Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:02:32.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 29 - Diabetes mellitus

from Section 9 - Endocrinology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Neil H. Winawer
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Surgery has major effects on carbohydrate metabolism and thus presents special risks for patients with diabetes. Surgical mortality rates for patients with diabetes have declined but the successful perioperative care of these patients requires close cooperation between surgeons, anesthesiologists, and primary physicians to prevent complications. There are 25.8 million children and adults in the USA with diabetes – 8.3% of the population [1]. Diabetes is listed as a diagnosis on 23% of hospital discharges [2]. At least half of these patients will require surgery at some point in their lives. In addition to surgical conditions typical of the general population, patients with diabetes have an increased incidence of occlusive vascular disease; cholelithiasis; ophthalmic disease (i.e., cataract extraction, vitrectomy); renal disease; and infection. Three of four patients with diabetes are older than 40 years and are approaching a time of life when surgical indications increase. The presence of diabetes typically is known prior to surgery, although a new diagnosis of diabetes is made in the perioperative period in as many as 12% of cases [3].

Hyperglycemia in the hospital is common and may result from stress, infection, effect of procedures, or is iatrogenic [4]. Previously, glucose levels between 100 and 200 mg/dL were not treated in the perioperative period. This practice was challenged by studies suggesting that more aggressive treatment of elevated glucose levels with insulin reduces infectious complications, decreases mortality, and decreases length of hospital stay [5–7]. Many hospitals developed programs, and started treating both medical and surgical patients with intensive insulin therapy to maintain blood glucose at or below 110 mg/dL, particularly in ICU settings. But, following studies performed in other ICUs, particularly medical ones, failed to reproduce the beneficial effects of intensive insulin therapy. In fact, intensive insulin therapy increased the risk of death [8–11]. One study demonstrated a 2.6% absolute increase in 90-day mortality in patients randomized to tight glucose control [10]. This may have been related to the increased risk for hypoglycemia in the intensive insulin group [12].

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
, pp. 343 - 349
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet. American Diabetes Association. .
Newton, CA, Young, S.Financial implications of glycemic control: results of an inpatient diabetes management program. Endocr Pract 2006; 12 (Suppl 3): 43–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levetan, CS, Passaro, M, Jablonski, K, Kass, M, Ratner, RE.Unrecognized diabetes among hospitalized patients. Diabetes Care 1998: 21: 246–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Diabetes Association. ADA Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2013. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 511–66.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, G, Wouters, P, Weekers, F et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patient. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, AJ, Moghissi, ES, Bransome, ED et al.; American College of Endocrinology Task Force on Inpatient Diabetes Metabolic Control. American College of Endocrinology position statement on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control. Endocr Pract 2004; 10: 77–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Clement, S, Braithwaite, SS, Magee, MF et al.; American Diabetes Association Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee. Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 553–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berghe, G, Wilmer, A, Hermans, G et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 449–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arabi, YM, Dabbagh, OC, Tamim, HM et al. Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 3190–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finfer, S, Chittock, DR, Su, SY et al. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1283–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Lena, D, Kalfon, P, Preiser, JC, Ichai, C.Glycemic control in the intensive care unit and during the postoperative period. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 438–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marik, PE.Glycemic control in critically ill patients: what to do post NICE-SUGAR?World J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 1: 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, LS, Meeks, D, Moyer, VA, Lally, KP.Peri-operative glycaemic control regimens for preventing surgical site infections in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 3: CD006806.Google Scholar
Qaseem, A, Humphrey, LL, Chou, R, Snow, V, Shekelle, P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Use of intensive insulin therapy for the management of glycemic control in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 260–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodsky, GM, Curry, D, Landahl, H, Bennett, L.Further studies on the dynamic aspects of insulin release in vitro with evidence for a two-compartmental storage system. Acta Diabetol Lat 1969; 6 (Suppl 1): 554–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Preiser, JC, Devos, P, Van den Berghe, G.Tight control of glycaemia in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002; 5: 533–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golden, SH, Peat-Vigilance, C, Kao, WH, Brancati, FL.Perioperative glycemic control and the risk of infectious complications in a cohort of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rassias, AJ, Givan, AL, Marrin, CA et al. Insulin increases neutrophil count and phagocytic capacity after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1113–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizock, BA.Alterations in carbohydrate metabolism during stress: a review of the literature. Am J Med 1995; 98: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCowen, KC, Malhotra, A, Bistrian, BR.Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit Care Clin 2001; 17: 107–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capes, SE, Hunt, D, Malmberg, K, Gerstein, HC.Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet 2000; 355: 773–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, BW, Braithwaite, SS, Steed, RD, Davidson, PC.Intravenous insulin infusion therapy: indications, methods, and transition to subcutaneous insulin therapy. Endocr Pract 2004; 10 (Suppl 2): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G, Dodek, P.Intravenous insulin nomogram improves blood glucose control in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1714–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyer, J, Krause, U, Dobronz, A et al. Assessment of insulin needs in insulin-dependent diabetics and healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. Horm Metab Res 1990; 24 (Suppl): 71–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Mokan, M, Gerich, JE.A simple insulin infusion algorithm for establishing and maintaining overnight near-normoglycemia in type I and type II diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 74: 943–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, HJ, Steinke, DT, Karounos, DG, Lane, MT, Matson, AW.Intensive insulin protocol implementation and outcomes in the medical and surgical wards at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Ann Pharmacother 2010; 44: 249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×