Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T17:04:10.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jon Elster
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
John E. Roemer
Affiliation:
University of California
Jon Elster
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

In 1987 and 1988 we organized two conferences, one at the University of California (Davis) and one at the University of Chicago, to study the problem of interpersonal comparisons of well-being. We enlisted philosophers, economists, political scientists, and psychologists in the hope that an interdisciplinary approach would help to make some progress on a notoriously intractable issue. The chapters in this book do not yield a complete solution to the problem. We believe, however, that they make us understand better what would count as a solution. Also, they illustrate a number of approaches to the practical task of comparing the well-being – welfare, utility, standard of living – of different people.

We may distinguish among four main problems that arise in this context. First, what do we mean by well-being? Second, is a comparison of the well-being of different people at all meaningful? Third, can such comparisons actually be carried out, precisely or at least approximately, routinely or at least under ideal conditions? Last, how does the purpose for which the comparison is carried out affect the answer to the first three questions? The topic of the chapters in this book is, “How to construct a notion of well-being that is (1) interpersonally comparable, and (2) adequate for purposes of distributive justice.” Whenever the contributors object to a particular concept of wellbeing, it is rarely on the grounds that comparisons of well-being in this sense are devoid of meaning, but rather that the concept itself is inappropriate or that it is inappropriately operationalized, given the normative purposes it is to serve.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×