Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:26:35.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Environmental Law and Irrigated Land in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Karen Bubna-Litic
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer Law in the Faculty of Law at UTS, Australia
Nathalie J. Chalifour
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Patricia Kameri-Mbote
Affiliation:
University of Nairobi
Lin Heng Lye
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
John R. Nolon
Affiliation:
Pace University, New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Australia's waterways are at a crisis point. This is evidenced from the amount of water-related “reform” that the Australian Governments have embarked on over the past 10 years. Almost all of the country's capital cities are currently under severe water restrictions and experiencing a drought that has caused unprecedented shortages of water for irrigation.

Today, in Australia, irrigated agricultural land has a gross value of production of $8.6 billion/year. This land occupies 2.5 million hectares, which represents less than 0.5 percent of the country's land and yet uses 75 percent of all of the water harvested. Approximately two-thirds of the total agricultural production derives from the Murray-Darling Basin, which spans four Australian states: New South Wales (NSW), Victoria (Vic), South Australia (SA), and Queensland (Qld). Clearly, irrigation is important to Australia, but past practices have resulted in severe degradation of its water resources. It has been acknowledged in Australia that water resources are being used inefficiently, and overexploitation and unsustainable practices have resulted. The relevant legal framework has been far too complex with separate legislation in each state and no legal recognition of water sources crossing boundaries. There was no legislative limit on the number of water users in the irrigation schemes, so demand inevitably outstripped supply. The legislation was fragmented, with separate laws covering groundwater versus surface water. The laws required no consideration of environmental impact.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×