Abbe, Owen, Goodliffe, Jay, Herrnson, Paul, and Patterson, Kelly. 2003. “Agenda Setting in Congressional Elections: The Impact of Issues and Campaigns on Voting Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly. 56(4): 419–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. Scott. 2000. “Constituency Characteristics and the “Guardian” Model of Appropriations Subcommittees, 1959–1998.” American Journal of Political Science. 44 (1): 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. Scott, and Lapinski, John. 1997. “Demand Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.” American Journal of Political Science. 41(3): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahuja, Sunil. 1994. “Electoral Status and Representation in the United States Senate.” American Politics Quarterly. 22(1): 104–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aleman, Eduardo, Calvo, Ernesto, Jones, Mark, and Kaplan, Noah. 2009. “Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll Call Ideal Points.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34(1): 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 58(3): 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., Jr., and Stewart, Charles, III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science. 45(1): 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Atkeson, Lonna, and Partin, Randall. 2001. “Candidate Advertisements, Media Coverage, and Citizen Attitudes: The Agendas and Roles of Senators and Governors in a Federal System.” Political Research Quarterly. 54(4): 795–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review. 56(4): 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael. 2001. “Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Postwar Trade Policy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 26(1): 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Ross K. 2008. House and Senate. 4th edition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Barone, Michael, Cohen, Richard, and Ujifusa, Grant, eds.2002. The Almanac of American Politics. Boston: Gambit.

Barone, Michael, Cohen, Richard, and Ujifusa, Grant, eds. 2004. The Almanac of American Politics. Boston: Gambit.

Barone, Michael, Cohen, Richard, and Ujifusa, Grant, eds. 2008. The Almanac of American Politics. Boston: Gambit.

Barone, Michael and Ujifusa, Grant, eds. 2000. The Almanac of American Politics. Boston: Gambit.

Bass, Charles F. 2009. “Forests Can Provide Both Heat and Lights: Power Plants, Pellet Makers Can Coexist.” Concord Monitor, March 6.

Bauer, Raymond, Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1963. American Business and Public Policy. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D., eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D., 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bender, Bruce, and Lott, John R., Jr. 1996. “Legislator Voting and Shirking: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Public Choice. 87(1): 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhard, William, and Sala, Brian R.. 2006. “The Remaking of an American Senate: The 17th Amendment and Ideological Responsiveness.” Journal of Politics. 68(2): 345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Robert A. 1988. “Do U.S. Senators Moderate Strategically?” American Political Science Review. 82(1): 237–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives & Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bimber, Bruce, and Davis, Richard. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boatright, Robert G. 2004. Expressive Politics: The Issue Strategies of Congressional Challengers. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Bond, Jon R. 1985. “Dimensions of District Attention over Time.” American Journal of Political Science. 29(2): 330–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovitz, Gregory, and Carson, Jamie. 2006. “Position-Taking and Electoral Accountability in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly. 59(2): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brasher, Holly. 2003. “Capitalizing on Contention: Issue Agendas in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Political Communication. 20(4): 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2006. “The Resilient Voter: Moving toward Closure in the Debate over Negative Campaigning and Turnout.” Journal of Politics. 68(3): 684–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and Geer, John 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science. 51(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, Ian, and Hofferbert, Richard. 1990. “United-States Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures.” American Political Science Review. 84(1): 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burden, Barry. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry C., and Kimball, David C.. 2002. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review. 96(1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M. 1998. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie, Engstrom, Erik, and Roberts, Jason. 2007. “Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress.” American Political Science Review. 101(2): 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D.. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Conley, Patricia H. 2001. Presidential Mandates: How Elections Shape the National Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G., and Silver, Glenn E.. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior. 12(3): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle. Public Interest. 28(2): 38–50.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N., Kifer, Martin, and Parkin, Michael. 2007. “The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Websites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations.” Social Science Computer Review. 25(4): 425–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., Kifer, Martin, and Parkin, Michael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. 103(3): 343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. “Fact Sheet: New Source Review (NSR) Report and Improvements.” June 13. http://www.epa.gov/nsr/facts.html.

,Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. “Clear Skies.” http://www.epa.gov/clearskies/.

Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Political Science Review. 65(4): 1018–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., and Wright, Gerald C.. 2000. “Representation of Constituency Ideology in Congress.” In Continuity and Change in Congressional Elections, eds. Brady, David and Cogan, John. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1989. The Making of a Senator: Dan Quayle. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1996. Senators on the Campaign Trail: The Politics of Representation. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 2007. Congressional Travels: Places, Connections, and Authenticity. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice. 50(1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Boston: DC Heath.Google Scholar

Fishel, Jeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda L., Douglass, Scott R., and Clark, Wesley D., Jr. 1980. “The Electoral Effects of House Committee Assignments.” Journal of Politics. 42(1): 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francis, Wayne L., and Kenny, Lawrence W.. 1996. “Position Shifting in Pursuit of Higher Office.” American Journal of Political Science. 40(3): 768–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review. 85(4): 1193–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, Scott, and Kelly, Sean. 2006. Committee Assignment Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Kenneth. 2000. “Political Advertising in 1998.” Final release. Madison: Department of Political Science at University of Wisconsin–Madison and Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

Goldstein, Kenneth, Franz, Michael, and Ridout, Travis. 2002. “Political Advertising in 2000.” Final release. Madison: Department of Political Science at University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

Goldstein, Ken, and Freedman, Paul. 2002. “Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect.” Journal of Politics. 64(3): 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Kenneth, and Rivlin, Joel. 2005. “Political Advertising in 2002.” Final release. Madison: Wisconsin Advertising Project, Department of Political Science at University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Grofman, Bernard, Griffin, Robert, and Berry, Gregory. 1995. “House Members Who Become Senators: Learning from a ‘Natural Experiment’ in Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 20(4):513–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Political Science. 38(1): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossback, Lawrence, Peterson, David, and Stimson, James. 2006. Mandate Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard, and Houweling, Robert. 1995. “Avarice and Ambition in Congress: Representatives' Decisions to Run or Retire from the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review. 89(1): 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Thomas, and Humes, Brian. 1993. “The Spatial Model and Elections.” In Information, Participation, and Choice, ed. Grofman, Bernard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Harrington, Joseph. 1993. “The Impact of Reelection Pressures on the Fulfillment of Campaign Promises.” Games and Economic Behavior. 5(1): 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harward, Brian M., and Moffett, Kenneth W.. 2010. “The Calculus of Cosponsorship in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 35(1): 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, Matthew, Hibbing, Matthew and Sulkin, Tracy. 2010. “Redistricting, Responsiveness, and Issue Attention.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 35(1): 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrick, Rebekah, Moore, Michael K. and Hibbing, John R.. 1994. “Unfastening the Electoral Connection: The Behavior of U.S. Representatives When Reelection Is No Longer a Factor.” Journal of Politics. 56(1): 214–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrnson, Paul. 2008. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. 5th edition. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1984. Running for Office: The Political Education of Campaigners. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. 1986. “Ambition in the House: Behavioral Consequences of Higher Office Goals among U.S. Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science. 30(3): 651–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holian, David. 2004. “He's Stealing My Issues!: Clinton's Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership.” Political Behavior. 26(2): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 2001. “David Mayhew's Congress: The Electoral Connection after 25 Years.” PS: Political Science and Politics. 34(2): 259–61.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. 72(2): 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946–1988. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1993. “Deficit-Cutting Politics and Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly. 108(3): 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 5th edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 6th edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary, and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2000. Everything You Think You Know about Politics … and Why You're Wrong. New York: Basic.Google Scholar

Janofsky, Michael. 2005. “Clear Air Change Is Built into Bill.” New York Times, April 16.

Johannes, John R. 1984. To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Johannes, John R., and McAdams, John. 1981. “The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework Policy Compatible, or Something Else?” American Journal of Political Science. 25(3): 512–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., Larsen-Price, Heather, and Wilkerson, John. 2009. “Representation and American Governing Institutions.” Journal of Politics. 71(1): 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kamarck, E. C. 1999. “Campaigning on the Internet in the Elections of 1998.” In Democracy.com?: Governance in a Networked World, eds. Kamarck, E. C. and Nye, J. S.. Hollis, NH: Hollis.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Noah, Park, David, and Ridout, Travis. 2006. “Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science. 50(3): 724–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, Karen. 2004. “Disaggregating and Reexamining Issue Ownership and Vote Choice.” Polity. 36(2): 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Stanley. 1960. Political Campaigning: Problems of Creating an Informed Electorate. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Kessler, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” American Political Science Review. 90(3): 555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, and Laver, Michael J.. 1993. “On Party Platforms and Government Spending.” American Political Science Review. 87(3): 744–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science. 44(2): 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1968. Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. 3rd edition. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert, Richard I., and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Koger, Gregory. 2003. “Position-Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 28(2): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science. 39(4): 906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krukones, Michael. 1984. Promises and Performance: Presidential Campaigns as Policy Predictors. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science. 21(3): 627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, E. C. 1990. “Public Opinion and the ‘Congress Problem.’” Public Interest. 90(100): 57–67.Google Scholar

Lau, Richard R., and Pomper, Gerry. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.Google Scholar

,League of Conservation Voters. 2004. “National Environmental Scorecard.” February. http://www.lcv.org/images/client/pdfs/2003lcvsc_final.pdf.

Lott, John R. 1987. “Political Cheating.” Public Choice. 52(2): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review. 97(4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy. 17(4): 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McLeod, Scott. 2001. “Taylor to Seek TVA Reduction Base on Data in GAO Report.” Smoky Mountain News, May 30.

Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review. 57(1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Michael K., and Hibbing, John R.. 1992. “Is Serving in Congress Fun Again? Voluntary Retirements from the House since the 1970s.” American Journal of Political Science. 36(3): 824–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mund, Nat. 2004. “Bush Administration Sticks to Pro-Polluter Agenda Despite Decision to Reopen New Source Review.” http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2004–06–30a.asp.

Murakami, Michael. 2009. “Minority Status, Ideology, or Opportunity: Explaining the Greater Retirement of House Republicans.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34(2): 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 2004. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. 6th edition. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin. 1976. “The Theory of Political Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review. 70(3): 742–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Glenn R. 1980. “Sources of Change in Congressional District Attentiveness.” American Journal of Political Science. 24(1): 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Glenn R. 1992. Institutional Change, Discretion, and the Making of Modern Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrocik, John. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science. 40(3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W., and Schickler, Eric. 2002. “Landmarks in the Study of Congress since 1945.” Annual Review of Political Science. 5: 333–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomper, Gerald. 1968. Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar

Pratt, John, and Zeckhauser, Richard, eds. 1985. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Price, David. 1989. “The House of Representatives: A Report from the Field.” In Congress Reconsidered. 4th edition, eds. Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Ragsdale, Lyn, and Cook, Timothy E.. 1987. “Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House.” American Journal of Political Science. 31(1): 45–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainie, Lee, and Horrigan, John. 2007. “Election 2006 Online.” January 17. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Election-2006-Online.aspx?r=1.

Rauber, Paul. 2001. “Lay of the Land: Old King Coal.” Sierra Magazine, July/ August. http://sierraclub.org/sierra/200107/lol3.asp.

Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ringquist, Evan, and Dasse, Carl. 2004. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Campaign Promises: Environmental Legislation in the 105th Congress.” Social Science Quarterly. 85(2): 400–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rocca, Michael S., and Gordon, Stacy. 2010. “The Position Taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly. 63(2): 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothenberg, Lawrence S., and Sanders, Mitchell S.. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science. 44(2): 316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas. 1998. “The Normative Force of Electoral Promises.” Journal of Theoretical Politics. 10(2): 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science. 39(1): 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar

Sellers, Patrick J. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” American Political Science Review. 92(1): 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semiatin, Richard 2005. Campaigns in the 21st Century: The Changing Mosaic of American Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard, and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 15: 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review. 66(2): 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., Houweling, Robert P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Hanson, Peter C. 2009. “The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics.” American Journal of Political Science. 53(2): 343–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sides, John. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science. 36(3): 407–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sides, John. 2007. “The Consequences of Campaign Agendas.” American Politics Research. 35(4): 465–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigelman, Lee, and Buell, Emmett. 2003. “You Take the High Road and I'll Take the Low Road? The Interplay of Attack Strategies and Tactics in Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics. 65(2): 518–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigelman, Lee, and Buell, Emmett. 2004. “Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000.” American Journal of Political Science. 48(4): 650–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1977. “Party Realignment and the Transformation of the Political Agenda: The House of Representatives, 1925–39.” American Political Science Review. 71(3): 940–53.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Aaron. 2009. “The Internet's Role in Campaign 2008.” April 15. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/6–The-Internets-Role-in-Campaign-2008.aspx?r=1.

Spiliotes, Constantine, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2002. “Campaign Advertising: Partisan Convergence or Divergence?” Journal of Politics. 64(1): 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Squire, Peverill. 1989. “Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 14(4): 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Squire, Peverill. 1995. “Field Essay: Candidates, Money, and Voters – Assessing the State of Congressional Election Research.” Political Research Quarterly. 48(4): 891–917.Google Scholar

,State Environmental Resource Center. 2003. “Clean Power.” July 24. http://www.serconline.org/clean/background.html.

Stokes, Donald. 1992. “Valence Politics.” In Electoral Politics, ed. Kavanagh, Dennis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy. 2005. Issue Politics in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy. 2009a. “Promises Made and Promises Kept” in Congress Reconsidered, eds. Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. 9th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy. 2009b. “Campaign Appeals and Legislative Action.” Journal of Politics. 71(3): 1093–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy, Moriarty, Cortney, and Hefner, Veronica. 2007. “Congressional Candidates' Issue Agendas On- and Off-Line.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 12(2): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sulkin, Tracy, and Swigger, Nathaniel. 2008. “Is There Truth in Advertising? Campaign Ad Images as Signals about Legislative Behavior.” Journal of Politics. 70(1): 232–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, John, and O'Connor, Robert E.. 1972. “Electoral Choice and Popular Control of Public Policy: The Case of the 1966 House Elections.” American Political Science Review. 66(4): 1256–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomz, Michael, and Houweling, Robert. 2008. “Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice.” American Political Science Review. 102(3): 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomz, Michael, and Houweling, Robert. 2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review. 103(1): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/.

Vavreck, Lynn. 2001. “The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic Candidate: Signals and Specificity in Campaign Advertising, 1998.” American Politics Research. 29(5): 507–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2009. “Legislative Effectiveness in Congress.” Working Paper. Ohio State University.

Wattenberg, Martin P., and Brians, Craig Leonard. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?” American Political Science Review. 93(4): 891–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wawro, Gregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Willett, David. 2003. “Bush Touting Plan to Weaken Clean Air Act: Sierra Club Fact Sheet on So-Called ‘Clear Skies.’” September 13. http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2003–09–16.asp.

Wilson, Rick K., and Young, Cheryl D.. 1997. “Cosponsorship in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 22(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Woon, Jonathan. 2009. “Issue Attention and Legislative Proposals in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34(1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Gerald C., and Berkman, Michael B.. 1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review. 80(2): 567–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zupan, Mark A. 1990. “The Last Period Problem in Politics: Do Congressional Representatives Not Subject to a Reelection Constraint Alter Their Voting Behavior?” Public Choice. 65(2): 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar