The Case for Judicial Review

Ronald C. Den Otter

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809507.011

10 - The Case for Judicial Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2010

Ronald C. Den Otter

Show author details

Ronald C. Den Otter: Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Scholars who write about public justification and deliberative democracy usually have little to say about judicial review. This neglect may be due to their preoccupation with citizenship. Rather than putting institutions front and center, as many empirical political scientists do, they write about how ordinary people must think and behave in certain ways when they participate in politics. There is nothing wrong with this focus, and those who hope that Americans politics can become more principled and more deliberative have come up with some ingenious plans for adapting the “ideal of face-to-face democracy to the large nation-state.” As I see it, the prominence of the judiciary in our contemporary politics also merits an account of the proper relationship between judicial decision making and the ideal of public deliberation that deliberative democrats envision. Any theory of deliberative democracy that is premised on the notion that citizens are supposed to deliberate in the public sphere cannot pretend that courts do not exist and overlook the fact that most Americans continue to put their faith in them.

According to many accounts, the framers were republicans who rejected more populist forms of democracy and believed that the wisest men should exercise political power subject to institutional checks and balances. That sounds unacceptably elitist to contemporary democratic ears, and few of us today would be comfortable with the notion that our elected representatives should feel free to ignore public opinion because they are more virtuous, more disinterested, more intelligent, or more knowledgeable than the people.

Type: Chapter
Information: Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism , pp. 291 - 315

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S., The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995), 5Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen, The New Right v. the Constitution (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1987), 42Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005)Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 7Google Scholar

Graglia, Lino A., “Constitutional Law without the Constitution: The Supreme Court's Remaking of America,” in A Country I Do Not Recognize: The Legal Assault on American Values, ed. Bork, Robert H. (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2005), 11Google Scholar

Meese, Edwin III, “Interpreting the Constitution,” in Interpreting the Constitution: The Debate over Original Intent, ed. Rakove, Jack N. (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990), 13Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel, “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review,” 9 Law and Philosophy (1990–1991), 327CrossRef Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J., The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), 91–145Google Scholar

Brest, Paul, “The Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding,” 60 Boston University Law Review (1988), 238Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Interpreting the Constitution (New York: Praeger Books, 1987), 191Google Scholar

Nelson, William E., Marbury v. Madison: The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000), 1–2Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis, Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 48Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M., American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), 91Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard, A History of the Supreme Court (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 12Google Scholar

Brest, Paul, “The Fundamental Rights Controversy: The Essential Contradictions of Normative Constitutional Scholarship,” 90 Yale Law Journal (1981), 1106CrossRef Google Scholar

Madison, James, The Federalist No. 10 (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000), 54–7Google Scholar

Tulis, Jeffrey K., The Rhetorical Presidency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 38–9, 176–7Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, “Philosophy and Democracy,” 9 Political Theory (1981), 379–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Bessette, Joseph, The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 3Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957), 36–50, 207–76Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), li–liiGoogle Scholar

Solum, Lawrence, “Constructing an Idea of Public Reason,” 30 San Diego Law Review (1993), 752Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent, Private Consciences and Public Reasons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 138CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent, “On Public Reason,” 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 678Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., Constitutional Choices (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), viiGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Mikva, Abner, “How Well Does Congress Support and Defend the Constitution?” 61 North Carolina Law Review (1983), 587Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry D., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., The Partial Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Bronner, Ethan, Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America (New York: Anchor Books, 1989), 123Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard, Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court – A Judicial Biography (New York: New York University Press, 1983), 2Google Scholar

Eisler, Kim Isaac, The Last Liberal: Justice William J. Brennan Jr. and the Decisions that Transformed America (Washington, D.C.: Beard Books, 2005), 84, 89Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., The Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 6Google Scholar

Fehrenbacher, Don E., The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Klarman, Michael J., Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), xGoogle Scholar

Bell, Derrick, “Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma,” 93 Harvard Law Review (1980), 518CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M., Liberalism and American Constitutional Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 4Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith, American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 3Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P., The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections in the 1980s (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E., “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes,” Public Opinion Quarterly (Winter 1962), 581–2Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E., The American Voter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), 256–65Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N., Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954)Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. R., Republic.com (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 58–89Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter, Public Opinion (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1922)Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1942)Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, Considerations of Representative Government, ed. Acton, H. B. (London: Dent, 1951), 324Google Scholar

Soltan, Karol Edward, “Introduction: Civic Competence, Democracy, and the Good Society,” in Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, ed. Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999), 4Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E., “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David (New York: Free Press, 1964), 243–5Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E., “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Tufte, Edward R. (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1970), 168–89Google Scholar

Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R., The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), 34Google Scholar

Carpini, Michael X. Delli and Keeter, Scott, What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 26Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack M., “Preface,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (New York: New York University Press, 2007), xiiGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, “A More Democratic Liberalism,” 92 Michigan Law Review (1994), 1503CrossRef Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, “Giving Reasons,” 47 Stanford Law Review (1995), 636CrossRef Google Scholar

Roosevelt, Kermit, The Myth of Judicial Activism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008), 3Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 162Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A. and Fleming, James E., Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 148CrossRef Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 33Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy J., “Legislation,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 246Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, “Giving Reasons,” 47 Stanford Law Review (1995), 636–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

10 - The Case for Judicial Review

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive