Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: October 2013

10 - Much ado about nothing? International judicial review of human rights in well-functioning democracies

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Bibliography

Arai-Takahashi, Y., 2001. The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR, Antwerpen: Intersentia.
Barry, B., 1991. Is democracy special? In Barry, B. ed., Democracy and Power, Oxford University Press.
Beetham, D. & Lord, C., 1998. Legitimacy and the European Union, London: Longman.
Bellamy, R., 1999. Liberalism and pluralism, London: Routledge.
Bellamy, R., 2001. Constitutive citizenship versus constitutional rights: Republican reflections on the EU Charter and the Human Rights Act. In T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing & A. Tomkins eds., Sceptical essays on human rights, Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, R., 2007. Political constitutionalism: A republican defence of the constitutionality of democracy, Cambridge University Press.
Bernhardt, R., 1994. Human rights and judicial review: The European Court of Human Rights. In D. M. Beatty ed., Human rights and judicial review: A comparative perspective, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Bratza, N., 2012. Britain should be defending European justice, not attacking it. The Independent [Online]. Available at: www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/nicolas-bratza-britain-should-be-defending-european-justice-not-attacking-it-6293689.html [Accessed 30 May 2013].
Cameron, D., 2012. Speech to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 25 January.
Campbell, T., Ewing, K. D. & Tomkins, A. eds., 2001. The Legal Protection of Rights: Sceptical essays on human rights, Oxford University Press.
Conforti, B., 2007. The role of the judge in international law. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1.
Crema, L., 2010. Disappearance and new sightings of restrictive interpretation(s). The European Journal of International Law, 21, 681700.
Dahl, R. A., 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Democracy Index, 2008. http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/Democracy%20Index%202008.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2013].
Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ely, J. H., 1980. Democracy and distrust: A theory of judicial review, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
European Court of Human Rights, 2010. A, B & C v Ireland.
European Court of Human Rights, 2011. Table of Violations by Article and by State 2011.
European Court of Human Rights, 2012a. The European Court of Human Rights in Facts and Figures 2011.
European Court of Human Rights, 2012b. Preliminary opinion of the Court in preparation for the Brighton Conference. Available at: http://adam1cor.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/3841140-v2-2012-court-opinion-brighton-conference.doc [Accessed 30 May 2013].
European Court of Human Rights, 2012c. Table of violations 2011. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/596C7B5C-3FFB-4874–85D8-F12E8F67C136/0/TABLEAU_VIOLATIONS_EN_2011.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2013].
Fabre, C., 2000. A philosophical argument for a Bill of Rights. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 7798.
Ferejohn, J., 2002. Judicializing politics, politicizing law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 65, 4168.
Føllesdal, A., 1998a. Democracy, legitimacy and majority rule in the EU. In: A. Weale & M. Nentwich eds., Political theory and the European Union: Legitimacy, constitutional choice and citizenship, London: Routledge.
Føllesdal, A., 1998b. Subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 231259.
Føllesdal, A., 2009. The legitimacy of international human rights review: The case of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 595607.
Føllesdal, A., 2013. The legitimacy deficits of the human rights judiciary: Elements and implications of a normative theory. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14, 339360.
Føllesdal, A. & Hix, S., 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 533–562.
Føllesdal, A. & Pogge, T., 2005. Introduction. In A. Føllesdal & T. Pogge eds., Real world justice: Grounds, principles, human rights standards and institutions, Doordrecht: Springer.
Føllesdal, A. & Wind, M., 2009. Introduction: Nordic reluctance towards judicial review under siege. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 27, 131141.
Freeman, S., 1990. Constitutional democracy and the legitimacy of judicial review. Law and Philosophy, 9, 327370.
Grant, R. W. K. & Robert, O., 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99, 2943.
Helfer, L. & Slaughter, A.-M., 1997. Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Review, 107.
Hirschl, R., 2004. Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Letsas, G., 2007. A theory of interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
Marthaler, S., 2005. The French referendum on ratification of the constitutional treaty. European Parties Elections and Referendums Network – Briefing Paper.
Moore, M., 2001. Justifying the natural law theory of constitutional interpretation. Fordham Law Review, 69, 20872117.
Moravcsik, A., 1995. Explaining international human rights regimes. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 157189.
Nergelius, J., 2009. Judicial review in Swedish law: A critical analysis. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 142159.
NOU 2003: 19: Makt- og demokratiutredningen. Available at: www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fad/dok/nouer/2003/nou-2003-019.html?id=118893 [Accessed 30 May 2013].
Ojanen, T., 2009. From constitutional periphery toward the center: Transformations of judicial review in Finland. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 194207.
Østerud, Ø. & Selle, P., 2006. Power and democracy in Norway: The transformation of Norwegian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29, 2546.
Palmer, E., 2009. Protecting socio-economic rights through the European Convention on Human Rights: Trends and developments in the European Court of Human Rights. Erasmus Law Review, 2, 397425.
Pettit, P., 2000. Democracy: Electoral and contestatory. In I. Shapiro & S. Macedo eds., Designing democratic institutions, New York University Press.
Powell, G. B., 2000. Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Przeworski, A., Shapiro, I. & Hacker-Cordon, C., 1999. Minimalist conception of democracy: a defense. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon eds., Democracy’s value, Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J., 1971. A theory of justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schlütter, B., 2012. Aspects of human rights interpretation by the UN treaty bodies. In G. Ulfstein & H. Keller eds., UN treaty bodies – law and legitimacy, Cambridge University Press.
Shany, Y., 2005. Toward a general margin of appreciation doctrine in international law?European Journal of International Law, 16, 907940.
Shany, Y., 2012. Assessing the effectiveness of international courts: A goal-based approach. American Journal of International Law, 106, 225270.
Shapiro, I., 2001. The state of democratic theory. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner eds., Political science: The state of the discipline, New York: Norton.
Siedentop, L., 2008. Europe is failing to restore idealism. Financial Times.
Simmons, B. A., 2009. Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
SOU 2007: 85: Olika former av normkontroll. Available at: www.regeringen.se/sb/d/8586/a/92025 [Accessed 30 May 2013].
Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. & Steenebergen, M. R., 2005. Deliberative politics in action: Crossnational study of parliamentary debates, Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. R., 1996. Legal reasoning and political conflict, Oxford University Press.
Tamanaha, B. Z., 2004. On the rule of law: History, politics, theory, Cambridge University Press.
Tamanaha, B. Z., 2010. Beyond the formalist-realist divide, Princeton University Press.
Treaty of Lisbon, 2007. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (adopted 13 December 2007, in force 1 December 2009) [2007] Official Journal of the European Union C306/1. Official Journal of the European Union C306/1.
Tushnet, M., 2005. Democracy versus judicial review: Is it time to amend the constitution? Dissent.
UK Government, 2012. Draft Brighton declaration on the future of the European Court of Human Rights – second version. Available at: http://adam1cor.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/2012dd220e.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2013].
United Nations Development Programme, 2009. Human Development Report 2009.
Waldron, J., 2005. On judicial review. Dissent.
Waldron, J., 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 13461406.
Woolf, L., 2005. Review of the working methods of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg:The European Court of Human Rights.