Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T21:29:56.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Proletariat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Marcello Musto
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Fourth and the last, Friedrich Engels published his The Condition of the Working Class in England: From Personal Observation and Authentic Sources in 1845. Basing himself on Manchester’s textile industry, Engels suggested how manufacture ‘centralises property in the hands of the few’, and therefore how the working population becomes centralized, as ‘[a] manufacturing establishment requires many workers employed together in a single building, living near each other and forming a village of themselves in the case of a good-sized factory.’

Type
Chapter
Information
The Marx Revival
Key Concepts and New Critical Interpretations
, pp. 70 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, V. L. (1972), ‘The Meaning of the Working Class in Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 10 (2): 169–89.Google Scholar
Amin, Shahid, and van der Linden, Marcel, eds (1996), ‘Peripheral’ Labour? Studies in the History of Partial Proletarianization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banaji, Jairus (2010), Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation, Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Bensen, Heinrich W. (1847), Die Proletarier. Eine historische Denkschrift, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bhandari, Rakesh (2007), ‘Slavery and Wage Labor in History’, Rethinking Marxism, 19 (3): 396408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, Rakesh (2008), ‘The Disguises of Wage-Labour: Juridical Illusions, Unfree Conditions and Novel Extensions’, Historical Materialism, 16 (1): 7199.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robin (1976), ‘Marxism: Theory of Proletarian Revolution’, New Left Review, 97: 335.Google Scholar
Bögenhold, Dieter, and Staber, Udo (1991), ‘The Decline and Rise of Self-Employment’, Work, Employment and Society, 5: 223–39.Google Scholar
Bovenkerk, Frank (1984), ‘The Rehabilitation of the Rabble: How and Why Marx and Engels Wrongly Depicted the Lumpenproletariat as a Reactionary Force’, The Netherlands Journal of Sociology, 20 (1): 1341.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Alexander (1977), Theoriebildungsprozesse in der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung, 1835–1850, Hannover: SOAK-Verlag.Google Scholar
Breman, Jan (1994), Wage Hunters and Gatherers: Search for Work in the Urban and Rural Economy of South Gujarat, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caspard, Pierre (1974), ‘Aspects de la lutte des classes en 1848: le recruitement de la garde nationale mobile’, Revue historique, 511: 81106.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1988), ‘The Labour Theory of Value and the Concept of Exploitation’, in Cohen, G. A (ed.), History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cowling, Mark (2002), ‘Marx’s Lumpenproletariat and Murray’s Underclass: Concepts Best Abandoned?’, in Cowling, Mark and Martin, James (eds), Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire: (Post)Modern Interpretations, London: Pluto Press, pp. 228–42.Google Scholar
Draper, Hal (1972), ‘The Concept of the “Lumpenproletariat” in Marx and Engels’, Economies et Sociétés, VI (12): 2285–312.Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard (1985), ‘Sweezy and the Proletariat’, in Resnick, Stephen and Wolff, Richard (eds), Rethinking Marxism: Struggles in Marxist Theory: Essays for Harry Magdoff and Paul Sweezy, Brooklyn: Autonomedia, pp. 99114.Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick (1975), The Condition of the Working Class in England: From Personal Observation and Authentic Sources, MECW, vol. 4, pp. 295583.Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick (1988), The Housing Question, MECW, vol. 23, pp. 317–91.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz (1967), The Wretched of the Earth. Preface Jean-Paul Sartre, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. (1995), Insurgent Identities: Class Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granier de Cassagnac, Adolphe (1838), Histoire des classes ouvrières et des classes bourgeoises, Paris: Desrez.Google Scholar
Hall, Michael, and Stolcke, Verena (1983), ‘The Introduction of Free Labour on São Paulo Coffee Plantations’, Journal of Political Science of Peasant Studies, 10 (2–3): 170200.Google Scholar
Herrnstadt, Rudolf (1965), Die Entdeckung der Klassen. Die Geschichte des Begriffs Klasse von den Anfängen bis zum Vorabend der Pariser Julirevolution 1830, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth Stedman (1971), Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship between Classes in Victorian Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kiernan, Victor (1972), ‘Victorian London – Unending Purgatory’, New Left Review, 76: 7390.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, Michael A. (2009), Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis, Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, Peter, and Rediker, Marcus (2000), The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1975), ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction’, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 175–87.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1975), ‘Critical Notes on the Article: “The King of Prussia and Social Reform. By a Prussian”’, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 189206.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1978), The Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850, MECW, vol. 10, pp. 45145.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1979), The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, MECW, vol. 11, pp. 99209.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1986), ‘Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy [Grundrisse]. First Instalment’, MECW, vol. 28.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1989), The Economic Manuscript of 1861–63, MECW, vol. 31.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1996), Capital, volume I, MECW, vol. 35.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1997), Capital, volume II, MECW, vol. 36.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1998), Capital, volume III, MECW, vol. 37.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Fredrick (1975), The German Ideology. Critique of Modern German Philosophy According to Its Representatives Feuerbach, B. Bauer and Stirner, and of German Socialism According to Its Various Prophets, MECW, vol. 5, pp. 19539.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Fredrick (1976), Manifesto of the Communist Party, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 477519.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Fredrick (1983), Letters, 1852–55, MECW, vol. 39.Google Scholar
Mauke, Michael (1970), Die Klassentheorie von Marx und Engels, Frankfurt/Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, H. F. (1973), ‘The Political Incorporation of the British Working Class: An Interpretation’, Sociology, 7: 341–59.Google Scholar
Notz, Gisela (2009), ‘Warum der Weberaufstand kein Weberinnenaufstand war’, in Bitzegeio, Ursula, Kruke, Anja, and Woyke, Meik (eds), Solidargemeinschaft und Erinnerungskultur im 20. Jahrhundert. Beiträge zu Gewerkschaften, Nationalsozialismus und Geschichtspolitik, Bonn: Verlag J. H. W. Dietz Nachf, pp. 97118.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Franz (1912), Die soziale Frage und der Sozialismus. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit der marxistischen Theorie, Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Post, Ken (1997), Revolution’s Other World: Communism and the Periphery, 1917–39, Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, João José (1997), ‘“The Revolution of the Ganhadores”: Urban Labour, Ethnicity and the African Strike of 1857 in Bahia, Brazil’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 29: 355–93.Google Scholar
Rougerie, Jacques (1964), ‘Composition d’une population insurgée: l’example de la Commune’, Le Mouvement Social, 48: 3147.Google Scholar
Samuel, Raphael (1977), ‘The Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain’, History Workshop Journal, 3 (1): 672.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Michael (1993), ‘“Proletarier” und “Lumpen”: Sozialistische Ursprünge eugenischen Denkens’, Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 42: 537–70.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Joachim, and Singelmann, Peter (1986), ‘Lorenz von Stein and the Paradigmatic Bifurcation of Social Theory in the Nineteenth Century’, British Journal of Sociology, 37 (3): 431–52.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George, and Wright, Erik Olin (1989), ‘The Fall and Rise of the Petty Bourgeoisie: Changing Patterns of Self-Employment in the Postwar United States’, American Journal of Sociology, 94 (5): 9731018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweezy, Paul (1967), ‘Marx and the Proletariat’, Monthly Review, 19 (7): 2542.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1963), The Making of the English Working Class, London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Traugott, Mark (1985), Armies of the Poor: Determinants of Working-Class Participation in the Parisian Insurrection of June 1848, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, Marcel (2008), Workers of the World: Essays toward a Global Labor History, Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Von Hodenberg, Christina (1997), Aufstand der Weber. Die Revolte von 1844 und ihr Aufstieg zum Mythos, Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
Von Hodenberg, Christina (2002), ‘Weaving Survival in the Tapestry of Village Life: Strategies and Status in the Silesian Weaver Revolt of 1844’, in Kok, Jan (ed.), Rebellious Families: Household Strategies and Collective Action in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, New York and Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 3958.Google Scholar
Von Stein, Lorenz (1842), Der Socialismus und Communismus des heutigen Frankreichs. Ein Beitrag zur Zeitgeschichte, Leipzig: Wigand.Google Scholar
Wells, Miriam J. (1984), ‘The Resurgence of Sharecropping: Historical Anomaly or Political Strategy?’, American Journal of Sociology, 90 (1): 129.Google Scholar
Welskopp, Thomas (2000), Das Banner der Brüderlichkeit. Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie vom Vormärz bis zum Sozialistengesetz, Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
Whitman, T. Stephen (1993), ‘Industrial Slavery at the Margin: The Maryland Chemical Works’, Journal of Southern History, 59 (1): 3162.Google Scholar
Worsley, Peter (1972), ‘Frantz Fanon and the “Lumpenproletariat”’, The Socialist Register 1972: 193230.Google Scholar
Zaniewski, Romuald (1957), L’Origine du prolétariat romain et contemporain. Faits et théories, Louvain and Paris: Editions Nauwelaerts and Béatrice Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×