Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T04:23:34.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 9 - Crystal Vases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2021

Get access

Summary

‘Murray’ is a company that manufactures crystal vases. It has entered into a contract with ‘OnTrack’, an operator of cargo transportation by container freight trains. Clause 4 of their contract provides that Murray will be responsible for delivering its goods to ‘Distribution Warehouse 10, at the local freight train station.’ Murray delivers a consignment of goods to Distribution Warehouse 10. OnTrack refuses to ship them, however, explaining that delivery at a freight train terminal means delivery up to the actual container terminal. There the goods will be loaded into the appropriate containers. In fact, Murray delivered the goods to the entrance of the Distribution Warehouse, which is at least 800 metres away from the actual container terminal. The nature of the goods in question makes carriage of them, even over short distances, a complex task. Murray disputes OnTrack's view. It argues that Clause 4 of the contract is very clear on the issue of where the goods were to be delivered. It raises an action against OnTrack for breach of contract. OnTrack contests this action. It argues that Clause 4 must be read in light of the fact that it is a local custom of trade that goods are delivered up to the container terminal.

Assume that there is indeed, as OnTrack argues, a local custom of trade that goods are delivered by the manufacturers to the container terminal. How much weight is the court likely to give to this local custom of trade in interpreting Clause 4?

KEY ISSUES

This case maintains the focus on transport contracts which was seen in Case 8. The context is again the sale of goods, and the dispute concerns the interpretation of contractual clauses governing the way in which goods are to be delivered by the manufacturer to the cargo transportation company. The parties have differing interpretations of the terms of the contract which govern the location where goods are to be placed before collection by the cargo transportation company. This time there is a local custom of trade that goods should be delivered to a certain location.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×