Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Prologue
- Introduction
- 1 Law and science in the Western way of war
- 2 The American way of war
- 3 Vietnam and the “science” of war
- 4 Immaculate destruction: reorganization, revolution and re-enchantment of War
- 5 Revolution denied: the “war” on terror
- 6 Back to the future?
- Index
- References
5 - Revolution denied: the “war” on terror
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Prologue
- Introduction
- 1 Law and science in the Western way of war
- 2 The American way of war
- 3 Vietnam and the “science” of war
- 4 Immaculate destruction: reorganization, revolution and re-enchantment of War
- 5 Revolution denied: the “war” on terror
- 6 Back to the future?
- Index
- References
Summary
Kind-hearted people might of course think that there was some ingenious way to disarm or defeat an enemy without too much bloodshed, and might imagine this is the true goal of the art of war. Pleasant as it sounds, it is a fallacy that must be exposed: war is such a dangerous business that the mistakes which come from kindness are the very worst.
Carl von Clausewitz, On WarFollowing the success of Operation Desert Storm to oust Iraq from Kuwait, the US establishment felt that they had finally rid themselves of the dreaded body-bag syndrome that had haunted US policy-makers since the Vietnam War. Technology and the law had come together to wage a war so effective that the US military had managed to topple their adversary in a matter of days. The victory came with the loss of few American lives, the objective quickly met and the international coalition was successfully maintained. The campaign was critiqued from a number of angles, but the sum total of America’s engagement was seen within the establishment as an unmitigated success. This experience would fuel those in the military establishment and the civilian policy world who felt that by harnessing newly emergent technology they could eliminate the “fog or war” identified by Clausewitz, giving the United States the ability to see the entire field of battle and to dominate it with high-end technology resulting in similar successes in future wars.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of WarfareThe Quest for Humanity in Conflict, pp. 157 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, A Revolution in Military Adaption: The US Army in the Iraq War (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2011), p. 5Google Scholar
, “Gulf War (1990–1991),” in (ed.), Military Communications (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2007), pp. 201–204Google Scholar
, The Army after Next: The First Postindustrial Army (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008), p. 95Google Scholar
, “The Rise of Afghanistan’s Insurgency,” International Security, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Spring 2008), 7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “A Flawed Masterpiece,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3 (March/April 2002), 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “World War IV: Let’s Call This Conflict What It Is,” Wall Street Journal (November 20, 2001)Google Scholar
, “America’s Defense Transformation: A Conceptual and Political History,” Defense Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2006)Google Scholar
, Technology and the American Way of Warfare (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
, “Empire Lite Revisited: NATO, the Comprehensive Approach and State-Building in Afghanistan,” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 18, No. 1 (2011), 64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Private Secretary to the Prime Minister, Cabinet Minutes of Discussion, S 195/02, July 23, 2002. Source: Printed in The Sunday Times, May 1, 2005
and , Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (New York: Random House, Inc., 2007)Google Scholar
, Fiasco and The Gamble: General Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq (New York: Penguin Press, 2009)Google Scholar
, One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America’s Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006)Google Scholar
’s three books on the George Bush Presidency: Bush at War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002)Google Scholar
Plan of Attack (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004)
State of Denial: Bush at War III (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007)
and , “Military Would be Stressed by New War, Study Finds,” New York Times (May 24, 2002)Google Scholar
, Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs, Iraq Contingency Planning, February 7, 2003
, “Perpetually Wrong, Paul Wolfowitz Is Still Convinced He Knows What Would Have Happened in Iraq If We Hadn’t Invaded,” Vanity Fair (March 19, 2013)Google Scholar
and General , Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (New York: Pantheon Books, 2006), pp. 503–504Google Scholar
, The Limits of American Power: The End of American Exceptionalism (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2008), p. 126Google Scholar
and , The Iraq War: A Military History (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 2003), p. 183Google Scholar
“The Reach of War: Excerpts of DOD Report on War in Iraq,” New York Times (August 25, 2004)
, “Eight Years Ago Bush Declared Mission Accomplished in Iraq,” The Atlantic Wire (May 1, 2011)Google Scholar
and , The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Prophets,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 6 (November/December 2000), 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Global Prosecutors: Hunting War Criminals in the Name of Utopia,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 1 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Law without Nations: Why Constitutional Governance Requires Sovereign States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Linking Purpose and Tactics: America and the Reconsideration of the Laws of War during the 1990s,” International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 2 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Prisoners of America’s Wars: From The Early Republic to Guantanamo (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
, The Politics of Prisoner Abuse: The United States and Enemy Prisoners after 9/11 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Anchor Books, 2009)Google Scholar
, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2005)Google Scholar
, Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules (London: Allen Lane, 2005)Google Scholar
Torture Team: Uncovering War Crimes in the Land of the Free (London: Penguin, 2009)
, Regulating the Private Security Industry, Adelphi Paper 384 (London: International Institute of Strategic Studies, 2006)Google Scholar
, Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, “Conduct of Hostilities during Operation Iraqi Freedom: An International Humanitarian Law Assessment,” 6 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law (2003), pp. 73–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Changing the Army for Counterinsurgency Operations,” Military Review (November–December 2005), 2–15, p. 4Google Scholar
, “Months after US Withdrawal, Iraq’s Minorities Fear for Safety, Distrust Security Forces and Call for Justice, New Report,” Thomas Reuters: Alernet, July 19, 2012Google Scholar
, Why the West Has Won: Culture and Carnage from Salamis to Vietnam (New York: Faber and Faber, 2002)Google Scholar