Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:50:11.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Democracy in the LAC region, challenges and solutions: political party and party system institutionalization and women's legislative representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The countries of the LAC region confront numerous challenges to the quality of their democracies. A 2006 survey conducted by the Research Department (RES) at the Inter-American Development Bank evaluated the challenges faced by the region in sixteen thematic areas, one of which was democracy (Berkman and Cavallo 2006). Among the sixteen thematic areas, democracy was considered by the respondents to represent one of the top ten problems faced by the region, and the survey evaluated six principal challenges to democracy, in order of importance for the survey respondents: “Little real enforcement of rules and accountability for politicians,” “Weak democratic culture,” “Crisis of representation,” “Political intimidation and violence,” “Traditional parties losing traditional constituencies,” and “No real separation of powers.”

The challenges that LAC democracies face today are very real, and quite daunting. However, when discussing them, and any potential solutions, we must be cognizant of the considerable diversity in the objective conditions of the region's democracies. The extent and nature of any specific challenge varies considerably, depending on the country in question. Therefore any solution offered to a challenge will vary in many important respects, depending on country-specific factors (Spiller and Tommasi 2007; Stein and Tommasi 2008).

Type
Chapter
Information
Latin American Development Priorities
Costs and Benefits
, pp. 13 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartolini, Stefano and Mair, Peter, 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates, 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Heather and Cavallo, Eduardo, 2006. “The Challenges in Latin America: Identifying what Latin Americans Believe to be the Main Problems Facing their Countries.” Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, unpublished manuscript
Bratton, Kathleen A. and Ray, Leonard P., 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 428–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, 1997. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., 2000. Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Pressure Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
,Freedom House, 2008. “Freedom in the World 2007.” New York: Freedom House, www.freedomhouse.org
Htun, Mala N. and Jones, Mark P., 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Craske, Nikki and Molyneux, Maxine, eds., Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. New York: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
,Inter-Parliamentary Union, 1994. Plan of Action: To Correct Present Imbalances in the Participation of Men and Women in Political Life. Series Reports and Documents, 22. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary UnionGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P., 2005. “The Role of Parties and Party Systems in the Policymaking Process.” Workshop on “State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes.” Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, February 28–March 2
Jones, Mark P., 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42: 56–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2007. Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Economics Research GroupGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 845–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, 2005. Politicizing Representation: Campaigns for Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide. PhD dissertation, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, 1998. “Rethinking Party Systems Theory in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Importance of Party System Institutionalization.” Kellogg Institute Working Paper 260, University of Notre Dame
Mainwaring, Scott, 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., eds., Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Zoco, Edurne, 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13: 155–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., 2005. “Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.” In Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza, eds., Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, A Revised Edition. Stockholm: International IDEAGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., 2006. “Electoral Quotas: Frequency and Effectiveness,” In Dahlerup, Drude, ed., Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Moñtano, Sonia, 2007. Women's Contribution to Equality in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the CaribbeanGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, 2001. “Breaking the Barriers: Positive Discrimination Policies for Women.” In Klausen, Jyette and Maier, Charles S., eds., Has Liberalism Failed Women? Parity, Quotas, and Political Representation. New York: St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, and Díaz, Mercedes Mateo, 2007. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America (Expanded and Updated Edition). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne, 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
,Proyecto de Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA), 2007. Manuel Alcántara Sáez, Director, Universidad de Salamanca, 1994–2007
Rahat, Gideon, 2007. “Candidate Selection: The Choice Before the Choice.” Journal of Democracy 18(1): 157–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Gregory D., 2005. “Is Closed List PR Really Optimal for the Election of Women?: A Cross-National Analysis.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Mainwaring, Scott, 1997. “Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T. and Tommasi, Mariano, 2007. The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transactions Cost Approach. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ernesto and Tommasi, Mariani (with Spiller, Pablo T. and Scartascini, Carlos), 2008. Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shape Policies. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue, 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
,UN, 1995. Report on the Fourth World Conference on Women: Beijing, September 4–15. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×