Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:35:38.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response Essay – The Benefits of Avoiding Conflicts between the Constitution and International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Julian Ku
Affiliation:
Hofstra University School of Law
David L. Sloss
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, California
Michael D. Ramsey
Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
William S. Dodge
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of Law
Get access

Summary

Professor Lori Damrosch's essay on the Supreme Court decisions in Medellin v. Texas and Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon offers a careful and measured critique with a discouraging assessment of their future implications. In her view, the Medellin/Sanchez-Llamas opinions represent a “discontinuity” with the “Supreme Court's previous respectful treatment of international tribunals.” To make matters worse, the results in Medellin and Sanchez-Llamas create tension with historically accepted doctrines guaranteeing federal supremacy for treaty violations, presuming congressional intent to comply with international obligations, and providing judicial remedies for treaty violations. Thus, she strongly suggests that the Court is rejecting at least the spirit of past U.S. historical practice, if not the letter of U.S. law.

In this brief comment, I take issue with Professor Damrosch's critique of Medellin and Sanchez-Llamas. I maintain that her emphasis on doctrines favoring U.S. compliance with international law overlooks an equally strong tradition of U.S. adherence to constitutional norms over international ones. Seen in this broader historical context, the Court's decisions in Medellin and Sanchez-Llamas seem much less “discontinuous” than Professor Damrosch suggests. Because the decisions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Vienna Convention cases posed a serious and unprecedented constitutional challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court's authority and to the U.S. system of federalism, the Court's decisions fall within the long and honorable tradition of avoiding direct conflicts between constitutional requirements and international obligations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, Willard L., Treaties Governing the Succession to Real Property by Aliens, 51 Mich. L. Rev. 1001, 1005 (1953).
Ku, Julian G., The State of New York Does Exist, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 457, 492 n.179 (2004).
Young, Ernest A., Treaties as “Part of Our Law,” 88 Tex. L. Rev. 91 (2009).
Movsesian, Mark L., Judging International Judgments, 48 Va. J. Int'l L. 65 (2007) (examining and ultimately agreeing with the Court's result in Sanchez-Llamas).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×