Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:46:53.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - First Trimester Ultrasound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Vicki Noble
Affiliation:
Massachussetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Bret Nelson
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Nicholas Sutingco
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States and is estimated to have a prevalence of 8% in pregnant patients presenting to the ED for any complaint (1, 2). Indeed, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy has been rising since the mid-1980s (3). Therefore, any female of child-bearing age who comes to the emergency room with abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, near-syncope, or syncope has ectopic pregnancy on the differential. This is a “can't miss” diagnosis. Given the volume of female patients presenting with these complaints, an algorithm incorporating first trimester ultrasound can be timesaving for the physician and patient but must increase efficiency without compromising safety.

The evaluation for ectopic pregnancy differs from other indications for bedside ultrasound. Evaluation of the uterus seeks to confirm an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), ruling out ectopic gestation by exclusion. Visualization of the actual ectopic pregnancy is not the goal. In contrast, evaluation of the aorta, heart, and other organs typically confirms pathology (aneurysm, asystole, hydronephrosis) via direct visualization.

There are instances where an extrauterine gestation will be seen on bedside ultrasound or free fluid will be seen in a hypotensive pregnant female and ectopic pregnancy will be diagnosed or inferred. This will be the exception, however, to how bedside ultrasound is used for this application. Bedside ultrasonography instead will be used to increase the number of IUP cases that can be definitively diagnosed and discharged in the ED without further imaging.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reardon R F, Martel M L. First trimester pregnancy. In Ma, O J, Mateer, J R (eds), Emergency Ultrasound. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003:239–76.Google Scholar
Moore C, Promes S B. Ultrasound in pregnancy. In Rosen, C L, Wolfe, R E (eds), Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America – Ultrasound in Emergency MedicineSaunders, Philadelphia. 2004:697–722.Google Scholar
Lyons E, Levi C, Dashefsky S. The first trimester. In Rumack, C, Wilson, S, Carboneau, J (eds), Diagnostic Ultrasound. Vol 2. St. Louis: Mosby–Year Book; 1998:978–1011.Google Scholar
Richards, S R, Stempel, L E, Carlton, B D. Heterotopic pregnancy: reappraisal of incidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:928–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, E A, Petrie, R H, Sirmans, M F. Combined intrauterine and extrauterine gestations: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:323–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, D A, Gaupp, F B. Heterotopic pregnancy: a reevaluation. J Am Board Fam Pract 1990;3:125–8.Google Scholar
Gamberoella, F, Marrs, R. Heterotopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;160:1520–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dart, R G, Kaplan, B, Cox, C. Transvaginal ultrasound in patients with low beta-human chorionic gonadotropin values: how often is the study diagnostic?Ann Emerg Med 197;30(2):135–40.
Chambers, S E, Muir, B B, Haddad, N G. Ultrasound evaluation of ectopic pregnancy including correlation with human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Br J Radiol 1990;63(748):246–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMarchi, J M, Kosasa, T S, Hale, R W. What is the significance of the human chorionic gonadotropin value in ectopic pregnancy?Obstet Gynecol 1989;74(6):851–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Kadar, N, Bohrer, M. The discriminatory human chorionic gonadotropin zone for endovaginal sonography: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1994;61(6):1016–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gracia, C R, Barnhart, K T. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: decision analysis comparing six strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(3):464–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Yeh, H-C, Goodman, J D, Carr, L. Intradecidual sign: ultrasound criteria of early pregnancy. Radiology 1986;161:463–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaivas, M, Sierzenski, P, Plecque, D. Do emergency physicians save time when locating a live intrauterine pregnancy with bedside ultrasonography?Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(9):988–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, D F. Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. J Fla Med Assoc 1997;84(9):549–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Durston, W E. Ultrasound availability in the evaluation of ectopic pregnancy in the ED: comparison of quality and cost-effectiveness with different approaches. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18(4):408–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, B C, Dart, R G, Moskos, M. Ectopic pregnancy: prospective study with improved diagnostic accuracy. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:10–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayal, V S, Cohen, H, Norton, H J. Outcome of patients with an indeterminate emergency department first trimester pelvic ultrasound to rule out ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11(9):912–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stovall, T G, Kellerman, A L, Ling, F W, Buster, J E. Emergency department diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1098–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgher, S W, Tandy, T K, Dawdy, M R. Transvaginal ultrasonography by emergency physicians decreases patient time in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5(8):802–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayal, V S, Forgash, A J, Norton, H J. Outcomes for ectopic pregnancy patients with indeterminate pelvic ultrasounds using a modified CMC pregnancy ultrasound protocol with selective non-IUP gynecologic consultation. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48(4):S105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×