ON the first opening of Oxford, BodL, MS Digby 86 as it is currently bound, the first coloured capital is backwards. The initial S is drawn in the same ink as the text, with red infill and a flourish in the top corner. It has been drawn back-tofront, with the upper curve starting in the top left and the spine running diagonally right to left. The apparent error on this folio prompts several questions. How did such a reversal happen? What decorative practices or design considerations caused it? And, as a corollary of this, what does such an elementary mistake suggest about the competency, training, skills or objectives of the scribe?

In attempting to answer these questions, it would be prudent first to confirm the identity of the person responsible for producing the initials and rubrication in Digby 86. Previous scholarship has suggested that the same person who decorated the manuscript was responsible for the majority of the writing – the scribe identified by Judith Tschann and Malcolm Parkes as Scribe A (termed here the ‘Digby scribe’). This ascription is probably correct; however, the evidence for it is rarely unpacked. In part, this evidence is material. The coloured capitals in Digby are usually filled in red or brown and sometimes a combination of the two. The same combination of red and brown inks is used in the marginal illustrations. By sight, it is possible to identify four different shades at various points in the manuscript: a pale brown, a dark brown, a watery orange-red and a thicker pink-red. In some sections, the colour of the line work and brown capitals appears to be the same as the ink used for the text. Similarly, the shade of red used for the capitals sometimes matches that used for titles and other rubrication. For example, the A that begins the Anglo- Norman verse Life of Saint Nicholas seems to have been drawn in the same ink as the text's title (‘Les miracles de seint nicholas’; fol. 150r), while initials several folios later seem to match the colour used to highlight the litterae notabiliores (fol. 152r). Palaeographic analysis suggests that the handwriting of these rubricated elements is the same leftward-sloping, late thirteenth-century anglicana of the main scribe.