‘Is Zippo's Sliding Scale a Slippery Slope of Uncertainty? A Case for Abolishing Web Site Interactivity as a Conclusive Factor in Assessing Minimum Contacts in Cyberspace’ (2001) 34 John Marshall Law Review1051 (note)

‘No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2003) 116 Harvard Law Review1821 (note)CrossRef

Aarnio, Aulis and MacCormick, Neil (eds.), Legal Reasoning (New York: New York University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Aciman, Carole and Vo-Verde, Diane, ‘Refining the Zippo Test: Trends on Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Activities’ (2002) 19 Computer and Internet Lawyer16Google Scholar

Ahlert, Christian, ‘Technology of Control: How Code Controls Communication’, in Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (Hardy, Christiane and Möller, Christian eds.), Spreading the Word on the Internet (Vienna: OSCE, 2003), 119Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, ‘Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1972–3) 46 British Yearbook of International Law145Google Scholar

Albrecht, A. R., ‘The Enforcement of Taxation under International Law’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law454Google Scholar

Allott, P., Eunomia: A New Order for a New World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

American Bar Association (ABA), http://www.abanet.org, Addressing Disputes in Electronic Commerce – Final Report and Recommendations of the American Bar Association's Task Force on Electronic Commerce and Alternative Dispute Resolution (August 2002)

American Bar Association (ABA),‘Achieving Legal and Business Order in Cyberspace: A Report on Global Jurisdiction Issues Created by the Internet’ (2000) 55 The Business Lawyer1801, http://www.kentlaw.edu/cyberlaw/docs/drafts/draft.rtf

Atiyah, P. S., Law and Modern Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar

Atiyah, P. S.,‘From Principles to Pragmatism: Changes in the Function of the Judicial Process and the Law’ (1980) 65 Iowa Law Review1249Google Scholar

Aubert, Vilhelm and Eckhoff, Torstein (eds.), Continuity and Development in Law and Society (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Ausness, Richard C., ‘The Application of Product Principles to Publishers of Violent or Sexually Explicit Material’ (2000) 52 Florida Law Review603Google Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832, ed. by Hart, H. L. A., London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954)Google Scholar

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, http://www.accc.gov.au, The Global Enforcement Challenge: Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws in a Global Marketplace, Discussion Paper (1997)

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission,‘ACCC Issues Warning to On-line Traders: “Shape-up” Sites’ (2004)

Australian Law Reform Commission, http://www.alrc.gov.au, Legal Risk in International Transactions, Report No. 80 (1996)

Australian Law Reform Commission,Choice of Law, Report No. 58. (1992)

Australian Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Six-Month Report on Co-Regulatory Scheme for Internet Content Regulation January to June 2001 (February 2002)

Australian National Office for the Information Economy (now the Australian Government Information Management Office), http://www.agimo.gov.au, Convergence Review – Final Review (10 May 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, http://www.asic.gov.auElectronic Prospectuses, Policy Statement 107 (18 September 1996, reissued 10 February 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission,Investment Advisory Services: Media, Computer Software and Internet Advice, Policy Statement 118 (3 March 1997, reissued 12 January 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission,Offers of Securities on the Internet, Policy Statement 141 (10 February 1999, reissued 2 March 2000)

Australian Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG) Working Group of State and Territory Officers, Proposal for Uniform Defamation Laws (July 2004)

Australian Tax Office, http://www.ato.gov.au, Tax and the Internet, Discussion Report of the ATO Electronic Commerce Project (1997)

Axelrod, Robert, The Complexity of Cooperation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert,The Evolution of Co-operation (first published 1984, London: Penguin Books, 1990)Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian and Braithwaite, John, Responsive Regulation – Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Ayres, Phil, ‘Prescribing a Cure for Online Pharmacies’ (2005) 72 Tennessee Law Review949Google Scholar

Baade, Hans W., ‘The Operation of Foreign Public Law’ (1995) 30 Texas International Law Journal429Google Scholar

Balda, Volker and Schmits, Volker, ‘Fernsehen ohne Grenzen auf dem Weg zur Konvergenz’ (1998) 7 Computer und Recht421Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, Scott, Colin and Hood, Christopher (eds.), A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, Richard A. and Wert, Suzanne, ‘Internet Jurisdiction’ (2001) 20 John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law21Google Scholar

Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, ‘Common Law Property Metaphors on the Internet: The Real Problem with the Doctrine of Cybertrespass’ (2006) 12 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review265Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E., ‘Forewords: Four Senses of the Public Law–Private Law Distinction’ (1994) 9 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy267Google Scholar

Beech, Andrew, ‘Discretion in the Exercise of Jurisdiction: Recent Developments’ (1989) 19 University of Western Australia Law Review8Google Scholar

Bell, Griffin B., ‘International Comity and the Extra-territorial Application of Anti-Trust Laws’ (1977) 51 Australian Law Journal80Google Scholar

Benkler, Yockai, ‘Internet Regulation: A Case Study on the Problem of Unilateralism’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham Jeremy, Of Laws in General (ed. by Hart, H. L. A., London: Athlone Press, 1970)Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘The Globalisation of Jurisdiction’ (2002) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardez, Santiago Torres, ‘Territorial Sovereignty’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 487

Betlem, Gerrit, ‘Cross-Border Private Enforcement of Community Law’, in Vervaelde, J. A. E. (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 391Google Scholar

Betlem, Gerrit,‘Transboundary Enforcement: Free Movement of Injunction’, in Deimann, Sven and Dyssli, Bernard (eds.), Environmental Rights – Law, Litigation and Access to Justice (London: Cameron May, 1995), 184Google Scholar

Betlem, Gerrit and Nollkaemper, Andre, ‘Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law567CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyleveld, Deryck, Kirkham, Richard and Townend, David, ‘Which Presumption? A Critique of the House of Lords’ Reasoning on Retrospectivity and the Human Rights Act' (2002) 22 Legal Studies185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigos, Oren, ‘Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Wrongs on the Internet’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowrey, Kathy, Law and Internet Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Boyle, James, ‘Foucault in Cyberspace: Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hard-Wired Censors’ (1997) 66 University of Cincinnati Law Review177Google Scholar

Bradney, Tony, ‘Law Schools and the Egg Marketing Board’ (2001) 22 SPTL Reporter1Google Scholar

Braun, Odelia, ‘Internet Publications and Defamation: Why the Single Publication Rule Should Not Apply’ (2002) 32 Golden Gate University Law Review325Google Scholar

Bremer, Karsten, Strafbare Internet-Inhalte in International Hinsicht – Ist der Nationalstaat wirklich überholt? (Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang Verlag, 2001), http://ub-dok.uni-trier.de/diss/diss60/20000927/20000927.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (6th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian,Principles of Public International Law (4nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Brownsword, Roger, ‘Code, Control, and Choice: Why East Is East and West Is West’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burk, Dan L., ‘Jurisdiction in a World Without Borders’ (1997) 1 Virginia Journal of Law and Technology1522Google Scholar

Burnstein, Matthew R., ‘Conflicts on the Net: Choice of Law in Transactional Cyberspace’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law75Google Scholar

Buxbaum, Hannah L., ‘The Private Attorney General in a Global Age: Public Interests in Private International Antitrust Litigation’ (2001) 26 Yale Journal of International Law219Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camp, L. Jean and Syme, Serena, ‘Code as Governance, the Governance of Code’ (2001), John F Kennedy School Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series, http://ssrn.com/abstract=297154/

Carr, Indira and Williams, Katherine S., ‘Cyber-crime and the Council of Europe: Reflections on a Draft Convention’ (2001) 7 International Trade Law and Regulation93Google Scholar

Carter, P. B., ‘Rejection of Foreign Law: Some Private International Law Inhibitions’ (1984) 55 British Yearbook of International Law111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Cohen, Laurence J., ‘E-Libel and Proportionality’ (2000) 1 E-Journal12Google Scholar

Collier, J. G., Conflict of Laws (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Lawrence (ed.), Dicey and Morris on Conflict of Laws (13th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000)Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew, The Law of Defamation and the Internet (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew,Online Updates to the Law of Defamation and the Internet, http://www.mattcollins.com.au/LawofDefamationandtheInternet.html

Corn-Revere, Robert, Caught in the Seamless Web: Does the Internet's Global Reach Justify Less Freedom of Speech, Briefing Paper No. 71 (2002), Cato Institute, http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp71.pdf

Commonwealth of Australia, Australia–United States Relations: The Extraterritorial Application of United States Laws, Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence (Canberra, 1983)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (Philip McCrea, Bob Smart and Mark Andrews), Blocking Content on the Internet: A Technical Perspective (June 1998), http://www.cmis.csiro.au/projects + sectors/blocking.pdf

Council of Europe, http://www.coe.int, Declaration on Freedom of Political Debate in the Media (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 February 2004)

Council of Europe,Declaration on Freedom of Communication on the Internet (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 May 2003)

Council of Europe,Draft Declaration on Freedom of Communication on the Internet (8 April 2002)

Council of Europe,Recommendation No. R(97)20E of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on ‘Hate Speech’ (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 October 1997)

Currie, Brainerd, Selected Essays in the Conflict of Laws (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963)Google Scholar

Davies, Martin, Ricketson, Sam and Lindell, Geoffrey, Conflicts of Laws – Commentary and Materials (Sydney: Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar

Davis, Phillip Adam, ‘The Defamation of Choice-of-Law in Cyberspace: Countering the View that the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Is Inadequate to Navigate the Borderless Reaches of the Intangible Frontier’ (2002) 54 Federal Communications Law Journal339Google Scholar

Deakin, Simon, Legal Diversity and Regulatory Competition: Which Model for Europe? Working Paper No. 323 (Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 2006), http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/WP323.pdf

Deakin, Simon,International and Jurisdictional Issues (ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1999)Google Scholar

Debussere, Frederic, ‘International Jurisdiction over E-Consumer Contracts in the European Union: Quid Novi Sub Sole?’ (2002) 10 International Journal of Law and Information Technology344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, Everette E., ‘Internal Examination: Self-Regulation and the American Media’ (1995) 13 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal697Google Scholar

Dewey, John, ‘Logical Method and Law’ (1924) 10 Cornell Law Quarterly17Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme, ‘Trademarks and Territory: Detaching Trademark from the Nation-State’ (2004) 41 Houston Law Review885Google Scholar

Dodge, William S., ‘Antitrust and the Draft Hague Judgments Convention’ (2001) 33 Law and Policy in International Business363Google Scholar

Dodge, William S.,‘Extraterritoriality and Conflict-of-Laws Theory: An Argument for Judicial Unilateralism’ (1998) 39 Harvard International Law Journal101Google Scholar

Doehring, Karl, ‘State’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 423

Donaghey, Teague I., ‘Terminal Railroad Revisited: Using the Essential Facilities Doctrine to Ensure Accessibility to Internet Software Standards’ (1997) 25 AIPLA Quarterly Journal277Google Scholar

Doughdrill, Brian E., ‘Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet: Waiting for the Other Shoe to Drop on First Amendment Concern’ (2000) 51 Mercer Law Review919Google Scholar

Dyson, George, Darwin Among the Machines (London: Allen Lane, 1998)Google Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin (Berkman Center for Internet and Society, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/), Empirical Analysis of Google SafeSearch (2003), Berkman Center for Internet & SocietyGoogle Scholar

Edelman, BenjaminWeb Sites Sharing IP Addresses: Prevalence and Significance (2003), Berkman Center for Internet and SocietyGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin‘Shortcomings and Challenges in the Restriction of Internet Retransmissions of Over-the-Air Television Content to Canadian Internet Users’ (Expert Memorandum attached to the National Association of Broadcasters' submission to Industry Canada) (2001)

Eden, Sandra, ‘Taxation of Electronic Commerce’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – Regulating Cyberspace (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), 151Google Scholar

Edwards, Lilian, ‘Defamation and the Internet’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – Regulating Cyberspace (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), 183Google Scholar

Eko, Lyombe, ‘Many Spiders, One Worldwide Web: Towards a Typology of Internet Regulation’ (2001) 6 Communication Law and Policy445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eorsi, Gyula, Comparative Civil (Private) Law (Budapest: Academiai Kiado, 1979)Google Scholar

European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu, Special Eurobarometer 250 ‘Safer Internet’ Report (May 2006)

European Commission,Safer Internet Plus Programme, Factsheet 18 (October 2005), Communication on the Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in Criminal Matters and the Strengthening of Mutual Trust between Member States, COM(2005) 195 final

European Commission,Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of Ne Bis in Idem in Criminal Proceedings, COM(2005) 696 final

European Commission,Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument and its Modernisation, COM(2002) 654 final

European Commission,Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: Electronic Commerce and Indirect Taxation, COM(1998) 374 final

Farber, Daniel A., ‘Expressive Commerce in Cyberspace: Public Goods, Network Effects and Free Speech’ (2000) 16 Georgia State University Law Review789Google Scholar

Faulstich, Werner, ‘Mediengeschichte’, in Faulstich, Werner (ed.), Grundwissen Medien (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1994), 19Google Scholar

Fawcett, James J. and Torremans, Paul, Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Feintuck, Mike, Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Feld, Harold, ‘Structured to Fail: ICANN and the Privatisation Experiment’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 333Google Scholar

Feldman, David, Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Feng, Zhen, ‘China to Introduce New Legislation to Deal with ISP Liability for Copyright Infringement’ (2004) 5 World Internet Law Report19Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, The Cash Nexus: Money and Power in the Modern World 1700–2000 (London: Allen Lane, 2001)Google Scholar

Ferran, Eilis, Company Law and Corporate Finance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des Cours209Google Scholar

Fleming, John G., The Law of Torts (9th edn, Sydney: LBC Information Services, 1998)Google Scholar

Foss, M. and Bygrave, L. A., ‘International Consumer Purchases through the Internet: Jurisdictional Issues Pursuant to European Law’ (2000) 8 International Journal of Law and Information Technology99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Marc A., Anderson, David and Cate, Fred H., Mass Media Law (6th edn, New York: Foundation Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Freeman, D. A., ‘Milgram's Obedience to Authority – Some Lessons for Legal Theory’ (1979) 1 Liverpool Law Review45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromme, Friedrich Karl and Dornhege, Hermann, ‘“Die Entscheiding is unanfechtbar” Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ (1997) 6 Deutschland – Zeitschrift fuer Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft24Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen, ‘Recognition’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 340

Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard, ‘Trademarks and the Internet: Resolution of International IP Disputes by Unilateral Application of US Law’ (2005) 30 Brooklyn Journal of International Law925Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick – An Adequate Response to Transnational Internet Defamation?’ (2003) 4 Melbourne Journal of International Law197Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘International Arbitration Law: Progress Towards Harmonisation’ (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law400Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Are Foreign Internet Infringers beyond the Reach of the Law?’ (2000) 23 University of New South Wales Law Journal105Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Regulating Foreign-Based Internet Content: A Jurisdictional Perspective’ (2000) 6 University of New South Wales Law Journal8Google Scholar

Geist, Michael, ‘Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction’ (2001) 661 PLI/Pat561Google Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm, The Tipping Point (London: Abacus, 2001)Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, ‘Unilateral Regulation of the Internet: A Modest Defence’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack,‘The Internet and the Abiding Significance of Territorial Sovereignty’ (1998) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies475Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack,‘What Internet Gambling Legislation Teaches About Internet Regulation’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer1115Google Scholar

Goode, Matthew, ‘The Tortured Tale of Criminal Jurisdiction’ (1997) 21 Melbourne University Law Review411Google Scholar

Goodhart, A. L., English Law and the Moral Law System (London: Stevens & Son, 1953)Google Scholar

Goodman, Marc D. and Brenner, Susan, ‘The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace’ (2002) 10 International Journal of Law and Information Technology139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabosky, P. N. and Smith, Russell G., Crime in the Digital Age (Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Graveson, R. H., Comparative Conflict of Laws (Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1977)Google Scholar

Greig, Donald W. ‘Sources of International Law’, in Blay, Sam, Piotrowicz, Ryszard and Tsamenyi, Martin (eds.), Public International Law – An Australian Perspective (2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Greve, Michael S., ‘If It Ain't Broke, Why Is Everyone Trying to Fix It? Taxing E-Commerce in a Destination-Based World’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? Internet Governance and Jurisdiction (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 269Google Scholar

Griffith, Gareth, Censorship in Australia: Regulating the Internet and other Recent Developments, Briefing Paper (April 2002)

Gringas, Clive, The Laws of the Internet (London: Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar

Gross, Grant, ‘US Anti-Spam Law Still Not Making a Difference’ (2 April 2004), Techworld, http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?newsid=1332/.

Gross, Jason, ‘Internet Gambling and the Law – Prohibition vs. Regulation’ (August 2006) The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel 2, http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/pdf/2006/August/11.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, http://www.hcch.net (Andrea Schulz), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Legal Aspect of an E-Commerce Transactions (2004)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Avril D. Haines), The Impact of the Internet on the Judgments Projects: Thoughts for the Future, Prel. Doc. No. 17 (2002)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Catherine Kessedjian), Electronic Commerce and International Jurisdiction, Prel. Doc. No. 12 (2000)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Peter Nygh and Fausto Pocar), Report of the Special Commission, Prel. Doc. No. 11 (1999)

Hancher, L. and Moran, M., ‘Organizing Regulatory Space’, in Baldwin, Robert, Scott, Colin and Hood, Christopher (eds.), A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Christopher, ‘Legal Subjectivity as a Fundamental Value: The Emergence of Non-State Actors in Europe’, in Economides, Kimet al. (eds.), Fundamental Values (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 115Google Scholar

Harding, Christopher,‘The Identity of European Law: Mapping Out the European Legal Space’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, I. Trotter, ‘The Proper Legal Regime for “Cyberspace”’ (1994) 55 University of Pittsburgh Law Review995Google Scholar

Harris, David J., Cases and Materials on International Law (5th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (1961, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.,Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.,The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954)Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith, Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hestermeyer, Holger P., ‘Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Torts: Towards an International Solution’ (2006) 26 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business267Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn,‘The Legal Bases of Jurisdiction’, in Olmstead, Cecil J. (ed.), Extraterritorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: ECS Publishing Limited, 1984), 3Google Scholar

Hirst, Michael, ‘Cyberobscenity and the Ambit of Criminal Law’ (2002) 13 Computers & Law25Google Scholar

Holder, William E., ‘Public Policy and National Preferences: The Exclusion of Foreign Law in English Private International Law’ (1969) 17 International and Comparative Law Quarterly926CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, Julia, ‘Country of Origin Regulation in Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond the Freedom to Provide Services?’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, Julia,‘Online Dispute Resolution in Business to Consumer E-Commerce Transactions’ (2002) (2) Journal of Information, Law and TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Hurt, Christine, ‘Regulating Public Morals and Private Markets: Online Securities Trading, Internet Gambling and the Speculation Paradox’ (2005) 86 Boston University Law Review371Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce, http://www.iccwbo.org, The Impact of Internet Content Regulation (18 November 2002)

International Chamber of Commerce,Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Electronic Commerce (6 June 2001)

International Law Association, http://www.ila-hg.org, First Report by the Committee on Transnational Enforcement of Environmental Law (2002)

International Telecommunication Union (ITU), http://www.itu.int, ITU Survey on Anti-Spam Legislation Worldwide (2005) CYB/06

Jacobson, Joy, ‘Of Love and Defamation in China’ (2003) Poets & Writers Magazine, http://www.pw.orgGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim's International Law (9th edn, London: Longman, 1992)Google Scholar

Johnson, David R. and Post, David, ‘Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, Karl, ‘Wie das Internet die Weltpolitik verandert’ (2001) 3 Deutschland – Zeitschrift fuer Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft40Google Scholar

Kalathil, Shanthi and Boas, Taylor C., ‘The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution’ (2001) Carnegie Endowment Working Papers, Global Policy Program No 21, http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/21KalathilBoas.pdf

Katsh, Ethan, ‘Cybertime, Cyberspace and Cyberlaw’ (1995) Journal of Online LawGoogle Scholar

Katyal, Neal Kumar, ‘Digital Architecture as Crime Control’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kearsly, Amanda, ‘The Internet, Paedophilia and the ISP’ (2001) April/May Computers and Law29Google Scholar

Keck, Richard, ‘Developing an Intuitive Understanding of the Behavior and Legal Treatment of Information Assets’ (2001) 605 PLI/Pat771Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946)Google Scholar

Kightlinger, Mark F., ‘A Solution to the Yahoo! Problem? The EC E-Commerce Directive as a Model for International Cooperation on Internet Choice of Law’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law719Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta, ‘Ignorance Is No Defence But Is Inaccessibility? On the Accessibility of Law in the Transnational Online Context’ (2005) 14 Information & Communications Technology Law27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Who Has the Right to Govern Online Activity? A Criminal and Civil Point of View’ (2004) 18 International Review of Law, Computers and Technology387CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘The Rule of Law, Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2004) 12 International Journal of Law and Information Technology365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Defamation on the Internet – Nice Decision, Shame about the Reasoning. Dow Jones & Co v Gutnick’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Eggs, Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Yahoo! – But No Hooray! for the International Online Community’ (2001) 75 Australian Law Journal411Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Defamation on the Internet – A Duty Free Zone After All? Macquarie Bank Ltd & Anor v Berg’ (2000) 22 Sydney Law Review119Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Legal Reasoning and Legal Change in the Age of the Internet – Why the Ground Rules Are Still Valid’ (1999) 7 International Journal of Law and Information Technology123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Larry, ‘Rethinking Choice of Law’ (1990) 90 Columbia Law Review277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kress, Claus, ‘Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institut de Droit international’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuchinskas, Susan, ‘Google Axes Hate News’ (23 March 2005), Internetnews.com, http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3492361/

Lasswell, Harold D., ‘The Structure and Function of Communication in Society’, in Schramm, Wilbur (ed.), Mass Communications (2nd edn, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960), 117Google Scholar

Lauterbach, H., ‘The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States’ (1951) 28 British Yearbook of International Law220Google Scholar

Leets, Laura, ‘Responses to Internet Hate Sites: Is Speech Too Free in Cyberspace?’ (2001) 6 Communication Law and Policy287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. and McGowan, David, ‘Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects’ (1998) 86 California Law Review479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books, 1999)Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Laws of Cyberspace – Draft 3’ (1998), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/laws_cyberspace.pdf

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Zones of Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, L. Harold, ‘The Public Law/Private Law Distinction in the Courts’ (1989) 57 George Washington Law Review1579Google Scholar

Levinson, Paul, Digital McLuhan – A Guide to the Information Millennium (London: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar

Levinson, Paul,The Soft Edge – A Natural History and Future of the Information Revolution (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar

Lianos, Michalis, ‘Social Control after Foucault’ (2003) 1(3) Surveillance and Society412Google Scholar

Lombois, Claude, Droit Penal International (2nd edn, Paris: Dalloz, 1979)Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V. (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction – An Annotated Collection of Legal Materials (Cambridge: Grotius Publications Ltd, 1983)Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., ‘Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law and Some Suggestions for their Interaction’ (1979) 163 Recueil des Cours311Google Scholar

Luban, David, ‘The Publicity of Law and the Regulatory State’ (2002) 10 Journal of Political Philosophy296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (first published 1978, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,‘The Artificial Reason and Judgement of Law’, in Aarnio, Aulis and MacCormick, Neil (eds.), Legal Reasoning (New York: New York University Press, 1992), Vol. 1, 167Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,‘On Legal Decisions and Their Consequences: From Dewey to Dworkin’ (1983) 58 New York University Law Review239Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

MacQueen, Hector, ‘Copyright and the Internet’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – A Framework for Electronic Commerce (2nd edn, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 67Google Scholar

Maggs, Peter B., ‘Abusive Advertising on the Internet (Spam) under United States Law’ (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich and Mankowski, Peter, Joint Response to the Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument and its Modernisation COM(2002) 654 final (2003), http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/rome_i/news_summary_rome1_en.htm

Maltby, Jeremy, ‘Juggling Comity and Self-Government: The Enforcement of Foreign Libel Judgments in US Courts’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, F. A., Further Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited After Twenty Years’ (1984) 186 Recueil des Cours9Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘Conflicts of Laws and Public Law’ (1971) 132 Recueil des Cours107Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1964) 111 Recueil des Cours 1, reproduced in Mann, F. A., Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973)Google Scholar

Mann, Michael, ‘Foreign Revenue Laws and the English Conflict of Laws’ (1954) 8 International and Comparative Law Quarterly465Google Scholar

Mathiason, John R. and Kuhlman, Charles C., An International Communication Policy: The Internet, International Regulation and New Policy Structures (1998), http://www.intlmgt.com/portfolio/ITSpaper.htmlGoogle Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Foreign Private and Private International Law, Comments on the European Commission's Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument (2003), http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/rome_i/news_summary_rome1_en.htm

Mayer, Franz C., ‘Recht und Cyberspace’ (1997) 3 Humboldt Forum Recht, http://www.rewi.hu-berlin.de/online/hfr/3-1997/Drucktext.htmlGoogle Scholar

McConnaughay, Philip J., ‘Reviving the “Public Law Taboo” in the International Conflicts of Law’ (1999) 35 Stanford Journal of International Law255Google Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert and Pangalangan, Raul, ‘Pushing Back the Limitations of Territorial Boundaries’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, John F., ‘When Speech is Heard Around the World: Internet Content Regulation in the United States and Germany’ (1999) 74 New York University Law Review750Google Scholar

McMahon, Tom, ‘Improving Access to the Law in Canada’ (1999) Computerisation of Law Resources3Google Scholar

Meessen, Karl M., ‘International Law Limitations on State Jurisdiction’, in Olmstead, Cecil J. (ed.), Extra-Territorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: ESC Publishing Limited, 1984), 38Google Scholar

Mefford, Aron, ‘Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet’ (1997) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies211Google Scholar

Mehra, Salil K., ‘Deterrence: The Private Remedy and International Antitrust Cases’ (2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law275Google Scholar

Meng, Werner, ‘Recognition of Foreign Legislative and Administrative Act’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 348Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry, ‘The Public Law–Private Law Distinction in European and American Law’ (1968) 17 Journal of Public Law2Google Scholar

Metzger, R. S., ‘Communications Convergence’ (2001) 18 Computer and Internet Lawyer1Google Scholar

Meyer, Christopher W., ‘World Wide Web Advertising: Personal Jurisdiction Around the Whole Wide World?’ (1997) 54 Washington and Lee Law Review1269Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority (London: Tavistock, 1974)Google Scholar

Miller, Nigel, ‘Has Your Trademark Been Googled?’ (2004) 15 Computer & Law36Google Scholar

Mnookin, Robert H., ‘The Public/Private Dichotomy: Political Disagreement and Academic Repudiation’ (1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mody, Sanjay S., ‘National Cyberspace Regulation: Unbundling the Concept of Jurisdiction’ (2001) 37 Stanford Journal of International Law365Google Scholar

Moerel, Lokke, ‘The Country-of-Origin Principle in the E-Commerce Directive: The Expected One Stop Shop’ (2001) 7 Computer and Telecommunication Law Review184Google Scholar

Mozina, Damjan, ‘Persönlichkeitsverletzungen im Internet – Die Internationale Zuständigkeit’ (2004) 1 Slovenian Law Review77Google Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter Thomas, ‘Globalisation and Legal Research’ (2003) 37 International Lawyer221Google Scholar

Mutz, Gerfried, ‘Private International Law’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 330Google Scholar

Naughton, John, A Brief History of the Future – The Origins of the Internet (London: Phoenix, 2000)Google Scholar

Netanel, Neil Weinstock, ‘Cyberspace Self-Governance: A Skeptical View from Liberal Democratic Theory’ (2000) 88 California Law Review395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nguy, N., ‘Using Architectural Constraints and Game Theory to Regulate International Cyberspace Behaviour’ (2004) 5 San Diego International Law Journal431Google Scholar

Nguyen, Titi, ‘A Survey of Personal Jurisdiction Based on Internet Activity: A Return to Tradition’ (2004) 19 Berkeley Technology Law Journal519Google Scholar

Nitschke, Paul and Griggs, Lynden, ‘Banking on the Internet – Reformulation of the Old or Adoption of the New’ (1996) 7 Journal of Law and Information Science223Google Scholar

North, Peter and Fawcett, J. J., Cheshire and North's Private International Law (13th edn, London: Butterworths, 1999)Google Scholar

Nygh, P. N., Conflicts of Law in Australia (6th edn, Sydney: Butterworths, 1995)Google Scholar

Online Policy Group Inc, Why Blocking Technology Can't Work, http://www.onlinepolicy.org/research/blockcantwork.shtml

Oren, Joakim S. T., ‘International Jurisdiction over Consumer Contracts in e-Europe’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly665CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), http://www.oecd.org, Anti-Spam Regulation (2005) DSTI/CP/ICCP/SPAM(2005)10/FINAL

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),OECD Input to the United Nations Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) (2005) DSTI/ICCP(2005)4/FINAL

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),The Use of Authentication Across Borders in OECD Countries (2005) DSTI/ICCP/REG(2005)4/FINAL

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),OECD Guidelines for Protecting Consumers from Fraudulent and Deceptive Commercial Practices Across Borders (2003)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),Legal Provisions Related to Business-to-Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in Relation to Privacy and Consumer Protection (2002) DSTI/ICCP/REG/CP(2002)1/FINAL

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (2002)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),Measuring the Information Economy (2002)

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),OECD Guidelines for Consumer Protection in the Context of Electronic Commerce (1999)

Opeskin, Brian R., ‘The Price of Forum Shopping: A Reply to Professor Juenger’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Review14Google Scholar

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), http://www.osce.org, Amsterdam Recommendations on Freedom of the Media and the Internet (Vienna: OSCE, 2003)

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE),(Hardy, Christiane and Möller, Christian), Spreading the Word on the Internet (Vienna: OSCE, 2003)Google Scholar

Osborne, Dawn, ‘Jurisdiction on the Internet – Not Such a Barrel of Laughs for Euromarket!’ (2000) August/September Computer and Law26Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., ‘Jurisdiction of States’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 277Google Scholar

Palmer, Laura R., ‘A Very Clear and Present Danger: Hate Speech, Media Reform, and Post-Conflict Democratization in Kosovo’ (2001) 26 Yale Journal of International Law179Google Scholar

Perez, Antonio F., ‘The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate between Private and Public Law Solutions’ (2001) 19 Berkeley Journal of International Law44Google Scholar

Perritt, Henry H., ‘The Internet Is Changing the Public International Legal System’ (2000) 88 Kentucky Law Review885Google Scholar

Perritt, Henry H.,‘The Internet as a Threat to Sovereignty? Thoughts on the Internet's Role in Strengthening National and Global Governance (1998) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies423Google Scholar

Perritt, Henry H.,‘Cyberspace and State Sovereignty’ (1997) 3 Journal of International Legal Studies155Google Scholar

Piotrowicz, Ryszard, ‘Immunities of Foreign Ministers and their Exposure to Universal Jurisdiction’ (2002) 76 Australian Law Journal290Google Scholar

Piotrowicz, Ryszard,‘Child Sex Tourism and Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction’ (1997) 71 Australian Law Journal108Google Scholar

Podgor, Ellen S., ‘International Computer Fraud: A Paradigm for Limiting National Jurisdiction’ (2002) 35 University of California Davis Law Review267Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe, ‘Public Law and Private Law’ (1939) 24 Cornell Law Quarterly469Google Scholar

Pribetic, Antonio I., ‘“Strangers in a Strange Land” – Transnational Litigation, Foreign Judgment Recognition, and Enforcement in Ontario’ (2004) 13 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy347Google Scholar

Pryles, Michael C., ‘Internationalism in Australian Private International Law’ (1989) 12 Sydney Law Review96Google Scholar

Puathasnanon, Sam, ‘Cyberspace and Personal Jurisdiction: The Problem of Using Internet Contacts to Establish Minimum Contacts’ (1998) 31 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review691Google Scholar

Raw, Hazel, ‘Spam: Where's the Beef?’ (2004) 15(1) Computers & Law38Google Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘International Environmental Law’, in Blay, Sam, Piotrowicz, Ryszard and Tsamenyi, B. Martin (eds.), Public International Law – An Australian Perspective (2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005), 352Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, ‘The Rule of Law and its Virtue’ (1977) 93 Law Quarterly Review195Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph,The Concept of a Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970)Google Scholar

Reed, Christopher, Internet Law: Text and Materials (London: Butterworths, 2000)Google Scholar

Reed, Kristina M., ‘From the Great Firewall of China to the Berlin Firewall: The Cost of Content Regulation on Internet Commerce’ (2000) 13 Transnational Lawyer451Google Scholar

Reidenberg, Joel R., ‘Technology and Internet Jurisdiction’ (2005) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reidenberg, Joel R.,‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology’ (1998) 76 Texas Law Review553Google Scholar

Reidenberg, Joel R.,‘Governing Networks and Rule-Making in Cyberspace’ (1996) 45 Emory Law Journal911Google Scholar

Reilly, Robert, ‘Mapping Legal Metaphors in Cyberspace: Evolving the Underlying Paradigm’ (1998) 16 Journal of Computer and Information Law579Google Scholar

Reiman, Mathias, ‘Introduction: The Yahoo! Case and Conflict of Laws in the Cyberage’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law663Google Scholar

Reiss, Albert J., ‘Selecting Strategies of Social Control over Organisational Life’, in Hawkins, K. and Thomas, J. (eds.), Enforcing Regulation (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Responsible Gambling Council (Ontario), http://www.responsiblegambling.org, ‘Denmark Rejects Australian Online Gambling’ (16 May 2003) Newscan

Responsible Gambling Council (Ontario),‘Law Fails to Slow Online Gambling in Australia’ (8 February 2002) Newscan

Reydams, Luc, Universal Jurisdiction – International and Municipal Legal Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Rice, Denis T., ‘2001: A Cyberspace Odyssey Through US and EU Internet Jurisdiction over E-Commerce’ (2001) 661 PLI/Pat421Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘The Message, Not the Medium: Defamation, Publication and the Internet in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick’ (2002) 24 Sydney Law Review263Google Scholar

Rotenberg, Marc, ‘Fair Information Practices and the Architecture of Privacy’ (2001) Stanford Technology Law Review1Google Scholar

Rothchild, John, ‘Protecting the Digital Consumer: The Limits of Cyberspace Utopianism’ (1999) 74 Indiana Law Journal895Google Scholar

Rothman, Michael S., ‘It's a Small World After All: Personal Jurisdiction, the Internet and the Global Marketplace’ (1999) 23 Maryland Journal of International Law and Trade127Google Scholar

Salmony, Michael, ‘Multimedia – Chancen und Illusionen – Eine kritische Betrachtung’, in Lehmann, Michael (ed.), Internet- und Multimediarecht (Cyberlaw) (Stuttgart: Schaffer-Poeschel Verlag, 1997), 1Google Scholar

Sanders, Jeff, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of the First Amendment to Defamation’ (1994) 19 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation515Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘The Impact of the Internet on Sovereignty: Unfounded and Real Worries’, in Engel, Christoph and Keller, Kenneth H. (eds.), Understanding the Impact of Global Networks on Local Social, Political and Cultural Values (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000), 195Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia,‘Digital Networks and Power’, in Featherstone, Mike and Lash, Scott (eds.), Spaces of Culture – City, Nation, World (London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1999), 49Google Scholar

Savigny, F. C., Private International Law: A Treatise on the Conflict of Law (first published 1848, 2nd Guthrie trans., 1988)Google Scholar

Schauer, Fredrick, ‘Free Speech and the Demise of the Soapbox’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review558CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlachter, Eric, ‘The Intellectual Property Renaissance in Cyberspace: Why Copyright Law Could Be Unimportant on the Internet’ (1997) 12 Berkeley Technology Law Journal15Google Scholar

Schlachter, Oscar, ‘New Custom: Power, Opinio Juris and Contrary Practice’, in Makarczyk, Jerzy (ed.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996), 531Google Scholar

Schramm, Wilbur (ed.), Mass Communications (2nd edn, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960)Google Scholar

Shearer, Ivan, ‘Jurisdiction’, in Blay, Sam, Piotrowicz, Ryszard and Tsamenyi, Martin (eds.), Public International Law – An Australian Perspective (2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005), 154Google Scholar

Siebert, Fred S., ‘Communications and Government’, in Schramm (ed.), Wilbur, Mass Communications (2nd edn, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960), 219Google Scholar

Siebert, Fred S., Peterson, Theodore and Schramm, Wilbur, Four Theories of the Press (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1956)Google Scholar

Sinclair, Kent, ‘Legal Reasoning: In Search of an Adequate Theory of Argument’, in California Law Review (ed.), Essays in Honor of Hans Kelsen (South Hackensack, NY: Fred B. Rothman & Co, 1971)Google Scholar

Sinclair, Kent‘Legal Reasoning: In Search of an Adequate Theory of Argument’ (1971) 59 California Law Review821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slutsky, Bradley A., ‘Jurisdiction over Commerce on the Internet’ (1996) 4 The DataLaw ReportGoogle Scholar

Smart, P. St J., ‘International Insolvency and the Enforcement of Foreign Revenue Laws’ (1986) 35 International and Comparative Law Quarterly704CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Bradford L., ‘The Third Industrial Revolution: Law and Policy for the Internet’ (2000) 282 Recueil des Cours229Google Scholar

Smith, Graham, Internet Law and Regulation (3rd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002) Online Updates to Internet Law and Regulation, http://www.smlawpub.co.uk/online/intereg/apr02.cfmGoogle Scholar

Snijders, Henricus and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), E-Commerce Law: National and Transnational Topics and Perspectives (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003)Google Scholar

Spencer, A. Benjamin, ‘Jurisdiction and the Internet: Returning to Traditional Principles to Analyze Network Mediated Contacts’ (2006) University of Illinois Law Review71Google Scholar

Spilsbury, Sallie, Media Law (London: Cavendish, 2000)Google Scholar

Stein, Allan R., ‘The Unexceptional Problem of Jurisdiction in Cyberspace’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer1167Google Scholar

Stein, Peter and Shand, John, Legal Values in Western Society (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1974)Google Scholar

Steinberger, Helmut, ‘Sovereignty’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 397Google Scholar

Stoel, Thomas B., ‘The Enforcement of Foreign Non-Criminal Penal and Revenue Judgments in England and the United States’ (1967) 16 International and Comparative Law Quarterly663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Julius, The Legal Systems and Lawyer's Reasoning (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Stone, Peter, ‘Internet Consumer Contracts and European Private International Law’ (2000) 9 Information and Communications Technology Law5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stravitz, Howard B., ‘Personal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Something More Is Required on the Electronic Stream of Commerce’ (1998) 49 South Carolina Law Review925Google Scholar

Sullivan, Danny, ‘Google Now Censoring China’ (25 January 2006), SearchEngineWatch, http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060125-072617/

Summers, Robert S., ‘Two Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common-Law Jurisdictions’ (1978) 63 Cornell Law Review707Google Scholar

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B., ‘Borders on, or Border around – The Future of the Internet’ (2006) 16 Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology343Google Scholar

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B‘Geo-Location Technologies and other Means of Placing Borders on the ‘Borderless’ Internet’ (2004) 23 John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law101Google Scholar

Swire, Peter P., ‘Of Elephants, Mice and Privacy: International Choice of Law and the Internet’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer991Google Scholar

Taggart, Will, ‘The Digital Revolt: Resistance and Agency on the Net’ (2001) New Media and Information Technology in the Middle East, http://nmit.georgetown.edu/papers/wtaggert.htmGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Global Law Without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997)Google Scholar

Thornburg, Elizabeth G., ‘Fast Cheap and Out of Control: Lessons from the ICANN Dispute Resolution Process’ (2002) 6 Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law191Google Scholar

Thornburg, Elizabeth G.,‘Going Private: Technology, Due Process, and Internet Dispute Resolution’ (2000) 34 UC Davis Law Review151Google Scholar

Thierer, Adam and Crews, Jr, Wayne, Clyde (eds.), Who Rules the Net? Internet Governance and Jurisdiction (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003)Google Scholar

Timofeeva, Yulia A., ‘Worldwide Prescriptive Jurisdiction in Internet Content Controversies: A Comparative Analysis’ (2005) 20 Connecticut Journal of International Law199Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., ‘Cyberspace, Sovereignty, Jurisdiction and Modernism’ (1998) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies561Google Scholar

Trudel, Pierre, ‘Jurisdiction over the Internet: A Canadian Perspective’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer1027Google Scholar

Tschuma, Lawrence, ‘Hierarchies and Governance: Competing Regulatory Paradigms in Global Economic Regulation’ (2000) (1) Law, Social Justice and Global DevelopmentGoogle Scholar

Unger, Roberto, ‘Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983) 96 Harvard Law Review561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urquhart, Joshua G., ‘Transnational Securities Fraud Regulation: Problems and Solutions’ (2000) 1 Chicago Journal of International Law471Google Scholar

UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport, http://www.culture.gov.uk, Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill, First Report (25 March 2004)

UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport,Draft Gambling Bill – Regulatory Impact Assessment (November 2003)

UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport,The Future Regulation of Remote Gambling: A DCMS Position Paper (April 2003)

UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport,A Safe Bet for Success – Modernising Britain's Gambling Laws (March 2002)

UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport,Gambling Review Report (July 2001)

UK Department of Trade and Industry, http://www.dti.gov.uk, Cross Border Jurisdiction FAQs (2006)

UK Department of Trade and Industry,Implementation of the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications (March 2003)

UK Home Office, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk, Review of Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction, Steering Committee Report (1996)

UK Law Commission, http://www.lawcom.gov.uk, Mutual Legal Assistance Guidelines: Obtaining assistance in the UK and Overseas (2nd edn, December 2004)

UK Law Commission,Defamation and the Internet – A Preliminary Investigation, Scoping Study No. 2 (2002)

UK Office of Fair Trading, http://www.oft.gov.uk, Cross-Border Action to Tackle Spam (3 November 2005)

UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), http://www.unctad.org, E-Commerce and Development Report 2002 (UNCTAD/SDTE/ECB/2)

US Securities and Exchange Commission, http://www.sec.gov, Statement of the Commission Regarding Use of Internet Web Sites to Offer Securities, Solicit Securities Transactions or Advertise Investment Services Offshore, International Series Release No. 1125 (23 March 1998)

Houweling, Molly S., ‘Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, the First Amendment, and Internet Speech: Notes for the Next Yahoo! v. LICRA’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law697Google Scholar

Vartanian, Thomas P., Ledig, Robert H. and Bruneau, Lynn, 21st Century Money, Banking and Commerce (Washington DC: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, 1998)Google Scholar

Vasiljeva, Ksenija, ‘1968 Brussels Convention and EU Council Regulation No. 44/2001: Jurisdiction in Consumer Contracts Concluded Online’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vassilaki, Irini E., ‘Anmerkung’ (2001) 4 Computer und Recht262Google Scholar

Waelde, Charlotte, ‘Trade Marks and Domain Names: What's in a Name?’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – A Framework for Electronic Commerce (2nd edn, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 133Google Scholar

Wasmeier, Martin and Thwaites, Nadine, ‘The “Battle of the Pillars”: Does the European Community Have the Power to Approximate National Criminal Law’ (2004) 29 European Law Review613Google Scholar

Watt, Horatia Muir, ‘Yahoo! Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates?’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law673Google Scholar

Weinrib, Ernest J., The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘The Continental Experience’, in Olmstead, Cecil H. J. (ed.), Extraterritorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: ECS Publishing Limited, 1984), 63Google Scholar

Williams, Cynthia A., ‘Corporate Compliance with the Law in the Era of Efficiency’ (1998) 76 North Carolina Law Review1265Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville, ‘The Venue and Ambit of the Criminal Law’ (1965) 81 Law Quarterly Review518Google Scholar

Wilske, Stephan and Schiller, Terasa, ‘International Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Which States May Regulate the Internet?’ (1997) 50 Federal Communications Law Journal117Google Scholar

Wimmer, Kurt, ‘International Liability for Internet Content: Publish Locally, Defend Globally’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 239Google Scholar

Winn, Jane Kaufman, ‘The Hedgehog and the Fox: Distinguishing Public and Private Sector Approaches to Managing Risk for Internet Transactions’ (1999) 51 Administrative Law Review955Google Scholar

World Trade Organization (WTO), http://www.wto.org, Electronic Commerce and the Role of the WTO, Special Study 2 (1998), www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/special_study_2_e.pdf

Wortley, B. A., ‘The Interaction of Public and Private International Law Today’ (1954) 85 Recueil des Cours239Google Scholar

Wrenn, Gregory J., ‘Cyberspace Is Real, National Borders Are Fiction: The Protection of Expressive Rights Online Through Recognition of National Borders in Cyberspace’ (2002) 38 Stanford Journal of International Law97Google Scholar

Wu, Tim, ‘When Code Isn't Law’ (2003) 89 Virginia Law Review679CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyngaert, Christine and Stessens, Guy, ‘The International Non Bis in Idem Principle: Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions’ (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly779CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yahoo! Europe, Comments on the Green Paper on a ‘Rome 1 Regulation’ (2003), http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/rome_i/news_summary_rome1_en.htm

Yntema, Hessel E., ‘The Historic Bases of Private International Law’ (1953) 2 American Journal of Comparative Law297CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yum, Kyo Ho, ‘The Interaction Between American and Foreign Libel Law: US Courts Refuse to Enforce English Libel Judgments’ (2000) 49 International and Comparative Law Quarterly132Google Scholar

Zander, Oliver, ‘Recent Developments in German Internet Law’ (October/November 2000) Computer & Law36Google Scholar

Zittrain, Jonathan, ‘Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling a Global Internet and Local Law’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 13Google Scholar

Zittrain, Jonathan and Edelman, Benjamin, ‘Documentation of Internet Filtering in Saudi Arabia’ (2002), Berkman Center for Internet and Society, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/

Zittrain, Jonathan and Edelman, Benjamin,‘Documentation of Internet Filtering Worldwide’, in Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (Hardy, Christiane and Möller, Christian), Spreading the Word on the Internet (Vienna: OSCE, 2003)Google Scholar

‘Is Zippo's Sliding Scale a Slippery Slope of Uncertainty? A Case for Abolishing Web Site Interactivity as a Conclusive Factor in Assessing Minimum Contacts in Cyberspace’ (2001) 34 John Marshall Law Review1051 (note)

‘No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2003) 116 Harvard Law Review1821 (note)CrossRef

Aarnio, Aulis and MacCormick, Neil (eds.), Legal Reasoning (New York: New York University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Aciman, Carole and Vo-Verde, Diane, ‘Refining the Zippo Test: Trends on Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Activities’ (2002) 19 Computer and Internet Lawyer16Google Scholar

Ahlert, Christian, ‘Technology of Control: How Code Controls Communication’, in Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (Hardy, Christiane and Möller, Christian eds.), Spreading the Word on the Internet (Vienna: OSCE, 2003), 119Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, ‘Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1972–3) 46 British Yearbook of International Law145Google Scholar

Albrecht, A. R., ‘The Enforcement of Taxation under International Law’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law454Google Scholar

Allott, P., Eunomia: A New Order for a New World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

American Bar Association (ABA), http://www.abanet.org, Addressing Disputes in Electronic Commerce – Final Report and Recommendations of the American Bar Association's Task Force on Electronic Commerce and Alternative Dispute Resolution (August 2002)

American Bar Association (ABA),‘Achieving Legal and Business Order in Cyberspace: A Report on Global Jurisdiction Issues Created by the Internet’ (2000) 55 The Business Lawyer1801, http://www.kentlaw.edu/cyberlaw/docs/drafts/draft.rtf

Atiyah, P. S., Law and Modern Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar

Atiyah, P. S.,‘From Principles to Pragmatism: Changes in the Function of the Judicial Process and the Law’ (1980) 65 Iowa Law Review1249Google Scholar

Aubert, Vilhelm and Eckhoff, Torstein (eds.), Continuity and Development in Law and Society (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Ausness, Richard C., ‘The Application of Product Principles to Publishers of Violent or Sexually Explicit Material’ (2000) 52 Florida Law Review603Google Scholar

Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832, ed. by Hart, H. L. A., London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954)Google Scholar

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, http://www.accc.gov.au, The Global Enforcement Challenge: Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws in a Global Marketplace, Discussion Paper (1997)

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission,‘ACCC Issues Warning to On-line Traders: “Shape-up” Sites’ (2004)

Australian Law Reform Commission, http://www.alrc.gov.au, Legal Risk in International Transactions, Report No. 80 (1996)

Australian Law Reform Commission,Choice of Law, Report No. 58. (1992)

Australian Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Six-Month Report on Co-Regulatory Scheme for Internet Content Regulation January to June 2001 (February 2002)

Australian National Office for the Information Economy (now the Australian Government Information Management Office), http://www.agimo.gov.au, Convergence Review – Final Review (10 May 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, http://www.asic.gov.auElectronic Prospectuses, Policy Statement 107 (18 September 1996, reissued 10 February 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission,Investment Advisory Services: Media, Computer Software and Internet Advice, Policy Statement 118 (3 March 1997, reissued 12 January 2000)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission,Offers of Securities on the Internet, Policy Statement 141 (10 February 1999, reissued 2 March 2000)

Australian Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG) Working Group of State and Territory Officers, Proposal for Uniform Defamation Laws (July 2004)

Australian Tax Office, http://www.ato.gov.au, Tax and the Internet, Discussion Report of the ATO Electronic Commerce Project (1997)

Axelrod, Robert, The Complexity of Cooperation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert,The Evolution of Co-operation (first published 1984, London: Penguin Books, 1990)Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian and Braithwaite, John, Responsive Regulation – Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Ayres, Phil, ‘Prescribing a Cure for Online Pharmacies’ (2005) 72 Tennessee Law Review949Google Scholar

Baade, Hans W., ‘The Operation of Foreign Public Law’ (1995) 30 Texas International Law Journal429Google Scholar

Balda, Volker and Schmits, Volker, ‘Fernsehen ohne Grenzen auf dem Weg zur Konvergenz’ (1998) 7 Computer und Recht421Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert, Scott, Colin and Hood, Christopher (eds.), A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, Richard A. and Wert, Suzanne, ‘Internet Jurisdiction’ (2001) 20 John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law21Google Scholar

Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, ‘Common Law Property Metaphors on the Internet: The Real Problem with the Doctrine of Cybertrespass’ (2006) 12 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review265Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E., ‘Forewords: Four Senses of the Public Law–Private Law Distinction’ (1994) 9 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy267Google Scholar

Beech, Andrew, ‘Discretion in the Exercise of Jurisdiction: Recent Developments’ (1989) 19 University of Western Australia Law Review8Google Scholar

Bell, Griffin B., ‘International Comity and the Extra-territorial Application of Anti-Trust Laws’ (1977) 51 Australian Law Journal80Google Scholar

Benkler, Yockai, ‘Internet Regulation: A Case Study on the Problem of Unilateralism’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham Jeremy, Of Laws in General (ed. by Hart, H. L. A., London: Athlone Press, 1970)Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘The Globalisation of Jurisdiction’ (2002) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardez, Santiago Torres, ‘Territorial Sovereignty’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 487

Betlem, Gerrit, ‘Cross-Border Private Enforcement of Community Law’, in Vervaelde, J. A. E. (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 391Google Scholar

Betlem, Gerrit,‘Transboundary Enforcement: Free Movement of Injunction’, in Deimann, Sven and Dyssli, Bernard (eds.), Environmental Rights – Law, Litigation and Access to Justice (London: Cameron May, 1995), 184Google Scholar

Betlem, Gerrit and Nollkaemper, Andre, ‘Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law567CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyleveld, Deryck, Kirkham, Richard and Townend, David, ‘Which Presumption? A Critique of the House of Lords’ Reasoning on Retrospectivity and the Human Rights Act' (2002) 22 Legal Studies185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigos, Oren, ‘Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Wrongs on the Internet’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowrey, Kathy, Law and Internet Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Boyle, James, ‘Foucault in Cyberspace: Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hard-Wired Censors’ (1997) 66 University of Cincinnati Law Review177Google Scholar

Bradney, Tony, ‘Law Schools and the Egg Marketing Board’ (2001) 22 SPTL Reporter1Google Scholar

Braun, Odelia, ‘Internet Publications and Defamation: Why the Single Publication Rule Should Not Apply’ (2002) 32 Golden Gate University Law Review325Google Scholar

Bremer, Karsten, Strafbare Internet-Inhalte in International Hinsicht – Ist der Nationalstaat wirklich überholt? (Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang Verlag, 2001), http://ub-dok.uni-trier.de/diss/diss60/20000927/20000927.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (6th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian,Principles of Public International Law (4nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Brownsword, Roger, ‘Code, Control, and Choice: Why East Is East and West Is West’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burk, Dan L., ‘Jurisdiction in a World Without Borders’ (1997) 1 Virginia Journal of Law and Technology1522Google Scholar

Burnstein, Matthew R., ‘Conflicts on the Net: Choice of Law in Transactional Cyberspace’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law75Google Scholar

Buxbaum, Hannah L., ‘The Private Attorney General in a Global Age: Public Interests in Private International Antitrust Litigation’ (2001) 26 Yale Journal of International Law219Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camp, L. Jean and Syme, Serena, ‘Code as Governance, the Governance of Code’ (2001), John F Kennedy School Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series, http://ssrn.com/abstract=297154/

Carr, Indira and Williams, Katherine S., ‘Cyber-crime and the Council of Europe: Reflections on a Draft Convention’ (2001) 7 International Trade Law and Regulation93Google Scholar

Carter, P. B., ‘Rejection of Foreign Law: Some Private International Law Inhibitions’ (1984) 55 British Yearbook of International Law111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Cohen, Laurence J., ‘E-Libel and Proportionality’ (2000) 1 E-Journal12Google Scholar

Collier, J. G., Conflict of Laws (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Lawrence (ed.), Dicey and Morris on Conflict of Laws (13th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000)Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew, The Law of Defamation and the Internet (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew,Online Updates to the Law of Defamation and the Internet, http://www.mattcollins.com.au/LawofDefamationandtheInternet.html

Corn-Revere, Robert, Caught in the Seamless Web: Does the Internet's Global Reach Justify Less Freedom of Speech, Briefing Paper No. 71 (2002), Cato Institute, http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp71.pdf

Commonwealth of Australia, Australia–United States Relations: The Extraterritorial Application of United States Laws, Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence (Canberra, 1983)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (Philip McCrea, Bob Smart and Mark Andrews), Blocking Content on the Internet: A Technical Perspective (June 1998), http://www.cmis.csiro.au/projects + sectors/blocking.pdf

Council of Europe, http://www.coe.int, Declaration on Freedom of Political Debate in the Media (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 February 2004)

Council of Europe,Declaration on Freedom of Communication on the Internet (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 May 2003)

Council of Europe,Draft Declaration on Freedom of Communication on the Internet (8 April 2002)

Council of Europe,Recommendation No. R(97)20E of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on ‘Hate Speech’ (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 October 1997)

Currie, Brainerd, Selected Essays in the Conflict of Laws (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963)Google Scholar

Davies, Martin, Ricketson, Sam and Lindell, Geoffrey, Conflicts of Laws – Commentary and Materials (Sydney: Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar

Davis, Phillip Adam, ‘The Defamation of Choice-of-Law in Cyberspace: Countering the View that the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Is Inadequate to Navigate the Borderless Reaches of the Intangible Frontier’ (2002) 54 Federal Communications Law Journal339Google Scholar

Deakin, Simon, Legal Diversity and Regulatory Competition: Which Model for Europe? Working Paper No. 323 (Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 2006), http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/WP323.pdf

Deakin, Simon,International and Jurisdictional Issues (ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1999)Google Scholar

Debussere, Frederic, ‘International Jurisdiction over E-Consumer Contracts in the European Union: Quid Novi Sub Sole?’ (2002) 10 International Journal of Law and Information Technology344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, Everette E., ‘Internal Examination: Self-Regulation and the American Media’ (1995) 13 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal697Google Scholar

Dewey, John, ‘Logical Method and Law’ (1924) 10 Cornell Law Quarterly17Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme, ‘Trademarks and Territory: Detaching Trademark from the Nation-State’ (2004) 41 Houston Law Review885Google Scholar

Dodge, William S., ‘Antitrust and the Draft Hague Judgments Convention’ (2001) 33 Law and Policy in International Business363Google Scholar

Dodge, William S.,‘Extraterritoriality and Conflict-of-Laws Theory: An Argument for Judicial Unilateralism’ (1998) 39 Harvard International Law Journal101Google Scholar

Doehring, Karl, ‘State’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 423

Donaghey, Teague I., ‘Terminal Railroad Revisited: Using the Essential Facilities Doctrine to Ensure Accessibility to Internet Software Standards’ (1997) 25 AIPLA Quarterly Journal277Google Scholar

Doughdrill, Brian E., ‘Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet: Waiting for the Other Shoe to Drop on First Amendment Concern’ (2000) 51 Mercer Law Review919Google Scholar

Dyson, George, Darwin Among the Machines (London: Allen Lane, 1998)Google Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin (Berkman Center for Internet and Society, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/), Empirical Analysis of Google SafeSearch (2003), Berkman Center for Internet & SocietyGoogle Scholar

Edelman, BenjaminWeb Sites Sharing IP Addresses: Prevalence and Significance (2003), Berkman Center for Internet and SocietyGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin‘Shortcomings and Challenges in the Restriction of Internet Retransmissions of Over-the-Air Television Content to Canadian Internet Users’ (Expert Memorandum attached to the National Association of Broadcasters' submission to Industry Canada) (2001)

Eden, Sandra, ‘Taxation of Electronic Commerce’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – Regulating Cyberspace (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), 151Google Scholar

Edwards, Lilian, ‘Defamation and the Internet’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – Regulating Cyberspace (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), 183Google Scholar

Eko, Lyombe, ‘Many Spiders, One Worldwide Web: Towards a Typology of Internet Regulation’ (2001) 6 Communication Law and Policy445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eorsi, Gyula, Comparative Civil (Private) Law (Budapest: Academiai Kiado, 1979)Google Scholar

European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu, Special Eurobarometer 250 ‘Safer Internet’ Report (May 2006)

European Commission,Safer Internet Plus Programme, Factsheet 18 (October 2005), Communication on the Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in Criminal Matters and the Strengthening of Mutual Trust between Member States, COM(2005) 195 final

European Commission,Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of Ne Bis in Idem in Criminal Proceedings, COM(2005) 696 final

European Commission,Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument and its Modernisation, COM(2002) 654 final

European Commission,Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: Electronic Commerce and Indirect Taxation, COM(1998) 374 final

Farber, Daniel A., ‘Expressive Commerce in Cyberspace: Public Goods, Network Effects and Free Speech’ (2000) 16 Georgia State University Law Review789Google Scholar

Faulstich, Werner, ‘Mediengeschichte’, in Faulstich, Werner (ed.), Grundwissen Medien (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1994), 19Google Scholar

Fawcett, James J. and Torremans, Paul, Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Feintuck, Mike, Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Feld, Harold, ‘Structured to Fail: ICANN and the Privatisation Experiment’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 333Google Scholar

Feldman, David, Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Feng, Zhen, ‘China to Introduce New Legislation to Deal with ISP Liability for Copyright Infringement’ (2004) 5 World Internet Law Report19Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, The Cash Nexus: Money and Power in the Modern World 1700–2000 (London: Allen Lane, 2001)Google Scholar

Ferran, Eilis, Company Law and Corporate Finance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des Cours209Google Scholar

Fleming, John G., The Law of Torts (9th edn, Sydney: LBC Information Services, 1998)Google Scholar

Foss, M. and Bygrave, L. A., ‘International Consumer Purchases through the Internet: Jurisdictional Issues Pursuant to European Law’ (2000) 8 International Journal of Law and Information Technology99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Marc A., Anderson, David and Cate, Fred H., Mass Media Law (6th edn, New York: Foundation Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Freeman, D. A., ‘Milgram's Obedience to Authority – Some Lessons for Legal Theory’ (1979) 1 Liverpool Law Review45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromme, Friedrich Karl and Dornhege, Hermann, ‘“Die Entscheiding is unanfechtbar” Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ (1997) 6 Deutschland – Zeitschrift fuer Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft24Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen, ‘Recognition’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 340

Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard, ‘Trademarks and the Internet: Resolution of International IP Disputes by Unilateral Application of US Law’ (2005) 30 Brooklyn Journal of International Law925Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick – An Adequate Response to Transnational Internet Defamation?’ (2003) 4 Melbourne Journal of International Law197Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘International Arbitration Law: Progress Towards Harmonisation’ (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law400Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Are Foreign Internet Infringers beyond the Reach of the Law?’ (2000) 23 University of New South Wales Law Journal105Google Scholar

Garnett, Richard,‘Regulating Foreign-Based Internet Content: A Jurisdictional Perspective’ (2000) 6 University of New South Wales Law Journal8Google Scholar

Geist, Michael, ‘Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction’ (2001) 661 PLI/Pat561Google Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm, The Tipping Point (London: Abacus, 2001)Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, ‘Unilateral Regulation of the Internet: A Modest Defence’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack,‘The Internet and the Abiding Significance of Territorial Sovereignty’ (1998) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies475Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack,‘What Internet Gambling Legislation Teaches About Internet Regulation’ (1998) 32 The International Lawyer1115Google Scholar

Goode, Matthew, ‘The Tortured Tale of Criminal Jurisdiction’ (1997) 21 Melbourne University Law Review411Google Scholar

Goodhart, A. L., English Law and the Moral Law System (London: Stevens & Son, 1953)Google Scholar

Goodman, Marc D. and Brenner, Susan, ‘The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace’ (2002) 10 International Journal of Law and Information Technology139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabosky, P. N. and Smith, Russell G., Crime in the Digital Age (Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Graveson, R. H., Comparative Conflict of Laws (Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1977)Google Scholar

Greig, Donald W. ‘Sources of International Law’, in Blay, Sam, Piotrowicz, Ryszard and Tsamenyi, Martin (eds.), Public International Law – An Australian Perspective (2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Greve, Michael S., ‘If It Ain't Broke, Why Is Everyone Trying to Fix It? Taxing E-Commerce in a Destination-Based World’, in Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne Jr (eds.), Who Rules the Net? Internet Governance and Jurisdiction (Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 269Google Scholar

Griffith, Gareth, Censorship in Australia: Regulating the Internet and other Recent Developments, Briefing Paper (April 2002)

Gringas, Clive, The Laws of the Internet (London: Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar

Gross, Grant, ‘US Anti-Spam Law Still Not Making a Difference’ (2 April 2004), Techworld, http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?newsid=1332/.

Gross, Jason, ‘Internet Gambling and the Law – Prohibition vs. Regulation’ (August 2006) The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel 2, http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/pdf/2006/August/11.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, http://www.hcch.net (Andrea Schulz), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Legal Aspect of an E-Commerce Transactions (2004)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Avril D. Haines), The Impact of the Internet on the Judgments Projects: Thoughts for the Future, Prel. Doc. No. 17 (2002)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Catherine Kessedjian), Electronic Commerce and International Jurisdiction, Prel. Doc. No. 12 (2000)

Hague Conference on Private International Law,(Peter Nygh and Fausto Pocar), Report of the Special Commission, Prel. Doc. No. 11 (1999)

Hancher, L. and Moran, M., ‘Organizing Regulatory Space’, in Baldwin, Robert, Scott, Colin and Hood, Christopher (eds.), A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Christopher, ‘Legal Subjectivity as a Fundamental Value: The Emergence of Non-State Actors in Europe’, in Economides, Kimet al. (eds.), Fundamental Values (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 115Google Scholar

Harding, Christopher,‘The Identity of European Law: Mapping Out the European Legal Space’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, I. Trotter, ‘The Proper Legal Regime for “Cyberspace”’ (1994) 55 University of Pittsburgh Law Review995Google Scholar

Harris, David J., Cases and Materials on International Law (5th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (1961, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.,Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.,The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1954)Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith, Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hestermeyer, Holger P., ‘Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Torts: Towards an International Solution’ (2006) 26 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business267Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn,‘The Legal Bases of Jurisdiction’, in Olmstead, Cecil J. (ed.), Extraterritorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: ECS Publishing Limited, 1984), 3Google Scholar

Hirst, Michael, ‘Cyberobscenity and the Ambit of Criminal Law’ (2002) 13 Computers & Law25Google Scholar

Holder, William E., ‘Public Policy and National Preferences: The Exclusion of Foreign Law in English Private International Law’ (1969) 17 International and Comparative Law Quarterly926CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, Julia, ‘Country of Origin Regulation in Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond the Freedom to Provide Services?’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, Julia,‘Online Dispute Resolution in Business to Consumer E-Commerce Transactions’ (2002) (2) Journal of Information, Law and TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Hurt, Christine, ‘Regulating Public Morals and Private Markets: Online Securities Trading, Internet Gambling and the Speculation Paradox’ (2005) 86 Boston University Law Review371Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce, http://www.iccwbo.org, The Impact of Internet Content Regulation (18 November 2002)

International Chamber of Commerce,Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Electronic Commerce (6 June 2001)

International Law Association, http://www.ila-hg.org, First Report by the Committee on Transnational Enforcement of Environmental Law (2002)

International Telecommunication Union (ITU), http://www.itu.int, ITU Survey on Anti-Spam Legislation Worldwide (2005) CYB/06

Jacobson, Joy, ‘Of Love and Defamation in China’ (2003) Poets & Writers Magazine, http://www.pw.orgGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim's International Law (9th edn, London: Longman, 1992)Google Scholar

Johnson, David R. and Post, David, ‘Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, Karl, ‘Wie das Internet die Weltpolitik verandert’ (2001) 3 Deutschland – Zeitschrift fuer Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft40Google Scholar

Kalathil, Shanthi and Boas, Taylor C., ‘The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution’ (2001) Carnegie Endowment Working Papers, Global Policy Program No 21, http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/21KalathilBoas.pdf

Katsh, Ethan, ‘Cybertime, Cyberspace and Cyberlaw’ (1995) Journal of Online LawGoogle Scholar

Katyal, Neal Kumar, ‘Digital Architecture as Crime Control’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kearsly, Amanda, ‘The Internet, Paedophilia and the ISP’ (2001) April/May Computers and Law29Google Scholar

Keck, Richard, ‘Developing an Intuitive Understanding of the Behavior and Legal Treatment of Information Assets’ (2001) 605 PLI/Pat771Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946)Google Scholar

Kightlinger, Mark F., ‘A Solution to the Yahoo! Problem? The EC E-Commerce Directive as a Model for International Cooperation on Internet Choice of Law’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law719Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta, ‘Ignorance Is No Defence But Is Inaccessibility? On the Accessibility of Law in the Transnational Online Context’ (2005) 14 Information & Communications Technology Law27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Who Has the Right to Govern Online Activity? A Criminal and Civil Point of View’ (2004) 18 International Review of Law, Computers and Technology387CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘The Rule of Law, Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2004) 12 International Journal of Law and Information Technology365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Defamation on the Internet – Nice Decision, Shame about the Reasoning. Dow Jones & Co v Gutnick’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Eggs, Jurisdiction and the Internet’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Yahoo! – But No Hooray! for the International Online Community’ (2001) 75 Australian Law Journal411Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Defamation on the Internet – A Duty Free Zone After All? Macquarie Bank Ltd & Anor v Berg’ (2000) 22 Sydney Law Review119Google Scholar

Kohl, Uta,‘Legal Reasoning and Legal Change in the Age of the Internet – Why the Ground Rules Are Still Valid’ (1999) 7 International Journal of Law and Information Technology123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Larry, ‘Rethinking Choice of Law’ (1990) 90 Columbia Law Review277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kress, Claus, ‘Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institut de Droit international’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuchinskas, Susan, ‘Google Axes Hate News’ (23 March 2005), Internetnews.com, http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3492361/

Lasswell, Harold D., ‘The Structure and Function of Communication in Society’, in Schramm, Wilbur (ed.), Mass Communications (2nd edn, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1960), 117Google Scholar

Lauterbach, H., ‘The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States’ (1951) 28 British Yearbook of International Law220Google Scholar

Leets, Laura, ‘Responses to Internet Hate Sites: Is Speech Too Free in Cyberspace?’ (2001) 6 Communication Law and Policy287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. and McGowan, David, ‘Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects’ (1998) 86 California Law Review479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books, 1999)Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Laws of Cyberspace – Draft 3’ (1998), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/laws_cyberspace.pdf

Lessig, Lawrence‘The Zones of Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, L. Harold, ‘The Public Law/Private Law Distinction in the Courts’ (1989) 57 George Washington Law Review1579Google Scholar

Levinson, Paul, Digital McLuhan – A Guide to the Information Millennium (London: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar

Levinson, Paul,The Soft Edge – A Natural History and Future of the Information Revolution (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar

Lianos, Michalis, ‘Social Control after Foucault’ (2003) 1(3) Surveillance and Society412Google Scholar

Lombois, Claude, Droit Penal International (2nd edn, Paris: Dalloz, 1979)Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V. (ed.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction – An Annotated Collection of Legal Materials (Cambridge: Grotius Publications Ltd, 1983)Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., ‘Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law and Some Suggestions for their Interaction’ (1979) 163 Recueil des Cours311Google Scholar

Luban, David, ‘The Publicity of Law and the Regulatory State’ (2002) 10 Journal of Political Philosophy296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (first published 1978, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,‘The Artificial Reason and Judgement of Law’, in Aarnio, Aulis and MacCormick, Neil (eds.), Legal Reasoning (New York: New York University Press, 1992), Vol. 1, 167Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,‘On Legal Decisions and Their Consequences: From Dewey to Dworkin’ (1983) 58 New York University Law Review239Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil,Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

MacQueen, Hector, ‘Copyright and the Internet’, in Edwards, Lilian and Waelde, Charlotte (eds.), Law and the Internet – A Framework for Electronic Commerce (2nd edn, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 67Google Scholar

Maggs, Peter B., ‘Abusive Advertising on the Internet (Spam) under United States Law’ (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich and Mankowski, Peter, Joint Response to the Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument and its Modernisation COM(2002) 654 final (2003), http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/rome_i/news_summary_rome1_en.htm

Maltby, Jeremy, ‘Juggling Comity and Self-Government: The Enforcement of Foreign Libel Judgments in US Courts’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, F. A., Further Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited After Twenty Years’ (1984) 186 Recueil des Cours9Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘Conflicts of Laws and Public Law’ (1971) 132 Recueil des Cours107Google Scholar

Mann, F. A.,‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1964) 111 Recueil des Cours 1, reproduced in Mann, F. A., Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973)Google Scholar

Mann, Michael, ‘Foreign Revenue Laws and the English Conflict of Laws’ (1954) 8 International and Comparative Law Quarterly465Google Scholar

Mathiason, John R. and Kuhlman, Charles C., An International Communication Policy: The Internet, International Regulation and New Policy Structures (1998), http://www.intlmgt.com/portfolio/ITSpaper.htmlGoogle Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Foreign Private and Private International Law, Comments on the European Commission's Green Paper on the Conversion of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations into a Community Instrument (2003), http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/consulting_public/rome_i/news_summary_rome1_en.htm

Mayer, Franz C., ‘Recht und Cyberspace’ (1997) 3 Humboldt Forum Recht, http://www.rewi.hu-berlin.de/online/hfr/3-1997/Drucktext.htmlGoogle Scholar

McConnaughay, Philip J., ‘Reviving the “Public Law Taboo” in the International Conflicts of Law’ (1999) 35 Stanford Journal of International Law255Google Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert and Pangalangan, Raul, ‘Pushing Back the Limitations of Territorial Boundaries’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, John F., ‘When Speech is Heard Around the World: Internet Content Regulation in the United States and Germany’ (1999) 74 New York University Law Review750Google Scholar

McMahon, Tom, ‘Improving Access to the Law in Canada’ (1999) Computerisation of Law Resources3Google Scholar

Meessen, Karl M., ‘International Law Limitations on State Jurisdiction’, in Olmstead, Cecil J. (ed.), Extra-Territorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: ESC Publishing Limited, 1984), 38Google Scholar

Mefford, Aron, ‘Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet’ (1997) 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies211Google Scholar

Mehra, Salil K., ‘Deterrence: The Private Remedy and International Antitrust Cases’ (2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law275Google Scholar

Meng, Werner, ‘Recognition of Foreign Legislative and Administrative Act’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 348Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry, ‘The Public Law–Private Law Distinction in European and American Law’ (1968) 17 Journal of Public Law2Google Scholar

Metzger, R. S., ‘Communications Convergence’ (2001) 18 Computer and Internet Lawyer1Google Scholar

Meyer, Christopher W., ‘World Wide Web Advertising: Personal Jurisdiction Around the Whole Wide World?’ (1997) 54 Washington and Lee Law Review1269Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority (London: Tavistock, 1974)Google Scholar

Miller, Nigel, ‘Has Your Trademark Been Googled?’ (2004) 15 Computer & Law36Google Scholar

Mnookin, Robert H., ‘The Public/Private Dichotomy: Political Disagreement and Academic Repudiation’ (1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mody, Sanjay S., ‘National Cyberspace Regulation: Unbundling the Concept of Jurisdiction’ (2001) 37 Stanford Journal of International Law365Google Scholar

Moerel, Lokke, ‘The Country-of-Origin Principle in the E-Commerce Directive: The Expected One Stop Shop’ (2001) 7 Computer and Telecommunication Law Review184Google Scholar

Mozina, Damjan, ‘Persönlichkeitsverletzungen im Internet – Die Internationale Zuständigkeit’ (2004) 1 Slovenian Law Review77Google Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter Thomas, ‘Globalisation and Legal Research’ (2003) 37 International Lawyer221Google Scholar

Mutz, Gerfried, ‘Private International Law’, in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (1987), Vol. 10, 330Google Scholar