Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: December 2010

10 - The Case for Judicial Review

Summary

Scholars who write about public justification and deliberative democracy usually have little to say about judicial review. This neglect may be due to their preoccupation with citizenship. Rather than putting institutions front and center, as many empirical political scientists do, they write about how ordinary people must think and behave in certain ways when they participate in politics. There is nothing wrong with this focus, and those who hope that Americans politics can become more principled and more deliberative have come up with some ingenious plans for adapting the “ideal of face-to-face democracy to the large nation-state.” As I see it, the prominence of the judiciary in our contemporary politics also merits an account of the proper relationship between judicial decision making and the ideal of public deliberation that deliberative democrats envision. Any theory of deliberative democracy that is premised on the notion that citizens are supposed to deliberate in the public sphere cannot pretend that courts do not exist and overlook the fact that most Americans continue to put their faith in them.

According to many accounts, the framers were republicans who rejected more populist forms of democracy and believed that the wisest men should exercise political power subject to institutional checks and balances. That sounds unacceptably elitist to contemporary democratic ears, and few of us today would be comfortable with the notion that our elected representatives should feel free to ignore public opinion because they are more virtuous, more disinterested, more intelligent, or more knowledgeable than the people.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)
Fishkin, James S., The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995), 5
Macedo, Stephen, The New Right v. the Constitution (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1987), 42
Breyer, Stephen, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005)
Sunstein, Cass R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 7
Graglia, Lino A., “Constitutional Law without the Constitution: The Supreme Court's Remaking of America,” in A Country I Do Not Recognize: The Legal Assault on American Values, ed. Bork, Robert H. (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2005), 11
Meese, Edwin III, “Interpreting the Constitution,” in Interpreting the Constitution: The Debate over Original Intent, ed. Rakove, Jack N. (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990), 13
Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980)
Freeman, Samuel, “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review,” 9 Law and Philosophy (1990–1991), 327
Perry, Michael J., The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), 91–145
Brest, Paul, “The Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding,” 60 Boston University Law Review (1988), 238
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Interpreting the Constitution (New York: Praeger Books, 1987), 191
Nelson, William E., Marbury v. Madison: The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000), 1–2
Fisher, Louis, Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 48
Griffin, Stephen M., American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), 91
Schwartz, Bernard, A History of the Supreme Court (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 12
Brest, Paul, “The Fundamental Rights Controversy: The Essential Contradictions of Normative Constitutional Scholarship,” 90 Yale Law Journal (1981), 1106
Madison, James, The Federalist No. 10 (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000), 54–7
Tulis, Jeffrey K., The Rhetorical Presidency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 38–9, 176–7
Walzer, Michael, “Philosophy and Democracy,” 9 Political Theory (1981), 379–99
Bessette, Joseph, The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 3
Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957), 36–50, 207–76
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), li–lii
Solum, Lawrence, “Constructing an Idea of Public Reason,” 30 San Diego Law Review (1993), 752
Greenawalt, Kent, Private Consciences and Public Reasons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 138
Greenawalt, Kent, “On Public Reason,” 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 678
Tribe, Laurence H., Constitutional Choices (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), vii
Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)
Mikva, Abner, “How Well Does Congress Support and Defend the Constitution?61 North Carolina Law Review (1983), 587
Kramer, Larry D., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)
Sunstein, Cass R., The Partial Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)
Bronner, Ethan, Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America (New York: Anchor Books, 1989), 123
Schwartz, Bernard, Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court – A Judicial Biography (New York: New York University Press, 1983), 2
Eisler, Kim Isaac, The Last Liberal: Justice William J. Brennan Jr. and the Decisions that Transformed America (Washington, D.C.: Beard Books, 2005), 84, 89
Posner, Richard A., The Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 6
Fehrenbacher, Don E., The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978)
Rosenberg, Gerald, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)
Klarman, Michael J., Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), x
Bell, Derrick, “Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma,” 93 Harvard Law Review (1980), 518
Smith, Rogers M., Liberalism and American Constitutional Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 4
Shklar, Judith, American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 3
Wattenberg, Martin P., The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections in the 1980s (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)
Converse, Philip E., “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes,” Public Opinion Quarterly (Winter 1962), 581–2
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E., The American Voter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), 256–65
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N., Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954)
Sunstein, Cass. R., Republic.com (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 58–89
Lippmann, Walter, Public Opinion (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1922)
Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1942)
Mill, John Stuart, Considerations of Representative Government, ed. Acton, H. B. (London: Dent, 1951), 324
Soltan, Karol Edward, “Introduction: Civic Competence, Democracy, and the Good Society,” in Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, ed. Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999), 4
Converse, Philip E., “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David (New York: Free Press, 1964), 243–5
Converse, Philip E., “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Tufte, Edward R. (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1970), 168–89
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R., The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), 34
Carpini, Michael X. Delli and Keeter, Scott, What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996)
Schauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 26
Balkin, Jack M., “Preface,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (New York: New York University Press, 2007), xii
Cohen, Joshua, “A More Democratic Liberalism,” 92 Michigan Law Review (1994), 1503
Schauer, Frederick, “Giving Reasons,” 47 Stanford Law Review (1995), 636
Roosevelt, Kermit, The Myth of Judicial Activism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008), 3
Macedo, Stephen, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 162
Barber, Sotirios A. and Fleming, James E., Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 148
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 33
Waldron, Jeremy J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 1
Waldron, Jeremy J., “Legislation,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 246
Schauer, Frederick, “Giving Reasons,” 47 Stanford Law Review (1995), 636–7