Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:20:59.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Internet and Democratic Citizenship
Theory, Practice and Policy
, pp. 199 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. (2004) Deliberation Day, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Agar, J. (2004) The Government Machine: A Revolutionary History of the Computer, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Akkerman, T., Hajer, M. and Grin, J. (2005) ‘The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?’, Political Studies, 52(1): 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, S. (2006) ‘Whose Voice Is Heard in Online Deliberation? A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet’, Information, Communication & Society, 9(1): 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (2003) Lost Geographies of Power, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, A. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amna, E., Munck, I. and Zetterberg, P. (2004) ‘Meaningful Participation? Political Efficacy of Adolescents in 24 Countries’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Uppsala, Sweden.
Angell, I. (2000) The New Barbarian Manifesto: How to Survive the Information Age, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1970) On Violence, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1998) The Human Condition, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1978) ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, Philosophia, 7(2): 223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, J. (2006) ‘Labour's Young MPs Want to Do Politics Differently’, Guardian, 4 September.Google Scholar
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. and McBurney, P. (2006) ‘Computational Representation of Practical Argument’, Synthese, 152(2): 157–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, J. and Stark, D. (2004) ‘Link, Search, Interact: The Co-evolution of NGOs and Interactive Technology’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21(3): 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P. (1967) The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. and McConville, M. (1979) Jury Trials, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (2002) Politics and the Other Scene, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barabas, J. (2004) ‘Virtual Deliberation: Knowledge from Online Interaction versus Ordinary Discussion’ in Shane, P. (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet, New York: Routledge, 239–52.Google Scholar
Barbalet, J. (1988) Citizenship: Rights, Struggle and Class Inequality, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, London: Taylor & Francis.
Bauman, Z. (1999) In Search of Politics, Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Baym, N. (2000) Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
,BBC (2004) Building Public Value: Renewing the BBC for a Digital World, London: BBC.Google Scholar
Beck, P. (1991) ‘Voters’ Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest', Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3): 371–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. and Slaton, C. (2000) The Future of Teledemocracy, Westport, CT:Praeger.Google Scholar
Beniger, J. (1986) The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2000) ‘From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation toward Sustainable Commons and User Access’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 53(3): 561–80.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2003a) ‘New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism’ in Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (eds.) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 17–37.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2003b) ‘Communicating Global Activism’, Information, Communication & Society, 6(2): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2007) ‘Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age’ in Bennett, W. L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. and Entman, R. (2001) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. and Manheim, J. B. (2001) ‘The Big Spin: Strategic Communication and the Transformation of Pluralist Democracy’ in Bennett and Entman (2001), 279–98.
Bhabba, H. (2004) The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1995) Banal Nationalism, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bimber, B. (2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, E. and Wagner, G. (1997) ‘Sport as a Common Property Resource: A Solution to the Dilemmas of Doping’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6): 749–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainey, G. (1968) The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia's History, Melbourne: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, R. (1999) ‘The Tyranny of the Visible: Problems in the Evaluation of Anti-Institutional Radicalism’, Organization, 6(1): 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, R. (2002) ‘Engineering Democracy’, Political Studies, 50(1): 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumler, J. G. (1990) ‘Elections, the Media and the Modern Publicity Process’ in Ferguson, M. (ed.) Public Communication: The New Imperatives – Future Directions for Media Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 101–13.Google Scholar
Blumler, J. G. (1998) ‘Wrestling with the Public Interest in Organized Communications’ in Brants, K., Hermes, J. and Zoonen, L. (eds.) The Media in Question: Popular Cultures and Public Interests, London: Sage, 51–63.Google Scholar
Blumler, J. G. (1999) ‘The Third Age of Political Communication’, Journal of Public Affairs, 1(3): 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumler, J. G. and Coleman, S. (2001) Realising Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace, London: Institute of Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (2002a) ‘The New Media and Our Political Communication Discontents: Democratizing Cyberspace’, Information, Communication & Society, 4(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (2002b) ‘Public Service in Transition? Campaign Journalism at the BBC’ in Bartle, J., Atkinson, S. and Mortimore, R. (eds.) Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 2001, London: Frank Cass, 215–35.Google Scholar
Blumler, J. and Kavanagh, D. (1999) ‘The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features’, Political Communication, 16(3): 209–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boal, I. (1998) ‘The Campus and the Commons’, Common Property Resource Digest, 46: 1–4.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (2004) ‘Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy’, Sociological Review, 52(1): 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bora, A., Furchner, I., Hausendorf, H. and Munte, P. (2001) ‘State of the Art Report: Currents of Thought on the Main Issues of the PARADYS Project’, IWT, Bielefeld University.
Born, G. (2004) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC, London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Born, G. (2005) ‘Digitising Democracy’, Political Quarterly, 76(1): 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourriaud, N. (2002) Relational Aesthetics, Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
Bowker, N. and Tuffin, K. (2002) ‘Disability Discourses for Online Identities’, Disability & Society, 17(3): 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J. (2003) ‘Popular Attitudes towards Direct Democracy’, paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Philadelphia.
Brants, K. (1998) ‘Who's Afraid of Infotainment?’, European Journal of Communication, 13(3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. (1998) ‘Free Riders or Easy Riders? An Examination of the Voluntary Provision of Public Radio’, Public Choice, 97(4): 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, A. (2006) Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2007a) ‘Produsage, Generation C, and Their Effects on the Democratic Process’ in Proceedings Media in Transition 5, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2007b) ‘Methodologies for Mapping the Political Blogosphere: An Exploration Using the IssueCrawler Research Tool’, First Monday, 12(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham-Shum, S. (2003) The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, G., Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (1871) The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 4th edition, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1997) The British General Election of 1997, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (2002) The British General Election of 2001, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
,Cabinet Office (UK) (2002) In the Service of Democracy, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Cammaerts, B. (2007) ‘Jamming the Political: Beyond Counter-hegemonic Practices’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (2005) How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, J., Price, V. and Nir, L. (2002) ‘Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000’, Political Communication, 19(1): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, D. and Atkinson, K. (2008) ‘Political Engagement through Tools for Argumentation’ in Hunter, A. (ed.) Computational Models of Argument, Proceedings of COMMA '08, Toulouse, France, 28–30 May.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. I), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2007) ‘Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity’, Political Communication, 24(3): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, M. and Mulvenon, J. (2002) You've Got Dissent! Chinese Dissident Use of the Internet Beijing's Counter-Strategies, Washington: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Citrine, W. (1952) ABC of Chairmanship, London: NCLC Publications Society.Google Scholar
Cleaver, H. (1998) ‘The Zapatista Effect: The Internet and the Rise of an Alternative Political Fabric’, Journal of International Affairs, 26(2): 621–40.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2004) ‘From Service to Commons: Re-inventing a Space for Public Communication’ in Tambini, D. and Cowling, J. (eds.) Public Service Communications, London: IPPR.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2005a) ‘The Lonely Citizen: Indirect Representation in an Age of Networks’, Political Communication, 22(2): 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S. (2005b) E-democracy from the Ground Up: An Evaluation of Projects in the National Project for Local E-Democracy, London: National Project for Local eDemocracy.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2006) ‘Whose Conversation: Engaging the Public in Authentic Polylogue’, Political Quarterly, 75(2): 112–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S. (2007a) ‘Doing IT for Themselves: Management versus Autonomy in Youth E-Citizenship’ in Bennett, W. L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 189–206.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2007b) ‘How The Other Half Votes: Big Brother Viewers and the 2005 British General Election Campaign’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(4): 457–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S. (2007c) ‘E-Democracy: The History and Future of an Idea’ in Quah, D., Silverstone, R., Mansell, R. and Avgerou, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 362–82.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2007d) ‘From Big Brother to Big Brother: Two Faces of Interactive Engagement’ in Dahlgren, P. (ed.) Young Citizens and New Media: Learning for Democratic Participation, New York: Routledge, 165–82.Google Scholar
Coleman, S., Morrison, D. and Svennevig, M. (2008) ‘New Media and Political Efficacy’, International Journal of Communication, in press.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. and Moss, G. (2008) ‘Governing at a Distance: Politicians in the Blogosphere’, Information Polity, 13(1/2): 7–20.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. and Ross, K. (2009) Them and Us: How the Media Frame the Public, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. and Spiller, J. (2005) ‘Exploring New Media Effects on Representative Democracy’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(3): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Congress Online (2001a) ‘E-mail Overload in Congress: Managing a Communication Crisis’, downloaded from http://www.cmfweb.org/storage/cmfweb/documents/CMF_Pubs/e-mailoverload.pdf.
,Congress Online (2001b) ‘Constituents and Your Web Site: What Citizens Want to See on Congressional Web Sites’, downloaded from http://www.cmfweb.org/storage/cmfweb/documents/CMF_Pubs/constituentsandwebsites.pdf.
Connolly, W. (1974) The Terms of Political Discourse, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Cook, R. (2002) Speech to yougov conference, Reviving Democracy, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London, 10 April.
Coote, A. and Lenaghan, J. (1997) Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (2003) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crosby, N. (1999) ‘Using the Citizens Jury Process for Environmental Decision-Making’ in Sexton, K., Marcis, A., Easter, K. and Burkhardt, T. (eds.) Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Governments, Businesses and Communities, Washington, DC: Island Press, 401–18.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (1996) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Davis, R. (1999) The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, D., Golding, P. and Billig, M. (2001) ‘Press and Broadcasting’ in Norris, P. (ed.) Britain Votes 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 666–78.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cindio, F. and Schuler, D. (2007) ‘Deliberation and Community Networks: A Strong Link Waiting to Be Forged’ in Proceedings of CIRN Conference: Communities and Action, Prato, Italy, 5–7 November.Google Scholar
Deibert, R. (2000) ‘International Plug ‘n Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet, and Global Public Policy’, International Studies Perspectives, 1(3): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delakorda, S. (2007) ‘Internet Technology and Deliberative Democratic Constitutionalisation of the EU: Case Study of the Citizens’ Forum', paper presented at the conference The Future of the European Union: Democratic Constitutionalisation of the EU and the Role of States, Solevenia Political Science and CEPSA annual conference, Portorož, Slovenia.
Dellarocas, C. (2003) ‘The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms’, Management Science, 49(10): 1407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Department of Justice (2007) Digital Dialogues 2, London: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Derakhshan, H. (2003) Blog: Editor Myself, downloaded from http://hoder.com/weblog/archives/2003_03_01_index.html.
Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems, New York: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Diani, M. (2000) ‘Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real’, Information, Communication & Society, 3(3): 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, M., A. and Popkin, S. L. (1999) ‘Political Knowledge and Citizen Competence’ in Elkin, S. and Soltan, K. (eds.) Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 117–46.Google Scholar
Dionne, E. (1991) Why Americans Hate Politics, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Donath, J. (2002) ‘A Semantic Approach to Visualizing Online Conversations’, Communications of the ACM, 45(4): 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, J. (2003) ‘The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition’ in Couldry, N. and Curran, J. (eds.) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 243–55.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. and List, C. (2003) ‘Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, W. (1996) ‘Network Rules of Order: Regulating Speech in Public Electronic Fora’, New Media & Society, 18(2): 269–90.Google Scholar
Dutton, W. (2007) ‘Through the Network (of Networks) – the Fifth Estate’, inaugural lecture, University of Oxford, 15 October, downloaded from http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/dutton/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/5th-estate-lecture-text.pdf.
Dutton, W., Elberse, A. and Hale, M. (1999) ‘A Case Study of a Netizen's Guide to Elections’, Communications of the ACM, 42(12): 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebo, B. (1998) Cyberghetto or Cybertopia: Race, Class and Gender on the Internet, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2004) ‘The Moderator in Government-Initiated Internet Discussions: Facilitator or Source of Bias?’ in Malkia, M., Anttiroiko, A. and Savolainen, R. (eds.) eTransformation in Governance: New Directions in Government and Politics, Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 150–63.Google Scholar
Eisinger, P. (1973) ‘The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities’, American Political Science Review, 67(1): 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Electoral Commission (2001) Public Opinion and the 2001 General Election, London: Electoral Commission.Google Scholar
,Electoral Commission (2007a) Audit of Political Engagement, London: Electoral Commission.Google Scholar
,Electoral Commission (2007b) Electronic Voting, London: Electoral Commission.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, N. (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1997) ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’ in Elster, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 103–32.Google Scholar
Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. and Miller, A. (1980) ‘Front-page news and real-world cues: a new look at agenda-setting by the media’, American Journal of Political Science, 24: 16–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, F., Reinemann, C. and Fan, D. (2000) ‘Spin Doctoring in British and German Election Campaigns’, European Journal of Communication, 15(2): 209–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1992) Teledemocracy. The Atlantic (October), 34–39.
Fairclough, N. (1998) ‘Democracy and the Public Sphere in Critical Research on Discourse’, unpublished paper given at conference Discourse, Politics and Identity in Europe, Vienna, April.
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1997) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. and Luskin, R. (2005) ‘Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion’, Acta Politica, 40(3): 284–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourniau, J. (2001) ‘Information, Access to Decision-Making and Public Debate in France: The Growing Demand for Deliberative Democracy’, Science and Public Policy, 28(6): 441–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2007) ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Postwestphalian World’, Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, S. (2005) ‘Web-Enabled Strategic GDSS, e-Democracy and Arrow's Theorem: A Bayesian Perspective’, Decision Support Systems, 43(4): 1476–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W. (1992) Talking Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garbe, D. (1986) ‘Planning Cell and Citizen Report: A Report on German Experiences with New Participation Instruments’, European Journal of Political Research, 14(1/2): 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, T. (2005) ‘What's Good on Television?’, Political Quarterly, 76(1): 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, N. and Sanders, D. (1997) ‘The Economy and Voting’, Parliamentary Affairs, 50: 631–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., Ward, S. and Nixon, P. (eds.) (2003) Net Gain? Political Parties and the Impact of the New Information Communication Technologies, London: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives, London: Profile.Google Scholar
Goddard, P., Scammell, M. and Semetko, H. (1998) ‘Too Much of a Good Thing: Television in the 1997 Election Campaign’ in Crewe, I., Gosschalk, B. and Bartle, J. (eds.) Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1997, London: Frank Cass, 49–68.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963) Behavior in Public Places, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goggin, G. and Newell, C. (2003) Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gold, H. (2002) ‘Third-Party Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: A Study of Angus King of Maine and Jesse Ventura of Minnesota’, Polity, 35(2): 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. (2003) Reflective Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, A. (1994) Speech to the International Telecommunications Union, downloaded from http://vlib.iue.it/history/internet/algorespeech.html.
Goss, S. (1999) Managing Working with the Public, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Gould, P. (2002) ‘Power to the People’, The Spectator, 18 May.Google Scholar
Graber, D. (1998) ‘Whither Televised Election News? Lessons from the 1996 Campaign’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3: 112–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M. and Khosravi, S. (2002) ‘Reordering Public and Private in Iranian Cyberspace: Identity, Politics, and Mobilization’, Identities: Global Studies in Power and Culture, 9(2): 219–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, T. and Witschge, T. (2003) ‘In Search of Online Deliberation: Towards a New Method for Discussing the Quality of Online Discussions’, Communications: the European Journal of Communication Research, 28(2): 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R., Fischoff, B. and McDaniels, T. (2005) ‘Acceptable Input: Using Decision Analysis to Guide Public Policy Deliberations’, Decision Analysis, 2(1): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, E. (1963) Dean's Report, Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, P. (2002) ‘The Order of E-Democracy: Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments’, e-Service Journal, 2(1): 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, T. (2005) ‘From “Public Journalism” to the “Public's Journalism”? Rhetoric and Reality in the Discourse on Weblogs’, Journalism Studies, 6(3): 387–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hain, P. (2003) Transcript of speech to Parliamentary Press Gallery, 16 September.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. (2003) ‘Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void’, Policy Sciences, 36(2): 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, D. (1992) ‘Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968–1988’, Journal of Communication, 42(2): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Hansard Society (2001) None of the Above: Non-Voters and the 2001 Election, London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. (2001) ‘Politics on the Air’ in Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (eds.) The British General Election of 2001, London: Palgrave, 652–58.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Healy, R. (1994) ‘The “Common Pool” Problem in Tourism Landscapes’, Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3): 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heater, D. (2004) Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics, and Education, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1979) A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Heller, F. (2003) ‘Participation and Power: A Critical Assessment’, Applied Psychology, 52(1): 144–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, M. and Moor, A. (2003) ‘From Habermas's Communicative Theory to Practice on the Internet’, Information Systems Journal, 13(4): 331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, S. (1995) Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (2003) ‘Gender and Power in Online Communication’ in Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Blackwell, 202–28.Google Scholar
Hertsgaard, M. (1988) On Bended Knee: The Press and the Reagan Presidency, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Hess, C. (1999) ‘A Comprehensive Bibliography of Common Pool Resources’, CD-ROM, Bloomington: Indiana University, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.
Hill, K. and Hughes, J. (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hill, M. (1993) The Policy Process: A Reader, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ho, Ho Yeon (2004). Speech to World Association of Newspapers Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 31 May.
Honig, B. (2001) Democracy and the Foreigner, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrigan, J., Garrett, G. and Resnick, P. (2001) ‘The Internet and Democratic Debate: Pew Research Center’, downloaded from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Political_Info_Report.pdf.
,House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2001a) Sixth Report, in Public Participation: Issues and Innovations, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
,House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2001b) Minutes of Evidence and Appendices to the Sixth Report of the House of Commons Public Administration Committee, in Public Participation: Issues and Innovations, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. and Sprague, J. (1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Isin, E. (2002) Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ito, M. (2003) ‘Weblogs and Emergent Democracy’, downloaded from http://joi.ito.com/static/emergentdemocracy.html.
Jamieson, K. (1992) Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jankowski, N. and Os, R. (2002) ‘Internet-Based Political Discourse: A Case Study of Electronic Democracy in the City of Hoogeveen’, paper presented at the conference Prospects for Electronic Democracy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 20–22 September, downloaded from http://insitesinfo.org/Paper/jankowski.pdf.
Jankowski, N. and Selm, M. (2000) ‘The Promise and Practice of Public Debate in Cyberspace’ in Hacker, K. and Dijk, J. (eds.) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Janssen, J. and Kies, R. (2005) ‘Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy’, Acta Politica, 40(3): 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. (2000) ‘Governance Failure’ in Stoker, G. (ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, London: St. Martin's Press, 11–32.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. and Kaye, B. (1998) ‘A Vehicle for Engagement or a Haven for the Disaffected: Internet Use, Political Alienation and Voter Participation’ in Johnson, T., Hays, C. and Hays, S. (eds.) Engaging the Public: How Government and the Media Can Reinvigorate American Democracy, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 123–35.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2002) The Control Freaks: How New Labour Gets Its Own Way, London: Politico's Publishing.Google Scholar
Jordan, G. (1990) ‘Policy Community Realism versus ‘New’ Institutionalist Ambiguity’, Political Studies, 38(3): 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. (2007) ‘Online Direct Action: Hacktivism and Radical Democracy’ in Dahlberg, L. and Siapera, E. (eds.) Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 73–88.Google Scholar
Juris, J. (2005) ‘The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within Anti-Corporate Globalization Movements’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1): 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R. and Kellner, D. (2004) ‘New Media and Internet Activism: From the “Battle of Seattle” to Blogging’, New Media & Society, 6: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalathil, S. and Boas, T. (2006) Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Kalven, H. (1964) The Dignity of the Civil Jury, Cambridge, MA: Roscoe Pound.Google Scholar
Kalven, H. and Zeisel, H. (1971) The American Jury, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Katz, E. (1996) ‘Viewers Work’ in Hay, J., Grossberg, L. and Wartella, E. (eds.) The Audience and Its Landscape, Boulder: Westview Press, 9–21.Google Scholar
Kavada, N. (2005) ‘Exploring the Role of the Internet in the Movement for Alternative Globalization: The Case of the Paris 2003 European Social Forum’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, downloaded from http://www.wmin.ac.uk/mad/pdf/Kavada.pdf.
Kavanagh, D. (1995) Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaye, B. and Johnson, T. (2004) ‘Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46(1): 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, J. (1991) The Media and Democracy, London: Polity.Google Scholar
Kelly, J., Fisher, D. and Smith, M. (2005) ‘Debate, Division and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in USENET Groups’, paper presented to the Online Deliberation conference, Stanford University, downloaded from http://www.coi.columbia.edu/pdf/kelly_fisher_smith_ddd.pdf.
Kendall, K. (1993) Communication in the Presidential Primaries: Candidates and the Media, 1912–2000, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kenny, W., Swee, D., Lim, C. and Benjamin, H. (2007) ‘The Impact of Language Variety and Expertise on Perceptions of Online Political Discussions’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 76–99.Google Scholar
Kernell, S. (1997) Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. (2002) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. (2000) ‘Politicians and Interactive Decision Making: Institutional Spoilsports or Playmakers’, Public Administration, 78(2): 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. (1999) ‘Political Opportunity Structure: Some Splitting to Balance the Lumping’, Sociological Forum, 14(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, B. (2002) ‘Assessing the Potential of Internet Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach’, American Politics Research, 30(5): 476–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubey, R. (1996) ‘On Not Finding Media Effects: Conceptual Problems in the Notion of an “Active” Audience (with a reply to Elihu Katz)’ in Hay, J., Grossberg, L. and Wartella, E. (eds.) The Audience and Its Landscape, Boulder: Westview Press, 187–205.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. and Norman, W. (1994) ‘Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory’, Ethics, 104: 352–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, C. (2006) ‘Ratings Use in an Online Discussion System: The Slashdot Case’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan, downloaded from http://sambuca.umdl.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/39369.
Lane, R. (1959) Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lasn, K. (1999) Culture Jam – The Uncooling of America, New York: Eagle Brook.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. (1935) Politics: Who Gets What, When, How, New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. (2000) ‘Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News’, Political Communication, 17(2): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. (2000) Writing: The Political Test, Ames Curtis, David (trans. and ed.), Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity, New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Lichter, S. (2001) ‘A Plague on Both Parties: Substance and Fairness in TV Election News’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(3): 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liffman, L., Coleman, S. and Ward, S. (2007) ‘Only Joking? Online Humour in the 2005 UK General Election’, Information, Communication & Society, 10(4): 465–87.Google Scholar
Lin, W. and Dutton, W. (2003) ‘The “Net” Effect in Politics: The “Stop the Overlay” Campaign in Los Angeles’, Party Politics, 9(1): 124–36.Google Scholar
Lippmann, W. (1922) Public Opinion, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2005) ‘On the Relation between Audiences and Publics’ in Livingstone, S. (ed.) Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere, Bristol: Intellect Books, 17–42.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. (2005) What the Media Are Doing to Our Politics, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. (1998) The Democratic Dilemma Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mancini, C. and Buckingham-Shum, S. (2006) ‘Modelling Discourse in Contested Domains: A Semiotic and Cognitive Framework’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(11): 1154–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (1996) The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, M. and Resnick, D. (2000) Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace ‘Revolution’, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Marquand, D. (2004) Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (1998) ‘The Development of the Policy Network Approach’ in Marsh, D. (ed.) Comparing Policy Networks, Buckingham: Open University Press, 3–17.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J. and Monikhof, R. (2005) ‘Interactive Policy Development: Undermining or Sustaining Democracy?’, Public Administration, 83(1): 179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayfield, R. (2005) ‘Social Network Dynamics and Participatory Politics’ in Lebkowsky, K. and Ratcliffe, M. (ed.) Extreme Democracy, lulu.com, 154–75.
Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W. (1999) ‘Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?’, Political Communication, 16(3): 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, S. and Purves, R. (1972) By-passing the Jury: A Study of Changes of Plea and Directed Acquittals in Higher Courts, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCann, A. (2001) ‘All That Is Not Given Is Lost: Irish Traditional Music, Copyright and Common Property’, Ethnomusicology, 45(1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, M., Deshpande, S., Shah, D. and McLeod, J. (2004) ‘The Efficacy Gap and Political Participation: When Political Influence Fails to Meet Expectations’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4): 437–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. and Reynolds, A. (1999) The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication, Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McKenna, K. and Bargh, J. (2000) ‘Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, B. (2000) Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McQuail, D. (2003) Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meikle, G. (2002) Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merelman, R. (1998) ‘The Mundane Experience of Political Culture’, Political Communication, 15(4): 515–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, C. (1931) The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, S. and Soss, J. (2004) ‘The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics’, Perspectives on Politics, 2(1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, R. (1968) Political Parties, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859; 1975) On Liberty, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1998) Technologies of Truth: Cultural Citizenship and the Popular Media, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Monnoyer-Smith, L. (2007) ‘The Public Debate Enacted: A French Learning Process’, Hermes 47: 21–8.Google Scholar
Moor, A. and Weigand, H. (2006) ‘Effective Communication in Virtual Adversarial Collaborative Communities’, Journal of Community Informatics, 2(2): 116–34.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (2001) ‘Direct Democracy and the Internet’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 34(3): 1033–53.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T. and Walker, J. (2002) ‘Blogging Thoughts: Personal Publication as an Online Research Tool’, downloaded from http://www.intermedia.uio.no/konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching_ICTs_in_context-Ch11-Mortensen-Walker.pdf.
Moss, G. and O'Loughlin, B. (2005) ‘New Labour's Information Age Policy Programme: An Ideology Analysis’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(2): 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muhlberger, P. (1995) ‘Defining and Measuring Deliberative Participation and Potential: A Theoretical Analysis and Operationalization’, paper presented at the International Society of Political Psychology Twenty-third Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington, DC, July.
Muhlberger, P. and Weber, L. (2005) ‘Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: A Research Design for Studying Democratic Deliberation’, Journal of Public Deliberation, 1(1), http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art6.Google Scholar
Musser, J. and O'Reilly, T. (2007) Web 2.0: Principles and Best Practices, Sebastapol CA: O'Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Nathanson, I. (1997) ‘Showdown at the Domain Name Corral: Property Rights and Personal Jurisdiction over Squatters, Poachers and Other Parasites’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 58(4): 911–90.Google Scholar
Newman, S. (2004) ‘The Place of Power in Political Discourse’, International Political Science Review, 25(2): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Noam, E. (2002) ‘Why the Internet Is Bad for Democracy’, Communications of the ACM, 48(10): 57–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, D. (1998) ‘Internet Decentralization, Feedback and Self-Organization’ in Baden, J. and Noonan, D. (eds.) Managing the Commons, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 188–94.Google Scholar
Norris, C. and Armstrong, G. (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2002) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1989) Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Odugbemi, S. and Jacobson, T. (eds.) (2008) Governance Reform under Real World Conditions, Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRef
Offe, C. (1996) Modernity and the State: East, West, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, B. (1937) ‘Trial by Jury’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 11: 141–7.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, K. (2005) ‘From Usenet to Gaydar: A Comment on Queer Online Community’, ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(2): 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1996) ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy and Development’, World Development, 24(6): 1073–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999) ‘Coping with Tragedies of the Commons’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 493–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. (1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2004) ‘The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 4(1): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry-Giles, T. and Parry-Giles, S. (2001) ‘Reassessing the State of Political Communication in the United States’, Argumentation & Advocacy, 37(3): 158–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquet, D. (1925) An Essay on the Origins of the House of Commons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T. (1980) The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. (1993) Out of Order, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. (2002) The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2003) ‘Civic Attitudes and Engagement in Modern Britain’, Parliamentary Affairs, 56(4): 616–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharr, S. and Putnam, D. (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pickard, V. (2006) ‘United Yet Autonomous: Indymedia and the Struggle to Sustain a Radical Democratic Network’, Media, Culture & Society, 28(3): 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993) ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Policy Change’, World Politics, 45: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plant, R. (2004) ‘Online Communities’, Technology in Society, 26: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plasser, F. and Plasser, G. (2002) Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Platon, S. and Deuze, M. (2003) ‘Indymedia Journalism: A Radical Way of Making, Selecting and Sharing News?’, Journalism, 4(3): 336–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation, New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. and Court, J. (2005) How Civil Society Organisations Use Evidence to Influence Policy Processes, ODI Working Paper 249, London: ODI.Google Scholar
Poor, N. (2005) ‘Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2).Google Scholar
Prettenthaler, F. and Steininger, K. (1999) ‘From Ownership to Service Use Lifestyle: The Potential of Car Sharing’, Ecological Economics, 28(3): 443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, V. and Cappella, J. (2002) ‘Online Deliberation and Its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000’, IT & Society, 1(1): 303–29.Google Scholar
Price, V. and Neijens, N. (1997) ‘Opinion Quality in Public Opinion Research’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(4): 336–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Public Administration Committee (2007) Putting People First, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
,Public Administration Committee (2008) Minutes of Evidence, meeting of 8 March 2007, London: House of Commons.
Putnam, D. (2000) Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafaeli, S. (1988) ‘Interactivity: From New Media to Communication’ in Hawkins, R., Wiemann, J. and Pingree, S. (eds.) Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 16: 110–34.
Raymond, D. (2006) Make Poverty History New Media Review, London: FairSay.Google Scholar
Reilly, R. (1997) ‘Transforming the Paradigm for Creating Acceptable Use Policy: Managing the Electronic Commons’, unpublished PhD thesis, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Widemann, P. (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renton, A. and Macintosh, A. (2007) ‘Computer Supported Argument Maps as a Policy Memory’, Information Society, 23(2): 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reschenthaler, G. and Thompson, F. (1996) ‘The Information Revolution and the New Public Management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1): 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, P. (2004) ‘Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and Collective Action among Strangers’ in Dutton, W., Kahin, B., O'Callaghan, R. and Wyckoff, A. (eds.) Transforming Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1999) Speech to BBC Communities Day, personal copy.
Rheingold, H. (2006) Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1998) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rider, R. (1998) ‘Hangin’ Ten: The Common-Pool Resource Problem of Surfing', Public Choice, 97(1/2): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W. and Sened, I. (1991) ‘A Political Theory of the Origin of Property Rights: Airport Slots’, American Journal of Political Science, 35(4): 951–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, M. (1992) Rethinking Citizenship: Welfare, Ideology, and Change in Modern Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2004) Information Politics on the Web, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology, 43(2): 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, J. (1993) ‘Politics, Vision and the Press: Toward a Public Agenda for Journalism’ in Rosen, J. and Taylor, P. (eds.) The News versus the Old News: Press and Politics in the 1990s, New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 3–37.Google Scholar
Rowe, G., Marsh, R., Reynolds, C. and Frewer, L. (2001) Public Participation Methods: Evolving and Operationalising an Evaluation Framework, Report to the Department of Health and Health and Safety Executive, Norwich: Institute of Food Research.
Routledge, P. (2003) ‘Convergence Space: Process Geographies of Grassroots Globalization Networks’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(3): 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushkoff, D. (2003) Open Source Democracy: How Online Communication Is Changing Offline Politics, London: Demos.Google Scholar
Sack, W. (2000) ‘Conversation Map: An Interface for Very-Large-Scale Conversations’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3): 73–92.Google Scholar
Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, L. (1996) ‘Against Deliberation’. Political Theory, 25(3): 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. (2002) ‘The Repositioning of Citizenship: Emergent Subjects and Spaces for Politics’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 46: 4–26.Google Scholar
Sax, J. (1999) Playing Darts with a Rembrandt: Public and Private Rights in Cultural Treasures, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scammell, M. (2000) ‘Spinning Political Communication’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53(2): 381–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2006) ‘The Joint-Decision Trap Revisired’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4): 845–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, P. (2004) ‘Do Institutions Matter for Public Service Broadcasting?’, downloaded from http://www.ofcom.org.uk.
Schneider, S. (1996) ‘Creating a Democratic Public Sphere through Political Discussion: A Case Study of Abortion Conversation on the Internet’, Social Science Computer Review, 14(4): 373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, M. (1995) The Power of News, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (2006) ‘The Varieties of Civic Experience’, Citizenship Studies, 10(5): 591–606.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. (2000) ‘Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study of Online Forums and Reader Email’, Media, Culture & Society, 22(2): 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, W. (1997) ‘Changes of the Mass Media and the Public Sphere’, Javnost/The Public, 4(2): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1976) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 5th ed., London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the “Digital Divide”’, New Media & Society, 6(3): 341–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, H., Blumler, J., Gurevitch, M. and Weaver, D. (1991) The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Semetko, H. and Krasnoboka, N. (2003) ‘The Political Role of the Internet in Societies in Transition: Russia and Ukraine Compared’, Party Politics, 9(1): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennett, R. (1977) The Fall of Public Man, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. (2003) Respect in a World of Inequality, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Seyd, P. (2001) ‘The Labour Campaign’ in Norris, P. (ed.) Britain Votes, 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 607–23.Google Scholar
Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (1995) ‘Labour and Conservative Party Members: Change Over Time’, Parliamentary Affairs, 48(3): 457–70.Google Scholar
Seymour-Ure, C. (1987) ‘Leaders’ in Seaton, J. and Pimlott, B. (eds.) The Media in British Politics, Hants: Avebury, 3–24.Google Scholar
Shah, D., Kwak, N. and Holbert, L. (2001) ‘Connecting and Disconnecting with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication, 18: 141–62.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. (1983) The Failure of Congressional Budgeting, St. Louis: Center for the Study of American Business.Google Scholar
Shulman, S. (2006) ‘Whither Deliberation? Mass e-Mail Campaigns and U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking’, Journal of E-Government, 3(3): 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstone, R. (2007) Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Skelton, T. and Valentine, G. (2003) ‘Political Participation, Political Action and Political Identities: Young D/deaf People's Perspectives’, Space & Polity, 7(2): 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. and Wales, C. (2000) ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy', Political Studies, 48(1): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. and Ingram, H. (2002) ‘Rethinking Policy Analysis: Citizens, Community, and the Restructuring of Public Services’, Good Society, 11(1): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soon, C. and Kluver, R. (2007) ‘The Internet and Online Political Communities in Singapore’, Asian Journal of Communication, 17(3): 246–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J., Kendall, E. and Coote, A. (1994) Citizens' Juries, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Stolle, D. and Micheletti, M. (2005) ‘The Expansion of Political Action Repertoires: Theoretical Reflections on Results from the Nike Email Exchange Campaign’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2002) ‘New Voices in the Public Sphere: Political Conversation in the Internet Age’, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005) The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassin, E. (1992) ‘Europe: A Political Community?’ in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy, London: Verso, 169–92.Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, J. (2002) ‘Dueling for Da'Wa: State V. Society on the Saudi Internet’, Middle East Journal, 56(2): 222–39.Google Scholar
Thatcher, M. (1998) ‘The Development of Policy Network Analyses: From Modest Origins to Overarching Frameworks’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4): 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (2005) ‘The New Visibility’, Theory, Culture & Society, 22(6): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toffler, A. (1981) The Third Wave, London: Pan.Google Scholar
Toynbee, P. (2003) ‘Breaking News’, The Guardian, 5 September.Google Scholar
Trippi, J. (2004) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (1990) ‘Outline of a Theory of Citizenship’, Sociology, 24(2): 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. (2006) ‘Citizenship and the Crisis of Multiculturalism’, Citizenship Studies, 10(5): 607–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, D. (2001) ‘Reporting and the Push for Market-Oriented Journalism: Media Organizations as Businesses; in Bennett, W. L. and Entman, R. (eds.) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 99–116.Google Scholar
Uricchio, W. (2004) ‘Cultural Citizenship in the Age of P2P Networks’ in Bondjeberg, I. and Golding, P. (eds.) European Culture and the Media, Bristol: Intellect Books, 139–63.Google Scholar
Aelst, P. (2002) ‘New Media, New Movements? The Role of the Internet in Shaping the “Anti-Globalisation” Movement’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, downloaded from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/6/3/0/p66308_index.htm.
Vugt, M. (1996) ‘Social Dilemmas and Transportation Decisions’, unpublished PhD thesis, Maastrict, University of Limburg.
Zoonen, L. (2005) Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Vergez, C. and Caddy, J. (2001) Citizens as Partners, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Verheij, B. (2005) Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viegas, F. and Smith, M. (2004) ‘Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the Activity of Individuals in Cyberspaces’, downloaded from http://research.microsoft.com/~masmith/Newsgroup%20Crowds%20and%20Author%20Lines.pdf.
Walters, L., Aydelotte, J. and Miller, J. (2000) ‘Putting More Public in Policy Analysis’, Public Administration Review, 60(4): 349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, T. (2008) ‘The Power of Information’, speech given at the Tower 08 Conference, 10 March.
West, W. (2004) ‘Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis’, Public Administration Review, 64(1): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, D. (2005) The Internet in the Middle East: Global Expectations and Local Imaginations in Kuwait, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
White, C., Lewis, G. and Elam, J. (1999) Citizens' Juries: An Appraisal of Their Role, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics, or Communication and Control in the Animal and the Machine, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilhelm, A. (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilke, J. and Reinemann, C. (2001) ‘Do the Candidates Matter? Long-Term Trends of Campaign Coverage – A Study of the German Press since 1949’, European Journal of Communication, 16(3): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, G. (2004) ‘How the Internet Invented Howard Dean’, downloaded from http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~comp300/documents/HowtheInternetInventedDean.pdf.
Wright, S. (2006) ‘Government-Run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8(4): 550–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (2008) ‘Read My Day? Communication, Campaigning and Councillors’ Blogs', Information Polity, 13(1/2).Google Scholar
Wright, S. and Street, J. (2007) ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Design: The Case of Online Discussion Forums’, New Media & Society, 9(5): 849–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, R., Katz, E. and Kim, J. (2000) ‘Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces’, Journal of Communication, 50(1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, S. (1997) ‘Gender, Identity and CMC’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4): 281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (2001) A Theory of Media Politics: How the Interests of Politicians Journalists and the Citizens Shape the News, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J. and Edelman, B. (2003) ‘Internet Filtering in China’, Internet Computing IEEE, 7(2): 70–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×