Book contents
- Language and Materiality
- Language and Materiality
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Images
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Toward a Theory of Language Materiality: An Introduction
- 2 Curated Conversation: “Materiality: It's the Stuff!”
- Part I Texts, Objects, Mediality
- Part II Transformation, Aesthetics, Embodiment
- Part III Time, Place, Circulation
- Part IV More Stuff: Short Topical Commentaries on Language and Materiality and Afterword
- Index
- References
Part III - Time, Place, Circulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Language and Materiality
- Language and Materiality
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Images
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Toward a Theory of Language Materiality: An Introduction
- 2 Curated Conversation: “Materiality: It's the Stuff!”
- Part I Texts, Objects, Mediality
- Part II Transformation, Aesthetics, Embodiment
- Part III Time, Place, Circulation
- Part IV More Stuff: Short Topical Commentaries on Language and Materiality and Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language and MaterialityEthnographic and Theoretical Explorations, pp. 163 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
An Coimisinéir Teanga. 2012. Tuarascáil Bhliantúil / Annual Report 2012. Available at http://coimisineir.ie/downloads/Annual_Report_2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. “Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change: Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues.” In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, edited by Androutsopoulos, Jannis, 3–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard and Briggs, Charles. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, Scott eds. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian and Shankar, Shalini. 2014. “Producing Authenticity in Global Capitalism: Language, Materiality and Value.” American Anthropologist 116(1):1–14.Google Scholar
Office, Central Statistics. 2012. This Is Ireland: Highlights from Census 2011, Part 1. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Coupland, Bethan and Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. “The Authenticating Discourses of Mining Heritage Tourism in Cornwall and Wales.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(4): 495–517.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2003. “Sociolinguistic Authenticities.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7, 3: 417–431.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2012. “Bilingualism on Display: The Framing of Welsh and English in Welsh Public Spaces.” Language in Society 41: 1–27.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2013. “Welsh Tea: The Centring and Decentring of Wales and the Welsh language.” In Multilingualism and the Periphery, edited by Pietikäinen, Sari and Kelly-Holmes, Helen, 133–153. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014a. “Wales and Welsh: Boundedness and peripherality.” In Language and Borders, edited by Watt, D. and Llamas, C., 137–153. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014b. “Language, Society and Authenticity: Themes and Perspectives.” In Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Lacoste, Véronique, Leimgruber, Jakob, and Breyer, Thiemo, 14–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas and Aldridge, Michelle eds. 2009. “Sociolinguistic and Subjective Aspects of Welsh in Wales and Its Diaspora.” Special issue, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 195: 1–235.Google Scholar
Duchêne, Alexandre and Heller, Monica. 2012. Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, Carol and Stein, Roberta. 1993. “Language Display: Authenticating Claims to Social Identity.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 14(3):187–202.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2003. “Globalization, the New Economy, and the Commodification of Language and Identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4): 473–92.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2007. Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2008. “Language and the Nation-State: Challenges to Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 504–524.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2003. “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multisemiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2: 29–57.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2006. “Minority Language Movements.” In Bilingualism: A Social Approach, edited by Heller, Monica, 50–70. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2011. “Sociolinguistic Diversity in Mainstream Media: Authenticity, Authority and Processes of Mediation and Mediatisation.” Journal of Language and Politics 10(4): 562–586.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Thurlow, Crispin, eds. 2010. Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, Helen. 2005. Advertising as Multilingual Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, Helen. 2013. “Translation in Progress”: Centralizing and Peripheralizing Tensions in the Practices of Commercial Actors in Minority Language Sites.” In Multilingualism and the Periphery, edited by Pietikäinen, Sari and Kelly-Holmes, Helen, 118–132. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, Helen. 2014. “Linguistic Fetish: The Sociolinguistics of Visual Multilingualism.” In Visual Communication, edited by Machin, David, 135–151. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 1995. “Theorizing Heritage.” Ethnomusicology 39(3): 367–380.Google Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 2004. “Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production.” Museum International 56:52–65.Google Scholar
Mac Giolla Chríost, Diarmait. 2005. The Irish Language in Ireland: From Goídel to Globalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, Sinfee and Pennycook, Alastair, eds. 2007. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Moore, Robert E., Pietikäinen, Sari, and Blommaert, Jan. 2010. “Counting the Losses: Numbers as the Language of Language Endangerment.” Sociolinguistic Studies 4, 1: 1–26.Google Scholar
ÓLaoire, Muiris. 2005. “The Language Planning Situation in Ireland.” Current Issues in Language Planning 6:3: 251–314.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul and Wee, Lionel. 2012. Markets of English: Linguistic Capital and Language Policy in a Globalizing World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari, Jaffe, Alexandra, Kelly-Holmes, Helen, and Coupland, Nikolas. 2016. Sociolinguistics from the Periphery: Small Languages in New Circumstances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari and Kelly-Holmes, Helen. 2011. “The Local Political Economy of Languages in a Sámi Tourism Destination: Authenticity and Mobility in the Labelling of Souvenirs.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(3): 323–346.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari and Kelly-Holmes, Helen. eds. 2013. Multilingualism and the Periphery. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Jonathan E. 2009. “The Cultural Codes of Branding.” Marketing Theory 9, 1: 123–126.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Jonathan E. and Salzer-Mörling, M., eds. 2006. Brand Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shankar, Shalini and Cavanaugh, Jillian. 2012. “Language and Materiality in Global Capitalism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 355–369.Google Scholar
Shohamy, Elana, Ben-Rafael, Elizier, and Barni, Monica, eds. 2010. Linguistic Landscape in the City. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Urban, G.. 1996. “The Natural History of Discourse.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, edited by Silverstein, M. and Urban, G., 1–20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Slater, Don. 2002. “Markets, Materiality and the “New Economy.”” In Market Relations and the Competitive Process, edited by Metcalfe, Stan and Warde, Alan, 95–113. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 2001. Metaculture: How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin H. 2001. Language Revitalization: Policy and Planning in Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin H. 2008. Linguistic Minorities in Democratic Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
References
Agha, Asif. 2011. “Commodity registers.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21 (1): 22–53.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2015. “Tropes of branding in forms of life.” Signs and Society 3 (S1): S174–S194.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Chronicles of Complexity: Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Nice, R., trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chumley, Lily HOpe and Harkness, Nicholas, eds. 2013. Qualia. Special issue of Anthropological Theory 13: 1–2.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1997. “Books, letters, documents: The changing aesthetics of texts in late print culture.” Journal of Material Culture 2 (1): 5–39.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Featherstone, Mike. 2014. “Super-rich lifestyles.” In Elite Mobilities, edited by Birtchnell, T. and Caletrío, J., 99–135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frake, C. 1972. ““Struck by speech”: The Yakan concept of litigation.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D., 106–129. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2005. “Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public/private.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1951. “Symbols of class status.” British Journal of Sociology 2/4: 294–304.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 2002. “Material objects as social worlds.” Theory, Culture & Society 19(5&6): 22–33.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. 1999. “Packaged sentiments: The social meanings of greeting cards.” Journal of Material Culture 4 (2): 115–141.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On linguistic aspects of translation.” In On Translation, edited by Brower, R. A., 232–239. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2014. “Welcome: Synthetic personalization and commodification of sociability in the linguistic landscape of global tourism.” In Challenges for Language Education and Policy: Making Space for People, edited by Spolsky, B., Inbar, O., and Tannenbaum, M., 214–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2015a. “Globalese: A new visual-linguistic register.” Social Semiotics 25 (2): 217–235.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2015b. “Word cities and language objects: “Love” sculptures and signs as shifters.” Linguistic Landscape 1(1 –2): 75–94.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Thurlow, Crispin. 2009. “Taking an elitist stance: Ideology and the discursive production of social distinction.” In Perspectives on Stance, edited by Jaffe, A., 195–226. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Thurlow, Crispin. 2013. “The (de-)centering spaces of airports: Framing mobility and multilingualism.” In Peripheral Multilingualism, edited by Pietikäinen, S. and Kelly-Holmes, H., 154–198. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 2009. “Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (3): 283–302.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. and Norris, S.. 2005. “Introducing mediational means/cultural tools.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, edited by Norris, S. and Jones, R. H., 49–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the social analysis of material things.” Language & Communication 23: 409–425.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2006. “Residence in the world: Affordances, instruments, actions, roles, and identities.” Semiotica 162 (1/4): 19–71.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott and Lury, Celia. 2007. Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory. 2005. “Struck by speech: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 9 (2): 167–193.Google Scholar
Munn, Nancy. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim Society (Papua New Guinea). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 2001. “Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., 139–184. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language & Communication. 23: 193–229.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2006. “Pragmatic indexing.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, Volume 6, edited by Brown, Keith, 14–17. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2015. “Multimodality, materiality and everyday textualities: The sensuous stuff of status.” In Handbook of Intermediality: Literature, Image, Sound, Music, edited by Rippl, G., 619–636. Frankfurt am Main: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2016. “Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing new post-class ideologies.” Critical Discourse Studies. doi:10.1080/17405904.2015.1122646Google Scholar
, Thurlow Crispin and Aiello, G. 2007. “National pride, global capital: A social semiotic analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry.” Visual Communication 6: 305–344.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2006. “The alchemy of the upwardly mobile: Symbolic capital and the stylization of elites in frequent-flyer programmes.” Discourse & Society 17 (1): 131–167.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2010a. Tourism Discourse: The Language of Global Mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2010b. “Silence is golden: Elitism, linguascaping and “anti-communication” in luxury tourism discourse.” In Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, edited by Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C., 187–218. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2012. “Elite mobilities: The semiotic landscapes of luxury and privilege.” Social Semiotics 22 (5): 487–516.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2014. “Visible-invisible: The social semiotics of labour in luxury tourism.” In Elite Mobilities, edited by Birtchnell, T. and Caletrío, J., 176–193. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2017a. “The discursive production and maintenance of class privilege: Permeable geographies, slippery rhetorics.” Discourse & Society 28(5).Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin and Jaworski, Adam. 2017b. “Elite Discourse: The Rhetorics of Status, Privilege, and Power.” Special issue of Social Semiotics 27(3).Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. 2003. “Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education.” Language & Communication 23: 385–408.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2014. “Parametric systems: The case of voice quality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, 2nd edition, edited by Jewitt, C., 76–85. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Lier, Leo. 2004. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: a sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
References
Agha, Asif. 2007a. “The Object Called “Language” and the Subject of Linguistics.” Journal of English Linguistics 35(3): 217–235.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007b. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audet, M. 2001. “Native American Tribal Names as Monikers and Logos: Will these Registrations Withstand Cancellation under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act after Harjo v. Pro Football, Inc. (Redskins)?” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 29: 129–180Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981 [1934–1935]. “Discourse in the Novel.” In Bakhtin, M. M., The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bernholz, Charles D., Novotny, Linda G., and Gomez, Ana L.. 2009. American Indians and the United States Patent and Trademark Office: The Native American Tribal Insignia Database. Faculty Publications, University of Nebraska – Lincoln Libraries, Paper 177. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/177Google Scholar
Cattelino, Jessica. 2008. High Stakes: Florida Seminole Gaming and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Anne. 2010. “Pueblo Returns to Traditional Name. Santo Domingo quietly becomes ‘Kewa’; tribe alters seal, signs and letterhead.” Santa Fe New Mexican, March 9.Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary. 1993. “The Properties of Culture and the Politics of Possessing Identity: Native Claims in the Cultural Appropriation Controversy.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 6: 249–285.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998 [1967]. “The Violence of the Letter, from Lévi-Strauss to Rousseau.” In Derrida, J., Of Grammatology, 101–140. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Q. T. 2000. Official Insignia of Native American tribes; Report Pursuant to PL 105–330. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, David. 1998. “Authorizing Voices: Going Public in an Indigenous Language.” Cultural Anthropology 13(2): 193–223.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, David. 2002. Reserve Memories: The Power of the Past in a Chilcotin Community. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Terence. 1998. “Group Rights to Cultural Survival: Intellectual Property Rights in Native American Cultural Symbols.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 29: 355–400.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A. and Heller, M., eds. 2012. Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, Blaine, Burlingame, Robert, and Jacobi, Jeffrey. 2012. “Caution: Tribal Names Not a Free-for-All.” Advisory. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, March 30.Google Scholar
Guest, Richard A. 1995. “Intellectual Property Rights and Native American Tribes.” American Indian Law Review 20(1): 111–139.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken, Michael Krauss, Lucille J. Watahomigie, Akira Y. Yamamoto, Colette Craig, LaVerne Masayesva Jeanne, and Nora C. England . 1992. “Endangered Languages.” Language 68(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew. 2003. “The File: Agency, Authority, and Autography in an Islamabad Bureaucracy.” Language & Communication 23: 287–314.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1968. “Linguistic Problems in Defining the Concept of ‘Tribe.’” In Essays on the Problem of Tribe, edited by Helm, J., 23–48. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1989. “When Talk Isn't Cheap: Language and Political Economy.” American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267.Google Scholar
Kanamine, Linda. 1993. “Navajo Council is Considering a Name Change.” USA Today, December 15.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language & Communication 23: 409–425.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. K. 2007. “Owning the Sun: Can Native Culture Be Protected through Intellectual Property Law?” Journal of High Technology Law 7: 180–202.Google Scholar
Kremens, N. 2004. “Speaking with a Forked Tongue in the Global Dispute on Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources: Is US Intellectual Property Law and Policy Really Aimed at Meaningful Protection? for Native American cultures?” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 15: 1–146.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2011. “Challenging ‘extinction’ through Modern Miami Language Practices.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 35(2): 135–159.Google Scholar
Lockridge, Kay. 2010. “Out of Time: Pueblo Traditions Hold Strong in Modern Day.” Santa Fe New Mexican, May 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Lury, A. A. 1999. “Official Insignia, Culture, and Native Americans: An Analysis of Whether Current United States Trademark Law Should be Changed to Prevent the Registration of Official Tribal Insignia.” Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1: 137–157.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2010. “The Semiotics of Brand.” Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 33–49.Google Scholar
McIlwraith, T. F. 1992 [1948]. The Bella Coola Indians. 2 vols. New Introduction by Barker, John. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McKosato, Harlan. 2005. “Commentary: Native Nations Should Retake Native Names.” Santa Fe New Mexican, October 23.Google Scholar
Moore, Robert. 2003. “From Genericide to Viral Marketing: ‘On Brand.’” Language & Communication 23(3/4): 331–359.Google Scholar
Moore, Robert. 2012. ‘“Taking up speech’ in an Endangered Language: Bilingual Discourse in a Heritage Language Classroom.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 27(2): 57–78.Google Scholar
Moore, Robert, Pietikäinen, Sari, and Blommaert, Jan. 2011. “Counting the Losses: Numbers as the Language of Language Endangerment.” Studies in Sociolinguistics doi: 0.1558/sols.v4i1.1.Google Scholar
Muzellec, Laurent. 2006. “What is in a Name Change? Re-Joycing Corporate Names to Create Corporate Brands.” Corporate Reputation Review 8(4): 305–321.Google Scholar
Nakassis, Constantine V. 2012. “Brand, Citationality, Performativity.” American Anthropologist 114(4): 624–638.Google Scholar
Nason, James. 2001. “Traditional Property and Modern Laws: The Need for Native American Community Intellectual Property Rights Legislation.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 12(2): 255–266.Google Scholar
Newton, Nell Jessup. 1995. “Memory and misrepresentation: Representing Crazy Horse.” Connecticut Law Review 27: 1003–1036.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, Julian. 1957. “The Closed Community and its Friends.” Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 16: 5–15.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1949 [1933]. “The Psychological Reality of Phonemes.” In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, edited by Mandelbaum, D., 46–60. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1996 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Baskin, Wade. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shankar, Shalini, and Cavanaugh, Jillian R.. 2012. “Language and Materiality in Global Capitalism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 355–369.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1984. “The ‘Value’ of Objectual Language.” www.scribd.com/document/36490815/Silverstein-The-Value-of-Objectual-Language.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1998. “Contemporary Transformations of Local Linguistic Communities.” Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 401–426.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Urban, G.. 1996. “The Natural History of Discourse.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, edited by Silverstein, M. and Urban, G., 1–20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Marc. 2007. “Trail Dust: Name Changes Present Challenges.” Santa Fe New Mexican, October 13.Google Scholar
Stone, Marissa. 2005. “Indian Gang: Nambé Pueblo Seeks Help Naming Futuristic Casino.” Santa Fe New Mexican, August 24.Google Scholar
Urla, Jacqueline. 2012. Reclaiming Basque: Language, Nation, and Cultural Activism. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethic of Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Gary. 1977. Language and Art in the Navajo Universe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
References
Chardin, Jean. 1686. Journal du voyage du chevalier Chardin en Perse et aux Indes Orientales par la Mer Noire et par la Colchide. Pitt.Google Scholar
Chumley, Lily. 2013. “Evaluation regimes and the qualia of quality.” Anthropological Theory 13 (1/2):169–183.Google Scholar
Chumley, Lily, and Harkness, Nicholas. 2013. “Introduction: QUALIA.” Anthropological Theory 13 (1/2): 3–11.Google Scholar
Ellis, Markman. 2008. “An introduction to the coffee house: A discursive model.” Language & Communication 28:156–164.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias.” Translated by Jay Miskowiec. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité October (March 1967).Google Scholar
Frake, C. 1964. “How to ask for a drink in Subanun.” American Anthropologist 66 (6):127–132.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 2002. “A semiotics of the public/private distinction.” Differences 15 (1):77–95.Google Scholar
Gershon, Ilana and Manning, Paul. 2014. “Language and media.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Enfield, N. J., Kockelman, Paul, and Sidnell, Jack, 557–576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, Nicholas. 2013. “Softer soju in South Korea.” Anthropological Theory 13 (1/2):12–30.Google Scholar
Harkness, Nicholas. 2015. “The pragmatics of qualia in practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 573–589.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1985. The Poetics of Manhood: Contest and Identity in a Cretan Mountain Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew. 2012. “Documents and bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology. 41:251–267.Google Scholar
Iskander, F. 1983. Sandro of Chegem. Translated by Susan Brownsberger. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Karp, I. 1980. “Beer drinking and social experience in an African society: An essay in formal sociology.” In Explorations in African Systems of Thought, edited by Karp, Ivan and Bird, C. S., 83–119. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 1997. “Filth and the public sphere: Concepts and practices about space in Calcutta.” Public Culture 10 (1):83–113.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. and Volkov, V. 1998. “Directed desires: Kult'urnost’ and consumption.” In Constructing Russian Culture in the Age of Revolution, 1881–1940, edited by Kelly, Catriona and Shepherd, David, 291–313. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laurier, E. 2008. “Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café.” Language & Communication 28:165–181.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973. “Structuralism and ecology.” Social Science Information 12:7–23.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2009. “The city of balconies: Elite politics and the changing semiotics of the post-socialist cityscape.” In Urban Cultures, Urban Futures: City Culture and City Planning in Georgia, edited by Van Assche, K., Salukvadze, J., and Shavishvili, N., 71–102. Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2012b. Strangers in a Strange Land: Occidentalist Publics and Orientalist Geographies in Nineteenth-Century Georgia. Brighton: Academic Studies Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2013. “The theory of the café central and the practice of the café peripheral: Aspirational and abject infrastructures of sociability on the European periphery.” In Cafe Society, edited by Tjora, Aksel and Scrambler, Graham, 43–65. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul. 2017. “When the guest becomes the host: Review of Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora and the Evolution of the Soviet Empire.” Diaspora 19 (2010):351–360.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul and Shatirishvili, Zaza. 2011. “The exoticism and eroticism of the city: The “kinto” and his city.” In Urban Spaces after Socialism: Ethnographies of Public Places in Eurasian Cities, edited by Darieva, Tsypylma et al., 261–281. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1868. “Some consequences of four incapacities.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2:140–157.Google Scholar
John, Perry. 2001. “The historical role of Turkish in relation to Persian of Iran.” Iran & the Caucasus 5:193–200.Google Scholar
Pinder-Wilson, Ralph. 1985. “The Persian garden: Bagh and Chahar Bagh.” In Studies in Islamic Art, 273–286. London: Pindar Press.Google Scholar
Pruidze, Levan. 2001. “Ganatlebulta dilet'ant'izmi anu ras erchit erovnuli cxovrebis ts'ess da kartul supras?” Lit'eraturuli sakartvelo February 9–12:12–13.Google Scholar
Ram, Harsha. 2007. “The sonnet and the Mukhambazi: Genre wars on the edges of the Russian Empire.” PMLA 122 (5):1548–1570.Google Scholar
Rawsthorn, Alice. 2008. “No. 14: The chair that has seated millions.” www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/arts/10iht-design10.1.17621906.html?_r-0.Google Scholar
Scott, E. R. 2016. Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora and the Evolution of Soviet Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheil, Lady. 1856. Glimpses of Life and Manners in Persia. London: John Murray, Albemarle Atreet.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1949. The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology 55(3):254–261.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2014. Linguistic Anthropology and Sociocultural Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Volkov, V. 2000. “The concept of kul'turnost’: Notes on the Stalinist civilizing process.” In Stalinism: New Directions, edited by Fitzpatrick, Sheila, 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walcher, Heidi. 1998. “Between paradise and political capital: The semiotics of Safavid Isfahan.” Yale Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin 103:330–348.Google Scholar
Walker, Adam and Manning, Paul. 2013. Georgian wine: The transformation of socialist quantity into postsocialist quality. In Wine and Culture: Vineyard to Glass, edited by Black, Rachel and Ulin, Robert, 201–220. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar