Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: September 2011

20 - Judges and non-judicial functions in Australia

from Part V

Summary

Judges in Australia are not confined to the performance of judicial functions only. As judges at federal and state levels are held in very high regard by the general public, governments at both levels have from time to time sought to have judges perform non-judicial functions.

Australian judges have engaged in a broad spectrum of non-judicial or extra-judicial activities.There have been a few historical instances of judges accepting ambassadorial appointments. A Justice of the High Court of Australia, Sir Owen Dixon, served as Ambassador to the United States; Chief Justice John Latham was Minister Plenipotentiary in Japan; and Justice Fox of the Federal Court served as Ambassador of Australia for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Safeguards. The Director of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) was at one stage a federal judge; likewise the Chair of the National Crime Authority. Federal judges have been appointed as President or Deputy President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), a tribunal performing ‘administrative’ functions. Judges have been entrusted with the non-judicial function of authorising warrants for the interception of communications, and more recently with the issuance of detention and questioning orders in relation to terrorism investigations. The use of judges, federal and state, in conducting royal commissions and other inquiries ‘has been a settled feature of Australian public life during the whole history’ of Australia. Judges have been appointed to perform such a role mainly because of their special qualities: ‘training and skill to gather facts, identify those which are relevant, assess the honesty of evidence, evaluate competing arguments, act with sensitivity and neutrality in unravelling controversial issues and present an impartial report evidencing legal accuracy and dispassion’.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Campbell, E.Lee, H. P.The Australian JudiciaryMelbourneCambridge University Press 2001 166
Wheeler, F.Federal Judges as Holders of Non-judicial OfficeOpeskin, B.Wheeler, F.The Australian Federal Judicial SystemMelbourne University Press 2000 442
Brennan, G.Limits on the Use of Judges 1978 9 Federal Law Review1
Connor, S. D.The Use of Judges in Non-Judicial Roles 1978 52 Australian Law Journal482
Winterton, G.Judges as Royal Commissioners 1987 10 University of New South Wales Law Journal108
French, R. S.Executive Toys: Judges and Non-judicial Functions 2009 19 Journal of Judicial Administration5
Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts 1921 29 257
Boilermakers’ 1956 94 278
Meyerson, D.Using Judges to Manage Risk: The Case of v. 2000 36 Federal Law Review209
Boilermakers 1956 94 281
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 27
Thomas 2007 355
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 36
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 36
Winterton, G.The Separation of Judicial Power as an Implied Bill of RightsLindell, G.Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Leslie ZinesSydneyFederation Press 1994 185
Brennan, DeaneDawson, JJthe involuntary detention of a citizen in custody by the State . . . under our system of government, exists only as an incident of the exclusively judicial function of adjudging and punishing criminal guiltChu Kheng Lim 1992 176 27
Fardon 2004 223 611
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 28
Brennan, DeaneDawson, JJThomas 2007 233 330
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 28
Fardon 2004 223 613
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 28
Chu Kheng Lim 1992 176 19
Thomas 2007 233 330
Thomas 2007 233 329
Thomas 2007 233 326
Thomas 2007 233 345
Kable 1996 189 96
Mistretta 488 1989 407
Wilson 1996 189 14
Grollo 1995 184 364
Wilson 1996 189 15
Mason, A.A New Perspective on Separation of Powers 1996 82 Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration5
Campbell, C.An Examination of the Doctrine of Persona Designata in Australian Law 2000 7 Australian Journal of Administrative Law120
Grollo 1995 184 365
Campbell, E.Royal Commissions, Parliamentary Privilege and Cabinet Confidentiality 1999 29 University of Western Australia Law Review241
Prasser, S.Royal Commissions in Australia: When Should Governments Appoint Them 2006 65 Australian Journal of Public Administration34
Wilson 1996 189 16
Wilson 1996 189 17
Hilton 1985 157 81
Grollo 1995 184 383
Wilson 1996 189 49
Wilson 1996 189 49
Joseph, S.Castan, M.Federal Constitutional Law: A Contemporary ViewSydneyLawbook Co 2010 205
Grollo 1995 184 367
Grollo 1995 184 395
Grollo 1995 184 379
Carne, G.Detaining Questions or Compromising Constitutionality?: The ASIO Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth) 2004 27 University of New South Wales Law Journal524
Kable 1996 189 116
Lee, H. P.The Case: A Guard-Dog that Barked But OnceWinterton, G.State Constitutional LandmarksSydneyFederation Press 2006 390
Kable 1996 189 124
Kable 1996 189 108
Kable 1996 189 133
Kable 1996 189 96
Fardon 2004 223 618
Kable 1996 189 104
Guide to Judicial ConductCouncil of Chief Justices of Australia by the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated 2007