Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:45:59.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

3 - The Jack-a-Lent Riots and Opposition to Turnpikes in the Bristol Region in 1749

Andrew Charleswort
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Richard Sheldon
Affiliation:
University College London
Adrian Randall
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
David Walsh
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Adrian Randall
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Andrew Charlesworth
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

In 1754, a correspondent to the Gentleman's Magazine argued a case for good roads when he wrote, ‘Whatever quickens and cheapens the transportation of goods, and makes their migration more easy from place to place, must of course render a state more wealthy.’ For the most part the correspondent was referring to good turnpike roads where ‘smoothness, spaciousness and the advantage of celerity in passage’ achieved these objectives. Popular opposition to turnpikes in certain localities throughout the first half of the eighteenth century suggests that others had a less optimistic view of such highways and the trusts that administered them.

Turnpike trusts were set up by Act of Parliament. Groups of local people (trustees) were thereby granted temporary powers to maintain and upgrade defined stretches of road, the cost of which was borne by charging tolls at gates along the route. As Langford notes, ‘By 1770 they covered 15,000 miles of road, administered by more than five hundred separate trusts’. Opposition sprang from the fact that, as Langford and others have pointed out, the tolls charged were ‘in the nature of a tax, supplementing one form of highway rate with another’, for the trusts operated on roads which ‘were usually ancient thoroughfares, previously maintained by statute labour and travelled free by all who used them’. It is important to emphasize that ‘before the eighteenth century the highway was not so much an actual body of land reserved and maintained for the convenience of traffic as a “right of passage” for every subject of the Crown over another's land’.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×