Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:52:04.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - My Head's in Knots: On Uriagereka's Generalization and the Knot-Sentence Connection

from Part III - Linguistics and Other Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Ángel J. Gallego
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Roger Martin
Affiliation:
Yokohama National University, Japan
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the putative connection between knotting and linguistic abilities in recent human evolution. As a first step, it gives mathematical grounds to the idea that it makes sense referring to “knowledge of knotting” or “knotting grammars,” as customarily done in the case of language, yet maintaining open whether the underlying computational mechanisms are specific for each domain or shared. After reviewing some pieces of evidence of the use of scaffolds by early modern humans that clearly entail complex knotting activity—and which seems lacking in the case of Neanderthals, the chapter concludes that a cognitive architecture with a shared computational facility accessible to both knotting and language, is to be preferred both on theoretical and empirical grounds. Comparative data with other non-human species, as well as patterns of comorbidity in the context of linguistic impairments, are offered that support the stance
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Colin. 2004. The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Agol, Ian, Hass, Joel, and Thurston, William. 2002. “3-manifold knot genus is NP-complete,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. New York: ACM Press, pp. 761766.Google Scholar
Agol, Ian, Hass, Joel, and Thurston, William. 2005. “The computational complexity of knot genus and spanning area,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 358: 38213850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alle, Henrik and Geiger, Jörg R. P. 2006. “Combined analog and action potential coding in hippocampal mossy fibers,” Science 311: 12901293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, Sanjeev and Barak, Boaz. 2009. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 2007. Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, Paul. 2007. Cave Art: A Guide to the Decorated Ice Age Caves of Europe. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.Google Scholar
Balari, Sergio, Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Camps, Marta, Longa, Víctor M., and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2012. “Knots, language, and computation: A bizarre love triangle? Replies to objections,” Biolinguistics 6/1: 79111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balari, Sergio, Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Camps, Marta, Longa, Víctor M., Lorenzo, Guillermo, and Uriagereka, Juan. 2011. “The archaeological record speaks: Bridging anthropology and linguistics,” International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, volume 2011 (Special Issue: Key Evolutionary Transformations in Homo Sapiens), Article ID 382679, 17 pages, doi: 10.4061/2011/382679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2009. “Computational phenotypes: Where the theory of computation meets Evo-Devo,” Biolinguistics 3: 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2013. Computational Phenotypes: Towards an Evolutionary Developmental Biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2015. “It is an organ, it is new, but it is not a new organ: Conceptualizing language from a homological perspective,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3: 58, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbín Behrmann, Rodrigo and Moure Romanillo, Javier A. 1981. “Pinturas y grabados de la cueva de Tito Bustillo (Asturias): Conjuntos II al VII,” Boletín del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arqueología 47: 543.Google Scholar
Barrière, Claude. 1980. “Le Grand Plafond de Rouffignac,” Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 77/9: 269276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrière, Claude and Sahly, A. 1964. “Les empreintes humaines de Lascaux,” Miscelanea en Homenaje al Abate Henri Breuil, vol. I. Barcelona: Diputación Provincial, Instituto de Prehistoria y Arqueología, pp. 173180.Google Scholar
Bednarik, Robert. 1986. “Cave use by Australian Pleistocene man,” Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeology Society 17/3: 227245.Google Scholar
Bednarik, Robert. 2008. “Beads and cognitive evolution,” Time and Mind: The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture 1/3: 285318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio and Boeckx, Cedric. 2014. “Universal Grammar and biological variation: An EvoDevo agenda for comparative biolinguistics,” Biological Theory 9: 122134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Longa, Víctor M., Lorenzo, Guillermo, and Uriagereka, Juan. 2008. “Also sprach Neanderthalis … or did she?Biolinguistics 2/2–3: 225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert, Beckers, Gabriël J., Okanoya, Kazuo, and Bolhius, Johan J. 2012. “A bird's eye view of human language evolution,” Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4: 5, doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, Robert, Okanoya, Kazuo, Beckers, Gabriël J., and Bolhius, Johan J. 2011. “Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biederman, Irving. 1987. “Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding,” Psychological Review 94: 115147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeckx, Cedric. 2013. “Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology,” Journal of Anthropological Sciences 91: 128.Google ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, Johan J., Okanoya, Kazuo, and Scharff, Constance. 2010. “Twitter evolution: Converging mechanisms in birdsong and speech,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 747759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, Rudolf. 2010. “On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behavior,” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 20/3: 345356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, Marta and Uriagereka, Juan. 2006. “The Gordian Knot of linguistic fossils,” in Roselló, Joana and Martín, Jesús (eds.), The Biolinguistic Turn: Issues on Language and Biology. Barcelona: PPU, pp. 3465.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto. 2013. “Knowledge of knots: Shapes in action,” in Kutz, Oliver, Bhatt, Mehul, Borgo, Stefano, and Santos, Paulo (eds.), Shapes 2.0: The Shape of Things: Workshop Held at the World Congress and School of Universal Logic. Rio de Janeiro, pp. 320.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto and Varzi, Achille C. 1999. Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Castaño, José M. 2004. “Global indexed languages,” Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsiang-Chun, Chen, Hung-Yi, Tsai, Chia-Liang, Chen, Yung-Jung, and Cherng, Rong-Ju. 2009. “Comorbidity of motor and language impairments in preschool children in Taiwan,” Research in Developmental Disabilities 30: 10541061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1956. “On the limits of finite-state description,” Quarterly Progress Report 48: 116118.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “On certain formal properties of grammars,” Information and Control 2: 137168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1963. “Formal properties of grammars,” in Luce, Robert Dunca, Bush, Robert B., and Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. New York: John Wiley, pp. 323418.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collias, Nicholas E. and Collias, Elsie C. 1962. “An experimental study of the mechanisms of nest building in a weaverbird,” The Auk 79: 568595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delluc, Brigitte and Delluc, Gilles. 1979. “L'accès aux parois,” in Arlette Leroi-Gourhan and Jacques Allain (eds.), Lascaux inconnu. Paris: CNRS, pp. 175184.Google Scholar
d'Errico, Francesco, Henshilwood, Christopher, Vanhaeren, Marian, and van Niekerk, Karen. 2005. “Nassarius kraissianus shell beads from Blombos cave: Evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age,” Journal of Human Evolution 48: 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desdemaines-Hugon, Christine. 2010. Stepping-Stones: A Journey through the Ice Age Caves of the Dordogne. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, Joseph R. 2005. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby.Google Scholar
Eden, Guinevere F., Wood, Frank B., and Stein, John F. 2003. “Clock drawing in developmental dyslexia,” Journal of Learning Disabilities 36: 216228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enard, Wolfgang, Przeworki, Molly, Fischer, Simon E., Lai, , Cecilia, S. L., Wiebe, Victor, Kitano, Takashi, Monaco, Anthony P., and Pääbo, Svante. 2002. “Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language,” Nature 418: 868872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fung, Victor S., Morris, John G., Leicester, Jonathan, Soo, Y. S., and Davies, Llewelyn. 1997. “Clonic perseveration following thalamofrontal disconnection: A distinctive movement disorder,” Movement Disorders 12: 378385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González Sáinz, César, Cacho Toca, Roberto, and Fukazawa, Takeo. 2003. Arte Paleolítico en la region cantábrica. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Grossman, Murray G., Carvell, S., Gollomp, S., Stern, M. B., Vernon, G., and Hurtig, H. I. 1991. “Sentence comprehension and praxis deficits in Parkinson's disease,” Neurology 41: 16201628.Google ScholarPubMed
Gusella, James F. and MacDonald, Marcy E. 2006. “Huntington's disease: Seeing the pathogenic process through a genetic lens,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 31: 533540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansell, Mike H. 2000. Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansell, Mike H. 2005. Animal Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, Joel, Lagarias, Jeffrey C., and Pippenger, Nicholas. 1999. “The computational complexity of knots and link problems,” Journal of the ACM 46: 185211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298: 15691579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, Jeffrey and Idsardi, William. 2011. “Sentence and word complexity,” Science 333: 295297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, Jeffrey and Idsardi, William. 2013. “What complexity differences reveal about domains in language,” Topics in Cognitive Sciences 5: 111131, doi: 10.1111/tops.12000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshilwood, Christopher S., d'Errico, Francesco, Yates, Royden, Jacobs, Zenobia, Tribolo, Chantal, Duller, Geoff A.T., Mercier, Norbert, Sealy, Judith C., Valladas, Helene, Watts, Ian, and Wintle, Ann G. 2002. “Emergence of modern human behaviour: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa,” Science 295: 12781280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopcroft, John and Ullman, Jeffrey D. 1979. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hudson, Kerry D. and Farran, Emily K. 2010. “Drawing the line: Drawing and construction strategies for simple and complex figures in Williams syndrome and typical development,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29: 687706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, Jana M. and Braddock, Barbara A. 2011. “Gesture and motor skill in relation to language in children with language impairment,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54: 7286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Paul. 2003. Art: A New History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Jones, Colin. 1994. The Cambridge Illustrated History of France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Aravind K. 1985. “Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?,” in David Dowty and Lauri Kartunen (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, Aravind K., Vijay-Shanker, K., and Weir, David. 1991. “The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms,” in Peter Shells, Stuart M. Shieber, and Thomas Wasow (eds.), Foundational Issues of Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 3181.Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, Laura. 2013. “Linear context-free rewriting systems,” Language and Linguistics Compass 7/1: 2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 2006. “Williams Syndrome,” in Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 585589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Johannes, Lalueza-Fox, Carles, Orlando, Ludovic, Enard, Wolfgang, Green, Richard E., Burbano, Hernán A., Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Hänni, Catherine, Fortea, Javier, de la Rasilla, Marco, Bertranpetit, Jaume, Rosas, Antonio, and Pääbo, Svante. 2007. “The derived Foxp2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals,” Current Biology 17: 19081912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, Zing-Yang. 1967. The Dynamics of Behavior Development: An Epigenetic View. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, Greg. 2011. “Knottedness is in NP, modulo GRH.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0845 (4 February 2012).Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourham, Arlette. 1982. “The archaeology of Lascaux Cave,” Scientific American 246: 8088.Google Scholar
Lewis, Harry R. and Papadimitriou, Christos H. 1981. Elements of the Theory of Computation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lipowska, Malgorzata, Czaplewska, Ewa, and Wysocka, Anna. 2011. “Visuospatial deficits of dyslexic children,” Medical Science Monitor 17: CR216221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, Adrian and Bahn, Paul. 1994. Mammoths: Giants of the Ice Age. 3rd edn. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.Google Scholar
Lobina, David J. 2012. “All tied in knots,” Biolinguistics 6/1: 7078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobina, David J. and Brenchley, Mark. 2012. “Language, knots and computation: More Bermuda than love,” Biolinguistics 6/2: 176204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longa, Víctor M. 2013. “Un análisis computacional de las líneas prehistóricas: Diseños geométricos y lenguaje,” Zephyrus. Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología 71: 1543.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2012. “The evolution of the faculty of language,” in Boeckx, Cedric, Horno, María del Carmen, and Mendívil, José Luis (eds.), Language, from a Biological Point of View. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Publishing, pp. 263289.Google Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Mauriac, Muriel. 2011. “Lascaux: The history of the discovery of an outstanding decorated cave,” Adoranten. Journal of the Scandinavian Society for Prehistoric Art, vol. 2011, 525.Google Scholar
Michel, George F. and Harkins, Debra A. 1985. “Concordance of handedness between teacher and student facilitates learning manual skills,” Journal of Human Evolution 14: 597601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, Alessandro. 2011. “A principle of developmental inertia,” in Hallgrímsson, Benedikt and Hall, Brian K. (eds.), Epigenetics: Linking Genotype and Phenotype in Development and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 116133.Google Scholar
Montes Barquín, Ramón. 2003. “El conjunto rupestre paleolítico de la cueva de El Pendo (Escobedo de Camargo),” in Carmelo Fernández Ibáñez and Jesús Cobo, Ruiz (eds.), La arqueología de la Bahía de Santander, Vol. I. Santander: Fundación Marcelino Botín, pp. 227249.Google Scholar
Montes Barquín, Ramón, Sanguino González, Juan, Gómez Laguna, Antonio J., and Luque, Carlos G. 1998. “New Palaeolithic cave art in Cueva de El Pendo, Cantabria region, Spain,” Rock Art Research 15/2: 8997.Google Scholar
Moure Romanillo, Alfonso and González Morales, Manuel R. 1988. “El contexto del arte parietal: La tecnología de los artistas en la cueva de Tito Bustillo (Asturias),” Trabajos de Prehistoria 45: 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Laura L. 2000. “Spoken language production in Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43: 13501366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papadimitriou, Christos H. 1994. Computational Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo and Uriagereka, Juan. 2005. “The evolution of the narrow faculty of language,” Lingue e Linguaggio 4/1: 2779.Google Scholar
Pignocchi, Alessandro. 2010. “How the intentions of the draftsman shape perception of a drawing,” Consciousness and Cognition 19/4: 887898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polledo González, Miguel. 2011. El arte paleolítico de Tito Bustillo. Cazadores y artistas en la cueva del Pozu'l Ramu. Pola de Siero, Asturias: Ménsula Ediciones.Google Scholar
Rechetnikov, Rouslan P. and Maitra, Kinsuk. 2009. “Motor impairments in children associated with impairments of speech or language: A meta-analytic review of research literature,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 63: 255263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ristad, Eric Sven. 1993. The Language Complexity Game. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sarpeshkar, Rahul. 1998. “Analog versus digital: Extrapolating from electronics to neurobiology,” Neural Computation 10: 16011638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarpeshkar, Rahul 2009. “Neuromorphic and biomorphic engineering systems,” in McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology 2009. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 250252.Google Scholar
Saura, Pedro and Múzquiz, Matilde. 2007. Arte Paleolítico de Asturias: Ocho santuarios subterráneos. Oviedo: Cajastur.Google Scholar
Shriberg, Lawrence D., Ballard, Kirrie J., Tomblin, J., Bruce, Duffy, Joseph, R., Odell, Katharine H., and Williams, Charles A. 2006. “Speech, prosody, and voice characteristics of a mother and daughter with a 7,13 translocation affecting FOXP2,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49: 500525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, Yousheng, Hasenstaub, Andrea, Duque, Álvaro, Yo, Yuguo, and McCormick, David. 2006. “Modulation of intracortical synaptic potentials by presynaptic somatic membrane potential,” Nature 441: 761765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shubin, Nei, Tabin, Cliff, and Carroll, Sean. 2009. “Deep homology and the origins of novelty,” Nature 457: 818823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. 1983. “Color encoding sequences and the pursuit of meaning on the Great Mural rock art of Baja California,” in Hedges, Ken (ed.), Rock Art Papers. San Diego: San Diego Museum Papers 16, pp. 1724.Google Scholar
Soffer, Olga, Adovasio, James M., and Hyland, D. C. 2000. “The ‘Venus’ figurines: Textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the Upper Paleolithic,” Current Anthropology 41: 511525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striedter, Georg F. 2005. Principles of Brain Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Tracy, Joseph, Flanders, Adam, Madi, Saussan, Laskas, Joseph, Stoddard, Eve, Pyrros, Ayis, Natale, Peter, and DelVecchio, Nicole. 2003. “Regional brain activation associated with different performance patterns during learning of a complex motor skill,” Cerebral Cortex 13: 904910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troyer, Angela K., Black, Sandra E., Armilio, Maria L., and Moscovitch, Morris. 2004. “Cognitive and motor functioning in a patient with selective infarction of the left basal ganglia: Evidence for decreased non-routine response selection and performance,” Neuropsychologia 42: 902911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, Alan M. 1954. “Solvable and unsolvable problems,” in Copeland, Jack (ed.), The Essential Turing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 576595.Google Scholar
Tyldesley, Joyce A. and Bahn, Paul G. 1983. “Use of plants in the European Palaeolithic: A review of the evidence,” Quaternary Science Reviews 2: 5381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2008. “Desperately evolving syntax,” in Smith, Andrew, Smith, Kenny, and Cancho, Ramon Ferrer i (eds.), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (EVOLANG7). Singapore: World Scientific Press, pp. 331337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhaeren, Marian, d'Errico, Francesco, Stringer, Chris, James, Sarah L., Todd, Jonathan A., and Mienis, Henk K. 2006. “Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria,” Science 312: 17851788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, Faraneh, Gadian, David G., Copp, Andrew, and Mishkin, Mortimer. 2005. “FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 131138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vijay-Shanker, K. and Weir, David. 1994. “The equivalence of four extensions of context-free grammars,” Mathematical Systems Theory 27: 511546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, Conrad H. 1957. The Strategy of the Genes. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Webber, Adam Brooks. 2008. Formal Language: A Practical Introduction. Wilsonville, OR: Franklin, Beedle & Associates.Google Scholar
Webster, Richard I., Majnemer, Annette, Platt, Robert W., and Shevell, Michael I. 2005. “Motor function at school age in children with a preschool diagnosis of developmental language impairment,” Journal of Pediatrics 146: 8085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zilhão, João, Angelucci, Diego E., Badal-García, Ernestina, d'Errico, Francesco, Daniel, Floréal, Dayet, Laure, Douka, Katerina, Higham, Thomas F. G., Martínez-Sánchez, María José, Montes-Bernárdez, Ricardo, Murcia-Mascarós, Sonia, Pérez-Sirvent, Carmen, Roldán-García, Clodoaldo, Vanhaeren, Marian, Villaverde, Valentín, Wood, Rachel, and Zapata, Josefina. 2010. “Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107/3: 10231028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zylberberg, Ariel, Dehaene, Stanislas, Roelfsema, Pieter R., and Sigman, Mariano. 2011. “The human Turing machine: A neural framework for mental programs,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 293300.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×