Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T04:45:07.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law and Religious Dress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Get access

Summary

Abstract

In this chapter, the Right Hon the Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE, former President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, provides a comprehensive study of case law in national and international law for the specific purpose of examining religious freedom and legal justifications for restrictive measures in the area of religious dress. These pertain to indirect discrimination, which rely on the coupling of a proportionate means and a legitimate aim. Lady Hale aims to balance the competing stakes and, in the process of this, she incorporates sources from Sharī’a law. The chapter is based on a lecture which she delivered for the Woolf Institute in Cambridge, England (on 28 February 2019) and also a similar presentation at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies the year before (2018).

Introduction

I have had an interest in the subject of religious dress since the 1990s, when I was in the Family Division of the High Court trying a childcare case in which the local authority alleged that a young baby's serious head injuries had been caused’ non-accidentally’ by one or both parents. The baby's father was a doctor from Pakistan training for membership of the Royal College of Physicians. His mother was an arts graduate from Pakistan, but they had decided that she would go into full purdah while they were here. That meant a long robe, a face veil, a headscarf, and a black gauze shroud covering the whole of her head and upper body. Parents are compellable witnesses in care proceedings and it was essential that I heard her evidence. But we had an easy solution. Care proceedings are held in private. The judge was a woman. Counsel for the local authority was a woman. Counsel for the child's guardian ad litem was a woman. Counsel for the parents was a man, but it was agreed that she could give evidence behind a screen. Thus, the only male who could see her face was her husband and the only counsel who could not see her was her own.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Cultural Studies and the 'Burqa Ban' Trend
An Interdisciplinary Handbook
, pp. 117 - 130
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×