Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 November 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Melissus and Eleatic Monism , pp. 230 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Apelt, O. (1886) ‘Melissos bei pseudo-Aristoteles’. Neue Jahrbücher für classische Philologie. 729–66.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2002) ‘Philology or Philosophy? Simplicius on the Use of Quotations’ in Epea and Grammata: Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece. Worthington, I. and Foley, J. M. (eds.). Leiden: Brill. 173–89.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2008) Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Reply to Professor Mourelatos’. Philosophical Books 22. 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011) Zenone e l’infinito. Rosetti, L. and Pulpito, M. (eds.). Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Bauslaugh, R. A. (1979) ‘Thucydides IV 8.6 and the South Channel of Pylos’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 99. 1– 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, L. (2001) ‘Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography’ in The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Luraghi, N. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, N. B. (1958) ‘Did Melissus Believe in Incorporeal Being?’ American Journal of Philology 79. 61–5.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. (1991) ‘Aristotle on the Continuity of Physics VI’ in Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays. Judson, L. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, D. (2006) Space, Time, Matter, and Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandis, C. A. (1813) Commentationum Eleaticarum pars I: Xenophanis, Parmenidis et Melissi doctrina exposita. Altona: Hammerich.Google Scholar
Breglia, L. (2005) ‘Melisso: problemi di una incerta biografia’ in Da Elea a Samo. Breglia, L. and Lupi, M. (eds.). Naples: Arte Tipografica Editrice. 59–83Google Scholar
Brémond, M. (2016) ‘Lectures de Mélissos: édition, traduction et interprétation des témoignages sur Mélissos de Samos’. Doctoral thesis, Paris IV-Sorbonne and LMU München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. (1999) ‘Rational Theology’ in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Long, A. A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205–24.Google Scholar
Brown, E. A. (1997) ‘Plato’s Argument for the Immortality of the Soul’. Apeiron 30. 211–38.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (1986) ‘Being in the Sophist’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4. 49–70.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (1994) ‘The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’ in Language. Everson, S. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 212–36.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. (1930) Early Greek Philosophy, fourth edition. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2002) ‘Gorgias on Thought and its Objects’ in Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.). Aldershot: Ashgate. 205–32.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1935) Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chiesara, M. L. (2001) Aristocles of Messene: Testimonies and Fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R. (2014) ‘What Are “True” doxai Worth to Parmenides’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46. 1–31.Google Scholar
Covotti, A. (1898) ‘Melissi Samii Reliquiae’. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 6. 213–27.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. (2009) The Fragments of Parmenides. McKirahan, R. (ed.). Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Craik, E. M. (2006) Two Hippocratic Treatises: On Sight and On Anatomy. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curd, P. (1993) ‘Eleatic Monism in Zeno and Melissus’. Ancient Philosophy 13. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curd, P. (2007) Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, H., and Kranz, W. (1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, sixth edition. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1986) ‘Proclus and the Forty Logoi of Zeno’. Illinois Classical Studies 9. 35–41.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1975) ‘Zur Funktion und Formgeschichte des Proömiums in der ӓlteren griechischen Prosa’ in ΔΩΡΗΜΑ: Hans Diller zum 70. Geburtstag. Vourveris, K. and Skiadas, A. (eds.). Athens: Griechische Humanistische Gesellshaft. 61–75.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2005) ‘Melisso e la scuola eleatica’ in Da Elea a Samo. Breglia, L. and Lupi, M. (eds.). Naples: Arte Tipografica Editrice. 85–94.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. et al. (eds.) (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. (2001) ‘Early Historiē and Literacy’ in The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Luraghi, N. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, D. (1967) Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, D. (1989) ‘Melissus of Samos’ in Ionian Philosophy. Boudouris, K. J. (ed.). Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2000) Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Gershenson, D. E., and Greenberg, D. A. (1961) ‘Melissus of Samos in a New Light: Aristotle’s Physics 186a10–16’. Phronesis 6. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleede, B. (2012) ‘Creatio ex nihilo: A Genuinely Philosophical Insight Derived from Plato and Aristotle? Some Notes on the Treatise on the Harmony between the Two Sages’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22. 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1906) Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy. Trans. Magnus, Laurie. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Goodwin, W. W. (1889) Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1972) The Argument of Melissus. Athens: Hellenic Society for Humanistic Studies.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2010) The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2013) Science before Socrates: Parmenides, Anaxagoras, and the New Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962) A History of Greek Philosophy. Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965) A History of Greek Philosophy. Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Cause and Explanation in Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harriman, B. ‘The Beginning of Melissus’ On Nature, or On What-is: A Reconstruction’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 135. 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiberg, I. L. (1893) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Volume VII. Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A. (1913) ‘On Certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics’. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 48. 681–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidel, W. A. (1943) ‘Hecataeus and Xenophanes’. American Journal of Philology 64: 255–77.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F. G. (2007) Words and Ideas: The Roots of Plato’s Philosophy. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (1987) ‘Simplicius’ Polemics’ in Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. Sorabji, R. (ed.). London: Duckworth. 57–83.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2010) The Symptom and the Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. M. (1973) ‘Concerning Nature’: Review of Schmalzriedt, E. (1970) Peri Physeos. Classical Review 23. 206–8.Google Scholar
Huby, P. M., and Taylor, C. C. W. (2011) Simplicius: On Aristotle Physics 1.3–4. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (2004) ‘On Generation and Corruption I.8’. Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I. de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 243–65.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotus’. Real-Encyclopӓdie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Suppl. 2. 205–520.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1947) The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S. (1923) Hippocrates. Volume II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jori, A. (1996) Medicina e medici nell’antica Grecia: saggio sul peri technes ippocratico. Naples: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1965) ‘Rapports entre Mélissos de Samos et Diogène d’Apollonie, à la lumière du traité hippocratique De natura hominis’. Revue des Études Anciennes 67. 306–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1975) Hippocrate, De natura hominis. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, Volume 1.1.3. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1960) Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1966) ‘The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being’. Foundations of Language 2. 245–65.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2004) ‘A Return to the Theory of the Verb Be and the Concept of Being’. Ancient Philosophy 24. 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1975) ‘A Vindication of Melissus’. Critical notice of G. Reale (1970) Melisso: Testimonianze e frammenti. Classical Review 25: 186–7.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1962) Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., and Raven, J. E. (1957) The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., and Stokes, M. C. (1960) ‘Parmenides’ Refutation of Motion’. Phronesis 5. 1–4.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Orton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (1988) Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1991) ‘Xenophanes on Inquiry and Discovery: An Alternative to the “Hymn to Progress” Reading of Fr. 18’. Ancient Philosophy 11. 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1992) Xenophanes of Colophon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. (1940) A Greek–English Lexicon, ninth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1976) Critical notice of G. Reale (1970) Melisso: Testimonianze e frammenti. Gnomon 48. 645–50.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12. 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longrigg, J. (1993) Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makin, S. (2005) ‘Melissus and his Opponents: The Argument of DK 30 B8’. Phronesis 50. 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makin, S. (2014) ‘Parmenides, Zeno, and Melissus’ in The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Warren, J. and Sheffield, F. (eds.). London: Routledge. 34–48.Google Scholar
Malcolm, J. (1991) ‘On Avoiding the Void’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9. 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘The Chronology of Anaxagoras’ Athenian Period and the Date of his Trial’. Mnemosyne 32. 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1985) ‘Historical and Philosophical Aspects of Gorgias’ “On What Is Not”’ in Gorgia e la Sofistica, Siculorum Gymnasium 38 (1985). Montoneri, L. and Romano, F. (eds.). Catania: Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Università di Catania. 243–71.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1986) ‘Aristotle, Plato, and the Preplatonic Doxography and Chronology’ in Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica. Cambiano, G. (ed.). Turin: Tirrenia. 1–59.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1987) ‘Theophrastus and the Xenophanes Doxography’. Mnemosyne 40. 286–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990) ‘De Melisso Xenophanes Gorgia: Pyrrhonizing Aristotelianism’ in Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy. Assen: Van Gorcum. 200–37.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992) ‘Physikai doxai and Problēmata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and Beyond)’ in Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.). Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 5. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. 63–111.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2016) Melissus between Miletus and Elea. Pulpito, M. (ed.). Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume I. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D. (2008) ‘Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8’ in The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 189–229.Google Scholar
Merrill, B. L. (1998) ‘Melissus of Samos: A Commentary on the Sources and Fragments’. PhD thesis, University of Texas (Austin).Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1965) ‘The Real, Appearances and Human Error in Early Greek Philosophy’. Review of Metaphysics 19. 346–65.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1970) The Route of Parmenides. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1981) ‘Pre-Socratic Origins of the Principle that There Are No Origins from Nothing’. Journal of Philosophy 78. 649–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1987) ‘Quality, Structure, and Emergence in Later Pre-Socratic Philosophy’ in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Volume II. Cleary, John J. (ed.). New York: University Press of America. 127–94.Google Scholar
Mullach, F. W. A. (1883) Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum. Paris: Ambrosio Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1890) ‘Aristoteles und die Eleaten’. Philosophische Monatshefte 26. 147–69.Google Scholar
Obertello, J. (1984) ‘Melissus of Samos and Plato on the Generation of the World’. Dionysius 8. 3–18.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (1987) Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1958) ‘Zeno and the Mathematicians’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58. 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1965) ‘Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology’ in New Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Bambrough, R. (ed.). London: Routledge. 69–95.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1966) ‘Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present’. The Monist 50. 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1971) ‘Plato on Not-Being’ in Plato: I Metaphysics and Epistemology. Vlastos, G. (ed.). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. 223–67.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2003) ‘On the Alleged Incorporeality of What Is in Melissus’. Ancient Philosophy 23. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, J. (2004) ‘Melissus and Parmenides’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26. 19–54.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2009) Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendrick, G. J. (2002) Antiphon the Sophist: The Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porciani, L. (1997) La forma proemiale: storiografia e pubblico nel mondo antico. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. (2006) The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. (2006) ‘Zeno and the Eleatic anti-pluralism’ in La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici. Sassi, Maria Michela (ed.). Pisa: Edizioni della Normale. 161–82.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2013) ‘Melissos aus Samos’ in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Philosophie der Antike, Bd. 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie. Bremer, D., Flashar, H., and Rechenauer, G. (eds.). Basel: Schwabe Verlag. 573–98.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (1995) ‘Alexandre d’Aphrodise et la “Magna Quaestio”, rôle et indépendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristotélicien’. Études Classiques 63. 295–351.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (1997) ‘A “New” Text of Alexander on the Soul’s Motion’ in Aristotle and After. Sorabji, R. (ed.). London: Insititute of Classical Studies. 181–95.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2005) Aristote: De la génération et la corruption. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1916) Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn: Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1979) ‘The Meaning of ΣΩΜΑ in Homer: A Study in Methodology’. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 12. 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, R. (1980) ‘On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality’. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 21. 105–38.Google Scholar
Ritter, H., and Preller, L. (1888) Historia Philosophiae Graecae, seventh edition. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes.Google Scholar
Robbiano, C. (2011) ‘What Is Parmenides’ Being?’ in Parmenides: Venerable and Awesome. Cordero, N. L. (ed.). Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing. 213–31.Google Scholar
Schmalzriedt, E. (1970) Peri Physeos: Zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel. Munich: Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1970) ‘Did Parmenides Discover Eternity?’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52. 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2003) ‘The Presocratics’ in The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Sedley, David (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23. 74–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) ‘Parmenides and Melissus’ in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Long, A. A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 113–33.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007) Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1969) ‘The “Eleatic One” in Melissus’. Reprinted in Solmsen, F. 1982: 137–49.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1965) Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1986) ‘The First Fragment of Heraclitus’. Illinois Classical Studies 11. 1–15.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1987) ‘The Text of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics’ in Simplicius: sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie. Hadot, I. (ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 246–66.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1990) ‘More on Zeno’s Forty Logoi’. Illinois Classical Studies 15. 23–37.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. (1955) Senofane: Testimonianze e frammenti. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Vitelli, H. (1888) Philoponi in Physicorum Octo Libros Commentaria. Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1953) Critical Notice of Raven, J. E. (1948) Pythagoreans and Eleatics. Gnomon 53. 29–35.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1990) The Chain of Change: A Study of Aristotle’s Physics VII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Węcowski, M. (2004) ‘The Hedgehog and the Fox: Form and Meaning in the Prologue of Herodotus’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 124. 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H., and Cornford, F. M. (1934) Aristotle: The Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. (1982) Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, E. (1919) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Nestle, W. (ed.). Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar