In the final years of the fourteenth century, the Franciscan friar and chronicler Jacques de Guise recorded an account of a heated dispute between a group of early ninth-century Church reformers and the heads of several women's monastic communities in present-day Belgium and Germany. A major Church council had decreed that all communities of women religious would henceforth strictly observe the Rule of St Benedict and the message was relayed to all the convents in the area; however, the leaders of these places quickly agreed to appeal jointly against the reform. After much diplomatic wrangling involving the pope and Emperor Louis the Pious, a decision was made to hold a synod at the royal abbey of Nivelles to discuss the issue further. Bishop Walcand of Liège opened the meeting by reiter¬ating the council's precepts. But once he had finished speaking the heads of these women's communities rejected his call and responded with one voice:

These words sent shockwaves through the meeting. When Walcand sternly reminded the women of their duty to comply with the reform all remained silent, except for Abbess Doda of Sainte-Waudru in Mons. She, according to the chron¬icler, ‘spoke inappropriately’. The organisers hastily dissolved the synod and subsequently convened with a number of prominent clerical and lay lords to work out ‘a short instruction for an honest life without any vows, except for that of any Christian’, in order to give the women at least some written guidelines. This text they then sent to the heads of these women's monastic communities. They added that henceforth the heads of these women's monasteries and their subjects would be known as ‘secular religious’ instead of ‘nuns’. The account closes with the ominous statement that Walcand ended by deposing many of the heads of these women's communities as a token of their eternal punishment, and that he installed in their place noblemen as secular abbots.