Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aguiar, P., Vala, J., Correia, I., and Pereira, C. (2008). Justice in our world and in that of others: Belief in a just world and reactions to victims. Social Justice Research, 21, 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Apsler, R., and Friedman, H. (1975). Chance outcomes and the just world: A comparison of observers and recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 887–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkin, R. M., and Duval, S. (1975). Focus of attention and causal attributions of actors and observers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 (5), 427–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong-Stassen, M., and Latack, J. C. (1992). Coping with work-force reduction: The effects of layoff exposure on survivors' reactions. Best paper proceedings. Academy of Management, 207–11.CrossRef

Aronson, E., Ellsworth, P. C., Carlsmith, J. M., and Gonzales, M. H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rule. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., and Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments for fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1337–43.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. and Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 282–316). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Early, S., and Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 (7), 751–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batson, C. D., Kennedy, C. L., Nord, L., Stocksy, E. L., Fleming, D. A., Marzette, C. M., Lishner, D. A., Hayes, R. E., Kochinsky, L. M., and Zerger, T. (2007). Anger at unfairness, is it moral outrage? European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1272–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., and Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., and Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 330–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., and Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 525–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batson, C. D., Turk, C. L., Shaw, L. L., and Klein, T. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (2), 300–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. and Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 680–740). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R., and Vohs, K., eds. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.

Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., and Loewenstein, G. F. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, S. W., and Eagly, A. (2004). Heroism in men and women. American Psychologist, 59, 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bekoff, M., and Pierce, J. (2009). Wild justice: The moral lives of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedict, R. F. (1934). Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Benton, A. A. (1971). Productivity, distributive justice, and bargaining among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blader, S. L., and Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Braband, J., and Lerner, M. J. (1975). “A little time and effort” … Who deserves what from whom? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 177–80.Google Scholar

Brockner, J. (1990). Scope of justice in the workplace: How survivors react to co-worker layoffs. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., Reed, T., and Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem: Converging evidence from four studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockner, J., and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brody, E. M. (1985). Parent care as normative family stress. Gerontologist, 25, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, E. M., Dempsey, N., and Pruchno, R. (1990). Mental health of sons and daughters of the institutionalized aged. Gerontologist, 30, 212–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brosnan, S., and Waal, F. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425 (6955), 297–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., and Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buunk, B. P., Doosje, B. J.Jans, L. G. J. M., and Hopstaken, L. E. M. (1993). Perceived reciprocity, social support, and stress at work: The role of exchange and communal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 801–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, M. J. (2010). Justice motive effects in memory reconstruction. Unpublished manuscript.

Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., and Nicol, J. E. (2006). Belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., and Ellard, J. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, M. J., Powell, N. G., and Ellard, J. H. (2007). The consequences of victim's physical attractiveness on reactions to injustice: The role of observer's belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 20, 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., and Olson, J. M. (2009). Foregoing the labor for the fruits: The effect of just world threat on the desire for immediate monetary rewards, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 246–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., and Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving = causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., and Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (2), 284–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carlsmith, K. M., Wilson, T. D., and Gilbert, D. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (6), 1316–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, M. S., and Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, S. (2009). Attending to identity: Ideology, group membership, and perceptions of justice. In Hegtvedt, K. and Clay-Warner, J. (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Justice (pp. 241–66). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar

Clayton, S., and Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Correia, I., Vala, J., and Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim's innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalbert, C., and Sallay, H. (Eds.). (2004). The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood. London: Routledge.

Damon, W. (1975). Early conceptions of positive justice as related to the development of logical operations. Child Development, 46, 301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darley, J. S., and Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7 (4), 324–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quervain, D. J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., and Fehr, E. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305 (5688), 1254–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, M. (2000). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dharmapala, D., Garoupa, N., and McAdams, R. (2009). Belief in a just world, blaming the victim, and hate crimes statutes. Review of Law and Economics, 5, 311–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, K. L., and Dion, K. K. (1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 775–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dols, J. F., Aguilar, P., Campo, S., Vallacher, R., Janowsky, A., Rabbia, H., Brussino, S., and Lerner, M. J. (2010). Moral hypocrisy or legitimate self interest? Normative conflict and decision-making in zero-sum situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 525–30.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hilllsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N., and Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellard, J. H., Meindl, J. R., and Lerner, M. J. (2000). How do self-interest and justice appear in people's lives? The interplay of social norms and individual processes. Unpublished manuscript. University of Waterloo.

Epley, N., and Caruso, E. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research, 17, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epley, N., and Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feather, N. T. (2003). Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement: Earned outcomes versus lawful outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feather, N. T. (2008). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feather, N. T., and Johnstone, C. (2001). Social norms, entitlement, and deservingness: Differential reactions to aggressive behavior of schizophrenic and personality disorder patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 755–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feather, N. T., and Nairn, K. (2005). Resentment, envy, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Effects of own and other's deserved or undeserved status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and Gachter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415 (6868), 137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fischer, R., and Smith, P. (2003). Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foa, U. G., and Foa, E. B. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T. and Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 99–131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., and Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effects of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freud, Sigmund (1953). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Strachey, James, Trans.). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., and Moore, B. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: The costs of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 46, 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. (2003). “Belief in a just world”: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaucher, D.Hafer, C., Kay, A., and Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., and Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, J., Lerner, J., and Tetlock, P. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. The European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 781–95.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12) (pp. 111–57). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (1982). Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J., and Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafer, C. L. (2000a). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafer, C. L. (2000b). Investment in long term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafer, C. L., and Begue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just world theory: Problems, developments and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hafer, C. L., and Olson, J. M (2003). An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 311–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hastorf, A. H., and Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessing, D. J., Elfers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Exploring the limits of self-reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heuer, L., Blumenthal, E., Douglas, A., and Weinblatt, T. (1999). A deservingness approach to respect as a relationally based fairness judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (10), 1279–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, M. (1970). Moral development. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 261–359). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hogan, R., and Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In Lerner, M. J. and Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 126–44). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In Lerner, M. J. and Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 261–84). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. G., and Rempel, J. (1989) Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C., (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, close relationships (Vol. 10). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T., and Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 144–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar

Huo, Y. (2002). Justice and the regulation of social relations: When and why do group members deny claims to social goods? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 535–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979) Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL (version 7). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285–S300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, A. C., and Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., and Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., and Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 740–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kidder, L. H., Belletrie, G., and Cohn, E. S. (1977). Secret ambitions and public performances: The effect of anonymity on reward allocations made by men and women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, O., and Azzi, A. (2001). Procedural justice in majority-minority relations: Studies involving Belgian linguistic groups. Social Justice Research, 14 (1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konow, J. (2005). Blind spots: The effects of information and stakes on fairness bias and dispersion. Social Justice Research, 18, 349–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Smith, E. M., and Hedlund, J. (1993). Organizational downsizing: Strategies, interventions, and research implications. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Kurtines, W. M., and Gewirtz, J. L. (Eds.). (1991). Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1–3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lerner, J., Goldberg, J., and Tetlock, P. (1998). Sober second thoughts: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1971a). Justified self–interest: A replication and extension. Journal of Human Relations, 19, 550–9.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1971b). Observer's evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt, and veridical perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 539–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In Lerner, M. J. and Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 11–35). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Agar, E. (1972). The consequences of perceived similarity: Attraction and rejection, approach and avoidance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 69–75.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Becker, S. W. (1962). Interpersonal choice as a function of ascribed similarity and definition of the situation. Human Relations, 15, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Becker, S. W. (1996). Managers at risk: The hidden costs of normatively justified harm doing. Quality Management Journal, 3, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Grant, P. R. (1990). The influence of commitment to justice and ethnocentrism on children's allocations of pay. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (Eds.). (1981). The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Lerner, M. J., and Lichtman, R. R. (1968). Effects of perceived norms on attitudes and altruistic behavior toward a dependent other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 226–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lerner, M. J., and Torstrick, R. (Eds.). (1994). Special issue on social justice issues. Social Justice Research, 7 (4).CrossRef

Lerner, M. J., Dillehay, R. C., and Sherer, W. C. (1967). Similarity and attraction in social contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 481–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., and Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9) (pp. 134–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J., Somers, D., Reid, D., and Tierney, M. (1989). Sibling conflicts induced by dependent elderly parents: The social psychology of individual and social dilemmas. In Spacapan, S. and Oskamp, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of aging: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 53–80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J., Somers, D. G., Reid, D. G., Chiriboga, D., and Tierney, M. (1991). Adult children as caregivers: Egocentric biases in judgments of sibling contributions. The Gerontologist, 31, 746–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T. and Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–40). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar

Leventhal, G. S., and Anderson, D. (1970). Self-interest and the maintenance of equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 312–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, H. (1994). Why the behemoths fell: Psychological roots of corporate failure. American Psychologist, 49, 428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipkus, I. M., and Bissonnette, V. (1996) Relationships among the beliefs in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., and Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, G. T., and Lerner, M. J. (1974). Deserving, the “Personal Contract,” and altruistic behavior by children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 551–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, G., Thompson, L., and Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business. American Sociological Review, 28, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maes, J. (1998). Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice. In Montada, L. and Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 9–40). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, B., Blysma, W. H., and Cozzarelli, C. (1989). Gender differences in distributive justice preferences: The impact of domain. Sex Roles, 21, 487–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, B., McFarlin, D., and Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (6) 1399–1412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Markovsky, B. (1988). Injustice and arousal. Social Justice Research, 2, 223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121–36.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1939). From the south seas. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar

Meindl, J., and Lerner, M. J. (1983). The heroic motive in interpersonal relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meindl, J. R., and Lerner, M. J. (1984). Exacerbation of extreme responses to an out-group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness preference and fairness biases. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives (pp. 61–94). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Meyer, C. B., and Taylor, S. E. (1986). Adjustment to rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1226–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mikula, G. (1998). Does it only depend on the point of view? Perspective-related differences in justice evaluations of negative incidents in personal relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 931–62.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., and Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T. (1975). Personal deserving vs. justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive (Doctoral dissertation). University of Waterloo.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T. (1977). Personal deserving and justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, D. T., and Gunasegaram, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mischel, W. (1961). Preference for delayed reinforcement and social responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., and Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (4), 687–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (Eds.). (1996). Current societal concerns about justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (Eds.). (1998). Responses to victimization and belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

Montada, L., Schmidt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L. and Greenberg, J. (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 125–44). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, D. O., and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy-Berman, V., and Berman, J. J. (2002). Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice: A comparison of Hong Kong and Indonesia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemeth, C. (1970). Effects of free versus constrained behavior on attraction between people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 302–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, D. W., and Lerner, M. J. (1968). Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olson, K. R., Banaji, M. R., Dweck, C. S., and Spelke, E. S. (2006). Children's bias against lucky vs. unlucky people and their social groups. Psychological Science, 17, 845–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, K. R., Dunham, Y., Dweck, C. S., Spelke, E. S., and Banaji, M. R. (2008). Judgments of the lucky across development and culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 757–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Ratner, R. K., and Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reichle, B., Schneider, A., and Montada, L. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? Findings from a longitudinal study. In Montada, L. and Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimization and belief in a just world (pp. 55–64). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivera, A. N., and Tedeschi, J. T. (1976). Public versus private reactions to positive inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 895–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, M. A. (1989). The relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, M. A., and DiTecco, D. (1975). An attributional analysis of moral judgments. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, M. A., and Sicoly, F. (1979) Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Lowery, D., Hubbard, M. L., Maravankin, O. J., and Neises, M. (1988). Impact of employee mobility and employee performance on the allocation of rewards under conditions of constraint. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 605–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scher, S., and Cooper, J. (1989). Motivational basis of dissonance: The singular role of behavioral consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 899–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shweder, R. A., and Haidt, J. (1993). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4, 360–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shweder, R. A., and Miller, J. G. (1985). The social construction of the person: How is it possible? In Gergen, K. J. and Davis, K. E. (Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp. 41–69). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, C. H., and Lerner, M. J. (1968). Altruism as a search for justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 216–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simons, C., and Piliavin, J. (1972). The effects of deception on reactions to a victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 452–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skitka, L., Aramavich, M. P., Lytle, B. L., and Sargis, E. G. (2009). Knitting together an elephant: An integrative approach to understanding the psychology of justice reasoning. In Bobocel, D. R., Kay, A. C., Zanna, M. P., and Olson, J. M. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11) (pp. 1–26). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1994). Burned out Bosses. Fortune, 25, 44–52.Google Scholar

Sorrentino, R. M., and Hardy, J. (1974). Religiousness and derogation of a victim. Journal of Personality, 42, 372–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steil, J. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Stillwell, A. M., and Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokols, D., and Schopler, J. (1973). Reactions to victims under conditions of situational detachment: The effects of responsibility, severity, and expected future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunshine, J., and Heuer, L. (2002) Deservingness and perceptions of procedural justice in citizen encounters with the police. In Ross, M., and Miller, D. T. (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 397–415). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, B., Green, M., and Lerner, J. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Thornton, B. (1984). Defensive attribution of responsibility: Evidence for an arousal-based motivational bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 721–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomaka, J., and Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Towson, S., Lerner, M. J., and Carufel, A. (1981). Justice rules or ingroup loyalties: The effects of competition on children's allocation behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 696–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Valdesolo, P., and DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18, 689–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bos, K., Wilke, H. E. M., and Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449–58.Google Scholar

Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcomes when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034–46.Google Scholar

Bos, K., Peters, S. L., Bobocel, R., and Ybema, J. F. (2006). On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 273–89.Google Scholar

Bos, K., Wilke, H. E. M., Lind, E. A., and Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of fair process effect: Evidence for different process in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493–1503.Google Scholar

Yperen, N. W., and Buunk, B. P. (1994). Social comparison and social exchange in marital relationships. In Lerner, M. J. and Mikula, G. (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond (pp. 98–110). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Vermunt, R., and Steensma, H. (Eds.). (1991). Social justice in human relations: Societal and psychological origins of justice (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum.

Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity theory and research. New York: Allyn Bacon.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wicker, G., and Bushweiler, G. (1970). Perceived fairness, and pleasantness of social exchange situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 151, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., and MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zanna, M., Crosby, F., and Loewenstein, G. (1987). Male reference groups and discontent among female professionals. In Gutek, B. and Larwood, L. (Eds.), Women's career development (pp. 28–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M. (1975). Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 972–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuckerman, M., and Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in internal control or belief in a just world: The use and misuse of the I-E scale in prediction of attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality, 45, 356–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar