Book contents
- Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism
- Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- 1 Mimesis, style, and the spaces of metaphor
- 2 Rural resources
- 3 On the road
- 4 Rural retreats
- 5 Diaspora
- 6 On the road again
- 7 In Plato’s garden
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism
- Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- 1 Mimesis, style, and the spaces of metaphor
- 2 Rural resources
- 3 On the road
- 4 Rural retreats
- 5 Diaspora
- 6 On the road again
- 7 In Plato’s garden
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stevens, S. A.. 2002. “Rereading Callimachus’ Aetia Fragment 1.” CP 97: 238–55.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. 2002. Archeologies of the Greek Past: Landscape, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alter, R. 2005. “Woolf: Urban Pastoral.” In Imagined Cities: Urban Experience and the Language of the Novel. New Haven. 103–20.Google Scholar
Apfel, H. V. 1935. “Literary Quotation and Allusion in Demetrius Περὶ Ἑρμηνείας and Longinus Περὶ Ὕψους.” Diss. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Ashbery, J. 1985. “Whatever It Is, Wherever You Are.” In Selected Poems. New York. 319–21.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 1997. Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Hermes Einzelschriften 75. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. 1968. “Propertius 3.1.1–6 Again: Intimations of Immortality?” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 21.1: 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. 2001. “Proust and the Fine Arts.” In The Cambridge Companion to Proust, ed. Bales, R.. Cambridge. 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. and Warner, M. (eds.). 1992. The Language of the Cave. Apeiron 25.4 (Special Issue). Edmonton.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 1998. “Socrates Agonistes: The Case of the Cratylus Etymologies.” OSAP 16: 63–98.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1971. “Style and Its Image.” In Literary Style: A Symposium, ed. Chatman, S.. Oxford. 90–99.Google Scholar
Bates, W. N. 1899. “The Lenaea, the Anthesteria, and the Temple en Limnais.” TAPA 30: 89–98.Google Scholar
Battisti, D. G. 1997. Dionigi di Alicarnasso: Sull’ Imitazione. Edizione critica, traduzione e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Hermes Einzelschriften 4. Berlin.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. 2006. “Dancing with the Gods: The Myth of the Chariot in Plato’s Phaedrus.” AJP 127.2: 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, H. 1984. “The Origins of Bucolic Representation: Disenchantment and Revision in Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll.” CA 3.1: 1–39.Google Scholar
Biles, Z. P. 2002. “Intertextual Biography in the Rivalry Between Cratinus and Aristophanes.” AJP 123.2: 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billerman, R. 2000. Die “métaphore” bei Marcel Proust: Ihre Wurzeln bei Novalis, Heine und Baudelaire, ihre Theorie und Praxis. Munich.Google Scholar
Bing, P. 2003. “The Unruly Tongue: Philitas of Cos as Scholar and Poet.” CP 98.4: 330–48.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgeaud, P. [1979] 1988. The Cult of Pan in Ancient Greece, tr. Atlass, K. and Redfield, J.. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1985. “Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus.” CQ 35.1: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.). 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1975. “The Meadow of Love and Two Passages in Euripides’ Hippolytus.” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 28.3: 268–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, J. E. 1967. “Whitman and the Early Development of William Carlos Williams.” PMLA 82.7: 613–21.Google Scholar
Brulé, P. 1987. Le fille d’ Athènes. La religion des filles à Athènes à l’époque classique. Besançon and Paris.Google Scholar
Burger, R. 1980. Plato’s Phaedrus: A Defense of the Philosophical Art of Writing. Tuscaloosa, AL.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1999. Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 20. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2005 “Eikôs Muthos.” Rhizai: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2: 143–65.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. 1997. “The Meadow of Artemis and the Character of the Euripidean Hippolytus.” QUCC n.s. 57.3: 51–75.Google Scholar
Caizzi, F. D. 1993. “The Porch and the Garden: Early Hellenistic Images of the Philosophical Life.” In Images and Ideologies: Self-definition in the Hellenistic World, ed. Bulloch, A., Gruen, E., and Long, A. A.. Berkeley. 303–29.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1992. “Prairies intouchées et jardins d’ Aphrodite: éspaces ‘initiatique’ en Grèce.” In L’ initiation: Actes du colloque international de Montpellier II, ed. Moreau, A.. Montpellier. 103–18.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2007. “Gardens of Love and Meadows of the Beyond: Ritual Encounters with the Gods and Poetical Performances in Ancient Greece.” In Sacred Gardens and Landscapes: Ritual and Agency, ed. Conan, M.. Washington, DC. 43–54.Google Scholar
Camargo, M. 1992. “A Twelfth-Century Treatise on ‘Dictamen’ and Metaphor.” Traditio 47: 161–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, C. 2000. “Old Comedy and the Sophists.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London. 419–38.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2007. “Pindar, Place, and Performance.” In Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire, ed. Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C.. Oxford. 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1953. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. I, tr. Mannheim, R.. New Haven.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. 1995. “Rhetoric and Literary Criticism: Their Nature and Their Functions in Antiquity.” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 48.5: 513–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. 1979. “Socrates’ Prayer to Pan.” In Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, ed. Bowersock, G. W., Burkert, W., and Putnam, M. C. J.. Berlin. 345–53.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 2004. Archilochos Heros: The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis. Center for Hellenic Studies. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton-Engle, G. 2003. “Control of Costume in Three Plays of Aristophanes.” AJP 124.4: 507–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. 1988. “Seized by Nymphs: Nympholepsy and Symbolic Expression in Greece.” CA 7.2: 155–89.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 1997. “Field and Forum: Culture and Agriculture in Roman Rhetoric.” In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London, New York. 71–89.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. 2002. “Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 1985. “Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea.” Transcations of the Institute of British Geographers n.s. 10.1: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S.. [1988] 2002. The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. 1979. “Water and Wine as Symbols of Inspiration.” Mnemosyne 32.1–2: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csapo, E. 2004. “The Politics of the New Music.” In Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousikê in the Classical Athenian City, ed. Murray, P. and Wilson, P.. Oxford. 207–48.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. and Goette, H. R., 2007. “The Men Who Built the Theatres: Theatropolai, Theatronai, and Architektones,” with an archaeological appendix by Goette. In Wilson, P. (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals. Oxford. 87–121.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 1991. “Aesthetic Response and Technical Analysis in the Rhetorical Writings of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.” MH 48: 33–58.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1978. “What Metaphors Mean.” In On Metaphor, ed. Sacks, S.. Chicago. 29–45.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. 1997. Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Defradas, J. 1969. “Le chant des Grenouilles: Aristophane critique musical.” REA 71: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degli’Innocenti Pierini, R. 1979. “Cicerone ‘demiurgo’ dell’oratore ideale. Rifessioni in margine a Orator 7–10.” Studi italiani di filologia classica 51: 84–102.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. C. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Mnemosyne supplements: Monographs on Greek and Roman Language and Literature. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. [1972] 1981. “Plato’s Pharmacy.” In Dissemination, tr. Johnson, B.. Chicago. 61–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. [1972] 1982. “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.” In Margins of Philosophy. Chicago. 207–71.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1963. Crise agraire et attitude religieuse chez Hésiode. Collection Latomus 68. Brussels.Google Scholar
Donadi, F. 2000. Lettura dal De compositione verborum de Dionigi d’ Alicarnasso. Padova.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993b. “The Chorus of Initiates in Frogs.” Aristophane. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique, Foundation Hardt, vol. 38. Geneva. 173–93.Google Scholar
duBois, P. 1988. Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckerman, C. 2014. “Pindar’s Delphic Landscapes.” In Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture, ed. Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N.. Cambridge. 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2004. Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. 1993. “Homer’s Ethical Geography: Country and City in the Odyssey.” TAPA 123: 27–78.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. 1997. “The Art of Love and the Love of Art in Longus.” L’Antiquité classique 66: 239–48.Google Scholar
Elliger, W. 1975. Die Darstellung der Landschaft in der griechischen Dichtung. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlyn-Jones, C. 2004. “The Dramatic Poet and His Audience: Agathon in Plato’s ‘Symposium.’” Hermes 132: 389–405.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1978. “Imitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De oratore 2.78–97 and Some Related Problems of Ciceronian Theory.” CP 73: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2006. “Theocritus’ Constructive Interpreters, and the Creation of a Bucolic Reader.” In Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, ed. Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T.. Leiden. 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R.. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.). 2006. “Editors’ Introduction.” In Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden. vii–xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, N. 1999. “Vicarious Transport: Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian 4.” HSCP 99: 1–31.Google Scholar
Fenno, J. 2005. “A Great Wave Against the Stream: Water Imagery in Iliadic Battle Scenes.” AJP 126.4: 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficino, M. [1496] 2008. Commentaries on Plato, vol. 1, ed. and trans. Allen, M. J. B.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Foeglin, R. J. 1994. “Metaphors, Similes and Similarity.” In Aspects of Metaphor, ed. Hintikka, J.. Dordrecht. 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1994. Homeric Hymn to Demeter: Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1998. “The Mother of the Argument: Eros and the Body in Sappho and Plato’s Phaedrus.” In Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity, ed. Wyke, M.. Oxford. 39–70.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. 2000. “The Comic Body in Greek Art and Drama.” In Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art, ed. Cohen, B.. Leiden: 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Ancient Literary Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forehand, W. E. 1976. “Symbolic Gardens in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe.” Eranos 74: 103–12.Google Scholar
Fornaro, S. 1997. Dionisio di Alicarnasso: Epistola a Pompeo Gemino. Introduzione e commento. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1985. “Theophrastus on Delivery.” In Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W.. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. 2. New Brunswick, NJ: 269–88.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1992. Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces,” tr. Miskowiec, J.. Diacritics 16: 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. 1983. “‘On Not Knowing Greek’: The Classics and the Woman of Letters.” Classical Journal 78: 337–49.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1999. “Moments and Metamorphoses: Virginia Woolf’s Greece.” Comparative Literature 51.3: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froula, C. 2005. Virginia Woolf and the Bloomsbury Avant-Garde: War, Civilization, Modernity. New York.Google Scholar
Franke, W. 2000. “Metaphor and the Making of Sense: The Contemporary Metaphor Renaissance.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 33.2: 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. C. 2013. “Song Benders of Circular Choruses: Dithyramb and the Demise of Music. In Dithyramb in Context, ed. Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P.. Oxford. 213–36.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. 1988. Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, tr. Cole, A. T.. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesecke, A. L. 2007. The Epic City: Urbanism, Utopia, and the Garden in Ancient Greece and Rome. Hellenic Studies 21. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gilhuly, K. Forthcoming. “Lesbians Are Not From Lesbos.” In Ancient Sex: New Essays, ed. Blondell, R. and Ormand, K.. Columbus, OH. 143–76.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Representation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1998. “The Seduction of the Gaze: Socrates and his Girlfriends.” In Kosmos: Essays in Order, Conflict, and Community in Classical Athens, ed. Cartledge, P., Millett, P., and von Reden, S.. Cambridge. 105–25.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. 1980. “Thrasymachus of Chalcedon and Ciceronian Style.” CP 75.4: 297–311.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. 1965. The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams (ed. and comm.), 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grady, H. 2008. “Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics: The Case of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” Shakespeare Quarterly 59.3: 274–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, S. [1991] 2003. Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Groningen, B. A.. 1959. “Quelques problèmes de la poésie bucolique grecque.” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 12: 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1950. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Thucydides.” Phoenix 4.3: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1952. “Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus.” AJP 73: 251–67.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. 1962. “Educational, Rhetorical, and Literary Theory in Cicero.” Phoenix 16.4: 334–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1982. “Le Rane di Aristofane e la Topographia Ateniese.” Studi in Onore di Aristide Colonna. Perugia. 167–72.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2000. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1991. Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Habash, M. 2002. “Dionysus’ Roles in Aristophanes’ Frogs.” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 55.1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. A. 1968. “Pindar and Pan: Frs. 95–100 Snell.” Phoenix 22.1: 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J. 1996. “Sappho and Her Social Context: Sense and Sensuality.” In Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches, ed. Greene, E.. Berkeley. 125–43.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Values and Problems in Greek Conceptions of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1983. Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1990. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York.Google Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C. (eds.). 2002. Hellenistic Epigrams. Hellenistica Groningana 6. Louvain.Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. 1891. “Metaphors and Allusive Language in Greek Poetry.” CR 5.5: 191–93.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. 1999. “‘White Mythology’ Revisited: Derrida and His Critics on Reason and Rhetoric.” Critical Inquiry 25.3: 505–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. 2007. “Town and Country.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge. 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskins, E. 2000. “‘Mimesis’ Between Poetics and Rhetoric: Performance Culture and Civic Education in Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30.3: 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, P. 1998. Der locus amoenus in der antiken Literatur: Zu Theorie und Geschichte eines literarischen Motivs. Bamberg.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. [1975] 1991. The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, M. 1996. “Obscured by Dreams: Race, Empire, and Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” Shakespeare Quarterly 47.1: 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidber, T. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. and O’Hanlon, M. (eds.) 1995. The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. D. and Willis, P.. 1988. The Genius of the Place: The English Landscape Garden, 1260–1820. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2003. “Reflections on Writing and Culture: Theocritus and the Style of Cultural Change.” In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. 213–34.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. [1977] 2008b. “Longus and Plato.” In On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and Its Reception. Berlin. 775–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, D. 1985. “Theophrastus and the Theory of Style.” In Fortenbaugh, (ed.), 251–67.Google Scholar
Innes, D. 1995b. “Longinus: Structure and Unity.” In Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, ed. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam. 111–24.Google Scholar
Innes, D. 2002. “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.” Mnemosyne 4th ser. 55.3: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, M. 1989. Discourse as Performance. Stanford. (Orig. “Space and Reference in Drama.” Poetics Today 2 [1981]: 211–24.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1980. “A Greek Indecency and Its Students: Laikazein.” PCPS n.s. 26: 12–66.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kambylis, A. 1965. Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik: Untersuchungen zu Hesiodos, Callimachos, Properz und Ennius. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1999. “Slender Verse: Roman Elegy and Ancient Rhetorical Theory.” Mnemosyne 52.1: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinck, A. L. 2001. “Male Poets and Maiden Voices: Gender and Genre in Pindar and Alcman.” Hermes 129.2: 276–79.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H. 2010. Hesiod: The Other Poet. Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoudaki, M. 1980. “The ‘Greek’ Jacob: Greece in Virginia Woolf’s Jacob’s Room.” Papers in Romance 2: 67–75.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. 2009. “A Seemingly Artless Conversation: Cicero’s De Legibus (1.1–5).” CP 104.21: 90–106.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. 1983. “Geography and Literary Tradition in Theocritus 7.” TAPA 113: 201–20.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1990. “Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry.” TAPA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2005. “Choral Lyric as ‘Ritualization’: Poetic Sacrifice and Poetic Ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian.” CA 24.1: 81–130.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2006. “Plato, Aesop, and the Beginnings of Mimetic Prose.” Representations 94: 6–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 2011. Aesopic Conversations: Popular Culture, Conventional Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. 1999. Initiating Dionysus: Ritual and Theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. 2002. “Reinscribing the Muse: Greek Drama and the Discourse of Inspired Creativity.” In Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D.. Oxford. 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaDrière, C. 1951. “The Problem of Plato’s Ion.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10.1: 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidl, C. 2003. “The Harlot’s Art: Metaphor and Literary Criticism.” In Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R.. Oxford. 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, R. S. 2010a. “Appian Imagery and the Critique of Poetic Sweetness in Plato’s Republic.” TAPA 140.1: 97–115.Google Scholar
Lind, H. 1987. “Socrates am Ilissos: IG I3 1 257 und die Eingangsszene des Platonischen ‘Phaidros’.” ZPE 69: 15–19.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. “The Metaphors of Metaphora.” In Aristotelian Explorations. Cambridge. 205–29.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. F. 1937. “The Metaphorical Terminology of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.” CQ 31.3/4: 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, G. 1966. “Die Kunstauffassung im VII. Idyll Theokrits und das Programm des Kallimachos.” Hermes 94: 413–25.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 1995. The Experiences of Teiresias: The Feminine and the Greek Man. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. 2006. “Aristophanic Spacecraft.” In Playing Around Aristophanes: Essays in Honour of the Completion of the Edition of the Comedies of Aristophanes by Alan Sommerstein, ed. Kozak, L. and Rich, J.. Oxford. 48–64.Google Scholar
Luck, G. 1957. “The Cave and the Source (on the Imagery of Propertius 3.1.1–6).” CQ 7.3/4: 175–79.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macksey, R. 1987. “Introduction.” In On Reading Ruskin, ed. Autret, J., Burford, W., and Wolfe, P. J.. New Haven. xiii–liii.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. 1992. “Myth, Allegory, and Argument in Plato.” In Barker, A. and Warner, M. (eds.). 25–67.Google Scholar
McCall, M. H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlew, J. 2002. Citizens on Stage: Comedy and Political Culture in the Athenian Democracy. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, K. R. and Gray, T.. 2014. “Some Versions of Urban Pastoral.” In The Cambridge Companion to the City in Literature, ed. McNamara, K. R.. Cambridge. 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mölk, R. 2008. Durch die Blume gesagt: Pflanzen und Blumen in Marcel Prousts A la recherche du temps perdu. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. 2000. Plato’s Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995. “Filologi alessandrini e poeti alessandrini : La filologie su ‘contemporanei.’” Aevum antiquum 8: 47–63.Google Scholar
Moran, R. 1989. “Seeing and Believing: Metaphor, Image, and Force.” Critical Inquiry 16.1: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, R. 1996. “Artifice and Persuasion: The Work of Metaphor.” In Rorty, A. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Princeton. 385–98.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 1994. “Socrates and Gorgias at Delphi and Olympia: Phaedrus 235d6–236b4.” CQ 44.2: 375–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. 2007. “Debating Patronage, the Cases of Argos and Corinth.” In Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire, ed. Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C.. Oxford. 213–63.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 2010. “Inspiration, Recollection, and Mimesis in Plato’s Phaedrus.” In Ancient Models of Mind, ed. Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D.. Cambridge. 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. Forthcoming. “Plato’s Goat-Stags and the Uses of Comparison.” In Plato and the Power of Images, ed. Destrée, P. and Edmonds, R.G. III. Brill.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2007. “What Is Imitative Poetry and Why Is It Bad?” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F.. Cambridge. 415–44.Google Scholar
Motte, A. 1973. Prairies et jardins de la Grèce antique: De la religion à la philosophie. Brussels.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1992. “Inspiration and Mimesis in Plato.” In Barker, A. and Warner, M.. (eds.). 27–46.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2002. “Plato’s Muses.” In Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D.. Oxford. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990b. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narducci, E. 2002a. “Brutus: The History of Roman Eloquence.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden. 401–25.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 2002b. “Orator and the Definition of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden. 427–43.Google Scholar
Nassal, F. 1910. “Aesthetisch-Rhetorische Beziehungen zwischen Dionysios von Halicarnass und Cicero.” Diss. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1982. “Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10.” In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. Moravcsik, J. and Temko, P.. Totowa, NJ. 47–69.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 2007. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. J. 2005. Aristocracy and Athletics in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. [1873] 2009. “On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense.” In Writings from the Early Notebooks, ed. Geuss, R. and Nehamas, A., tr. Löb, L.. Cambridge. 253–64.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nora, P. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26:7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Connor, E. M. 1991. “‘A Bird in the Bush’: The Erotic and Literary Implications of Bucolic and Avian Imagery in Longus’ ‘Daphnis and Chloe’.” RhM 134.3/4: 393–401.Google Scholar
Olwig, K. 2002. “The Duplicity of Space: German Raum and Swedish Rum in English Language Geographical Discourse.” Geographiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 84.1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. 1992. Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and Early Greek Stylistic Theory. Hermes Einzelschriften 60. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Padel, R. 1974. “‘Imagery of the Elsewhere’: Two Choral Odes of Euripides.” CQ 24.2: 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, M. 1992. “The Heraclean Dionysus: Theatrical and Social Renewal in Aristophanes’ Frogs.” Arethusa 25: 359–84.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (ed. and comm.). 1981. Further Greek Epigrams: Epigrams before A.D. 50 from the Greek Anthology and other Sources, not included in Hellenistic Epigrams and the Garland of Philip. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1930. Hercules am Scheidewege und andere antike Bildstoffe in der neueren Kunst. Studien der Bibliothek Warburg 18. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. E. V. 1988. “The Function of the Locus Amoenus in Theocritus’ Seventh Poem.” RhM 131: 276–304.Google Scholar
Pender, E. E. 2003. “Plato on Metaphors and Models.” In Boys-Stone, G. R. (ed.). 55–81.Google Scholar
Perceau, S. 2011. “Corps chantés, corps chantant chez Homère et les tragiques.” In Musica corporis. Savoirs et arts du corps de l’antiquité à l’âge humaniste et classique, ed. Malhomme, F. and Villari, E.. Colloque les styles du savoir. Brussels. 105–28.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1933. “To prepon: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen Geistes.” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 1933: 58–92.Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2001. “Ideals and Ruins: Pausanias, Longinus, and the Second Sophistic.” In Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece, ed. Alcock, S. A., Cherry, J. F., and Elsner, J.. Oxford. 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2009. “Rhetoric, Aesthetics, and the Voice.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, ed. Gunderson, E.. Cambridge. 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2010. The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. 1975. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides (trans. and comm.). Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, M. [1922] 1987–89. À la recherche du temps perdu, Éd. Gallimard, . Paris. [Eng. Ed. In Search of Lost Time, tr. Davis, L., Grieve, J., Treharne, M., and Sturrock, J.. New York. 2003–05.]Google Scholar
Proust, M. [1906] 1987. “On Reading.” On Reading Ruskin, ed. Autret, J., Burford, W., and Wolfe, P. J.. New Haven.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. 1901. Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de Elocutione libellus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. [1921] 1954. Aristophanes Frösche: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Vienna.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. 1893. Epigramm und Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung. Giessen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2000. “Aristarchus and the Hellenistic Poets.” Seminari romani di cultura greca 3: 325–35.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. 2006. Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson Lear, G. 2006. “Plato on Learning to Love Beauty.” In The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, ed. Santas, G.. Oxford. 104–24.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 2010. Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1978a. “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling.” In On Metaphor, ed. Sacks, S.. Chicago. 141–57.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1996. “Between Rhetoric and Poetics.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. Rorty, A.. Princeton. 324–84.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 1987. Mysterienterminologie bei Plato, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, B. 2011. Histories of Peirene: A Corinthian Fountain in Three Millenia. Princeton.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. 2012. “Mount Helikon and the Valley of the Muses: The Production of a Sacred Space.” Journal of Roman Archeology 25: 227–58.Google Scholar
Roselli, D. K. 2005. “Vegetable-Hawking Mom and Fortunate Son: Euripides, Tragic Style, and Reception.” Phoenix 59.1/2: 1–49.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2000. “Cratinus’ Putine and the Construction of the Comic Self.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London. 23–39.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2006. “Comic Aischrology and the Unbanization of Agroikia.” In City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity, ed. Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden. 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. 2004. “Girls at Play in Early Greek Poetry.” AJP 125.2: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. 1969. The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 1971. “I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nella letterature classiche.” BICS 18: 69–94.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. 2001. The Epigrams Ascribed to Theocritus: A Method of Approach. Hellenistica Groningana 5. Louvain.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1992. “Reflections of the Sun: Explanation in the Phaedo.” In Barker, and Warner, (eds.) 89–101.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1989. Horace: Epistles, Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (Ars Poetica). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. 2002. “A Total Write-Off. Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the Rhetoric of Comic Competition.” CQ 52.1: 138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001. “Tourism and the Sacred: Pausanias and the Traditions of Greek Pilgrimage.” In Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece, ed. Alcock, S. A., Cherry, J. F., and Elsner, J.. Oxford. 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2013. State Pilgrims and Sacred Observers in Ancient Greece: A Study of Theôria and Theôroi. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R. 2007. “Poetics and Literary Criticism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge. 248–61.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 1997. “Le paysage des idylles bucoliques.” Les enjeux de paysage, ed. Collot, M. et al. Brussels. 13–31.Google Scholar
Saunier-Ollier, J. 1978. “Whitman, Williams, Ginsberg: histoire d’une filiation.” Revue française d’études américaines 5: 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E. 1997. “Imagining Flowers: Perceptual Mimesis (Particularly Delphinium).” Representations 57: 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharffenberger, E. W. 2007. “Deinon Eribremetas: The Sound and Sense of Aeschylus in Aristophanes’ Frogs.” CW 100.3: 229–49.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. 1991. “The Intended Public of Demetrius’s ‘On Style’: The Place of the Treatise in the Hellenistic Educational System.” Rhetorica 18.1: 28–49.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. 2000. “Horace and his Fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6.” AJP 121.1: 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, C. 1986. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his audience.” In Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, ed. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J.. Cambridge. 121–41.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1996. “Δόμων ἅγαλμα: Virgin Sacrifice and Aesthetic Object.” TAPA 126: 111–28.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1961. “The Character of Dionysus and the Unity of the Frogs.” HSCP 65: 207–42.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1978. “‘The Myth Was Saved’: Reflections on Homer and the Mythology of Plato’s Republic.” Hermes 106.2: 315–36.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1986. “Naming, Truth, and Creation in the Poetics of Pindar.” Diacritics 16.2: 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrao, G. 1977. “La poesia bucolica : realtà campestre e stilizzazione leterraria.” In La cultura ellenistica: Filosofia, scienza, letteratura, Adorno, F. et al. Milan. 180–99.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1925. Review of G. Rudberg, Kring Platons Phaidros (Göteborg, 1924). CP 20: 77–80.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (1995) “Poetic Rivalry and the Caricature of Comic Poets: Cratinus’ Putinê and Aristophanes’ Wasps.” In Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley, ed. Griffiths, A.. London. 56–80.Google Scholar
Simonsen, K. 2005. “Bodies, Sensations, Space and Time: The Contributions of Henri Lefebvre.” Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 87.1: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, B. 1955. “Das Symbol des Weges.” Ch. 13 in Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des euro-päizschen Denkens bei den Griechen, 3rd ed. Hamburg. 320–32.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1931. “Demetrios ΠΕΡΙ ΕΡΜΗΝΕΙΑΣ und sein Peripatetisches Quellenmaterial.” Hermes 66.4: 241–67.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1941. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” AJP 62.1–2: 35–50, 169–90.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1979. “The Myth of the First Temples at Delphi.” CQ 29.2: 231–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. 2006. “Horace’s Garden Thoughts: Rural Retreats and the Urban Imagination.” In City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity, ed. Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden. 240–74.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. 1977. “Retreat from the Male: Catullus 62 and Sappho’s Erotic Flowers.” Ramus 6: 83–102.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. 1997. Performance and Gender in Ancient Greece: Nondramatic Poetry in Its Setting. Princeton.Google Scholar
Stoneman, R. 1981. “Ploughing a Garland: Metaphor and Metonymy in Pindar.” Maia 33:125–38.Google Scholar
Swift, L. 2009a. “How to Make a Goddess Angry: Making Sense of the Demeter Ode in Euripides’ Helen.” CP 104.4: 418–38.Google Scholar
Swift, L. 2009b. “The Symbolism of Space in Euripides Choral Fantasy (HIPP. 732–75, MED. 824–65, BACCH. 370–433).” CQ 59.2: 364–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tecusan, M. 1992. “Speaking about the Unspeakable in Plato’s Use of Imagery.” In Barker, A. and Warner, M. (eds.). 69–87.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 2007. “Horace and Hellenistic Poetry.” In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge. 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, M. 1934. “The Parodos of Aristophanes’ ‘Frogs.’” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, section C, vol. 42: 199–218.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. 1970. “Furor Poeticus: Poetic Inspiration in Greek Literature before Democritus and Plato.” Journal of the History of Ideas 31.2: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, M. 1990. “Plato’s Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature.” In Antonine Literature, ed. Russell, D. A.. Oxford. 141–73.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y.-F. 1975. “Place and Space: Humanistic Perspective.” Progress in Geography 6: 211–52.Google Scholar
Tucker, P. G. 1904. “The Mysteries in the Frogs of Aristophanes.” CR 18.8: 416–18. With a postscript by J. E. Harrison.Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. 1905. The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism. Chicago.Google Scholar
Vara, J. 1992. “The Sources of Theocritean Bucolic Poetry,” tr. Weatherby, J.. Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 45.3: 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1983. “The Principles of Ancient Literary Criticism.” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., vol. 36: 14–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1989. “Dim Body, Dazzling Body.” In Fragments for a History of the Human Body, vol. 1, tr. Wilson, A. (New York). (Orig. “Corps des dieux,” Le temps de la réflection, vol. 7 [Paris, 1986].)Google Scholar
Videau, A. 1997. “Fonctions et representations du paysage dans la literature Latine.” In Les enjeux du paysage, ed. Collot, M.. Brussels. 32–53.Google Scholar
Volk, K. 2010. “Literary Theft and Roman Water Rights in Manilius’ Second Proem.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 65: 187–97.Google Scholar
Walcot, P. 1957. “The Problem of the Prooemium in Hesiod’s Theogony.” SO 33: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B. 2009. Pindar’s Verbal Art: An Ethnographic Study of Epinician Style. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2005. “The Lexicon of Love: Longus and Philetas Grammatikos.” JHS 125: 145–48.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2011. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U.. 1919. “Ein glücklicher Sommertag.” In Platon: Leben und Werke, vol. 1. Berlin. 450–88.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. 2000. The Boastful Chef: The Discourse of Food in Ancient Greek Comedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W. C. [1950–51] 1986. The Collected Poems of William Carlos Williams, ed. Litz, A. Walton and MacGowan, C., 2 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 1999. “The Aulos in Athens.” In Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, ed. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge. 58–95.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. 1995. “Greeks, Romans and the Rise of Atticism.” In Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, ed. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam. 65–82.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. 1917–41 [1989]. “A Dialogue upon Mount Pentelicus.” In The Complete Shorter Fiction of Virginia Woolf, ed. Dick, S.. New York. 63–68.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1988. “The Poetry of Tongue and Phrên in the Frogs.” In Language and the Tragic Hero: Essays on Greek Tragedy in Honor of Gordon M. Kirkwood, ed. Pucci, P.. Atlanta, GA. 175–85.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. 1989. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Hermogenes on the Style of Demosthenes.” AJP 110: 576–88.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 1999. “Odysseus Panourgos: The Liar’s Style in Oratory and Tragedy.” Helios 26.1: 35–68.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2009. “Bodies and Topographies in Ancient Stylistic Theory.” In Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity, ed. Fögen, T. and Lee, M.. Berlin. 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worman, N. 2012. “Cutting to the Bone: Recalcitrant Bodies in Sophocles.” In The Blackwell Companion to Sophocles, ed. Ormand, K.. New York. 351–66.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2014. “Mapping Literary Styles in Aristophanes’ Frogs.” In Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture, ed. Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N.. Cambridge. 200–39.Google Scholar
Wyk Cronjé, J.. 1986. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, De Demosthene: A Critical Appraisal of the Status Quaestionis. Spudasmata 39. Zurich.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. 1983. “Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A Study in Ancient Criticism.” CA 2: 156–170.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 1980. “Simichidas’ Walk and the Locality of Bourina in Theocritus, Id. 7.” CQ n.s. 30: 373–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1983. “The Nature and Origin of Realism in Alexandrian Poetry.” Antike und Abendland 29.2: 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. 1990. “The Poetics of Erôs: Nature, Art, and Imitation in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe.” In Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World, ed. Halperin, D. M., Winkler, J. J., and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton. 417–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. [1985] 1996a. “Playing the Other: Theater, Theatricality, and the Feminine.” In Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago. 341–74. (First published in Nothing To Do with Dionysus? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context, ed. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. Princeton. 63–96.)Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. [1981] 1996b. “Travesties of Gender and Genre in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazousae.” In Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago. 375–416. (First published in Reflections of Women in Antiquity, ed. Foley, H. P.. London. 169–217.)Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1980. “Flood Control on Mount Helicon: The Springs of Inspiration and Blending of Genres in Latin Poetry.” Conference paper.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1983. “Re-Creating the Canon: Augustan Poetry and the Alexandrian Past.” Critical Inquiry 10.1: 83–105.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2003. “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, ed. Braund, D. and Gill, C.. Exeter. 119–38.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. 1962. Cicero Platonis aemulus. Untersuchung über die Form von Ciceros Dialogen, besonders von de oratore. Zurich.Google Scholar