Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:08:02.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - New Insights into Food Safety Research Teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2017

By
Reza Sattari ,
Julia I. Lane  and
Jason Owen-Smith
Edited by
Kaye Husbands Fealing ,
Julia I. Lane ,
John L. King  and
Stanley R. Johnson
Kaye Husbands Fealing
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Julia I. Lane
Affiliation:
New York University
John L. King
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Stanley R. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring the Economic Value of Research
The Case of Food Safety
 , pp. 113 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Owen-Smith, J., in Big Data and Social Science, Foster, I., Ghani, R., Jarmin, R., Kreuter, F., Lane, J., eds. (Taylor & Francis, 2016).Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. A. et al., Science Funding and Short-Term Economic Activity. Science 344, 41–43 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buffington, C., Harris, B. C., Jones, C., Weinberg, B. A., STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census. Am. Eco. Rev. 106 (5), 333–338. (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzoni, M., Mairesse, J., Stephan, P., Lane, J., Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study. PLoS One 11, e0145146 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorsch, J. R., Maximizing the Return on Taxpayers’ Investments in Fundamental Biomedical Research. Mol. Biol. Cell. 26, 1578–1582 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, J., Estimated Publication Outputs as a Function of Number of R01 Grants per PI. Datahound Blog (2015), available at http://datahound.scientopia.Google Scholar
Chang, W., Chen, W., Jones, C., Lane, J., Weinberg, B., “Federal Funding of Doctoral Recipients Results from New Linked Survey and Transaction Data.” No. w23019. National Bureau of Economic Research (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxenian, A., Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hwang, K., International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 33 (1), 101–133 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., Siverstsen, G., Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 17, 101–126 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., Uzzi, B., The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Plant Cell. 316, 2005–2008 (2007).Google ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, T. L., Change in Academic Coauthorship, 1953–2003. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 37, 210–234 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. E., Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy. 34, 259–285 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J. A., The Transition from an Individual Science to a Collective One: The Case of Astronomy. Scientometrics. 42, 61–74 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W. M., Publication Trends of Doctoral Students in Three Fields from 1965–1995. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 51, 139–144 (2000).3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. E. J., Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 Suppl., 5200–5205 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, R. B., Ganguli, I., Murciano-Goroff, R., Why and Wherefore of Increased Scientific Collaboration. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy 17 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J., Penders, B., Vermeulen, N., Collaboration in the New Life Sciences (Routledge, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J., Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 10, 153–158 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milojević, S., Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 3984–3989 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., Holden, T., The How and Why of Academic Collaboration: Disciplinary Differences and Policy Implications. High. Educ. 64, 693–708 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, E., From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42, 81–100 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, E. B., Moreira, A. A., Furtado, V., Pequeno, T. H. C., Andrade, J. S., Collaboration Networks from a Large CV Database: Dynamics, Topology and Bonus Impact. PLoS One 9, 1–7 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozeman, B., Corley, E., Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Res. Policy. 33, 599–616 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardmana, P. C., Corley, E. A., University Research Centers and the Composition of Research Collaborations. Res. Policy. 37, 900–913 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melin, G., Pragmatism and Self-Organization. Res. Policy. 29, 31–40 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A., Ties That Last: Tie Formation and Persistence in Research Collaborations over Time. Adm. Sci. Q. 58, 69–110 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binz-Scharf, M., Kalish, Y., Paik, L., Making Science New Generations of Collaborative Knowledge Production. Am. Behav. Sci. 59 (5), 531–547. (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R., What Is Research Collaboration? Res. Policy. 26, 1–18 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikard, M. A., Murray, F. E., Gans, J. S., Exploring Tradeoffs in the Organization of Scientific Work: Collaboration and Scientific Reward. Manage. Sci. 61, 1473–1495 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. Y., Llorens, J. J., Investments in Scientific Research: Examining the Funding Threshold Effects on Scientific Collaboration and Variation by Academic Discipline. Policy Stud. J. 40, 698–729 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S., Coordination Costs and Project Outcomes in Multi-University Collaborations. Res. Policy. 36, 1620–1634 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, C. M., McFarland, D. A., Dahlander, L., Wang, D., Streams of Thought: Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Cohesion in a Multidisciplinary Era. Soc. Forces. 93, 1687–1722 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Solla Price, D. J., Little Science, Big Science, and Beyond (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Evans, J. A., Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Science 321, 395–399 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., Uzzi, B., Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science. 322, 1259–1262 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boh, W. F., Ren, Y., Kiesler, S., Bussjaeger, R., Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 595–612 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, K. B., Rethinking Scientific Specialization. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 151–164 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, M. L., Gadlin, H., Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice. J. Investig. Med. 60, 768–775 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, J. R., Why Teams Don’t Work, in Theory and Research on Small Groups, Tindale, R. S. et al., eds., pp. 245–267 (New York: Plenum, 1998)Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R., Collaborative Intelligence: Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems (Berrett-Koehler, 2011).Google Scholar
Leahey, E., Moody, J., Sociological Innovation through Subfield Integration. Soc. Curr. 1, 228–256 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M., Stanko, T. L., Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (1), 105–139 (2017)..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Börner, K., Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact. PLoS One 10, 1–15 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., Jones, B., Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science 342, 468–472 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, J. P., Maloney, N. G., Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams. J. Comput. Commun. 12, 378–398 (2007).Google Scholar
Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S., Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 703–722 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoten, D., Parker, A., Education: Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path. Science (80-. ) 306, 2046 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., The Ecology of Team Science: Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration. Am. J. Prev. Med. 305 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.Google Scholar
Stember, M., Advancing the Social Sciences through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise. Soc. Sci. J. 28, 1–14 (1991).Google Scholar
Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., Moser, R. P., The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, P., Stehr, N., eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. et al., Mapping a Research Agenda for the Science of Team Science. Res. Eval. 20, 145–158 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aboelela, S. W., Merrill, J., Carley, K. M., Larson, E., Social Network Analysis to Evaluate an Interdisciplinary Research Center. J. Res. Adm. 38, 61–79 (2007).Google Scholar
Haines, V. A., Godley, J., Hawe, P., Understanding Interdisciplinary Collaborations as Social Networks. Am. J. Community Psychol. 47, 1–11 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiore, S. M., Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork: How the Science of Teams Can Inform Team Science. Small Gr. Res. 39, 251–277 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyton, J., Ford, D. J., Smith, F. L., A Mesolevel Communicative Model of Collaboration. Commun. Theory. 18, 376–406 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börner, K. et al., A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science. Sci. Transl. Med. 2 (2010), doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.A.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borrego, M., Newswander, L., Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. Rev. High. Educ. 34, 61–84 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitrany, M., Gauging the Transdisciplinary Qualities and Outcomes of Doctoral Training Programs. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 24, 437–449 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. M., Transdisciplinary Training: Key Components and Prerequisites for Success. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granovetter, M., Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 481–510 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 35–67 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W., Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organ. Sci. 15, 5–21 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., Mallapragada, G., Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems. Manage. Sci. 52, 1043–1056 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P. V., Tan, Y., Mookerjee, V., Network Effects: The Influence of Structural Capital on Open Source Project Success. MIS Q. 35, 813–829 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabidussi, G., The Centrality of a Graph. Psychometrika. 31, 581–603 (1966).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, R. S., Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthonissen, J. M., The Rush in a Directed Graph (Amsterdam: SMC, 1971).Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stvilia, B. et al., Composition of Scientific Teams and Publication Productivity at a National Science Lab. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 270–283 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×