Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T14:29:49.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Ultrasound for Procedure Guidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Vicki Noble
Affiliation:
Massachussetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Bret Nelson
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Nicholas Sutingco
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Get access

Summary

Cannulation of the brachial and cephalic veins of the upper extremity

Peripheral venous cannulation can sometimes be unsuccessful after multiple attempts – even with attempts at the relatively larger antecubital veins. In this case, one might consider attempting cannulation of the brachial or cephalic veins. These veins lie deeper in the structures of the upper arm and are not readily palpable. Consequently, these veins are not generally used for intravenous catheter placement in the absence of ultrasound guidance. In most patients, the depth of these vessels requires that a longer intravenous catheter (1.75–2.0 in) be used. Caution should be exercised with the more proximal brachial vein because it lies immediately adjacent to the ulnar and median nerves.

Focused question

  1. Where is the target vein?

Anatomy

The axillary vein divides into the cephalic vein, which runs superficially toward the lateral (dorsal) aspect of the upper arm; the basilic vein, which courses superficially along the inferior and medial (ventral) aspect of the arm; and the brachial vein, which runs deeply inferior to the biceps muscle (Figure 13.1). The basilic and cephalic veins rejoin in the antecubital fossa, and the brachial vein runs deep in this location. Frequently, the brachial vein will be found as paired superficial and deep brachial veins.

Technique

Probe selection

Generally, a high-frequency linear transducer is used.

Special equipment

For deep vein cannulation, a longer catheter is required (at least 2 in). Sterile probe covers (described in Chapter 12) can be used for sterile peripheral access.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Costantino, T G, Parikh, A K, Satz, W A, Fojtik, J P. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46(5):456–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keyes, L E, Frazee, B W, Snoey, E R, Simon, B C, Christy, D. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34(6):711–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandhu, N P, Sidhu, D S. Mid-arm approach to basilic and cephalic vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance. Br J Anaesth 2004;93(2):292–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weingardt, J P, Guico, R R, Nemcek, A A Jr, Li, Y P, Chiu, S T. Ultrasound findings following failed, clinically directed thoracenteses. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22(7):419–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenstein, D, Hulot, J S, Rabiller, A, Tostivint, I, Meziere G. Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-aided thoracentesis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 1999;25(9):955–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, P W, Moyers, J P, Rogers, J T, Rodriguez, R M, Lee, Y C, Light, R W. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method?Chest 2003;123(2):418–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, T W, Morgenthaler, T I, Olson, E J, Hesley, G K, Decker, P A, Ryu, J H. Sonographically guided thoracentesis and rate of pneumothorax. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33(9):442–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runyon, B A. Paracentesis of ascitic fluid. A safe procedure. Arch Intern Med 1986;146(11):2259–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bard, C, Lafortune, M, Breton, G. Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis?CMAJ 1986;135(3):209–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Nazeer, S R, Dewbre, H, Miller, A H. Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians vs the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23(3):363–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, S, Dewitz, A, Paul, I. Ultrasound-assisted ankle arthrocentesis. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17(3):300–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S W. Emergency physician-performed ultrasonography-guided hip arthrocentesis. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6(1):84–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R, Conron, R, Greissinger, P, Heller, M. Ultrasound for the detection of foreign bodies in human tissue. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:353–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlinsky, M, Knitel, P, Feit, T, Chan, L, Mandavia, D. The comparative accuracy of radiolucent foreign body detection using ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:401–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blankstein, A, Cohen, I, Heiman, Z, Salai, M, Heim, M, Chechick, A. Localization, detection, and guided removal of soft tissue in the hands using sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120:514–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, B T, Fox, J C, Anderson, C. ABSCESS: applied bedside sonography for convenient evaluation of superficial soft tissue infections. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12(7):601–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayal, V S, Hasan, N, Norton, H J, Tomaszewski, C A. The effect of soft-tissue ultrasound on the management of cellulitis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(4):384–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaivas, M, Theodoro, D, Duggal, S. Ultrasound-guided drainage of peritonsillar abscess by the emergency physician. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21(2):155–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grau, T, Leipold, R W, Conradi, R, Martin, E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:766–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, M A, Abele, J. Bedside ultrasound for difficult lumbar puncture. J Emerg Med 2005;28(2):197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×