Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:15:30.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Birds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Michael Bowman
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Peter Davies
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Catherine Redgwell
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Background

Human recognition of the need to protect birds goes back many centuries, although the underlying motivations have changed significantly over time. Birds were originally valued as a food source, as controllers of insect pests and as sport hunting targets. More recently, emphasis has been placed on their aesthetic and ecological qualities and their importance as ‘indicator’ species which reflect the wellbeing of ecosystems as a whole. Since so many bird species habitually migrate across international boundaries, it is not surprising that international agreements have frequently been concluded to promote their conservation. Another key consideration is that ornithological organisations, which commonly boast a sizeable and articulate membership and command substantial resources and expertise, have played a particularly significant role in the development of international wildlife law.

Although various agreements have been concluded for the benefit of birds specifically, some of these are no longer of much practical importance, greater progress having often been achieved by treaties with a wider operational focus. This chapter begins by examining the instruments which have been adopted within the continent of Europe, followed by those concluded in other regions. It then briefly explains the significance in this context of certain more broadly based conservation agreements, detailed discussion of which can be found elsewhere in this work, before concluding with an analysis of the arrangements adopted specifically for the protection of birds within the framework of the Bonn Migratory Species Convention.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boardman, R., The International Politics of Bird Conservation (Edward Elgar, 2006)Google Scholar
Boere, G. C., Galbraith, C. A. and Stroud, D. A. (eds.), Waterbirds around the World (TSO, 2007)
Bowman, M. J., ‘International Treaties and the Global Protection of Birds, Parts I and II’ (1999) 11 Journal of Environmental Law 87, 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. G. G., European Union Environmental Law: An Introduction to Key Selected Issues (Ashgate, 2004), Chapter 4Google Scholar
Verschuuren, J., ‘Effectiveness of Nature Protection Legislation in the EU and the US: The Birds and Habitats Directives and the Endangered Species Act’ (2003) 3 Yearbook of European Environmental Law305Google Scholar
Herman, O., The International Convention for the Protection of Birds and Hungary (1907; Bibliolife ed., 2009), p. 32Google Scholar
Imboden, C., ‘Threatened Species: Birds as Indicators of Unsustainability’, in Bennett, G. (ed.), Conserving Europe's Natural Heritage (Springer, 1994)Google Scholar
Diamond, A. W. et al. (eds.), Save the Birds (International Committee for Bird Protection, 1987), pp. 298–303
Boardman, R., International Organization and the Conservation of Nature (Macmillan, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, S. S., The International Protection of Wildlife (1942; Kolthoff ed., 2007), pp. 90–1Google Scholar
(1939) 11 AD222, Case No. 118
Sand, P. H. (ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (Cambridge, 1992), p. 63Google Scholar
Heredia, B., Rose, L. and Painter, M. (eds.), Globally Threatened Birds in Europe: Action Plans (Council of Europe, 1996Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J., ‘The Birds Directive: 15 Years Later’ (1994) 6 Journal of Environmental Law219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Criminal Prosecution of Godefridus van der Feesten [1996] European Court Reports I-355
,Commission v France [1988] European Court Reports2243
[1987] European Court Reports 3073
[1996] European Court Reports I-6775
[1987] European Court Reports 3073
[1987] European Court Reports 3029
[2005] European Court Reports I-5261
[2002] European Court Reports I-4221
[1998] European Court Reports I-3031
[1993] European Court Reports I-4221
[2008] Environmental Law Reports (UK) 293
[1996] European Court Reports I-3843
[1991] European Court Reports I-883
Kramer, L., ‘The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive’ (2009) 21(1) Journal of Environmental Law59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemm, C., ‘The Problem of Migratory Species in International Law’ (1994) Green Globe Year Book 67, at p. 69Google Scholar
Taylor, A., ‘Rethinking the Irreparable Harm Factor in Wildlife Mortality Cases’ (2009) 2 Stanford Journal of Animal Law & Policy113Google Scholar
Margolin, S., ‘Liability under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act’ (1979) 7 Ecology Law Qly. 989Google Scholar
Means, B., ‘Prohibiting Conduct, Not Consequences: The Limited Reach of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act’ (1998) 97 Michigan Law Review823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raucher, S., ‘Raising the Stakes for Environmental Polluters: The Exxon Valdez Criminal Prosecution’ (1991) 19 Ecology Law Qly. 147, pp. 170–3Google Scholar
Herz, M., ‘Endangered Species: Stretching the Law to Protect Their Habitats’ (1996) 8 Journal of Environmental Law158Google Scholar
,Anon., ‘They Swooped’, The Economist, 19 August 1995, p. 27Google Scholar
Hunter, D., Salzman, J. and Zaelke, D., International Environmental Law and Policy (Foundation Press, 3rd ed., 2007), pp. 1318 ffGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J., ‘The Commission for Environmental Co-operation and North American Migratory Bird Conservation: The Potential of the Citizen Submission Procedure’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenten, B., ‘A Flying Start for the Agreement on the Conservation of African–Eurasian Waterbirds (AEWA)’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Crane Foundation, ‘Hang Glider-Assisted Migration Takes Off’, CMS Bulletin No. 16 (2002), pp. 16–17Google Scholar
Mirande, C., ‘Siberian Crane Wetland Project’, CMS Bulletin No. 18 (2003), p. 16Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Birds
  • Michael Bowman, University of Nottingham, Peter Davies, University of Nottingham, Catherine Redgwell, University College London
  • Book: Lyster's International Wildlife Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Birds
  • Michael Bowman, University of Nottingham, Peter Davies, University of Nottingham, Catherine Redgwell, University College London
  • Book: Lyster's International Wildlife Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Birds
  • Michael Bowman, University of Nottingham, Peter Davies, University of Nottingham, Catherine Redgwell, University College London
  • Book: Lyster's International Wildlife Law
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301.009
Available formats
×