Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:27:37.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - More realistic universe models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

Peter Coles
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
George Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access

Summary

Underlying what has been said above are some theoretical issues that remain unresolved, despite their importance for understanding the geometry of realistic universe models. The central feature is that the models on which the analysis above is based are the standard homogeneous and isotropic Friedman–Robertson–Walker (FRW) universe models; but the actual universe – from which our observations derive – is in fact inhomogeneous on small and intermediate scales.

Lumpy universe models

A series of related problems arise. The first point is that most methods of estimating Ω0 cannot determine the background model without simultaneously solving for its perturbations (for example, estimating velocity flows; calculating lensing effects; considering the effects of inhomogeneities on the CMB; and so on). Furthermore, there is a feedback from these inhomogeneities to the background model dynamics (and so to the equations whereby one estimates Ω0). But that raises the issue of gauge freedom in describing such perturbations, and how one chooses the background model when faced with a ‘lumpy’ real universe, which is the second main point.

The gauge issue has been intensively studied in recent years by Bardeen (1980), Ellis & Bruni (1989) and many others; see, e.g., Bruni, Dunsby & Ellis (1992) for a summary and references. The question here relates to the task of finding a description of inhomogeneities that does not depend on the way the background model is mapped to the real universe. The converse problem of the optimal way to fit a background FRW model to the real lumpy universe (Ellis & Stoeger 1987) has been the subject of much less thought.

Type
Chapter
Information
Is the Universe Open or Closed?
The Density of Matter in the Universe
, pp. 181 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×