Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:38:23.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Microinjection of Xenopus embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

R. J. Garriock
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona, 85743, USA
P. A. Krieg
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85743, USA
Manuel Marí-Beffa
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
Jennifer Knight
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Microinjection of Xenopus embryos is an important technique with multiple applications in the fields of Cell Biology and Developmental Biology. Literally thousands of publications have resulted from use of these microinjection approaches. Fortunately, the equipment required for microinjection is inexpensive and compact and, due to the extremely large size of the Xenopus eggs and embryos, little practice is needed before the researcher becomes proficient with the technique. The purpose of this article is to provide a straightforward guide to microinjection methods. We will emphasize the most important factors when considering the equipment and materials required and we will describe procedures known to be reliable and efficient.

EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS

INJECTION EQUIPMENT

Microscope. The technical specifications of a stereomicroscope suitable for microinjection are rather simple because the Xenopus embryos are large (about 1.2 mm across) and easily viewed under low magnification. The first concern is that the microscope has sufficiently good optics to be used for several hours (the length of a typical injection session) without causing eye strain. Second, the microscope must have a large working distance between the objective and the bench (at least 8–10 cm) to allow room for the microinjection apparatus, the injection dish and the operator's hands. To maximize the working distance the stereomicroscope should be supported by a boom stand rather than a conventional raised base (Figure 10.1a). Use of a boom stand provides a large working distance and also facilitates movement of the injection apparatus and dishes of embryos.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dagle, J. M., Littig, J. L., Sutherland, L. B., and Weeks, D. L. (2000). Targeted elimination of zygotic messages in Xenopus laevis embryos by modified oligonucleotides possessing terminal cationic linkages. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 2153–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, L., and Slack, J. M. (1987). Fate map for the 32-cell stage of Xenopus laevis. Development, 99, 527–51Google ScholarPubMed
Heasman, J. (2002). Morpholino oligos: Making sense of antisense?Dev. Biol., 243, 209–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heasman, J., Kofron, M., and Wylie, C. (2000). Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: A novel antisense approach. Dev. Biol., 222, 124–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krieg, P. A., and Melton, D. A. (1987). In vitro RNA synthesis with SP6 RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol., 155, 397–415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moody, S. A. (1987). Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol., 122, 300–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasevicius, A., and Ekker, S. C. (2000). Effective targeted gene ‘knockdown’ in zebrafish. Nat. Genet., 26, 216–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwkoop, P. D., and Faber, J. (1994). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin), 2nd ed. New York: Garland Publishing
Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. (2000). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Sive, H., Grainger, R. M., and Harland, R. M. (2000). Early Development of Xenopus Laevis: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Wang, D.-Z., Chang, P. S., Wang, Z., Sutherland, L., Richardson, J. A., Small, E., Krieg, P. A., and Olson, E. N. (2001). Activation of cardiac gene expression by myocardin, a transcriptional cofactor for serum response factor. Cell, 105, 851–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Microinjection of Xenopus embryos
    • By R. J. Garriock, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona, 85743, USA, P. A. Krieg, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85743, USA
  • Edited by Manuel Marí-Beffa, Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Jennifer Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Key Experiments in Practical Developmental Biology
  • Online publication: 11 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546204.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Microinjection of Xenopus embryos
    • By R. J. Garriock, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona, 85743, USA, P. A. Krieg, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85743, USA
  • Edited by Manuel Marí-Beffa, Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Jennifer Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Key Experiments in Practical Developmental Biology
  • Online publication: 11 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546204.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Microinjection of Xenopus embryos
    • By R. J. Garriock, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona, 85743, USA, P. A. Krieg, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSN 444, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245044, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85743, USA
  • Edited by Manuel Marí-Beffa, Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Jennifer Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: Key Experiments in Practical Developmental Biology
  • Online publication: 11 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546204.012
Available formats
×