Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: July 2012

13 - Finding a Loving Home

Summary

Although Loving has forever changed the lives of interracial couples by allowing them to legally marry in every state, it has not led society to embrace all multiracial couples and families. More than forty years after Loving, 95 percent of all individuals marry a person of the same race. Additionally, interracial couples continue to face both physical and verbal threats to their existence, and they also continue to be largely invisible from the media, textbooks, and other types of communications.

In other words, more than forty years since the Supreme Court decided Loving, we, a black woman and a white man who are married and reside with our three biracial children in Iowa, continue to live the legacy of Loving’s named plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard. Although we benefit from the Lovings’ courage and courtroom victory through a range of legal privileges and protections that stem from the Supreme Court’s recognition of their fundamental right to marry regardless of race, we also endure the legacy of their social lives. Even after the historic decision, the Lovings’ lives were affected by both conscious discriminatory attitudes and unconscious biases.

Today, society and law continue to work together to frame the normative ideal of intimate couples and families as not just monoracial but also heterosexual. In this chapter, however, we focus solely on the issue of race and the privilege of monoraciality among intimate couples and do not address the privilege of heterosexuality among couples, which is readily evident within our society. As our primary focus, we analyze contemporary challenges that interracial couples, particularly blackwhite couples, may face in the public eye. First, we identify and explicate both the social and legal ways in which interraciality may affect and alter the treatment and recognition of multiracial, heterosexual couples and their families. Thereafter, we utilize housing discrimination law as one example of the way in which law can render multiracial couples and families invisible and thus fail to address fully the harms to such groups.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Loving v. Virginia in a Post-Racial World
  • Online ISBN: 9781139043298
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043298
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Onwuachi-Willig, AngelaUndercover Other 94 Cal. L. Rev873 2006
Lenhardt, R. A.Beyond Analogy: Perez v. Sharp, Antimiscegenation Law, and the Fight for Same-Sex Marriage 96 Cal. L. Rev839 2008
Murray, MelissaStrange Bedfellows: Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life 94 Iowa L. Rev.1253 2009
Crenshaw, KimberléMapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color 43 Stan. L. Rev.1241 1991
Morrison, Adele M.Same-Sex Loving: Supporting White Supremacy Through Same-Sex Marriage 13 Mich. J. Race & L177 2007
Onwuachi-Willig, AngelaA Beautiful Lie: Exploring Rhinelander v. Rhinelander as a Formative Lesson on Race, Identity, Marriage, and Family 95 Cal. L. Rev2393 2007
Moran, Rachel F. 2001
Childs, Erica Chito 2005
Rosenblatt, Paul C. 1995
Dalmage, Heather M. 2000
Holloway, Steven R.Partnering ‘Out’ and Fitting In: Residential Segregation and the Neighbourhood Contexts of Mixed-Race Households 11 Population, Space & Place299 2005
1996
1984
2003
Lau, HolningTranscending the Individualist Paradigm in Sexual Orientation Antidiscrimination Law 94 Cal. L. Rev1271 2006
2008 http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/initiatives/e-race/why_e-race.cfm