Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:35:50.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Edited by
Michela Massimi  and
Angela Breitenbach
Michela Massimi
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Angela Breitenbach
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and the Laws of Nature , pp. 275 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1996. Idealism and Freedom. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2001. Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 1978. “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument.” Kant-Studien 69: 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2006. Kant and the Historical Turn. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2012. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2016. “On the Many Senses of ‘Self-Determination,’” in Moran, K. and von Platz, J. (eds.), Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature?. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John. 1995. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis,” in Wolters, G. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories and Rationality in Biological Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1967. “Once More unto the Breach: Kant’s Answer to Hume, Again.” Ratio 9: 33–37.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. 2006. “Kant and Naturphilosophie,” in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.), The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth Century Science. MIT Press. Pp. 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1966. Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 1993. Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. 1781/1789. Ueber den Bildungstrieb. Translated by Crichton, A.. T. Cadell, 1792.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1989. “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment: Comments on Hampshire and Horstmann,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. 2006. “Mechanical Explanation of Nature and Its Limits in Kant’s Critique of Judgment.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 37: 694–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breitenbach, Angela. 2008. “Two Views on Nature: A Solution to Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16: 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. 2009a. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. 2009b. “Teleology in Biology: A Kantian Approach.” Kant Yearbook 1: 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. 2014. “Biological Purposiveness and Analogical Reflection,” in Goy, I. and Watkins, E. (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Biology. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. Forthcoming. “Laws and Ideal Unity,” in W. Ott and L. Patton (eds.), Laws of Nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brittan, Gordon. 1978. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1965. “Causality, Causal Law, and Scientific Theory in the Philosophy of Kant.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16: 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, G. 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchwald, J. Z. 1994. The Creation of Scientific Effects: Heinrich Hertz and Electric Waves. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffon, George-Louis Leclerc. 1749–1804. Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roy, 46 vols. Imprimerie du Roi.Google Scholar
Buffon, George-Louis Leclerc. 1792. Buffon’s Natural History Containing a Theory of the Earth, a General History of Man, of the Brute Creation, and of Vegetables, Minerals, &c., 10 vols. Translated by Barr, J. Smith. J. S. Barr.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence.” Kant-Studien 105: 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Sungho and Fara, Michael. 2016. “Dispositions”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/dispositions/>..>Google Scholar
Clarke, Ellen. 2010. “The Problem of Biological Individuality.” Biological Theory 5: 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Ellen. 2013. “The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. Forthcoming. “Kant on Evolution: A Re-Evaluation,” in J. Callanan and L. Allais (eds.), Kant on Animals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne (eds.). 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Correia, Fabrice 2011. “On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84: 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darrigol, Olivier. 2000. Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols. Edited and translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1977. “Laws of Nature.” Philosophy of Science 44: 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Prel, Carl. 1889. Kant’s mystische Weltanschauung, in Immanuel Kant’s Vorlesungen ueber die Psychologie. Ernst Guenther.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeffrey. 2000. Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fellin, Renato, and Blè, Alessandro. 1997. “The Disease of Immanuel Kant.” The Lancet 350: 1771–1773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, Kit. 1994. “Essence and Modality,” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language. Ridgeview. Pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2002. “Varieties of Necessity,” in Gendler, T. Szabó and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. Pp. 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2012. “Guide to Ground,” in Correia, F. and Schnieder, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 1998. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret, H. (ed.), Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique De Kant. Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 192–218.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 2000. Parret, H. (ed.), Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1986. “Metaphysical Foundations of Newtonian Science,” in Butts, R. E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. Reidel. Pp. 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992a. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992b. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 161–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992c. “Regulative and Constitutive.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30: 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2008. “Einstein, Kant, and the a Priori,” in Massimi, M. (ed.), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 63. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2010. “Synthetic History Reconsidered,” in Domski, M. and Dickson, M. (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court. Pp. 571–813.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2012a. “Reconsidering the Dynamics of Reason.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2012b. “The Prolegomena and Natural Science,” in Lyre, H. and Schliemann, O. (eds.), Kant’s Prolegomena. Ein kooperativer Kommentar. Klostermann. Pp. 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2012c. “Newton and Kant: Quantity of Matter in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 50: 482–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2014. “Laws of Nature and Causal Necessity.” Kant-Studien 105: 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido. 2003. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94: 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroch, Robert. 1978. General Relativity from A to B. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. 1992. “Kant and the Systematicity and Purposiveness of Nature.” Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. 1998. “Korsgaard on Choosing Nonmoral Ends.” Ethics 109: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. 2015. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary J. 1979. “Introduction,” in Kant, Immanuel, Conflict of the Faculties. Translated by Gregor, M. J.. Abaris.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. 1997. “Kant on the Illusion of a Systematic Unity of Knowledge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14: 1–28.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtin, Morton, Fried, Eliot, and Anand, Lallit. 2010. The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continua. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1990. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity.” Noûs 24: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste, second edition (first edition published in 1979). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2000. “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant’s Conception of the System of Philosophy,” in Sedgwick, S. S. (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 19–63. Reprinted in Guyer 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2003a. “Kant’s Answer to Hume.” Philosophical Topics 31: 127–164. Reprinted in Guyer 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2003b. “Kant on the Systematicity of Nature: Two Puzzles.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20: 277–295.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2005. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2008. Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton University Press. Pp. 71–123.Google Scholar
Hamel, Georg. 1909. “Über die Grundlagen der Mechanik.” Mathematische Annalen 66: 350–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebbeler, James. 2015. “Kant on Necessity, Insight, and a Priori Knowledge.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97: 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, William. 1791. Über den Bau des Himmels: Drey Abhandlungen aus dem Englischen übersetzt. Nebst einem authentischen Auszug aus Kants allgemeiner Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels. Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1739–1740/2007. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Fate, D. and Norton, M. J.. 2 vols. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1748/2000. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Beauchamp, T. L.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1755. Vermischte Schriften. Translated by Grund, G. C. and Holle, A. H.. Hamburg and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1778/1998. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edited by Popkin, R. H.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1790–1792. Über die menschliche Natur. Translated by Jakob, L. H., 3 vols. Hemmerde and Schwetschke.Google Scholar
Irving, J. H., and Kirkwood, J. G.. 1950. “The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes IV. The Equations of Hydrodynamics.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 18: 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaki, Stanley L. 1981. “Introduction,” in his (tr.) Kant, I. 1755. Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens. Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Georg 1934. Theoretical Physics. Translated by Freeman, I. M.. Hafner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1900– . Gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols. Edited by Deutsche (formerly Königlich Preussische) Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992a. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by Young, J. M.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992b. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. Translated and edited by Walford, D. and Meerbote, R.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1995. Opus Postumum. Translated and edited by Förster, E. and Rosen, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated and edited by Ameriks, K. and Naragon, S.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2001. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated and edited by Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by Allison, H. E. and Heath, P.. Translated by Hatfield, G., Friedman, M., Allison, H. E. and Heath, P.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated and edited by Friedman, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2012. Natural Science. Edited by Watkins, E.. Translated by Beck, L. W., Edwards, J. B., Reinhardt, O., Schönfeld, M., and Watkins, E.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp-Smith, Norman. 1992. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kennefick, Daniel. 2009. “Testing Relativity from the 1919 Eclipse: A Question of Bias.” Physics Today 62: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1986. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” in Butts, R. E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. Reidel. Pp. 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1994. “The Unity of Science and the Unity of Nature,” in Parrini, Paolo (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Kluwer. Pp. 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1996. “Aprioristic Yearnings.” Erkenntnis 44: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy.” The Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, James. 2009. “Kant on the Laws of Nature and the Limitation of Our Knowledge.” European Journal of Philosophy 17: 527–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrange, Joseph-Louis. 1777. “Remarques générales sur le mouvement des plusieurs corps qui s’attirent mutuellement en raison inverse des carrés des distances,” in Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres. Berlin. Pp. 155–172.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. 1761/1976. Cosmological Letters on the Arrangement of the World Edifice. Edited and translated by Jaki, S. L.. Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility and Things in Themselves. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1980. “Kant, Blumenbach and Vital Materialism in German Biology.” Isis 71: 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1982/1989. The Strategy of Life. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1997. “Finkish Dispositions.” The Philosophical Quarterly 47: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucretius, Titus Carus. 1992. De Rerum Natura. Translated by Rouse, W. H.. Revised by Smith, M. F.. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malvern, Lawrence. 1969. Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. C. 1997. “Was Emmanuel Kant’s Dementia Symptomatic of a Frontal Tumor?” Revue Neurologique 153: 35–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Massimi, Michela. (ed.) 2008. Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 63. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela. 2011. “Kant’s Dynamical Theory of Matter in 1755, and Its Debt to Speculative Newtonian Experimentalism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, Michela. 2014. “Prescribing Laws to Nature. Part I. Newton, the Pre-Critical Kant, and Three Problems about the Lawfulness of Nature.” Kant-Studien 105: 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, Michela. Forthcoming. “Why Kant Was Not a Projectivist about Laws,” in Proceedings of the 12th Kant Congress.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de [aka Dr. Baumann]. 1750. Essay de cosmologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de [aka Dr. Baumann]. 1754. Essai sur la formation de corps organisés. Paris and Berlin.Google Scholar
McKinsey, John C. C. and Suppes, Patrick. 1955. “On the Notion of Invariance in Classical Mechanics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5: 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 1990. Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Mellon Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2003. “Newtonian Biology and Kant’s Mechanistic Concept of Causality,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment. Rowman and Littlefield. Pp. 209–218.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2014a. “Transcendental Presuppositions and Ideas of Reason.” Kant-Studien 105: 554–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2014b. “Mechanical Explanation in the ‘Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment,’” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Biology. De Gruyter. Pp. 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Bennett. 2015. “Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mensch, Jennifer. 2013. Kant’s Organicism. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Marcelo, Slachevsky, Andrea, and Garcia-Borreguero, Diego. 2010. “Did Immanuel Kant Have Dementia with Lewy Bodies and REM Behavior Disorder?” Sleep Medicine 11: 586–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A.. 1973. Gravitation. FreemanGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2000. “Dimensions of Scientific Law.” Philosophy of Science 67: 242–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, Stephen. 2004. Laws in Nature. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, A. Ian. 2012. Physical Foundations of Continuum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Daniel J. 2014. “The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology.” Philosophy Compass 9: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131: 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shea, James. 1997. “The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5: 216–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Walter. 2009. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, Wolfgang. 1957. Das Werden der Aufklärung in theologiegeschichtlicher Sicht. Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin. 2001. Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin. 2014. “‘The Understanding Prescribes Laws to Nature’: Spontaneity, Legislation, and Kant’s Transcendental Hylomorphism.” Kant-Studien 105: 509–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, E., Pargetter, R., and Jackson, F.. 1982. “Three Theses about Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 251–257.Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel. 2004. Transcendental Idealism and the Organism: Essays on Kant. Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010. “The Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews. 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1920. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimarus, Hermann Samuel. 1766. The Principal Truths of Natural Religion Defended and Illustrated, in Nine Dissertations: Wherein the Objections of Lucretius, Buffon, Maupertius, Rousseau, La Mettrie, and Other Ancient and Modern Followers of Epicurus Are Considered and Their Doctrines Refuted. Translated by R. Wynne B. Law.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, O., and Oldroyd, D. R.. 1982 “Kant’s Thoughts on the Aging of the Earth.” Annals of Science 39: 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, Robert. 1968. Introduction to Special Relativity. Wiley.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2000. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, Jacques. 1997. Buffon: A Life in Natural History. Translated by Bonnefoi, S. Lucille. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rohlf, Michael. 2014. “The Rationality of Induction in Kant (and Hume).” Idealistic Studies 43: 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction,” in Hale, B. and Hoffmann, A. (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. Pp. 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1994. Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. 2014. Earth’s Deep History. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander. 2007. “Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 47: 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander. 2008. “Beautiful Surfaces: Kant on Free and Adherent Beauty in Nature and Art.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16: 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, Fred L. Jr. 2000. “Reason and Regulation in Kant.” The Review of Metaphysics 53: 837–862.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 1993. “Nature, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz’s Critique of Occasionalism,” in Nadler, S. (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Pre-Critical Project. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1813/2012. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, second edition. Translated by Cartwright, D. E., Erdmann, E. E., and Janaway, C.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip R. 2006. “Kant on the History of Nature: The Ambiguous Heritage of the Critical Philosophy for Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37: 637–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, George E. 2002. “The Methodology of the Principia,” in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 138–173.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2012. “How Newton’s Principia Changed Physics,” in Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 360–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, George E. 2014. “Closing the Loop: Testing Newtonian Gravity, Then and Now,” in Biener, Z. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Newton and Empiricism. Oxford University Press. Pp. 252–351.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheldon. 2013. “Kant’s Picture of Monads in the Physical Monadology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1997. “Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.” Philosophy of Science 64, Supplement: 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, Marius. 2014. “Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 81: 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner (ed.). 2004. Immanuel Kant, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard. 1970. “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond,” in Stuewer, R. (ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspective of Science. University of Minnesota Press. Pp. 264–287.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. 2001. “The Reality of Ecological Assemblages: A Palaeoecological Puzzle.” Biology and Philosophy 16: 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel. 2014. “Kant on the Construction and Composition of Motion in the Phoronomy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44: 686–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teufel, Thomas. 2012. “What Does Kant Mean by ‘Power of Judgment’ in His Critique of the Power of Judgment?” Kantian Review 17: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2006. “Kant and the Nature of Logical Laws.” Philosophical Topics 34: 371–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1977. “The Nature of Laws.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 74: 667–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truesdell, Clifford. 1991. A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics, second edition. Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetries. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara. 2012. “Dispositional Essentialism and the Laws of Nature,” in Bird, A., Ellis, B., and Sankey, H. (eds.), Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis. 2015. Organisms, Agency, and Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel. 2001. Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. Routledge.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 1997. “The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.” Perspectives on Science 5: 311–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 1998a. “Kant’s Justification of the Laws of Mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 1998b. “The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2000. “Kant on Rational Cosmology,” in Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. Oxford University Press. Pp. 70–89.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2009. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Kantian Yearbook 1: 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2013. “Kant on Infima Species,” in La Rocca, Claudio (ed.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. De Gruyter. Vol. 5, pp. 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2014a. “What Is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?” Kant-Studien 105: 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2014b. “Nature in General as a System of Ends,” in Goy, I. and Watkins, E., Kant’s Theory of Biology. Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert A., and Barker, Matthew. 2017. “The Biological Notion of Individual,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/biology-individual/>..>Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 2005. “Kant and the Speculative Sciences of Origins,” in Smith, J. E. H. (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in the 17th and 18th Centuries. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 375–401.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 2013. “What Is ‘Classical Mechanics’ Anyway?,” in Batterman, R. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press. Pp. 43–106.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 1992. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2012. “The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 120–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckert, Rachel. 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michela Massimi, University of Edinburgh, Angela Breitenbach, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Kant and the Laws of Nature
  • Online publication: 31 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316389645.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michela Massimi, University of Edinburgh, Angela Breitenbach, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Kant and the Laws of Nature
  • Online publication: 31 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316389645.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michela Massimi, University of Edinburgh, Angela Breitenbach, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Kant and the Laws of Nature
  • Online publication: 31 March 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316389645.015
Available formats
×