Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:31:35.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The potential of social identity theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2009

Get access

Summary

All are but parts of one stupendous whole…

Alexander Pope, Essay on Man, 1.267

In recent years, there has been much criticism of psychology as being an essentially reductionist discipline which focuses almost exclusively on intra-individual psychological processes while ignoring the variety of contexts which influence the production of such processes (Bar-Tal & Kruglanski 1988; Broughton 1987; Parker 1989; Parker & Shotter 1990; Riegel 1976, 1979). Buss (1979) identifies elements of the individual-society debate as far back as Aristotle. Indeed, it is the ultimate relationship which any philosopher or student of human makeup must confront. Not surprisingly, it has been a central question of social psychology. Floyd Allport, one of the founders of modern social psychology, said that ‘the problem of the individual and the group is really the master problem of social psychology (1962: 7). This was reiterated more recently by Turner and Oakes (1986):

The raison d'être of social psychology is to solve scientifically a paradox. The paradox is to integrate two very different orders of phenomena: the psychological – to do with the mental properties of the individual – and the social – processes, properties and products deriving from the interrelatedness between individuals. The premises of the paradox are that, on the one hand, psychological processes belong only to individuals and not to any superordinate collective entity, and on the other, that social or even more so societal processes (political, cultural, economic, historical, etc…) [are]… distinct from and irreducible to … their elementary components, individuals … The issue is can there be and how can there be a non-individualistic science of the individual, a social psychology in the fullest sense? (p. 237).

Type
Chapter
Information
Lifetimes of Commitment
Ageing, Politics, Psychology
, pp. 22 - 41
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×