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2304–33.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 2009. The Germanic weak preterite. In Steinkrüger, Patrick & Krifka, Manfred (eds.), On Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 107–24.Google Scholar

Kirch, Patrick Vinton, & Green, Roger. 2001. Hawaiki, ancestral Polynesia: an essay in historical anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kitson, Peter. 1996. British and European river names. Transactions of the Philological Society 94: 73–118.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani. 2006. Was/were variation in traditional dialects of England. Paper given at ICEHL 14, Bergamo, August 21–25.Google Scholar

Korotkova, Natalia, & Lander, Yury. 2010. Deriving affix ordering in polysynthesis: evidence from Adyghe. Morphology 20: 299–319.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. Global synopsis: morphological and syntactic variation in English. In Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Edgar (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English II: morphology and syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1142–202.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann & Ringe, Donald. 1995. The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In Herring, Susan, van Reenen, Pieter & Schøsler, Lene (eds.), Textual Parameters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 353–91.Google Scholar

Krupa, Victor. 1982. The Polynesian languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kurath, Hans. 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kusmenko, Jurij. 1996. Sprachkontakte und Sprachveränderungen in der süddänisch-nordfriesisch-niederdeutschen Kontaktzone. In Baumgartner, Walter & Fix, Hans (eds.), Arbeiten zur Skandinavistik XII. Vienna: Fassbänder, 65–83.Google Scholar

Kusmenko, Jurij. 2000. Entwicklung des Genussystems in den skandinavischen Sprachen. In Paul, Fritz (ed.), Arbeiten zur Skandinavistik XIII. Frankfurt: Lang, 469–78.Google Scholar

Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: the influence of social change on verbal inflection. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change I: internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laing, Lloyd, & Laing, Jennifer. 1979. Anglo-Saxon England. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Laing, Margaret. 2011. The reflexes of OE beon as a marker of futurity in Early Middle English. In Lenker, Ursula, Huber, Judith & Mailhammer, Robert (eds.), Verbal and nominal constructions in the history of English: variation and conventionalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Laker, Stephen. 2002. An explanation for the changes kw-, hw-> χw- in the English dialects. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.), The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, 183–98.Google Scholar

Laker, Stephen. 2008. Changing views about Anglo-Saxons and Britons. In Aertsen, Henk & Veldhoen, Bart (eds.), Six papers from the 28th Symposium on Medieval Studies. Leiden: Leiden University Department, 1–38.Google Scholar

Lanham, Len. 1967. The pronunciation of South African English. Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 2 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–155.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 2000. Phonology and morphology. In Lass, R (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: vol. III, 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–186.Google Scholar

Lauttamus, Timo, Wiersma, Wybo & Nerbonne, John. 2008. Detecting syntactic substrate effects automatically in interlanguage corpora. In Norde, Muriel, de Jonge, Bob & Hasselblatt, Cornelius (eds.), Language contact in times of globalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Laycock, Donald. 1982. Melanesian linguistic diversity: a Melanesian choice? In May, R & Nelson, H (eds.), Melanesia: beyond diversity. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, 33–8.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1961. A definition of Proto-Germanic: a study in the chronological delimitation of languages. Language 37: 67–74.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred. 1993. Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lewis, Henry, & Pedersen, Holger. 1937. A concise comparative Celtic grammar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Lindow, Wolfgang, Möhn, Dieter, Niebaum, Hermann, Stellmacher, Dieter, Taubken, Hans & Wirrer, Jan. 1998. Niederdeutsche Grammatik. Bremen: Schuster Leer.Google Scholar

Lipski, John. 1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lively, Scott, Pisoni, David & Goldinger, Stephen. 1994. Spoken word recognition: research and theory. In Gernsbacher, Morton (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 265–301.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, Ernst. 1968. Beiträge zu einer nordfriesischen Grammatik. I. Das Substantiv und das Adjektiv, das Zahlwort und der bestimmte Artikel. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar

Luce, Paul. 1986. Neighbourhoods in the mental lexicon. In Research on speech perception technical report No. 6. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Luce, Paul, & Pisoni, David. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19, 1–36.Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary, & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5.1: e8559. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2009. The origin of the feminine gender in PIE: an old problem in a new perspective. In Bubenik, Vit, Hewson, John & Rose, Sarah (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: Benjamin, 3–13.Google Scholar

Lutz, Angelika. 2009. Celtic influence on Old English and West Germanic. English Language and Linguistics 13: 227–49.Google Scholar

Lutz, Angelika. 2010. Why is West-Saxon English different from Old Saxon? In Sauer, Hans & Story, Joanna (eds.), Anglo-Saxon England and the Continent. Tempe: Arizona Center for Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies, 113–38.Google Scholar

Lynch, John, Ross, Malcolm & Crowley, Tony. 2002. The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Donald. 1992. The Celtic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Macaulay, R. K. S. 2002. I’m off to Philadelphia in the morning. American Speech 77: 227–41.Google Scholar

Mackridge, Peter. 1985. The Modern Greek language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Madvig, Johan Nicolai. 1857. De grammatische Betegnelser. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Mailhammer, Robert. 2011. The prehistory of European languages. In Kortmann, B & van der Auwera, J (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: a comprehensive guide. Berlin: de Gruyter, 671–82.Google Scholar

Mailhammer, Robert. 2012. Diversity vs. uniformity: Europe before the arrival of the Indo-European languages: a comparison with prehistoric Australia. In Mailhammer, Robert & Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Linguistic roots of Europe. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 29–75.Google Scholar

Mallory, James. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: language, archaeology and myth. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Mallory, James. 2013. The origins of the Irish. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Marck, Jeff. 1999. Revising Polynesian linguistic subgrouping and its culture history implications. In Blench, R & Spriggs, M (eds.), Archaeology and language IV. London: Routledge, 95–122.Google Scholar

Marck, Jeff. 2000. Polynesian language and culture history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, & Reershemius, Gertrud. 2003. Low German: East Frisian dialect. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Matthews, William. 1953. The structure and development of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mattoso Camara, Joaquim. 1972. The Portuguese language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McDonough, Joyce, & Sussman, Rachel. 2006. A methodology for the investigation of speaker’s knowledge of structure in Athabaskan. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: 102–13.Google Scholar

McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McMahon, Rob. 2011. Variation and populations. In Maguire, Warren & McMahon, April (eds.), Analysing variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–60.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John. 1997. Towards a new model of creole genesis. New York: Lang.Google Scholar

Melchert, Craig 2015. The position of Anatolian. In Weiss, M & Garrett, A (eds.), Handbook of Indo-European studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melchert, Craig, & Oettinger, Norbert. 2009. Ablativ und Instrumental im Hethitischen und Indogermanischen: ein Beitrag zur relativen Chronologie. Incontri Linguistici 32: 53–73.Google Scholar

Miller, D. Gary. 2012. External influences on English: from its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James. 1992. Middle English dialectology. In Blake, N (ed.), The history of the English language II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 156–206.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mittendorf, Ingo, & Poppe, Erich. 2000. Celtic contacts of the English progressive? In Tristram, Hildegard (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II. Heidelberg: Winter, 117–45.Google Scholar

Moore, Bruce. 1999. Australian English: Australian identity. Lingua Franca. www.abc.net.au/rn/arts/ling/stories/s68786.htm.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma. 2003. Learning style and identity: a sociolinguistic analysis of a Bolton high-school. Manchester: Manchester University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Mørck, Endre. 2018. Seinmellomalderen (1350–1536). In Nesse, Agnete (ed.), Norsk språkhistorie IV: tidslinjer. Oslo: Novus, 293–356.Google Scholar

Morin, Yves-Charles. 1994. Les sources historiques de la prononciation du français du Québec. In Mougeon, R & Beniak, E (eds.), Les origines du français québécois. Quebec: Laval University Press, 199–236.Google Scholar

Morris, John. 1973. The age of Arthur: a history of the British Isles from 350 to 650. London: Weidenfeld & NicolsonGoogle Scholar

Mortensen, David. 2012. The emergence of obstruents after high vowels. Diachronica 29: 434–470.Google Scholar

Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A handbook of Middle English. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Mougeon, Raymond, & Beniak, Édouard (eds.). 1994. Les origines du français québécois. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1977. Pidginisation and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Munske, Horst Heine. (ed.). 2001. Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian Studies. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Nedkvitne, Arnved. 1983. Utenrikshandelen fra det vestafjelske Norge. Bergen: Bergen University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Nesse, Agnete. 2002. Språkkontakt mellom norsk og tysk i hansatidens Bergen. Oslo: Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.Google Scholar

Nesse, Agnete. 2005. Boken – han og kua – den: om endringer i norske genussystem. Maal og minne, 2005: 136–45.Google Scholar

Nesse, Agnete. 2009. Die Geschichte der Stadtmundart in Bergen (Norwegen) mit besonderem Augenmerk auf den Kontakt mit dem Mittelniederdeutschen. Niederdeutsches Wort 49: 31–40.Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel. 1995. Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency. Linguistics 33, 359–67.Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel, & Romaine, Suzanne. 2000. Vanishing voices: the extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1997. Modelling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 359–84.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Review of Ö. Dahl: The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Diachronica 24: 171–8.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, & Peterson, David. 1996. The Amerind personal pronouns. Language 72.2: 336–71.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Gunhild. 1947. Glidning og lukning i Rømømaalets høje vokaler (‘Klusilspring’). Danske Folkemaal 15: 41–65.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2007. English and the Jutland dialect; or, the demise of a romantic notion. In Wawn, A et al. (eds.), Constructing nations, reconstructing myth: essays in honour of T. A. Shippey. Turnhout: Brepols, 97–108Google Scholar

Nissen, Gunhild. 1945. Konsonaterne i Rømømålet i historisk belysning. Danske Folkemål 14: 97–119.Google Scholar

Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish: grammatical structure and dialectal variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ojanen, Anna-Liisa. 1982. A syntax of the Cambridgeshire dialect. Helsinki: Helsinki University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 1996a. On the position of Rotuman. In Nothofer, Bernd (ed.), Reconstruction, classification, description: Festschrift in honour of Isidore Dyen, Hamburg: Abera Verlag Meyer & Co., 387–410.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 1996b. On the Polynesian subgroup as a problem for Irwin’s continuous settlement hypothesis. In Davidson, Janet, Irwin, G, Leach, F, Pawley, A & Brown, D (eds.), Oceanic culture history: essays in honour of Roger Green. Dunedin: New Zealand Journal of Archaeology, 387–410.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 1999. Chasing rainbows: implications of the rapid dispersal of Austronesian languages for subgrouping and reconstruction. In Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Paul, Li (eds.), Selected papers from the eighth international conference on Austronesian linguistics. Taipei: Academia Sinica, 95–138.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, & Ross, Malcolm. 1993. Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 425–59.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Karen Margrethe. 1999. Genusforenkling i Københavnsk. Danske Folkemål 41: 79–106.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Karen Margrethe. forthcoming. Genus: nominal- og adjektivbøjning. In Hjorth, Ebba (ed.), Dansk sproghistorie. Copehhagen: Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar

Pelech, William, 2002. Charting the interpersonal underworld: the application of cluster analysis to the study of interpersonal coordination in small groups. Currents: New Scholarship in the Human Services 1: 1–12.Google Scholar

Pelteret, David. 1995. Slavery in early medieval England from the reign of Alfred until the twelfth century. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. 1991. A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. 1998. Mozarabic. In Price, G (ed.), Encyclopedia of the languages of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell, 327.Google Scholar

Penny, Ralph. 2000. Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere. 1980. The covariation of culture and grammar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere. 1995. Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Perridon, Harry. 1997. Is the definite article in Jutlandic a borrowing from Low German? Multilingua 16: 351–63.Google Scholar

Perridon, Harry. 2003. Language contact and grammatical change: the case of Bergen. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 24: 235–56.Google Scholar

Petyt, K. M. 1985. Dialect and accent in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: Benjamin.Google Scholar

Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. The grammar of variation: verbal agreement in northern dialects of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Pittman, Christine. 2004. ‘The key to the cabinets are rusty and unhinged’: the conceptual and functional effects of the predicate on agreement error rates. Toronto working papers in linguistics 23: 115–46.Google Scholar

Pogatscher, Alois. 1888. Zur Lautlehre der griechischen, lateinischen und romanischen Lehnworte im Altenglischen. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar

Poirier, Claude. 1994. La langue parlée en Nouvelle-France: vers un convergence des explications. In Mougeon, R & Beniak, E (eds.), Les origines du français québécois. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press, 237–74.Google Scholar

Pokorny, Julius. 1927–30. Das nicht-indogermanische Substrat im Irischen. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 16: 95–144, 231–66, 363–94; 17: 373–88; 18: 233–48.Google Scholar

Polomé, Edgar. 1990. Types of linguistic evidence for early contact: Indo-Europeans and non-Indo-Europeans. In Greppin, John & Markey, Thomas (eds.), When worlds collide. Ann Arbor: Karoma, 267–89.Google Scholar

Poulson, Laurie. 2011. Meta-modeling of tense and aspect in a cross-linguistic grammar engineering platform. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 28.Google Scholar

Pountain, Christopher. 1982. *essere/stare as a Romance phenomenon. In Vincent, Nigel & Harris, Martin (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb: essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th Birthday. London: Croom Helm, 139–60.Google Scholar

Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of Early Standard English: the creolisation hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85.Google Scholar

Priestly, Tom. 1983. On ‘drift’ in Indo-European gender systems. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11: 339–63.Google Scholar

Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and thematic roles: ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Rambø, Gro-Renée. 2008. Historiske og sosiale betingelser for språkkontakt mellom nedertysk og skandinavisk i seinmiddelalderen: et bidrag til historisk språksosiologi. Kristiansand: Agder University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 1999. Review of Leonard Faltz (1998): the Navajo verb: a grammar for students and scholars. Linguistic Typology 3: 393–400.Google Scholar

Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ritt, Nikolaus. 1992. Luick, the theoretician. Vienna English Working Papers 1: 93–104.Google Scholar

Rivard, Adjutor. 1914. Études sur les parlers de France au Canada. Quebec: Garneau.Google Scholar

Roberge, Paul. 1995. The formation of Afrikaans. In Mesthrie, Raj (ed.), Language and social history: studies in South African sociolinguistics. Cape Town: Philip, 68–88.Google Scholar

Roberge, Paul. 2010. Contact and the history of Germanic Languages. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Blackwell, 406–31.Google Scholar

Roma, Elisa. 2007. Relativisation strategies in insular Celtic languages: history and contacts with English. In Ramat, Paolo & Roma, Elisa (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas: convergencies from a historical and typological perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 245–88.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm. 1992. The sound of Proto-Austronesian: an outsider’s view of the Formosan evidence. Oceanic Linguistics 31: 23–64.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech community events. In Blench, R & Spriggs, M (eds.), Archaeology and language. London: Routledge, 209–61.Google Scholar

Rothwell, William. 1998. Arrivals and departures: the adoption of French terminology into Middle English. English Studies 79: 144–65.Google Scholar

Russ, Charles (ed.). 1989. The dialects of Modern German. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Russ, Charles. 1982. Die Vereinfachung der Nominalflexion im Englischen und Jutisch-Dänischen: ein Fall der gegenseitigen Beeinflussung? Orbis 29: 120–29.Google Scholar

Ryckeboer, Hugo. 2002. Dutch/Flemish in the North of France. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23: 22–35.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold. 2003. A grammar of Kalaallisut. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Sammallahti, Pekka. 1977. Suomalaisten esihistorian kysymyksiä. Virittäjä 81: 119–36.Google Scholar

Samuels, Michael. 1972. Linguistic evolution: with special reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1912. Language and environment. American Anthropologist 14: 226–42.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Schadeberg, Thilo. 1981. Die Geschichte der Nominalklassen des Laru (Kordofanisch). Berliner Afrikanistische Vorträge 21: 203–12.Google Scholar

Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. 1846. Œuvres de M. Auguste-Guillaume de Schlegel. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Schönfeld, Helmut. 1989. East Low German. In Russ, Charles (ed.), The dialects of Modern German. London: Routledge, 91–135.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 1995. Studies in British Celtic Phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 2002. The rise and fall of British Latin: evidence from English and Brittonic. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.), The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: University Press, 87–110.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 2003. Early developments of the vowel systems of Northwest Germanic and Saami. In Bammesberger, Alfred & Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Languages of prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Winter, 195–226.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 2007. What Britons spoke around 400 AD. In Higham, Nicholas (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 165–71.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 2009. Celtic influence on Old English: phonological and phonetic evidence. English Language and Linguistics, 13: 193–211.Google Scholar

Schumacher, Stefan. 2009. Lexical and structural language-contact phenomena along the Germano-Celtic transition zone. In Zimmer, Stefan (ed.), Kelten am Rhein II: Philologie. Sprachen und Literaturen. Mainz: von Zabern, 247–66.Google Scholar

Shetter, William. 1991. Dutch: an essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sheynin, Hayim. 2004. Review of T. Vennemann: Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica. http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15–1878.html#1.Google Scholar

Shields, Kenneth. 2010. Linguistic typology and the reconstruction of the Indo-European accusative plural. Emerita: Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 78: 33–42.Google Scholar

Shorrocks, Graham. 1999. A grammar of the dialect of the Bolton area II: morphology and syntax. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Sibata, Takeshi. 1999. The evolution of the Common Language in Hokkaido. In Shibata, Takeshi, Kunihiro, Tetsuya, Inoue, Fumio & Long, Daniel (eds.), Sociolinguistics in Japanese contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter, 229–248.Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2008. Pronominal gender in English: a study of English varieties from a cross-linguistic perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2009. Complexity in core argument marking and population size. In Sampson, G, Gil, D & Trudgill, P (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–40.Google Scholar

Skard, Vemund. 1967. Norskspråkhistorie I: til 1523. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Skard, Vemund. 1972. Norskspråkhistorie II: 1523–1814. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Skautrup, Peter. 1944. Det Danske Sprogs Historie I. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Skjekkeland, Martin. 1997. Dei norske dialektane: tradisjonelle særdrag i jamføring me skriftmåla. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.Google Scholar

Skrzypek, Dominika. 2010. Interactions of grammatical categories: how three genders became two. Skandinavistik: European Journal of Scandinavian Studies 38: 91–106.Google Scholar

Smith, Aaron. 2001. The role of frequency in the specialisation of the English anterior. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 361–82.Google Scholar

Smitherman, Thomas, & Jóhanna, Barðdal. 2009. Typological changes in the evolution of Indo-European syntax? Diachronica 26(2): 253–73.Google Scholar

Sneddon, J. N. 2006. Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Søndergaard, Bent. 1970. Den såkaldte klusilspring, specielt i morsingmål. Sprog og kultur 26: 61–8.Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: morphology and syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Spalinger, Edeltraut. 1955. Absterben von jacere im Galloromanischen. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2008. Zero copula for predicate nominals. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), World atlas of linguistic structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, nr. 120.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Roland C. 1956. A survey of the phonetics and grammatical structure of the Nuba Mountain languages. Afrika und Übersee 40: 93–115.Google Scholar

Sutton, Douglas (ed.). 1994. The origins of the first New Zealanders. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar

Szemerényi, Oswald. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tadmor, Uri. 2015. When culture grammaticalises: the pronominal system of Onya Darat. In De Busser, Rik & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), Language structure and environment: social, cultural, and natural factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–98.Google Scholar

Taeldeman, Johan. 2005. Oost-Vlaams. Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2008. There was universals; then there weren’t: a comparative sociolinguistic perspective on ‘default singulars’. In Fillpula, Markku, Paulasto, Heli & Klemola, Juhani (eds.), Vernacular universals versus contact induced change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thomas, Mark, Stumpf, Michael & Heinrich, Härke. 2008. Integration versus apartheid in post-Roman Britain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275: 2419–21.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah, & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. Icelandic. In König, E & van der Auwera, J (eds.), The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thurston, William 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: esoterogeny in West New Britain. In Harlow, R & Hooper, R (eds.), VICAL I: Papers in Oceanic linguistics. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand, 555–79.Google Scholar

Tiersma, Pieter Meijes. 1985. Frisian reference grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. 1963. English and Welsh. In Lewis, Henry (ed.), Angles and Britons: O’Donnell Lectures. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1–41.Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. 1983. English and Welsh. In Tolkien, J. R. R. (ed.), The monsters and the critics and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin, 162–97.Google Scholar

Tomlin, Roger. 1988. The curse tablets. In Cunliffe, B (ed.), The temple of Sulis Minerva at Bath II: the finds from the Sacred Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59–277.Google Scholar

Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Trask, Larry. 1997. The history of Basque. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Trask, Larry.1995. Origin and relatives of the Basque language: review of the evidence. In Hualde, José Ignacio, Lakarra, Joseba & Trask, Larry (eds.), Towards a history of the Basque language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 65–77.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard (ed.). 2003. The Celtic Englishes III. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard. 2004. Diglossia in Anglo-Saxon England, or what was spoken Old English like? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 40: 87–110.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard. 2006. Why don’t the English speak Welsh? In Higham, N. J. (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell, 192–214.Google Scholar

Trotter, David. 2000. Anglo-Norman. In Price, Glanville (ed.), Languages of the British Isles. Oxford: Blackwell, 197–206.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1973. Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3: 215–46.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On dialect: social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Typology and sociolinguistics: linguistic structure, social structure and explanatory comparative dialectology. Folia Linguistica 31: 349–60.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2000. On locating the boundary between language contact and dialect contact: Low German and continental Scandinavian. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Språkkontakt: innverknaden frå nedertysk på andre nordeuropeiske språk. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd, 71–86.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2002. Linguistic and social typology. In Chambers, J. K., Schilling-Estes, N & Trudgill, P (eds.), Handbook of Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 707–28.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2003. The Norfolk dialect. Cromer: Poppyland.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: the inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: on the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37(2): 241–54.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In Hickey, R (ed.), Handbook of language contact. Oxford: Blackwell, 299–319.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2012. The history of dialect contact in English. In Bergs, Alexander & Brinton, Laurel (eds.), Historical Linguistics of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2013. Gender maintenance and loss in Totenmålet, English, and other major Germanic varieties. In Lohndal, Terje (ed.), In search of Universal Grammar: from Old Norse to Zoque. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 77–108.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2020. Sociolinguistic typology and the uniformitarian hypothesis. In Crevels, Mily, Hombert, Jean-Marie & Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Language dispersal, diversification, and contact: a global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tryon, Darrell. 1993. Comparative Austronesian dictionary. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Tuten, Donald. 2003. Koineization in medieval Spanish. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Urbańczyk, Stanisław. 1976. Zarys dialektologii polskiej [An outline of Polish dialectology]. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar

Väänänen, Veikko. 1967. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward. 2010a. A Siberian link with the Na-Dene. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5: 31–99.Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward. 2010b. Yeniseian, Na-Dene, and historical Linguistics. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5: 100–18.Google Scholar

Van Loey, Adolphe. 1973. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst I: vormleer. 7th ed. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: De Ridder.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2000. English as a ‘Celtic’ language: Atlantic influences from above and below. In Tristram, Hildegard (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II. Heidelberg: Winter, 399–406.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2001. Atlantis Semitica: structural contact features in Celtic and English. In Brinton, Laurel (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999: selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 351–69.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2002. Semitic → Celtic → English: the transitivity of language contact. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.), The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, 295–330.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2003a. Languages in prehistoric Europe north of the Alps. In Bammesberger, Alfred & Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Languages in prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Winter, 319–32.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2003b. Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica. Edited by Hanna, Patrizia Noel Aziz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2010a. Contact and prehistory: the Indo-European Northwest. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The handbook of language contact. Oxford: Blackwell, 380–405.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2010b. Contact and prehistory in the Indo-European Northwest: lexical influences. Sprachwissenschaft 35: 247–90.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo. 2011. English as a contact language: typology and comparison. Anglia 129: 217–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Visser, Willem. 2011. Historical gender change in West Frisian. Morphology 21: 31–56.Google Scholar

Vogt, Hans. 1948. Dans quelles conditions et dans quelles limites peut s’exercer sur le système morphologique d’une langue l’action du système morphologique d’une autre langue? In Lejeune, M (ed.), Actes du Sixième Congrès International des Linguistes. Paris: Klincksieck, 31–45.Google Scholar

Wagner, Heinrich. 1959. Das Verbum in den Sprachen der Britischen Inseln. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Wagner, Max. 1920. Amerikansich-Spanisch und Vulgärlatein. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 40: 286–312, 385–404.Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne. 2005. Gender in English pronouns: Southwest England. In Kortmann, Bernd, Herrmann, Tanja, Pietsch, Lukas & Wagner, Susanne (eds.), Comparative grammar of English dialects: agreement, gender, relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 211–367.Google Scholar

Wahrig-Burfeind, Renate. 1989. Nominales und pronominales Genus im südlichen Nordseegebiet: eine areallinguistische Untersuchung. Bremen: Tuduv.Google Scholar

Walker, Alastair. 1980. Die nordfriesische Mundart der Bökingharde. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Walker, James. 2007. ‘There’s bears back there’: plural existentials and vernacular universals in (Quebec) English. English World-Wide 28: 147–66.Google Scholar

Wall, Arnold. 1938. New Zealand English: how it should be spoken. Auckland: Whitcombe & Tombs.Google Scholar

Wandruszka, Mario. 1965. Stare in den romanischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 81: 423–40.Google Scholar

Wang, Luming, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Bickel, Balthasar & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina. 2009. Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 1180–226.Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1998. Proto-Indo-European: comparison and reconstruction. In Giacalone Ramat, A & Ramat, P (eds.), The Indo-European Languages. London: Routledge, 25–73.Google Scholar

Weijnen, Anton. 2000. Nederlandse dialectkunde. 2nd ed. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Weiss, Helmut. 2015. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement: the emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the middle field. In Hinterhölzl, R, Bentzen, K, Speyer, A & Szucsuch, L (eds.). The German Middle Field in a comparative and diachronic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Wessén, Elias. 1970. Schwedische Sprachgeschichte. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

White, David. 2002. Explaining the innovations of Middle English: what, where, and why? In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.), The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, 153–74.Google Scholar

White, David. 2003. Brittonic influence in the reductions of Middle English nominal morphology. In Tristram, H (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II. Heidelberg: Winter, 29–45.Google Scholar

Whitelock, Dorothy. 1952. The beginnings of English society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf [edited by Carroll, John B.]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wier, Thomas. 2006. Review of J. Sadock: a Grammar of Kalaallisut. Language 82: 221–2.Google Scholar

Wiesenhann, Tjabe. 1977. Einführung in das ostfriesische Niederdeutsch. Leer: Schuster.Google Scholar

Wiik, Kalevi. 2003. Finnic-type pronunciation in the Germanic languages. Mankind Quarterly 44: 43–90.Google Scholar

Willemyns, Roland. 2002. The Dutch-French language border in Belgium. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23: 36–49.Google Scholar

Wischer, Ilse. 2011. On the use of beon and wesan in Old English. In Lenker, Ursula, Huber, Judith & Mailhammer, Robert (eds.), Verbal and nominal constructions in the history of English: variation and conventionalisation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 217–36.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan. 2010. Language endangerment, community size, and typological rarity. In Wohlgemuth, Jan & Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rethinking universals: how rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: De Gruyter, 255–77.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan, & Cysouw, Michael (eds.). 2010. Rara and rarissima: documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Woolf, Alex. 2007. Apartheid and economics in Anglo-Saxon England. In Higham, N (ed.), The Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell, 113–29.Google Scholar

Wray, Alison, & Grace, George. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117: 543–78.Google Scholar

Wright, Roger. 1982. Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.Google Scholar

Wubs-Mrozewicz, Justyna. 2008. Traders, ties and tensions: the interactions of Lübeckers, Overijsslers and Hollanders in Late Medieval Bergen. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar