Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:18:06.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Risk assessment for research participants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

This chapter tries to provide a way by which research participants can assess the risks of being involved in a particular research project. At the heart of the process will be the balance and a judgement made by the individual between the perceived benefits of the research and the possible risks.

Uncertainty is a key word in the assessment of risk. It should also be noted that any potential benefits may not be for the person taking part in the research, but for subsequent patients and/or populations. By definition, carrying out research means that the outcome is not known and thus potential benefits and risks not known. If they were clear, the procedure, treatment, intervention, would be classified as good practice, not research, as the risks would have been already assessed. It is thus difficult to assess the risks of taking part in a research project as much is unknown. This section can only give an indication of the terms and language used and the kinds of issues which might be considered by people before taking part in a research project.

Some definitions

Before considering some of the possible categories of risk, it is worth being clear about what certain terms mean.

  1. (a) A hazard is any set of circumstances that may have harmful consequences.

  2. (b) The risk is the probability of the hazard causing an adverse effect.

Thus a hazard, such as a drug, is not a risk until it is administered. The risk, the probability of an adverse effect occurring, will depend on various factors including the nature of the drug itself, the dose, the condition of the patient, and many others.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 67 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×