Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T17:04:49.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Judges, bias and recusal in Canada

from Part IV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

H. P. Lee
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

In Canada, as in other jurisdictions, natural justice has included in the injunction that, ‘No one may be the judge in his or her own cause’. This rule began with a concern for self-dealing and pecuniary interests, but has evolved to include a range of biases, including attitudinal ones.

The essence of bias is a closed mind, or put differently, the absence of an open mind – as one judge observed: ‘bias represents a predisposition to decide an issue or cause in a certain way which does not leave the judicial mind perfectly open to conviction’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryden, P.Dodek, A.Hoskins, J.Canadian Legal Regulation in the 21st CenturyTorontoLexisNexis 2009Google Scholar
Bryden, P.Legal Principles Governing the Disqualification of Judges 2003 82 Canadian Bar Review555Google Scholar
Lubet, S.Judicial Ethics and Private Lives 1984 79 Northwestern University Law Review983Google Scholar
Bryden, P.Legal Principles Governing the Disqualification of Judges 2003 82 Canadian Bar Review555Google Scholar
Shetreet, S.Judges on TrialNorth HollandAmsterdam 1976 17Google Scholar
Canadian Judicial CouncilCommentaries on Judicial ConductCowansville, QuebecYvon Blais 1991 62Google Scholar
Bryden, P.Legal Principles Governing the Disqualification of Judges 2003 82 Canadian Bar Review555Google Scholar
Tracey, R.Disqualified Adjudicators: The Doctrine of Necessity in Public Law 1982 Public Law628Google Scholar
Bailey, S.Chief Justice Irks Native GroupLondon Free Press 2002 A9Google Scholar
Sossin, L.Discretion and the Culture of Justice 2006 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies356Google Scholar
Makin, K.Judge Seen as Absolved of any BiasGlobe and Mail 2003 A6Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×